Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama's Attorney General - Eric Holder

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obama's Attorney General - Eric Holder

    He certainly has no qualms with picking former Clintonites for high level positions in his administration.
    Obama's Attorney General

    President-elect Obama has decided to tap Eric Holder as his attorney general, putting the veteran Washington lawyer in place to become the first African-American to head the Justice Department, according to two legal sources close to the presidential transition.

    Holder, who served as deputy attorney general during the Clinton administration, still has to undergo a formal “vetting” review by the Obama transition team before the selection is final and is publicly announced, said one of the sources, who asked not to be identified talking about the transition process. But in the discussions over the past few days, Obama offered Holder the job and he accepted, the source said. The announcement is not likely until after Obama announces his choices to lead the Treasury and State departments.

    Holder, 57, has been on Obama’s “short list” for attorney general from the outset. A partner at the D.C. law firm of Covington & Burling, Holder served as co-chief (along with Caroline Kennedy) of Obama’s vice-presidential selection process. He also actively campaigned for Obama throughout the year and grew personally close to the president-elect. Holder has not returned a call seeking comment; a spokeswoman for the Obama transition team told Newsweek in an e-mail early Tuesday afternoon that no decision has been made.

    The sources said the Obama transition team is still debating over who should serve under Holder in the key post of deputy attorney general. One top candidate, favored by Obama chief of staff Rahm Emanuel and other former Clinton White House officials, is Elena Kagan, dean of the Harvard Law School and a former lawyer in the White House counsel’s office under Clinton. Another top candidate, favored by other Obama advisors, is David Ogden, a former chief of staff to Attorney General Janet Reno, who is currently heading Obama’s Justice Department transition team. Kagan brings legal policy credentials; Ogden has more experience in the Justice Department trenches.

    The only hesitancy about Holder’s selection was that he himself had reservations about going through a confirmation process that was likely to revive questions about his role in signing off on the controversial pardon of fugitive financier Marc Rich. Although there is no evidence that Holder actively pushed the pardon, he was criticized for not raising with the White House the strong objections that some Justice Department lawyers and federal prosecutors in New York had to pardoning somebody who had fled the country. But after reviewing the evidence in the case, and checking with staffers on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Obama aides and Holder both decided the issue was highly unlikely to prove an obstacle to his confirmation, one of the sources said--especially given the Democrats’ more sizable post-election majority in the Senate.

    A New York City native who graduated from Columbia University and Columbia Law School, Holder spent years as a federal prosecutor—a job in which he earned a reputation as tough and aggressive foe of public corruption. After serving in the public integrity section of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and later a District of Columbia Superior Court judge, Holder was named by President Clinton as U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. He became deputy attorney general in 1997 under Janet Reno and was viewed as a centrist on most law enforcement issues, though he has sharply criticized the secrecy and the expansive views of executive power advanced by the Bush Justice Department.
    http://www.blog.newsweek.com/blogs/p...y-general.aspx
    "Every man has his weakness. Mine was always just cigarettes."

  • #2
    Originally posted by Ironduke View Post
    He certainly has no qualms with picking former Clintonites for high level positions in his administration.
    Balances out his inexperience and builds a solid team of veterans.

    Remember when Clinton first took office? There was a Doonesbury cartoon featuring the front of the White House and the caption "Anybody figure out how to use the phones yet?!"

    A former Clinton staffer laughed himself silly when he saw that cartoon, as he claimed that it was dead-on target.
    “He was the most prodigious personification of all human inferiorities. He was an utterly incapable, unadapted, irresponsible, psychopathic personality, full of empty, infantile fantasies, but cursed with the keen intuition of a rat or a guttersnipe. He represented the shadow, the inferior part of everybody’s personality, in an overwhelming degree, and this was another reason why they fell for him.”

    Comment


    • #3
      He will follow Bill Clinton's advice on many of his high level cabinet picks.

      Comment


      • #4
        This AG is wrong for this country

        A Nation of Cowards?
        http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...f_cowards.html
        February 20, 2009
        By Matthew May

        Of course, Eric Holder is correct.

