Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!
The World Affairs Board is the premier forum for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include military and defense developments, international terrorism, insurgency & COIN doctrine, international security and policing, weapons proliferation, and military technological development.
Our membership includes many from military, defense, academic, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
But why did we put ourselves in a position that forces our hand?
You did not put yourself in that position, events on the ground forced it. That event is the Arab spring and securing it is what forced your hand. For now the spotlight is on dictatorial republics, see Syria. So as to influence indirectly the dictatorial monarchies which are harder to mess with.
The ultimate goal here is a more free & prosperous Arab world. There is no better weapon to use against the Islamists.
The ultimate goal here is a more free & prosperous Arab world. There is no better weapon to use against the Islamists.
The "dictators" were the only thing between Islamists and power. Now Islamists are fighting side by side with NATO to remove them. Guess who will by in control of Egypt and Lybia very soon?
The great powers like to create these interlocking triangles of stability around the world.This is more valuable long term than some oil contracts.
" But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship. ...voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country. "
The "dictators" were the only thing between Islamists and power. Now Islamists are fighting side by side with NATO to remove them. Guess who will by in control of Egypt and Lybia very soon?
Yeah ? and what about the elections after. Think they will get in ?
The ppl want jobs, not religion. More interested in what they can get in this life rather than the next one.
Even Gaddafi who did everything West demanded, is still being blamed in WMD production. His mistake was attempt to change Production Share Agreement with western companies.
Are you suggesting this was the cassus belli ?
Cannot find too much on this apart from a embassy cable, what source would you recommend here. pls dont say stratfor
Originally posted by Officer of EngineersView Post
LGen Bouchard got chosen because he is a Canadian, ie a country with no real stakes in Libya.
Maybe we should force Mexico to join NATO.
Then it could have gone to a Mexican general, since it's a job "no American is willing to do"...
"We will go through our federal budget – page by page, line by line – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way." -President Barack Obama 11/25/2008
Four weeks after the fall of Tripolis loyalist troops continue to hold onto all towns they held back then.
There are currently three fronts:
- Syrte, where rebel troops are growing tired of constantly withdrawing again from their assaults with forward positions constantly under loyalist artillery and rocket fire
- Bani Walid, where loyalist troops have begun counterattacks against rebel troops yesterday
- Sabha, where rebels claim to have taken the airport and encircled the city
While losses look low at a first glance - maybe ten dead, fifty injured on each front per day on the rebel side - that casualty rate becomes something different when you consider that combat at such casualty rates has been going on for two weeks and that the rebel troops on each front did not exceed 2000-3000 troops in the first place - meaning they've been suffering overall casualty rates in the vicinity of 25-30%. On the Sabha front casualty numbers are slightly higher than on the other two, reflecting that NATO can't support them that far south.
The only major change from four weeks ago is that the rebels have taken over Libya's chemical weapons stored at the Ruwagha depot.
Comment