Originally posted by snapper
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Korean Dilemma
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by TopHatter View PostAnd the note-taking mystifies me, and I'm probably missing something from a cultural POV...Was his note-taking a deliberately submissive act?
Comment
-
Originally posted by snapper View PostI think it is in NK. Whenever you see him on film with lackeys visiting some place or with generals they all appear to be taking notes of the divinely inspired wisdom coming from him.
Originally posted by snapper View PostWell I did read about the renewed activity at the nuclear facility. Do you think this may have been discussed in China?Chimo
Comment
-
Originally posted by WABs_OOE View PostAnd that's why you should read the news. The pic was released by the Chinese and taken in their Halls. This just goes to show you were spouting nothing.
Originally posted by WABs_OOE View PostOld intelligence. We knew of the site two years ago.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WABs_OOE View Post“He was the most prodigious personification of all human inferiorities. He was an utterly incapable, unadapted, irresponsible, psychopathic personality, full of empty, infantile fantasies, but cursed with the keen intuition of a rat or a guttersnipe. He represented the shadow, the inferior part of everybody’s personality, in an overwhelming degree, and this was another reason why they fell for him.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by snapper View PostI was merely mentioning the 'culture' in NK. It is possible that the Chinese released this photo without Kim's consent but even if they did it would not get shown in NK.
Originally posted by snapper View PostI think it is in NK.
Originally posted by snapper View PostOf course by why new activity after the dictator has returned from China?Chimo
Comment
-
Originally posted by WABs_OOE View PostThat is not what you said.
Originally posted by WABs_OOE View PostAnd you were proven wrong.
Originally posted by WABs_OOE View PostI have news for you. It takes more than a few days to fire up a reactor.
You ever wonder why I give up replying to you? First you disagree then you try tell me what I said and did not say and next you insult me. You probably have well deserved time on your hands Sir. I am in living in a country at war and with much reform still left to be achieved. I do not know a thing about NK or it's nuclear program - never been near there, don't speak the lingo or anything, but when nuclear activity restarts after Kim returns from China I hardly think you have to be an 'expert' to question if there is a connection? I do not say there IS a connection - I do not know - I merely remark the 'coincidence' and if this is so presumably this new activity is ok with China.
And no don't bother replying because I will not respond to "Horse Puckey!" and insults and trying to tell me what I did and did not say. We have dance that dance too many times already.
Comment
-
Originally posted by snapper View PostI said "I think it is in NK. Whenever you see him on film with lackeys visiting some place or with generals they all appear to be taking notes of the divinely inspired wisdom coming from him."
Originally posted by snapper View PostWhere was that?
Originally posted by snapper View PostI am aware of that. Perhaps you would care to answer my previous question though? Do you think this may have been discussed in China?
Originally posted by snapper View PostYou ever wonder why I give up replying to you? First you disagree then you try tell me what I said and did not say and next you insult me. You probably have well deserved time on your hands Sir. I am in living in a country at war and with much reform still left to be achieved. I do not know a thing about NK or it's nuclear program - never been near there, don't speak the lingo or anything, but when nuclear activity restarts after Kim returns from China I hardly think you have to be an 'expert' to question if there is a connection? I do not say there IS a connection - I do not know - I merely remark the 'coincidence' and if this is so presumably this new activity is ok with China.
And no don't bother replying because I will not respond to "Horse Puckey!" and insults and trying to tell me what I did and did not say. We have dance that dance too many times already.Chimo
Comment
-
Originally posted by snapper View PostI pray you do not watch them as well as you do Ukraine.
Originally posted by snapper View PostWhat was it you said "I want them to kill each other".
Originally posted by snapper View PostI pray for a different outcome in Korea.Last edited by Officer of Engineers; 30 Mar 18,, 02:27.Chimo
Comment
-
So you never advised Ukraine to put 10k men in Mariupol? My mistake. Must have read it wrong. But you DO know about what "kowtowing" and "being sent to his room without dinner" went on in China? But still decline to answer if you think this renewed reactor activity may have been discussed in China? Trump should hire you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by snapper View PostSo you never advised Ukraine to put 10k men in Mariupol?
