Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!
The World Affairs Board is the premier forum for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include military and defense developments, international terrorism, insurgency & COIN doctrine, international security and policing, weapons proliferation, and military technological development.
Our membership includes many from military, defense, academic, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
they are not my country,so I had no opinion.I am doubt about the opinion of Muslim.maybe they admire Bin Laden more than Saladin now.
First post you had opinion, 2nd post you did no have an opion fllowing with another outlandish opinion. So which one is it? Do you have an opnion or not? When did "west soldiers traveled" all over Iran?
BTW: If you get proper travel credentials (i.e Visa) you can legally travel in any nation in the world.
First post you had opinion, 2nd post you did no have an opion fllowing with another outlandish opinion. So which one is it? Do you have an opnion or not? When did "west soldiers traveled" all over Iran?
BTW: If you get proper travel credentials (i.e Visa) you can legally travel in any nation in the world.
1,what I said in first post are fact,not opinion.I am just doubt about the opinion of Muslim,after all,many terrorist are muslim.why they choose that way?
2,When did "west soldiers traveled" all over Iran?
maybe next year,we all know US government want to announce Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps as terroristic organization.
3,did those west soldiers come to muslim land with Visa in their hands?
1,what I said in first post are fact,not opinion.I am just doubt about the opinion of Muslim,after all,many terrorist are muslim.why they choose that way?
2,When did "west soldiers traveled" all over Iran?
maybe next year,we all know US government want to announce Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps as terroristic organization.
3,did those west soldiers come to muslim land with Visa in their hands?
When westerners intervened to help Bosnian and Kosovar muslims it was about protecting civilians, prevent ethnic cleansing and other "principles" it was OK.
When for the same or similar reason the same powers intervene in a country that happens to be muslim it is a problem.
No such thing as a good tax - Churchill
To make mistakes is human. To blame someone else for your mistake, is strategic.
1,what I said in first post are fact,not opinion.I am just doubt about the opinion of Muslim,after all,many terrorist are muslim.why they choose that way?
How else a man can find his way to heaven and put his hands on 72 permanent virgins so quick?
When westerners intervened to help Bosnian and Kosovar muslims it was about protecting civilians, prevent ethnic cleansing and other "principles" it was OK.
When for the same or similar reason the same powers intervene in a country that happens to be muslim it is a problem.
You nailed it.
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
How else a man can find his way to heaven and put his hands on 72 permanent virgins so quick?
If it has not happened yet then you might consider modifying your list.
IRGC is already in USDoS terrorist organizations list. Canada and EU will follow soon.
You might want to read Dave Lukins comment again.;)
Three strikes, he's out and you hit the home run! Great reply buddy!
When westerners intervened to help Bosnian and Kosovar muslims it was about protecting civilians, prevent ethnic cleansing and other "principles" it was OK.
When for the same or similar reason the same powers intervene in a country that happens to be muslim it is a problem.
oh,what means " for the same or similar reason ".Are you going to label Muammar Gaddafi as " ethnic cleaner "?
if you have your problems ,I also have problem about these pictures
you optimistic guys,I hear that Muammar Gaddafi said he regret abandoning research on nuclear weapons.and he had persuaded Kim Jong II abandon nuclear weapons,which make him look like a fool now.if there would be another leader in some area who were disliked by western countries in future,what would be his choice?
Last edited by aeneasy; 07 Apr 11,, 13:14.
Reason: more words
Qaddafy abandonned his nuclear program because he did not have the expertise nor the equipment to make enriched uranium, not because he had became good.
Originally posted by Officer of EngineersView Post
Qaddafy abandonned his nuclear program because he did not have the expertise nor the equipment to make enriched uranium, not because he had became good.
Was that the primary reason or rather what happened to Saddam as a consequence ?
Originally posted by Officer of EngineersView Post
Qaddafy abandonned his nuclear program because he did not have the expertise nor the equipment to make enriched uranium, not because he had became good.
I never said Gaddafi is a good man or ever became good.
you'd better ask CIA to make sure your message.
And even if you were right,we all knows Gaddafi has a lot of gold.when he met Kim Jong II,why didn't he say:"I give you gold,you give me expertise and enriched uranium" instead of persuaded Kim Jong II abandon nuclear weapons.don't you think Kim Jong II didn't have those either? I remind you,north Korea is a very poor country,Kim Jong II need gold badly.
Comment