Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

21 killed as terrorists stage serial attacks to disrupt Kashmir polls

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    Two very independent sources, the good Captain LT and Col Shukla, got it and the Army acknowledged the Whatsapp message was wide spread.
    Ajai Shukla is a moron who writes a blog moderated by him. LT hates present government.

    The rule of thumb is credibility of the source. No person with sound mind will take this source seriously, will you? If leadership makes sure that an unfounded story is brought into perceptive and rebutted it doesn't make them suspect of some alleged guilt.

    BTW I just got message that I have won 2 million dollars. I hope every one else got the same message and we all are millionaire now. Disseminating a SMS doesn't tantamount to dissent or approval of the content by the receiver.

    It's pissing off the Army rank and file. What do you think?
    That is an exaggeration, possibility of a vicious propaganda/psy-op by enemy can not be ruled out either. There is no single sign if army has changed its tactics operating in that state. The whole reasoning this propaganda was founded on, was a lie that the terrorists rained in bulldozing the check post and it has been debunked. All we have been listening now as a counter to that failed premise is patronizing obfuscation.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Blademaster View Post
      Modi fucked up big time with the Army with that line of statement about forcing Army to apologize. I hope he is sincere enough to make amends to the Army for making such statements even though it was done in an attempt to win over the local populace who has long grievances with the Army because the Army serves the entire nation not just one part of the nation. I think we as a whole has made too many sops to the local populace. If we had done away with Article 370, we would not need to make too many sops to J&K. The best thing is to sever Jammu from Kashmir and make it into a state and then article 370 would cease to be in force since it only applies to J&K, not Kashmir only.

      In my opinion, there was no way in hell that the soldiers would have enough time to classify the incoming vehicle as a threat or not a threat in that short brief period of time. They only had seconds to react and it was better to shoot and ask questions later. Moreover, any reasonable person would not speed up toward a checkpoint.

      I strongly suspect that the teens knew what they were doing and they figured that they could extract more damage if they went at the soldiers wearing only civilian clothes and no weapons. I think it was similar to the lines of "suicide by cop" tactics. This was designed to embarrass the IA and force the IA through local populace outrage (misplaces as that may be) and change the tactics of IA so the terrorists could later take advantage of it. Sure enough it did, and the nation paid a price of 11 brave unreplaceable souls for it.

      Modi should have realized this and not make that line. It was a huge blunder and he needs to be called out for it regardless whether it would improve Congress' standings or not. I just hope he is smart enough to realize that and make amends.
      If I was to tell Modi, It should have been avoided.

      But we all missing a very crucial aspect when addressing this whole issue of Kashmir problem. I was about take this whole debate to a tangent using Modi's bold effort of political mobilization (him being a polarizing figure or political genius) by asking a question to all on what their inputs are to solve this Kashmir problem.

      Though you have already started few points and many good point were made by Lemontree on article 370 before as well. But my analogy is that we are missing the logistics and tools solving this problem over tactics.

      I will will explain it further, gotta go to job...

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by ambidex View Post
        Ajai Shukla is a moron who writes a blog moderated by him. LT hates present government.
        And how does two individuals so far apart came up with the same references if not widespread.

        Originally posted by ambidex View Post
        The rule of thumb is credibility of the source. No person with sound mind will take this source seriously, will you? If leadership makes sure that an unfounded story is brought into perceptive and rebutted it doesn't make them suspect of some alleged guilt.
        Who cares about alleged guilt? This is about leadership. If something is attributed to you, true or false, then it is your duty to make your position extremely clear.

        Originally posted by ambidex View Post
        BTW I just got message that I have won 2 million dollars. I hope every one else got the same message and we all are millionaire now. Disseminating a SMS doesn't tantamount to dissent or approval of the content by the receiver.
        Wrong analogy. You just won a milliion dollars and you want me to spend $200,000 on a house for you. I go ahead and make the contract and charged it back to you. Oh, that wasn't you? Well, why the hell didn't you say so?

        Originally posted by ambidex View Post
        That is an exaggeration,
        Is it? Both Col Shukla and Capt LT got feedback from their course mates.
        Chimo

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by ambidex View Post
          But we all missing a very crucial aspect when addressing this whole issue of Kashmir problem. I was about take this whole debate to a tangent using Modi's bold effort of political mobilization (him being a polarizing figure or political genius) by asking a question to all on what their inputs are to solve this Kashmir problem.
          The Kashmir problem lies in the following:-
          - Strategic location for origin of rivers watering Pakistan.
          - Pakistan's obsession since 1947 as it was a Muslim majority state. (They refuse to agree that the Royal Principalities were free to choose India or Pakistan if they were on the border).
          - British encouragement - Gilgit was handed over to Pakistan when the Commandant of the Gilgit Scouts, Major Brown was British to revolt against Raja Hari Singh and raise the Pakistani flag. he was awarded the MBE for this task.
          - Pakistan wants to avenge Bangladesh.