Originally posted by snapper View PostBut you DO know about what "kowtowing" and "being sent to his room without dinner" went on in China?
Originally posted by snapper View PostBut still decline to answer if you think this renewed reactor activity may have been discussed in China?
Originally posted by snapper View PostTrump should hire you.Chimo
Comment
-
"I want them to kill each other" and advocating Grozny x more plus without knowing anything about Ukraine - and telling us all that Ukraine didn't need newer weapons systems - when now you claim to never have a known much about Ukraine.... and I should listen to your "kowtowing" theory - and yea sure Kim told you all about it - and not what happened subsequent re the re-activitisation of a reactor? I will still stick to theorising on the facts. It's just the same BS as the US never had anything with article 5 in 2001, except that Colin Powell both signed off on it.
Look I do not have time for your arguments and I apologise if you dislike my views but is there no room at all for the possibility of 'coincidence' in the the new US trade tariffs aimed at, the meeting in China and the subsequent renewed nuclear activity after the mini me got home? I am not saying this to prove a point against you or anyone else. I merely raise the possibility that these matters may have a connection and if so I wonder if the US is in as strong as a position as some here seem to believe.
I wish you well Colonel but decline to respond again. Sadly I have a whole pile of stuff to go through.Last edited by snapper; 30 Mar 18,, 03:33.
Comment
-
Originally posted by snapper View Post"I want them to kill each other" and advocating Grozny x more plus without knowing anything about Ukraine - and telling us all that Ukraine didn't need newer weapons systems - when now you claim to never have a known much about Ukraine.... and I should listen to your "kowtowing" theory - and yea sure Kim told you all about it - and not what happened subsequent re the re-activitisation of a reactor? I will still stick to theorising on the facts. It's just the same BS as the US never had anything with article 5 in 2001, except that Colin Powell both signed off on it.
Look I do not have time for your arguments and I apologise if you dislike my views but is there no room at all for the possibility of 'coincidence' in the the new US trade tariffs aimed at, the meeting in China and the subsequent renewed nuclear activity after the mini me got home? I am not saying this to prove a point against you or anyone else. I merely raise the possibility that these matters may have a connection and if so I wonder if the US is in as strong as a position as some here seem to believe.
I wish you well Colonel but decline to respond again. Sadly I have a whole pile of stuff to go through.
As for weapons systems, I am still against NATO supplying you any, mainly because I know they would fall into Russian hands as did our counter artillery fire controls. However, Ukraines was a world class weapons producer and I listed all the systems that you should have but don't. That's not our fault. You still have not gotten your ATGM production lines back up.
Yeah, Colin Powell signed off on ARTICLE 5 BUT HE NEVER ASKED FOR IT. NO AMERICAN DID. NOT EVEN GEORGE BUSH! I CHALLENGE YOU TO FIND ME ONE SINGLE AMERICAN WHO ASKED FOR ARTICLE 5! FIND HIM! THE AMERICANS NEVER ASKED FOR ARTICLE 5! How much more black and white can that be! Colin Powell even thanked the Allies for invoking the ARTICLE 5 on the US's behalf! But if you think that Collin Powell was spending his time calling the various capitals for ARTICLE 5 support, you're cookoo!
God, you are freaking dense! The reactor was fired up BEFORE KJU left for China. So, NO! Xi was NOT part of the decision to fire it up.
Did the US trade tarrifs had an effect? Maybe but you never raised that point. As for kowtowing, Kim's words "Solemn duty" and "Moral obligation" to visit China. That's a vassal king on his way to perform his functions to the Chinese Emperor.
And here are Xi's words. "China will continue to play a constructive role on the issue (of talks) and work with all parties, including the DPRK, toward the thaw of the situation on the Peninsula," Xinhua reported. China will continue to play a constructive role. This upcoming meet between Moon and Kim and then between Trump and Kim bypassed China by accident. No one expected Moon and Trump to call Kim's bluff. Xi summoned Kim to tell him point blank you make no deals without passing it through me!
If you would have followed my suggestion and read the news, you would have gotten even a gist of it but no, you had to show your ignorance.Chimo
Comment
Comment