Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

USN Carriers to be Scrapped

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • USN Carriers to be Scrapped

    I guess this was inevitable:

    J--TOWING AND COMPLETE DISMANTLEMENT OF MULTIPLE CV-59/CV-63 CLASS AIRCRAFT CARRIERS IN THE UNITED STATES

    Solicitation Number: N0002412R4211
    Agency: Department of the Navy
    Office: Naval Sea Systems Command
    Location: NAVSEA HQ

    Added: Jan 26, 2012 3:27 pm
    The Naval Sea Systems Command intends to solicit for the towing and complete dismantlement of multiple CV-59/CV-63 Class Aircraft Carriers in the United States, removal and disposal of hazardous materials in accordance with applicable Federal, State and local laws and regulations, and processing and sale of scrap metals and reusable items. Ownership of the vessels remains with the United States. Towing will be required from the carriers' locations in Philadelphia, PA and Bremerton, WA to the Contractors' facilities in accordance with the U.S. Navy Tow Manual. The contract(s) will be five-year Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts awarded on a firm fixed-price basis at the net cost to the government, considering the estimated value to the Contractor of the resulting scrap metals and reusable items.

    The Contractor shall retain the proceeds of the sale of scrap metals and reusable items to offset its costs of performance. The government may award one, two or three IDIQ contracts depending on the best value to the government. The first ship to be awarded is ex-FORRESTAL (AVT/CV 59), located in Philadelphia, PA. The second is ex-INDEPENDENCE (CV 62), located in Bremerton, WA, and the third is ex-CONSTELLATION (CV 64), also located in Bremerton, WA. Additional aircraft carriers may be solicited during the five-year period if the Navy changes their disposition to dismantling. The hull and all portions of the structure of the vessels must be demilitarized by reduction to scrap dimensions not exceeding five (5) feet.

    Any and all weapons systems and communications equipment remaining on the vessels must be demilitarized by complete destruction. The Contractor must obtain a facility security clearance at the CONFIDENTIAL level at minimum from the Defense Security Service. All employees and others with access to the vessel, to components of the vessels prior to reduction to scrap, and to information regarding the vessels must be U.S. citizens and, for those with access to the third deck and below, possess individual security clearances at the CONFIDENTIAL level at minimum. The Contractor must have facility controls in place to prevent physical access to the vessels and facility by unauthorized persons, and limit visual observation of the dismantling of the third deck and below by unauthorized persons.

    The Contractor must provide office space for on-site government representatives who will serve as the Contracting Officer's Representative, and to observe and monitor the performance of the Contractor.

    Contracting Office Address:
    N00024 NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND, DC 1333 Isaac Hull Avenue S.E. Washington Navy Yard, DC

    It's going to be hard to see the old girls go ...

  • #2
    How many firms could anyone expect to bid on these monsters given all that is required of them before a torch could be taken to the hulls. Would the value of the steel, after all the remediation is done, actually yield a profit. Was not the Coral Sea the last carrier dismantled and that was a long drawn out affair or disaster depending on your point of view.

    Comment


    • #3
      Ex-USS Forrestal was a given. They could not find a home for her and most of that equipment if it is not already will probably be removed before this takes place. It was much the very same with the ex-USS America before she was taken out.
      Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.

      Comment


      • #4
        "demilitarized to no greater than 5 foot sections"? Are they really saying that a six foot piece of sheet steel is somehow militaristic vs a five foot section?

        Cutting the carrier to such tiny pieces is ridiculous overkill and will hugely raise the cost of dismantling.

        Comment


        • #5
          Why can't you sink those carriers as artificial reefs once you remove the toxic materials? Or better yet, take them to shipbreakers areas in Bangladesh or India once removing the toxic materials? They will do the work a lot faster and more efficiently than the workers in US could ever hope to do.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Chogy View Post
            "demilitarized to no greater than 5 foot sections"? Are they really saying that a six foot piece of sheet steel is somehow militaristic vs a five foot section?

            Cutting the carrier to such tiny pieces is ridiculous overkill and will hugely raise the cost of dismantling.

            Actually not...depending on the steel it will probably end up on Humvees, or used as add-on armor somewhere in the inventory. But the cutting up of the vessel is designed to help facilitate the removal. How they came about 5ft sq is beyond me but then why do B52s who have outlived their usefulness have to be shredded. The answer usually is "Thats what the DoD wants."

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Chogy View Post
              "demilitarized to no greater than 5 foot sections"? Are they really saying that a six foot piece of sheet steel is somehow militaristic vs a five foot section?

              Cutting the carrier to such tiny pieces is ridiculous overkill and will hugely raise the cost of dismantling.
              In the past when the USN has "surveyed" items for destruction they make sure (even if by unreasonable means) that it resembles nothing of it former self. Call it regulation if you would. One thing I have noticed though in watching steel scrap get loaded aboard ship along the piers it is better to be in smaller pieces, that way the cranes can just pick away at a very fast pace and can be sent to where ever.