          There can be no political solution as long as the Pak Army takes the decisions.
          The solution lies in creation of Baluchistan and assisting the Shias in Gilgit-Baltistan. This will neuter the Pak Army to a large extent and reduce (not end) the animosity. We need to reduce their capability to hit back.

          Making Jammu / Ladhak different states will not prevent Pak from pushing jihadis and killing Indians.

          These are my thoughts.

          Cheers!...on the rocks!!

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by lemontree View Post
            The solution lies in creation of Baluchistan and assisting the Shias in Gilgit-Baltistan. This will neuter the Pak Army to a large extent and reduce (not end) the animosity. We need to reduce their capability to hit back.
            I would say we need to drastically increase our capability to hit back. Militarily and covertly. When they carry out an attack like this, they should expect IA artillery to open up all along the LoC and IB and wipe out any PA target within range. I'm sure there are plenty. Those with a high likelihood of senior PA officers being present should be shown some special love. Unfortunately, we don't have anywhere near the kind of firepower we would need to completely overwhelm the PA and blunt the inevitable counter attacks by their artillery.

            Our response needs to be disproportionate and really hurt the PA in terms of men and money. How we can do that with current resources is something you can answer much better than me, if it is even possible. Of course we'd still need a government with the balls to actually sign the order to do something like this, even if we had the resources needed.

            We also need to grow some serious covert attack capabilities inside Pakistan. We are starting from scratch here, so this is not going to happen in the near future, but better to start now than never. I have some hopes on this front because of Ajit Doval. The man seems to have a clear understanding of what we are up against having been in the thick of things during his years in the IB. He was personally involved in several covert ops as a field agent nd also headed IB's operations wing. Appointing him as NSA was one of the best decisions Modi made. Let's see if he delivers.
            Last edited by Firestorm; 12 Dec 14,, 08:16.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Firestorm View Post
              I would say we need to drastically increase our capability to hit back. Militarily and covertly. When they carry out an attack like this, they should expect IA artillery to open up all along the LoC and IB and wipe out any PA target within range. I'm sure there are plenty. Those with a high likelihood of senior PA officers being present should be shown some special love. Unfortunately, we don't have anywhere near the kind of firepower we would need to completely overwhelm the PA and blunt the inevitable counter attacks by their artillery.
              We have more than enough arty resources, but so does the PA. Arty duels are nothing more than pissing contests. We will only end up hurting our own civilians. If you have ever visited the LOC/ IB in the J&K then you will see the close proximity of civilian habitation on both sides of the border.

              Our response needs to be disproportionate and really hurt the PA in terms of men and money. How we can do that with current resources is something you can answer much better than me, if it is even possible. Of course we'd still need a government with the balls to actually sign the order to do something like this, even if we had the resources needed.
              It is the covert capability that needs to be acquired to achieve any strategic reach and meaning, and I have told you before the reason why we don't have it now. It is for that reason that MMS could not hit back in 2008 after the 26/11 attacks.

              We also need to grow some serious covert attack capabilities inside Pakistan. We are starting from scratch here, so this is not going to happen in the near future, but better to start now than never. I have some hopes on this front because of Ajit Doval. The man seems to have a clear understanding of what we are up against having been in the thick of things during his years in the IB. He was personally involved in several covert ops as a field agent nd also headed IB's operations wing. Appointing him as NSA was one of the best decisions Modi made. Let's see if he delivers.
              Ajit Doval cannot do anything as the present govt is seen as an anti-Muslim party by region. Motivating groups in Pakistan will need a great effort.

              Cheers!...on the rocks!!

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by ambidex View Post
                LT hates present government.
                I like, many others have good reason to hate it.
                The actions of the Govt in the past 6 months, seem to have turned even the ardent supports of this govt into sceptics.
                Other nations wage war on other nations, while our govt wages war on its on citizens.

                Cheers!...on the rocks!!

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by commander View Post
                  We have seen in almost all elections in 2014 that a higher voter turnout meant it was favourable for the BJP. Hopefully BJP atleast manages to win a near majority if not absolute majority.
                  That would indeed be a welcome surprise but the article alluded to the opposite reason for higher turnouts in certain areas. Will take more research to understand the results which will be announced on Dec 23.

                  If Modi can appeal to the young of Kashmir who are the main reason behind his victory elsewhere then the BJP might come out better.

                  Those kids who ran through the check point were young people.

                  Originally posted by lemontree View Post
                  I like, many others have good reason to hate it.
                  The actions of the Govt in the past 6 months, seem to have turned even the ardent supports of this govt into sceptics.
                  Other nations wage war on other nations, while our govt wages war on its on citizens.
                  Kashmir is an insurgency. Militaries role is to fight foreign enemies. By turning military into police insurgents succeed in turning military against the people. This has to be countered.

