Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

America's axis of idiots

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • America's axis of idiots

    Jimmy Carter, you're the father of the Islamic Nazi movement. You threw the Shah under the bus, welcomed the Ayatollah home and then lacked the spine to confront the terrorists when they took our embassy and our people hostage. You're the Runner-in-Chief.

    Bill Clinton, you played "ring around the Lewinsky" while the terrorists were at war with us. You got us into a fight with them in Somalia, and then you ran from it. Your weak-willed responses embolden the killers. Each time you failed to respond adequately they grew bolder, until 9/11.

    John Kerry, dishonesty is your most prominent attribute. You lied about American Soldiers in Vietnam. Your military service, like your life, is more fiction than fact. You've accused our Soldiers of terrorizing women and inIraq. You called Iraq "the wrong war, wrong place, wrong time"...the same words you used to describe Vietnam. You're a fake. You want to run from Iraq and abandon the Iraqis to murderers just as you did the Vietnamese.Iraq, like Vietnam, is another war that you were for, before you were against it.

    John Murtha, you said our military was broken. You said we can't win militarily in Iraq. You accused United States Marines of cold-blooded murder without proof. And said we should re-deploy to Okinawa. Okinawa, John? And the Democrats call you their military expert. Are you sure you didn't suffer a traumatic brain injury while you were off building your war hero resume? You're a sad, pitiable, corrupt and washed up politician. You're not a Marine sir. You wouldn't amount to a pimple on a real Marine's ass. You're a phony and a disgrace. Run away John.

    Dick Durbin, you accused our Soldiers at Guantanamo of being Nazis, tenders of Soviet style gulags and as bad as the regime of Pol Pot who murdered two million of his own people after your party abandoned South East Asia to the Communists. Now you want to abandon the Iraqis to the same fate. History was not a good teacher for you, was it? See Dick run.

    Ted Kennedy, for days on end you held poster-sized pictures from Abu Garhaib in front of any available television camera. Al Jazeera quoted you saying that Iraq's torture chambers were open under new management. Did you see the news this week Teddy? The Islamic Nazis demonstrate real torture for you again. If you truly supported our troops, you'd show the world poster-sized pictures of that atrocity and demand the annihilation of it. Your legislation stripping support from the South Vietnamese which led to a communist victory there. You're a bloated fool bent on repeating the same historical blunder that turned freedom-seeking people over to homicidal, genocidal maniacs, all while sitting on your wide, gin-soaked rear-end in Washington.

    Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Carl Levin, Barbara Boxer, Diane Feinstein, Russ Feingold, Hillary Clinton, Pat Leahy, Chuck Schumer et al ad nauseam. Every time you stand in front of television cameras and broadcast to the Islamic Nazis that we went to war because our President lied. That the war is wrong and our Soldiers are torturers. That we should leave Iraq, you give the Islamic butchers - the same ones that tortured and mutilated American Soldiers - allow them to think that we will run away again and all they have to do is hang on a little longer.

    American news media, the New York Times in particular. Each time you publish stories about national defense secrets and our intelligence gathering methods, you become one with the sub-human pieces of camel dung that torture and mutilate the bodies of American Soldiers. You can't strike up the courage to publish cartoons, but you can help Al Qaeda destroy my country. Actually, you are more dangerous to us than Al Qaeda is. Think about that each time you face Mecca to admire your Pulitzer.

    You are America's axis of idiots. Your collective stupidity will destroy us. Self-serving politics and terrorist abetting news scoops are more important to you than our national security or the lives of innocent civilians and Soldiers. It bothers you that defending ourselves gets in the way of your elitist sport of politics and your ignorant editorializing. There is as much blood on your hands as is on the hands of murdering terrorists. Don't ever doubt that. Your frolics will only serve to extend this war as they extended Vietnam. If you want our Soldiers home, as you claim, knock off the crap and try supporting your country ahead of supporting your silly political aims and aiding our enemies. Yes, I'm questioning your patriotism. Your loyalty ends with -self. I'm also questioning why you're stealing air that decent Americans could be breathing. You don't deserve the protection of our men and women in uniform. You need to run away from this war and this country. Leave the war to the people who have the will to see it through and the country to people who are willing to defend it.

