Originally posted by Parihaka
View Post
As I recall I called it an act of vengeance against a group of religious zealot settlers famed for its violence against Palestinians. A settlement originally named after someone who took part in the killing of arabs as part of the Irgun and sponsored by a group that even right wing Israelis say is extreme right wing. The settlers here treated the Palestinians as less than human, engaging in arson, assault, attempted murder, murder, ethnic cleansing all for religious-political reasons ie terrorism. I did not condone the killings, I simply said the violence was an understandable out growth of the situation and the brutality the local Palestinians had been subjected to long term. Kick a dog long enough and he will bite.
You seem to be of the persuasion that the dog getting tired of being kicked is at fault. That the kicker has no fault and no reason to expect that what they do unto others will be done unto them. I am of the impression that if you don't kick the dog you wont get bit.
Pari you might want to familiarize yourself with Yehoshua Elitzur. He is a great example of why I am so critical of Israel in the territories. He wa s a resident of Itamar, feeling he was justified by God, he shot and killed a Palestinian taxi driver in what we in the US would call a car jacking or an ambush. His punishment- house arrest. This is the type of biased legal system the Palestinian residents near Itamar live with every day- would you stand for it?
The right to live in peace is prefaced on the idea that you yourself be peaceful. The residents of Itamar are most definitely not interested in being peaceful neighbors. They can't, for being peaceful would prevent them from reclaiming the Holy Land so that the Messiah could appear. They feel they answer to a higher calling and things like murder and terrorism are justified if it brings the Messiah.
Comment