Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!
The World Affairs Board is the premier forum for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include military and defense developments, international terrorism, insurgency & COIN doctrine, international security and policing, weapons proliferation, and military technological development.
Our membership includes many from military, defense, academic, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "My ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."- Isaac Asimov
Agreed. Teachers shooting students, teachers shooting teachers, students getting ahold of their teacher's gun and shooting teachers/students. I imagine we'd see all sorts of these occurrences, and they'd be rather common. How long until a kid gets violent and a teacher decides to use deadly force? Or use the gun as intimidation and the kid makes a grab for it, gets shot, or disarms the teacher and starts shooting? Outbursts and misbehavior are extremely common in schools. Adding guns into the mix opens up a world of possibilities with regards to risks. So many ways such an idea could go horribly, horribly wrong.
Thousands of guns have been stolen from law enforcement in the US. Why should we expect that arming teachers would be incident-free?
When I hear a genius idea, a different category from a great idea, my first retort is what could possibly go wrong in a sarcastic tone. The teacher above was a reserve police officer and if that can happen to him what chance would ordinary teachers have?
Are "red flags" the new code word making violating civil liberties ok? This kid had an immigration technicality. What's the next techicality for the next kid?
BTW, CNN reported a search of his devices came out clean:
Those red flags, the chief said, included Sun being uncommunicative with others and not leaving his room, dying his hair blond, paying for a fast expensive car with cash, and referring to one of his guns as a "sniper rifle."
Beary said Sun also went to a gun range to practice with his rifle and also wouldn't return calls from authorities when they tried to notify him his immigration status was subject to change.
But the chief acknowledged there were no comments in interviews or in reviews of his electronic devices that Sun was planning to harm anyone.
"That's the interesting thing in this case, there were no specific threats. Reiterating that, there were no threats," Beary said.
The chief said the red flags looked at separately might not mean much but when all of them were considered collectively they were concerning.
"I think there was a disaster about to happen and we stopped it," the chief said.
Orlando Sentinel story has more details.
I find this part the only truly disturbing act:
He said Sun chambered a round, pointed the rifle at the wall they shared with their neighbors and said, “Hey, look what I just got.”
Obviously the guy has no concept of gun safety. However, painting this guy as a sure fired mass shooter?
Are "red flags" the new code word making violating civil liberties ok? This kid had an immigration technicality. What's the next techicality for the next kid?
He wasn’t attending classes, which made his visa invalid.
Without a certain kind of visa, owning guns is illegal.
Oh, and he lied to the police (a $68,000 car in China is very, very expensive).
Eight weeks after coming to the attention of law enforcement, he was arrested.
He wasn’t attending classes, which made his visa invalid.
Invalidation of the Visa is an administrative action that usually proceeds very differently from what was done here.
Without a certain kind of visa, owning guns is illegal.
That's a circular argument
Oh, and he lied to the police (a $68,000 car in China is very, very expensive).
He's perfectly normal in this belief. Large numbers of Chinese students are wealthy enough to pay for very fancy cars. A colleague's street has high school kids with Range Rovers, Lamborghinis and Rolls Royces. A $70,000 car doesn't even register as expensive amongst some young Chinese expats, at least not in California.
Eight weeks after coming to the attention of law enforcement, he was arrested.
What took so long?
Written like someone with true disregard for civil liberties.
Are "red flags" the new code word making violating civil liberties ok? This kid had an immigration technicality. What's the next techicality for the next kid?
BTW, CNN reported a search of his devices came out clean:
Obviously the guy has no concept of gun safety. However, painting this guy as a sure fired mass shooter?
I don't know the particulars of this case, and I'm not going to rush to any judgments, and assume this guy is what the security services in the US says he is, or assume that he is innocent.
That being said, and this is a thing I find rather disturbing, is there's been a perverse reversal of Blackstone's Formulation in the US, one of the bedrocks of our system of criminal law.
The idea used to be "It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."
Now it is, "It is better that ten innocents shall suffer than let one guilty person escape."
And a single false accusation from years ago can follow one for the rest of one's life.
I don't know the particulars of this case, and I'm not going to rush to any judgments, and assume this guy is what the security services in the US says he is, or assume that he is innocent.
That being said, and this is a thing I find rather disturbing, is there's been a perverse reversal of Blackstone's Formulation in the US, one of the bedrocks of our system of criminal law.
The idea used to be "It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer."
Now it is, "It is better that ten innocents shall suffer than let one guilty person escape."
And a single false accusation from years ago can follow one for the rest of one's life.
This is exactly what makes me deeply uncomfortable about this case.
That and something else: In a society that purports to care deeply about civil liberties and where both the left and right believe freedom to be in peril, this highly ambiguous case has incited no serious controversy or debate after being reported on the front page of CNN. Not even a thread on reddit that I can find besides r/China.
We talk about Japanese internment in WWII like it could never happen again, and yet, in 2018, you push the right buttons, find the right target group, and, not a peep. No one even realizes there might be something of concern.
This is exactly what makes me deeply uncomfortable about this case.
That and something else: In a society that purports to care deeply about civil liberties and where both the left and right believe freedom to be in peril, this highly ambiguous case has incited no serious controversy or debate after being reported on the front page of CNN. Not even a thread on reddit that I can find besides r/China.
We talk about Japanese internment in WWII like it could never happen again, and yet, in 2018, you push the right buttons, find the right target group, and, not a peep. No one even realizes there might be something of concern.
One thing that bothers me most is that there's been the creation of a permanent underclass in American society. The only difference between many so-called "upstanding citizens" and career criminals is that at a critical juncture in their life, the former had access to a lawyer, the means to afford one, the right skin color, the benefit of the doubt, he reminded the cops of his own son, the police declined to pursue charges, or any combination of these. The latter gets the book thrown at them, gets a stain on their record, and is denied participation in and faces rejection from society, and slips further and further down the wrong path. These factors see themselves played out just as much in urban America as they do in rural America.
It's certainly not a healthy criminal justice system, and it makes for an unhealthy society. Justice isn't blind, yet we give lip service to the idea that it is.
Someone is working under the assumption that a Public Defender has not passed the Bar exam.
Your stated position is that career CJS workers and those in Judicial System have been stacked with racists and against those of limited means (including those that work tirelessly in public defenders offices across the country).
You have officially drank the cool aid and poisoned yourself against all facets of the American system of justice.
This system is most fair and just going in my opinion.
I’m sad for you that you are so jaded against those that give so much to operate the wheels of Justice.
You owe them thanks as they are hard working in draining jobs.
Comment