How did you come up with that figure? I would anticipate at LEAST twice DD(X), maybe more.
And every BB we buy would mean fewer DD(X)s.
Sorry, Theater Missile Defense - shooting down short-ranged ballistic missiles. (think anti-Scud)
'More' in the context of new missions that need attention. DD(X) and LCS help solve the littorals problem, plus the Burke design is getting old. CG(X) provides next-gen area air defense and TMD.
Well, if you want it to operate independently, or as part of a SAG, someone needs to have aviation facilities. Who's going to be spotting for your giganto-guns?
At minimum, I'd scrap the rear turrets and dedicate the entire section to a large flight deck and hanger for UAVs and helos. Maybe even a large, multi-misison area like the Danish Flexible Support Ship.
Not happening. Sorry.
Ok, if not sink, then mission-kill it.
We don't need 16" guns for NGFS. The 155mm AGS is spec'd to provide an entire artillery battery's worth of fire support. Each DD(X) has two. That's plenty.
Ship vs. ship just doesn't really happen anymore, except in the littorals. And if it does, it's via long-ranged cruise missile, not guns.
For littorals, chances are you'll be going up against a gun-boat or fast attack craft and even the 155mm AGS is overkill here. Better to hit them with a missile from a helo or UAV, or a 57mm round or NLOS-LS missile from an LCS.
For littorals, chances are you'll be going up against a gun-boat or fast attack craft and even the 155mm AGS is overkill here. Better to hit them with a missile from a helo or UAV, or a 57mm round or NLOS-LS missile from an LCS.
It doesn't operate ship to ship, as you noticed it is part of a fleet. Whether SCG or Carrier based.
And a fast attack craft can't outrun a missile. if it gets close, my ship has a CIWS.
Speaking of that, it has a 57mm CIWS.
And every massively expensive BB we bought would mean fewer LCSs and DD(X)s.
As can DD(X), Burkes, Tyco's, LCSs, etc., at a far lower price.
A half dozen hits will undoubtably shred any exposed antennas, leaving you blind and deaf and a mission-kill.
DD(X), Burkes and Tico's will be able to do this with Excaliber/ANSR/LRLAP.
No higher (or not much higher) than existing and near future vessels.
Perhaps, but not worth the price, IMHO.
Well, I'm guessing you won't be able to build a $20k guided 16" round, since we're having trouble building $20k guided 155mm and 5" rounds.
Besides, TacTom is somewhat cheaper and can go 7-900 miles and can be fired by any VLS ship in the fleet. What kind of range do your 16" rounds have?
If anything, we should just focus on cheaper VLS missiles. JASSM is less than $500k. But something a lot smaller and cheaper rmight be worthwile - something where 4 to 9 can be carried per VLS/PVLS, but packs the punch of a 250lb SDB and has TacTom range.
Even then you'll never exceed the explosive force of a 3,200 lb 16" shell.
Why 16 155mm guns? Scattering them about the ship will mean that only, probably, half will be able to fire at any one time. Seems wasteful for such an expensive system. Same goes for the 57mm guns.
The 16 turrets is suppose to be downsized to 10. However regardless this ship is optimized as it is. A 155mm turret costs about 3 million dollars with support systems. So really they don't add much cost, and it's reasonable to have more especially when the 155mm's can be unmanned.
Comment