        When it comes to race we Americans are, for the most part, a nation of cowards. This cowardice was on full display during the most recent presidential election and continues today.

        As they are in so many other areas of life, chief among our American cowards are the representatives of the national political media. During the presidential campaign, there was a maniacal effort on the part of the national media to find whites who would not vote for Barack Obama, never mind the reasoning for choosing so. Whites who were not for Mr. Obama were automatically racist in outlook and action, you see.

        No major media network or national newspaper attempted to investigate the associations of Barack Obama with William Ayres and the Annenberg Project in Chicago. No major media network or national newspaper launched an investigation as to the release of Barack Obama's grades in college, the lack of legal scholarship that somehow landed him as president of the Harvard Law Review, or any other aspect of his mysterious academic record. Think back to how resolute and determined that same media were in smoking out the academic record of George W. Bush to prove he is a dolt.

        What is the difference? It is the difference between the incurious or deliberate ignoring of the seemingly endless and disturbing associations and utterances of Barack Obama and the deliberate attempts at smashing anything and everything associated with Sarah Palin. Because Palin is white, she was fair game. Because Barack Obama is sort of black, anything said against him or an honest inquiry into his past was automatically deemed racist - literally no questions asked.

        While such cowardice is to be expected from the national media, there is, however, an element of cowardice among too many of us who blanch at the thought of fighting back when accused of racism or an unwillingness to "discuss race," whatever that means. We are reluctant to inflame or we think that perhaps it is understandable that some black Americans believe that all white Americans are inherently racist in thought and action and, as such, those who prattle on about white racism are not checked and required to defend their statements.

        Too many of us are unwilling to risk the censure of our self-proclaimed betters, or risk being labeled racists for fear of retribution in the workplace or the neighborhood. Too many of us are unwilling to say out loud that we truly live by the credo laid down so eloquently by Martin Luther King, Jr., on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in 1963 and demand that it be proved otherwise. Too many of us are reluctant to remind others that the "salient datum," as William F. Buckley, Jr., observed in Tennessee shortly after Dr. King was murdered, was not that the United States bred the murderer but that "we bred the most widely shared and the most intensely felt grief...as if felt over the loss of one's own sons."

        Too many of us are unwilling to respond to real racism perpetrated by the likes of Eric Holder, Barack Obama, and Jeremiah Wright by repudiating their bigotry in loud, bold language. Instead we slink to diversity awareness programs at work and school and pretend they are useful. We yield to the propaganda our children - all of our children - are fed in government schools at the expense of the canons of Western civilization without standing up to demand better of our educators. When reluctant to stand up for our children against the onslaught of illiberal education, it is difficult to imagine how much more cowardly we could be.

        Yes, there are rabid racists about in the land. They come in all shades. But they are few in relative number. Yet too many of us have cowered in the face of these racial bullies. No more. Americans of good faith, Americans who live our lives with love in our hearts, charity in our actions, and malice toward only those who seek to destroy us must stand up for ourselves and resist these baseless charges and worthless observations. It is obvious that our acts alone do not satisfy the race-warmongers among us, and it behooves us to conclude that they never will.

        We, Americans of goodwill, must push back and declare that the sentiments of people like the attorney general are invalid, untrue, and unacceptable. We must stand up and demand that our president state clearly if he endorses the remarks of the attorney general who, it must be remembered, serves at the pleasure of the president. Anything else and we truly are cowards.
        Yet we know in our hearts that we are not. Let us prove it once and for all, no matter what anyone might say.

        Matthew May welcomes comments at [email protected]
        J. J. Ogershok, Jr.

        Comment


        • #5
          Eric Holder ... well let's just say he is not very highly regarded by yours truly. I have disagreed with pretty much everything he has done namely his pardons of Puerto Rican terrorists and for his gun control advocacy.

