Britain Appeals To UN In Sailors' Case

[Ray]

Xerxes,

Answered on the link.

[Guest]

thank you Mr ray, i will look it up

[brokensickle]

The liberal leftists like to think we should be better than our enemies. The conservative right wingers would like to be the same as our enemies. I am pleased to see the US population is heading away from the views of the right wing zealots on this site.

First of all Kissru*p,

The left wants to change the complete landscape of American politics. Second, they, (the left) don't give a rip about the constitution of this country, (USA) or its sovereignty as the seek to destroy its founding principles, as they seek to make it a socialist country, and it seems at any cost, even the safety of its citizens.

When in a fight with a person who means to kill you, are you going to stand there and let the bloke drop lethal blows upon you so as to be better than your enemy? That's utter hogwash. It is true though that the left and you, know how to destroy America. Maybe NZ will come to our aid when we follow your prescription of rolling over and and exposing our collective vital parts?

When the enemy fights, We need to be better than the enemy and beat the ever evil hell out of them. You MOLLY CODDLER!


LET THE MAURIE'S HAVE THE ISLAND BACK, YOU DON"T DESERVE IT.


IVAN THE TERRIBLE!!!

[brokensickle]

It depends on what the meaning of IS, is..."Bill Clinton"

Frankly I'm a bit sick and tired of your condescending attitude. If you don't agree with something say so. I don't see the idea of descending into juvenile invectives everytime. There was a diplomat who was very conveniently released just before the brits were. And yes he was an accredited diplomat. Oh and those "spies" that you so despise also seem to have ended up with consular access.



If you go around rounding up diplomatic personnel then that is a thuggish act. There is a reason why the concept of diplomatic immunity first started. If you don't know it, tough luck!

I stated an opinion on the world's opinion of the alliance. If you can't be bothered to read through a single sentence then I can't be bothered to give a rat's a** about your opinions either.[/QUOTE]


Clankya,

When a "diplomat", is rallying folk's (the enemy) against you in a war and is consorting as the 'vile component' that is killing your boy's, he ceases in the roll of diplomat and has taken the roll of the enemy. You can't be so stupid as not to see that obvious point. Your writing seems on the surface intelligent. But unless you are also a sworn enemy of the USA, your rational is wanting, in favor of the USA to loosing this war. Which is it?


IRASCIBLE

[brokensickle]

Tee! Hee! Hee!...

Kirkpuss,

Don't get upset by Bluesman's comments.

He is a serious supporter of Bush and I agree he is touched to the quick rather easily. But he is entitled to his views and you are to yours.

If anyone is condescending, no one is cramping your style to answer. Hopefully, things should not go beyond control, but one can still politely state what one has to. As I have always held that the 'syntaxical' dexterity of the English language is immense. One can use it as a better weapon of war than bullets! :)

Was there a 'syntaxical' error in your posts entrance?
You are caving in to comedy. I'm rolling...


I HA! HA! VAN

[Ray]

Typographical error to be precise.

Kirk Douglas was one of the favourite heroes in the movies when I was in school!

[brokensickle]

Was it the manly chin?

Typographical error to be precise.

Kirk Douglas was one of the favourite heroes in the movies when I was in school!

He had a big divot in his chin. And seemed unaffected by fear in his role. Even though it was an act it was pretty convincing. Oh for the days 'Wholly Weird' was Hollywood and they portrayed MEN as MEN and Women as virtuous, the hero's and heroin's any way.

Oh for the day that there is no gray between the virtuous and the villian.



Oiy Vayan

[chankya]

Your writing seems on the surface intelligent. But unless you are also a sworn enemy of the USA, your rational is wanting, in favor of the USA to loosing this war. Which is it?

I was against the war in Iraq but now that you are there then I hope you win, because otherwise we're all stuck with one big jihadi academy.

If you kidnap another nation's diplomat then you have no business claiming to occupy the moral highground. Then you place yourself at the same level as the morons who who occupied the US embassy in Iranian in '79 and the government that permitted and abetted it.

[brokensickle]

Yes...

I was against the war in Iraq but now that you are there then I hope you win, because otherwise we're all stuck with one big jihadi academy.

We need no jihadi academies.

If you kidnap another nation's diplomat then you have no business claiming to occupy the moral highground. Then you place yourself at the same level as the morons who who occupied the US embassy in Iranian in '79 and the government that permitted and abetted it.

Do you understand that these men/diplomats were rallying the insurgency? This fact must be understood to understand the American response.



Vanya