              Can you imagine how many ships holds that a carrier dismantled into 5 foot sections can fill?
              Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Blademaster View Post
                Why can't you sink those carriers as artificial reefs once you remove the toxic materials? Or better yet, take them to shipbreakers areas in Bangladesh or India once removing the toxic materials? They will do the work a lot faster and more efficiently than the workers in US could ever hope to do.
                Those great ships are material assets that can continue their lives in the hull of a new ship or as a vehicle protecting our soldiers! We don't need to send any more to the bottom as reefs! The companies in Texas are quick to say they are "recyclers", not "ship breakers"! I believe a certain percentage of each ship should be used in the construction of a new ship, just as was done with the trade center steel in the USS New York. That way a little bit of the soul of a ship lives on in an another! A new carrier should have some of an old carrier in her!
                As for the far east, have you ever looked at an aerial of those places? This is a shot of Alang. That's not "volcanic sand"! That's why we can no longer supply them with our ships!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Please, anybody with some pull on this board. Can you arrange it to have the SPS-49 and SPS-35 antennas of one of the Carriers shipped down to the Iowa?
                  Able to leap tall tales in a single groan.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    One would think with the right investment these three once stripped of dangerous materials would make one hell of a home for the homeless Vets and others. Wishful thinking.
                    Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Dread, great minds think alike! I suggested to the RI group going for the JFK that they set aside a berthing, messing and medical area for just that purpose! Plus, in exchange for the housing on board the vets could do the maintenance and upkeep as well as the restoration. Another idea would be to use a carrier as a detention facility! Where else could a state or city get a billion dollar building for nothing from the feds!! A carrier would have everything they need on it, berthing, mess, medical, shops, classroom space and plenty of exercise area! NO escaping either! Too big of a jump down!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by RustyBattleship View Post
                        Please, anybody with some pull on this board. Can you arrange it to have the SPS-49 and SPS-35 antennas of one of the Carriers shipped down to the Iowa?
                        You don't need pull. Do you have anyone on your board at Admiral level? All you need to do is call Bremerton and start asking if you could get the radars off the Connie or Indy. We called numerous times asking for permission to take that 3"/50 cal twin mount and they eventually consented. Or enlist the help of Boxer or Feinstein (yes, that is what I said) to put light pressure on the Navy to cooperate. When the Hornet learned that the ships original wheel was down at Leemore NAS we asked for it. The ship was turned down flat. So one of the ships last QM's started writing letters to Feinstein about getting the wheel. A year or so later, lo and behold, we are told the Captain of the base was going to bring up the wheel to us. There was a little ceremony in the Pilot House as it was presented and installed and I was behind the helm watching. Then I took the wheel that was there, ex-Bennington, and placed it on the helm in Secondary Con.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by NavyDoc View Post
                          Dread, great minds think alike! I suggested to the RI group going for the JFK that they set aside a berthing, messing and medical area for just that purpose! Plus, in exchange for the housing on board the vets could do the maintenance and upkeep as well as the restoration. Another idea would be to use a carrier as a detention facility! Where else could a state or city get a billion dollar building for nothing from the feds!! A carrier would have everything they need on it, berthing, mess, medical, shops, classroom space and plenty of exercise area! NO escaping either! Too big of a jump down!
                          that wont happen for 3 reasons.
                          politics, politics, politics
                          "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" B. Franklin

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Sounds like a mission for ????

                            Originally posted by tbm3fan View Post
                            You don't need pull. Do you have anyone on your board at Admiral level? All you need to do is call Bremerton and start asking if you could get the radars off the Connie or Indy. We called numerous times asking for permission to take that 3"/50 cal twin mount and they eventually consented. Or enlist the help of Boxer or Feinstein (yes, that is what I said) to put light pressure on the Navy to cooperate. When the Hornet learned that the ships original wheel was down at Leemore NAS we asked for it. The ship was turned down flat. So one of the ships last QM's started writing letters to Feinstein about getting the wheel. A year or so later, lo and behold, we are told the Captain of the base was going to bring up the wheel to us. There was a little ceremony in the Pilot House as it was presented and installed and I was behind the helm watching. Then I took the wheel that was there, ex-Bennington, and placed it on the helm in Secondary Con.
                            Which one and where is the array located?
                            Could be interesting to see what happens in an election year. :)
                            Attached Files

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              These views may be a little more help in identification!




                              Rusty, would those be the animals you're looking for that are already laying on Sara's deck?


                              If they are, it might be better to wait until they move her to Philly! They'd be a few hundred miles closer!
                              Maybe we can find a Navy vet trucker that is making an empty turn around in Philly!
                              Last edited by SlaterDoc; 15 Feb 12,, 00:48.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X