    No, Commander in Chief, you don't get off the hook either. Our country has two enemies. Those who want to destroy us from the outside and those who attempt it from within. Your Soldiers are dealing with the outside force. It's your obligation to support them by confronting the axis of idiots. America must hear it from you that these people are harming our country, abetting the enemy and endangering our safety.

    Well up a little anger please, and channel it toward the appropriate target. You must prosecute those who leak national security secrets to the media. You must prosecute those in the media who knowingly publish those secrets. Our Soldiers need you to confront the enemy that they cannot. They need you to do it now.

  • #2
    And George Bush?

    St George?

    He did not even participate in Vietnam to have had the opportunity to lie or otherwise.

    Ayotollah Khoemeni, a Shia, has nothing to do with the Islamic terrorist that actually confront the world. Those terrorists are Sunnis and ObL was the icon.

    Kheomeni may have connections with the Hezbollah, but the Hezbollah is not a worldwide scourge!

    So, what has Jimmy Carter to do with Islamic fundamentalists running wild?

    I have posted since the post above appears totally one sided a view and very aggressive a denouncement!

    Let him who is without sin, cast the first stone - Jesus Christ
    Last edited by Ray; 18 Mar 07,, 15:53.


    "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

    I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

    HAKUNA MATATA

    Comment


    • #3
      More like Left-Wing-Axis-of-Idiots!

      Right wing has its own axis of idiots. I guess Rumsfeld-O'Reilly-Limbaugh-PatRobertson would be good choice.

      I guess every country has its own version(s) of 'Axis of idiots'!
      Last edited by saambaarblast; 18 Mar 07,, 16:06.

      Comment


      • #4
        I love how people bash democrats .... the simple fact is United States function actually better, with rotating Democrats-Republican rule, where when the Democrats are in power, the nation absorb energy/money/alliances in reserve, and when the Republican come to power it exhaust this energy/money/alliances by waging wars against enemy-of-the-day and finance massive military projects against enemy-of-the-day enemies.

        There are two entities that are interwoven together in a grand scope of things. I doubt without the Democrats rule once in a while, the military-industrial complex can work so effectivly and so well lubricated.

        Comment


        • #5
          I love how people bash democrats .... the simple fact is United States function actually better, with rotating Democrats-Republican rule, where when the Democrats are in power, the nation absorb energy/money/alliances in reserve, and when the Republican come to power it exhaust this energy/money/alliances by waging wars against enemy-of-the-day and finance massive military projects against enemy-of-the-day enemies.
          Care to give examples to back that up?

          101st Airborne:

          Hear, hear! Everything you said is the sad, sad, truth-Including the bit about Bush.
          "I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever."
          - Thomas Jefferson

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by saambaarblast View Post
            More like Left-Wing-Axis-of-Idiots!

            Right wing has its own axis of idiots. I guess Rumsfeld-O'Reilly-Limbaugh-PatRobertson would be good choice.

            I guess every country has its own version(s) of 'Axis of idiots'!
            O'Reilly? be specific what has he done to be listed as axis of idiots?

            Comment


            • #7
              Posted by 101st Airborne:
              American news media, the New York Times in particular. Each time you publish stories about national defense secrets and our intelligence gathering methods
              No kidding. In the movie Dr. Strangeglove when they were discussing the "doomsday device", the Russia ambassador said that the Soviets had learned of the American intention to make a device drom the New York Times! Isn't that funny? Isn't that infurinating? Isn't that sad?
              "I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice cannot sleep forever."
              - Thomas Jefferson

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by ExNavyAmerican View Post
                Care to give examples to back that up?
                The stillness and quiteness of Clinton era, compare to (in referance) to that of Bush era.