          Who the beeping heck pardons a group of people who set of bombs purposely targeting innocent civilians who had nothing to do with Puerto Rico's status by setting off bombs in Grand Central Station and a NYC restaurant, shooting up a bus filled with US Navy sailors, bombing a US Air Force base, etc.

          http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...,6643509.story
          The 16 members of the FALN (the Spanish acronym for Armed Forces of National Liberation) and Los Macheteros had been convicted in Chicago and Hartford variously of bank robbery, possession of explosives and participating in a seditious conspiracy. Overall, the two groups had been linked by the FBI to more than 130 bombings, several armed robberies, six slayings and hundreds of injuries.
          This group also had ties to Pedro Campos (another Puerto Rican terrorist) who orchestrated a 1950 revolution against US rule which culminated in an attempt to assassinate the President of the United States and the Governor of Puerto Rico, an armed revolt on the island which led to battles between the rebels and the US military, Puerto Rico State Police and the Puerto Rico National Guard (aka TREASON) and a later attempt to shoot up the US Congress chamber in 1954.

          Comment


          • #6
            $ talks BS walks

            Originally posted by ChrisF202 View Post
            Eric Holder ... well let's just say he is not very highly regarded by yours truly. I have disagreed with pretty much everything he has done namely his pardons of Puerto Rican terrorists and for his gun control advocacy.

            Who the beeping heck pardons a group of people who set of bombs purposely targeting innocent civilians who had nothing to do with Puerto Rico's status by setting off bombs in Grand Central Station and a NYC restaurant, shooting up a bus filled with US Navy sailors, bombing a US Air Force base, etc.

            http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...,6643509.story

            This group also had ties to Pedro Campos (another Puerto Rican terrorist) who orchestrated a 1950 revolution against US rule which culminated in an attempt to assassinate the President of the United States and the Governor of Puerto Rico, an armed revolt on the island which led to battles between the rebels and the US military, Puerto Rico State Police and the Puerto Rico National Guard (aka TREASON) and a later attempt to shoot up the US Congress chamber in 1954.
            Holder is a racist and if OBAMA had any stones Holder's remarks Holder: US a nation of cowards on racial matters would be enough to show him the door.

            When people remain silent they approve these types of behavior. Likewise OBAMA's silence is approval and tells me where he stands on racism in this country. He played the race card every chance he got.

            I am not surprised.
            J. J. Ogershok, Jr.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by JOgershok View Post
              Holder is a racist and if OBAMA had any stones Holder's remarks Holder: US a nation of cowards on racial matters would be enough to show him the door.

              When people remain silent they approve these types of behavior. Likewise OBAMA's silence is approval and tells me where he stands on racism in this country. He played the race card every chance he got.

              I am not surprised.
              What was racist? He was blunt. What did he say that you thought was racist? Was he just not politically correct enough when telling the truth? Where I work people for the most part don't talk about it. I work with some who are racists and others who see racism in everything just like everyone else in the country. I can't defend that pardon it is un defendable.
              Where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost.”
              ~Ronald Reagan

              Comment


              • #8
                Not a racist, just a self righteous pain in various orifices.
                I enjoy being wrong too much to change my mind.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by ChrisF202 View Post
                  Eric Holder ... well let's just say he is not very highly regarded by yours truly. I have disagreed with pretty much everything he has done namely his pardons of Puerto Rican terrorists and for his gun control advocacy.

                  Who the beeping heck pardons a group of people who set of bombs purposely targeting innocent civilians who had nothing to do with Puerto Rico's status by setting off bombs in Grand Central Station and a NYC restaurant, shooting up a bus filled with US Navy sailors, bombing a US Air Force base, etc.

                  http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...,6643509.story

                  This group also had ties to Pedro Campos (another Puerto Rican terrorist) who orchestrated a 1950 revolution against US rule which culminated in an attempt to assassinate the President of the United States and the Governor of Puerto Rico, an armed revolt on the island which led to battles between the rebels and the US military, Puerto Rico State Police and the Puerto Rico National Guard (aka TREASON) and a later attempt to shoot up the US Congress chamber in 1954.
                  Unfortunately this sort of thing is more common than you might think. Here are a couple of cheerfull fellows who blew up a Cuban airliner:

                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orlando_Bosch

                  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Posada_Carriles

                  People who target civilians shouldn't be permitted to escape the consequences.
                  sigpic

