Originally posted by Jimmy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A-10 Warthog - possible victim of the sequestration
Collapse
X
-
"There is never enough time to do or say all the things that we would wish. The thing is to try to do as much as you can in the time that you have. Remember Scrooge, time is short, and suddenly, you're not there any more." -Ghost of Christmas Present, Scrooge
-
Originally posted by TopHatter View PostHow long before they start refitting and training the Mud Hens for primarily air-to-air combat to make up the shortfall.
The hilarious part is that the F-15SE could easily fill the gap. Sure it's no F-22A but it's a damn sight better than coming short in overall numbers.
And it looks to be ready right now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by surfgun View PostBy being built on a hot production line. Who knows if any jigs have been made for an SE variant?
It's being offered for foreign sales so I would imagine they're either ready for production or will be shortly.“He was the most prodigious personification of all human inferiorities. He was an utterly incapable, unadapted, irresponsible, psychopathic personality, full of empty, infantile fantasies, but cursed with the keen intuition of a rat or a guttersnipe. He represented the shadow, the inferior part of everybody’s personality, in an overwhelming degree, and this was another reason why they fell for him.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Blademaster View PostThen I expect that USAF will use F-22s to exploit stealth to their greatest extent. I am imagining one large force of F-15s armed with Sidewinders and a smaller force of F-22s waiting in the wings as an enemy air force have no choice but to send a large force to meet the threat of F-15s, Viola! Comes out the F-22s and BAM! comes the AMRAAMs from F-22s. Anything left over will be left to the F-15s to mop up.
Once enemy radars are down, the F-22s won't be needed anymore and regular fighter planes can do the rest of the job. Hey Gulf War I and I showed that stealth was only useful for the first couple days and after that, it just becomes another expensive deadweight we do not need to wage the rest of the war. I think that is why the numbers of Raptors were so low. We just need to take out the AEWs and radars and dominate the skies so that regular planes can do their jobs without worrying about any external air threat.
If we're involved in another OEF or OIF scenario, then you're absolutely right, we don't need everything to be a stealth fighter. But if things go crazy in the Western Pacific and we end up facing off with China, yeah I want F-22s out there knocking J-11s out of the sky while B-2s hit the double-digit SAMs and F-35s hit C2 nodes. While the F-15 sits up in DCA CAPs protecting everything else, because there aren't enough Raptors to get it all done.
"Once radars are down" is a very very optimistic statement. SEAD is a lot easier than DEAD, which means those radars will come back up. The Chinese coast will never be a permissive environment (I use this example because it's pretty much the worst case scenario, which is what I think we should plan on). And in the next 10-30 years, when the F-22 is in it's prime as the US Air Force's premier air superiority tool, the systems that defend that coast will proliferate all over the place. Look at the crazy RPG and MANPADS that have been showing up in Syria. That's going to expand to other, more capable systems.
The F-22 was killed off not because nobody thought replacing the F-15 before it turned 50 was a bad idea, but because it was deemed "too expensive" because there was a cheaper, almost-as-good fighter coming down the pipeline...and yet the F-35 is closing in on F-22 prices, and those prices will continue to go up because Congress isn't done cutting orders yet and neither are the other partner nations.
Originally posted by TopHatter View PostHow long before they start refitting and training the Mud Hens for primarily air-to-air combat to make up the shortfall.
The hilarious part is that the F-15SE could easily fill the gap. Sure it's no F-22A but it's a damn sight better than coming short in overall numbers.
And it looks to be ready right now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stitch View PostYou'd put the Golden Eagles in front of the F-35's? I thought it would be the other way around.
Originally posted by TopHatter View PostExactly. The F-22A is out of the production game but Boeing is gearing up to start the SE. They're offering it for $100 million a copy vs $150 million for the Raptor.
Comment
-
Not trying to necro this thread, but it looks like the A-10 is getting ANOTHER (temporary) reprieve; how many lives does this cat have?
The USAF's Much Maligned A-10 Warthogs Are Deploying To Fight ISIS"There is never enough time to do or say all the things that we would wish. The thing is to try to do as much as you can in the time that you have. Remember Scrooge, time is short, and suddenly, you're not there any more." -Ghost of Christmas Present, Scrooge
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stitch View PostThe Warthog's straight wing maneuverability, heavy armor, defensive suite, honeycomb construction and redundant systems allows it to venture down into the MANPADS (shoulder fired heat-seeking missile) engagement envelope, an area where no other fixed wing military aircraft was actually built to operate in.
That being said, as long as we just want to kill angry tribesmen, we may as well keep using the A-10s until they start falling apart.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SteveDaPirate View PostUhh...what? I was under the impression that one of the biggest problems with the Warthogs (besides getting worn out) is that they are extremely vulnerable to MANPADS/SAMs making them mostly dead weight in any conflict with a semi-competent adversary.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SteveDaPirate View PostUhh...what? I was under the impression that one of the biggest problems with the Warthogs (besides getting worn out) is that they are extremely vulnerable to MANPADS/SAMs making them mostly dead weight in any conflict with a semi-competent adversary.
That being said, as long as we just want to kill angry tribesmen, we may as well keep using the A-10s until they start falling apart.
The USAF has been trying to get rid of her because, she showed that without expensive sensors she wasn't up to speed during ODS.
Do you speed assloads of money to make a marginal plane better? Or invest in newer planes?
But she does have her fanboys. Unfortunately many of them are in Congress. And wont let her die
Comment
-
It's relatively survivable when it comes to damage, but yeah it's not evading newer systems.
The reason much of the military wants to keep it is because there simply isn't a viable replacement. Nobody buys the line that the F-35 can take over. That jet won't be any better than the F-16 at the mission, and nobody makes a request for Viper 11 to provide CAS, they want Hawg surface to FL200. Particularly since the C model upgrades, the A-10 is simply the best CAS platform we have. Better than B-1s, better than F-15Es, better than F-16s, better than F/A-18s, and more survivable than helicopters. It's not the perfect solution or the best platform for every situation, but it gets the right results.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gun Grape View PostThe A-10 started out as a one way ticket. Low cost, lots of missiles, die a glorious death We seem to forget that.
The USAF has been trying to get rid of her because, she showed that without expensive sensors she wasn't up to speed during ODS.
Do you speed assloads of money to make a marginal plane better? Or invest in newer planes?
But she does have her fanboys. Unfortunately many of them are in Congress. And wont let her die
Comment
-
Originally posted by SteveDaPirate View PostUhh...what? I was under the impression that one of the biggest problems with the Warthogs (besides getting worn out) is that they are extremely vulnerable to MANPADS/SAMs making them mostly dead weight in any conflict with a semi-competent adversary.Originally posted by Jimmy View PostIt's relatively survivable when it comes to damage, but yeah it's not evading newer systems.
The reason much of the military wants to keep it is because there simply isn't a viable replacement. Nobody buys the line that the F-35 can take over. That jet won't be any better than the F-16 at the mission, and nobody makes a request for Viper 11 to provide CAS, they want Hawg surface to FL200. Particularly since the C model upgrades, the A-10 is simply the best CAS platform we have. Better than B-1s, better than F-15Es, better than F-16s, better than F/A-18s, and more survivable than helicopters. It's not the perfect solution or the best platform for every situation, but it gets the right results.Last edited by Operator; 04 Oct 14,, 04:04.
Comment
Comment