That is if the Japanese accept battle.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
WWII what-ifs
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Officer of Engineers View PostDon't see how if they just turn and run. Do recall the Battle of Midway. It wasn't the actual fight that was difficult. It was finding the carriers.No such thing as a good tax - Churchill
To make mistakes is human. To blame someone else for your mistake, is strategic.
Comment
-
North Atlantic is a cauldron compared to the Pacific.There is the GIUK,which are basically unsinkable CV's while the concentration of Allied ships is so great there is no way a surface combatant,let alone a whole fleet can escape undetected.
The Axis fleet may,of course,cause damage,but it'll be like Bismarck:a one time show.
The force ratio between the RN and the German navy in WW1 was much more in favor of the Germans,yet their surface fleet was contained easily
What I'll find interesting is :what if the Germans somehow manage to capture the entire French Navy in 1940?The combined German,French and Italian navies has to fight a RN divided between the Eastern Med,FE and the North Atlantic,while the Axis has the advantage of interior lines.Those who know don't speak
He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. Luke 22:36
Comment
-
Originally posted by Officer of Engineers View PostDon't see how if they just turn and run. Do recall the Battle of Midway. It wasn't the actual fight that was difficult. It was finding the carriers.
Assuming the RN slips the Far Eastern fleet through the Suez to take up station in the Med and ships the Med fleet to bottle up the Germans so the Home Fleet can give battle en mass.
British Home fleet- 5 battleships, 2 battle cruisers, 2 carriers, 6 heavy cruisers, 13 light cruisers, AA cruiser, 44 destroyers, 31 subs
US Atlantic Fleet at least 6 battleships and 3 carriers, 7 cruisers cruisers, 50 destroyers and 40 submarines
IJN- 10 battleships, 12 carriers, 18 heavy cruisers, 20 light cruisers, 126 destroyers, 68 subs
Comment
-
Originally posted by Officer of Engineers View PostJason, why are you not adding in the Kreigsmarine? Most obvious point, SEA LION immediately became viable.
On paper your match up favors the IJN, in everything but destroyers. But the trip will leave the IJN on Bingo fuel... the trip from the Kure naval yards to Brest France is 16750 miles going round the Horn of Africa and would take almost 70 days at 10 knots to conserve fuel. If the IJN wants to sail deeper into the roaring 40's and farther off the coast of Africa to reduce exposure to allied air craft the distance exceeds 20,000 miles and takes more than 3 months.
Comment
-
It would be extremely unrealistic for the IJN to sail into battle after such a long voyage. Both men and machine need rest and repair. Plus, the KM would need time to evaluate the new assets and how best to exploit them. Not to mention the language barrier that must be overcame if the IJN is to fall under the KM's command.Chimo
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mihais View PostNorth Atlantic is a cauldron compared to the Pacific.There is the GIUK,which are basically unsinkable CV's while the concentration of Allied ships is so great there is no way a surface combatant,let alone a whole fleet can escape undetected.
The Axis fleet may,of course,cause damage,but it'll be like Bismarck:a one time show.
The force ratio between the RN and the German navy in WW1 was much more in favor of the Germans,yet their surface fleet was contained easily
What I'll find interesting is :what if the Germans somehow manage to capture the entire French Navy in 1940?The combined German,French and Italian navies has to fight a RN divided between the Eastern Med,FE and the North Atlantic,while the Axis has the advantage of interior lines.No such thing as a good tax - Churchill
To make mistakes is human. To blame someone else for your mistake, is strategic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by zraver View PostI shifted the RN's Far East fleet into the Med to bottle up the Italians and shifted the RN's med fleet to Home waters to bottle up the Germans. The RN has half the transit distance of the IJN, there is no way for the two (IJN/KM) to Link up. Likewise the US Pacific Fleet based in Peal wont get there in time even with the Panama Canal since the US hasn't broken the naval code reliably yet.
On paper your match up favors the IJN, in everything but destroyers. But the trip will leave the IJN on Bingo fuel... the trip from the Kure naval yards to Brest France is 16750 miles going round the Horn of Africa and would take almost 70 days at 10 knots to conserve fuel. If the IJN wants to sail deeper into the roaring 40's and farther off the coast of Africa to reduce exposure to allied air craft the distance exceeds 20,000 miles and takes more than 3 months.
The KM would either be bottled up or largely destroyed. By this point in the war Sea Lion was off the table, so there would be no qualms about committing the Home Fleet to destroying it. The whole operation might cost the Allies some ships, but it would end with at least one Axis fleet littering the bottom of the Atlantic.
I think your attack on the US West Coast is more likely.sigpic
Win nervously lose tragically - Reds C C
Comment
-
Originally posted by Officer of Engineers View PostOutside of South Africa, most nations in South America and Africa were neutrals. How are you going to use them as a base of operations?
If you have a look at a map of Africa circa 1943-44 (the relevant period here) you'll see it is mostly Allied. Britain had colonies on every coast and Sth Africa into the deal. In the case of the Atlantic it had everything Sth of Angola, Nigeria, Gold Coast (Ghana) and Sierra Leone. It also controlled a series of islands in the mid-Atlantic which had bases in WW2. By the end of 1942 the French colonies in the region were all Free French (some had been since 1940). Their facilities were available for Allied use from that point and some were utilized.
Additionally, Portugal maintained a formal alliance with Britain throughout WW2, though it was formally neutral. British and American forces were using the Azores by early 1943 and in August 1943 Portugal leased out facilities to Britain and allowed the US to build more. Both Britain & the US used these facilities for the rest of the war and they were a major stopover for aircraft being ferried from the US to the UK. In 1942 the US also signed a defence agreement with Liberia. Roberts Airfield in Monrovia was both a base for ASW aircraft & a major stop in aircraft ferrying routes.
Brazil formally declared war on Germany & Italy in mid-1942 & had been allowing US forces to base themselves there even before that. The Brazilian Navy & Army took part in WW2 & a string of Brazilian airfields weer either used for ASW aircraft or for ferrying aircraft. Britain had colonies all along the Atlantic/Caribbean boundary starting in Guyana & running all the way up to Bermuda & the Virgin Islands.
That completely covers the mid-Atlantic and most of the Sth Atlantic. No large Naval formation was going to pass through that area without being spotted early. The Allies will have had months to plan their strategy and pre-position such forces as were required. The IJN fleet will be harassed and depleted before it gets anywhere near the Nth Atlantic. The RN & USN will be able to choose the time & place they take battle.sigpic
Win nervously lose tragically - Reds C C
Comment
Comment