                  Unfortunately, in this incident the military got the short end of the stick. Bear in mind that the people have been on that path for much longer.
                  Last edited by Double Edge; 12 Dec 14,, 12:32.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by lemontree View Post
                    I like, many others have good reason to hate it.
                    The actions of the Govt in the past 6 months, seem to have turned even the ardent supports of this govt into sceptics.
                    Other nations wage war on other nations, while our govt wages war on its on citizens.
                    Care to explain more on this Captain ?

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by commander View Post
                      I agree, but in my personal opinion though, if the CIA had indeed only tortured the terrorists then I wouldn't mind whatever way they treat those scum's. They are terrorists after all.
                      Are you serious? You are defending torture. How do you know that they are all terrorists, they are not even being given trials. The US is releasing some of them from time to time due to lack of any evidence that these are hardcore terrorists.

                      I am not saying that they should be given teddy bears at night and chocolate milk by day, but each time you give the govt. extra judicial powers, you dig a hole for yourselves. You assume that they will use it for "bad people", they will find a way to use it against all. See what is happening due to police militarization across the US, what was supposed to be used in hardcore drug wars is now being used against protesters and journalists.

                      I will say this though, what the CIA labels as torture is chickenshit compared to what our police does to people under their custody. That goes to show how much more fucked up our own legal and justice system is.
                      "Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?" ~ Epicurus

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by antimony View Post
                        Are you serious? You are defending torture. How do you know that they are all terrorists, they are not even being given trials. The US is releasing some of them from time to time due to lack of any evidence that these are hardcore terrorists.

                        I am not saying that they should be given teddy bears at night and chocolate milk by day, but each time you give the govt. extra judicial powers, you dig a hole for yourselves. You assume that they will use it for "bad people", they will find a way to use it against all. See what is happening due to police militarization across the US, what was supposed to be used in hardcore drug wars is now being used against protesters and journalists.

                        I will say this though, what the CIA labels as torture is chickenshit compared to what our police does to people under their custody. That goes to show how much more fucked up our own legal and justice system is.
                        Antimony, hence I have highlighted only if they were terrorists. Those scums kill innocent women, children just so they can terrorize. I don't mind how the terrorists (read: real terrorists) are treated. Saying that I do understand too much power corrupts any great mind over time. We have recently done away with Article 309 without so much so an debate on it. So I am hopeful more HR reforms are on it's ways and many british era laws will be shown their place in coffin.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by commander View Post
                          Antimony, hence I have highlighted only if they were terrorists. Those scums kill innocent women, children just so they can terrorize. I don't mind how the terrorists (read: real terrorists) are treated. Saying that I do understand too much power corrupts any great mind over time. We have recently done away with Article 309 without so much so an debate on it. So I am hopeful more HR reforms are on it's ways and many british era laws will be shown their place in coffin.
                          I repeat, any extra judicial power (like torture) given to anyone will be abused, against those who are not meant to be abused. It is not a question of if. It is a question of how often and against how many. We now have unspeakable tortures and custodial deaths in India where torture is not legal. What do you think will happen if any semblance of legality is given to it? How do you think politicians, policemen and such fine upstanding authorities will resort to when they have to resolve their private, land, property disputes?
                          "Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?" ~ Epicurus

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by antimony View Post
                            I repeat, any extra judicial power (like torture) given to anyone will be abused, against those who are not meant to be abused. It is not a question of if. It is a question of how often and against how many. We now have unspeakable tortures and custodial deaths in India where torture is not legal. What do you think will happen if any semblance of legality is given to it? How do you think politicians, policemen and such fine upstanding authorities will resort to when they have to resolve their private, land, property disputes?
                            and you would rather treat Kasab's with Biriyani's and kebab's ?

                            I get your point AM, it's human nature to abuse any kind of power if he knows he can get away with it. Even a peon in my local panchayat (village) office will ask for bribe to let me see the VAO. So it's not about how much power but rather the power itself that can be abused no matter how small it is. You gotta appoint right men for the right job and pray as hell they don't abuse their given powers.
                            Last edited by commander; 12 Dec 14,, 20:53.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by commander View Post
                              Those scums kill innocent women, children just so they can terrorize. I don't mind how the terrorists (read: real terrorists) are treated.
                              I have to check myself all the time when it comes to bad guys. I will shed no tears for their demise but I rather just put a bullet in them rather than make them suffer. I have this real fear. If I enjoy watching bad men suffer, I just might enjoy watching good men suffer. I rather not take that chance.
                              Chimo

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
                                I have to check myself all the time when it comes to bad guys. I will shed no tears for their demise but I rather just put a bullet in them rather than make them suffer. I have this real fear. If I enjoy watching bad men suffer, I just might enjoy watching good men suffer. I rather not take that chance.
                                But Sir,

                                Weren't these terrorists treated that way to extract information from them iirc ? If you kill them then you are at a loss aren't you ? I am not saying we just keep on treating them that way if they are of no value/use. You have no other way to deal with these hard trained , brain washed terrorists. I only see the good that comes out of it. Hundreds of lives maybe even thousands of innocent men,women,children could be saved. For the greater good I won't mind mind getting our hands dirty.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X