                  Win nervously lose tragically - Reds C C

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    National Black Republican Association

                    NBRA Civil Rights Newsletter
                    J. J. Ogershok, Jr.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by JOgershok View Post
                      National Black Republican Association

                      NBRA Civil Rights Newsletter
                      Whoever wrote that was home schooled and their home was in a compound. What a load of rubbish.
                      Where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost.”
                      ~Ronald Reagan

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Wonder how this got by OBAMA and HOLDER

                        Interior Announces Final Firearms Policy Update


                        WASHINGTON, D.C. – Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Fish and Wildlife and Parks Lyle Laverty today announced that the Department of the Interior has finalized updated regulations governing the possession of firearms in national parks and wildlife refuges. The final rule, which updates existing regulations, would allow an individual to carry a concealed weapon in national parks and wildlife refuges if, and only if, the individual is authorized to carry a concealed weapon under state law in the state in which the national park or refuge is located. The update has been submitted to the Federal Register for publication and is available to the public on www.doi.gov.

                        Existing regulations regarding the carrying of firearms remain otherwise unchanged, particularly limitations on poaching and target practice and prohibitions on carrying firearms in federal buildings.

                        “America was founded on the idea that the federal and state governments work together to serve the public and preserve our natural resources,” Laverty said. “The Department’s final regulation respects this tradition by allowing individuals to carry concealed firearms in federal park units and refuges to the extent that they could lawfully do so under state law. This is the same basic approach adopted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the United States Forest Service (USFS), both of which allow visitors to carry weapons consistent with applicable federal and state laws.”

                        On February 22, 2008, Interior Secretary Kempthorne responded to letters from 51 Senators, both Democrats and Republicans, as well as from the Chairman and Ranking Member of the House Natural Resources Committee, urging him to update existing regulations that prohibit the carrying of firearms in national parks and wildlife refuges. In his response, the Secretary directed Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks Lyle Laverty “to develop and propose for public comment by April 30 Federal regulations that will update firearms policies on these lands to reflect existing Federal laws (such as those prohibiting weapons in Federal buildings) and the laws by which the host states govern transporting and carrying of firearms on their analogous public lands.”

                        Changes in the final regulations from those originally proposed in April were developed as the result of public comments. In particular, comments expressed concern about the feasibility of implementing regulations which directly linked the carrying of concealed firearms in national parks and wildlife refuges to the ability of an individual to carry a concealed firearm on analogous state lands. The final regulations remove that potential logistical hurdle.

                        The existing regulations, as currently in effect, were adopted in 1981 for national wildlife refuges and in 1983 for national parks. Since that time many states have enacted new firearms policies. Currently, 48 states have passed legislation allowing for the lawful possession of concealed weapons.

                        “The Department believes that in managing parks and refuges we should, as appropriate, make every effort to give the greatest respect to the democratic judgments of State legislatures with respect to concealed firearms,” said Laverty. “Federal agencies have a responsibility to recognize the expertise of the States in this area, and federal regulations should be developed and implemented in a manner that respects state prerogatives and authority.”
                        J. J. Ogershok, Jr.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Roosveltrepub View Post
                          Whoever wrote that was home schooled and their home was in a compound. What a load of rubbish.
                          "As with the Clintons, Obama so earnestly believes in public school education that he sends his girls to ... an expensive private school. He demands that taxpayers support the very public schoolteachers he won't trust with his own children.

                          It is one thing to tell voters that school choice is wrong, because, you know, the public schools won't get better unless Americans sacrifice their children to the teachers' union's maw. But it is quite another for Democrats to feed their own kids to the union incinerator." Ann Coulter 02/25/2009
                          J. J. Ogershok, Jr.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Roosveltrepub View Post
                            Whoever wrote that was home schooled and their home was in a compound. What a load of rubbish.
                            Could you point out some of the "rubbish"? I need the guidance sinse I wuz publiklee edgicated.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by 7thsfsniper View Post
                              Could you point out some of the "rubbish"? I need the guidance sinse I wuz publiklee edgicated.
                              u 2

                              Tony
                              Yet another ex-tankie of 1 RTR origin.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X