Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!
The World Affairs Board is the premier forum for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include military and defense developments, international terrorism, insurgency & COIN doctrine, international security and policing, weapons proliferation, and military technological development.
Our membership includes many from military, defense, academic, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Wouldn't the bolded change literally change the way the rifle operates, aka.make it no longer an M4/AR-15 technically.
Well in America the lower reciver is considered the rifle. So even if you put an M468 upper onto your AR-15 lower, the ATF still considers the rifle the AR-15. But that's the ATF and not the army so...
Honestly with the designation being almost at the sole direction of the army they could call it whatever they want. In some ways this almost sounds like they are trying to slip through a gun without going through procurement contests. I'm highly suprized when I think about how expensive this will be but it also doesn't sound like it is being done without a fair amount of testing and consideration so I'm ok with it.
Changing the round adds about 33% to the price of changing the weapon. If they are trying an under the table change, which is kinda what it looks like they can't afford that and probably can't anyways.
Comment