                That is my view, which I am passing it as my view. My bad for passing that as a "fact". Ignore that. Human error.

                Comment


                • #9
                  St George is going around slaying dragons that breathe fire and they are still breathing fire as St George rustles up his backup forces!

                  And that is success!


                  "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

                  I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

                  HAKUNA MATATA

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by xerxes View Post
                    The stillness and quiteness of Clinton era, compare to (in referance) to that of Bush era.
                    Stillness and quietness of the Clinton era? The era where he turned a humanitarian effort in Somalia into an inspired Islamic jihad? Where he vasilated and waffled on what to do while thousands were displaced, raped, and butchered in the Balkans? Where terrorists were allowed to bomb embassies, military assets, and attack innocents without meaningful or deterrant retribution? Where North Korea and Iran were allowed to continue their nuclear ambitions unchalleneged? That stillness and quiet?

                    The Bush era hasn't initiated anything that didn't have a burning fuze under Clinton. The Bush administration has simply attempted to clean up the mess, albeit demonstrably poorly planned and executed, but at least they didn't just sit there like idol schoolboys pondering how to avoid their duties and responsibilities.
                    The black flag is raised: Ban them all... Let the Admin sort them out.

                    I know I'm going to have the last word... I have powers of deletion and lock.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Horrido View Post
                      Stillness and quietness of the Clinton era? The era where he turned a humanitarian effort in Somalia into an inspired Islamic jihad? Where he vasilated and waffled on what to do while thousands were displaced, raped, and butchered in the Balkans? Where terrorists were allowed to bomb embassies, military assets, and attack innocents without meaningful or deterrant retribution? Where North Korea and Iran were allowed to continue their nuclear ambitions unchalleneged? That stillness and quiet

                      The Bush era hasn't initiated anything that didn't have a burning fuze under Clinton. The Bush administration has simply attempted to clean up the mess, albeit demonstrably poorly planned and executed, but at least they didn't just sit there like idol schoolboys pondering how to avoid their duties and responsibilities.
                      I call that comparing things in referance.

                      Ofcourse at the end it is matter of opinion. You say, Clinton turned a humanitarian effort in Somalia into an inspired Islamic jihad, so did GWB under the watchfull eyes of the Grand Architect (Cheney), who turned a humanitarian effort in Iraq (sense they refered their invasion as liberation) into an inspired Islamic jihad, which has many many times them magnitude of the Somlian jehad. Regardless, of how a person thinks, while you might say that "Bush era hasn't initiated anything that didn't have a burning fuze under Clinton", another person might related US indecisivness in regard to Iraq during Clinton era, easilly to Bush the elder (67), whose administartion decided not to finish job. Therefore, Clinton-enthusiats might use your own logic, that he (Clinton) inheritated Iraq problem. That is very truth.

                      In case of Al-Qaida, like other things, while GWB enthusiats claim that he (GWB) had inherited the problem from the indesicive Clinton, I can say similiarly that Clinton inherited Al-Qaida problem from the Soviet-Afghan war and the Reagan administartion policy, and I presume another pro-republican will say that policy help to defeat the Soviets at a critical time, therefore it was worth the price.

                      In my view, it is extremelly easy to point finger, if a person has the inclintation to do so.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        In fact it is one huge Cluster**** which one inherited from another and each added to it and made it a greater Cluster****.

                        Is that what you are trying to convey, Xerxes?


                        "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

                        I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

                        HAKUNA MATATA

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by xerxes View Post
                          I call that comparing things in referance.

                          Ofcourse at the end it is matter of opinion. You say, Clinton turned a humanitarian effort in Somalia into an inspired Islamic jihad, so did GWB under the watchfull eyes of the Grand Architect (Cheney), who turned a humanitarian effort in Iraq (sense they refered their invasion as liberation) into an inspired Islamic jihad, which has many many times them magnitude of the Somlian jehad. Regardless, of how a person thinks, while you might say that "Bush era hasn't initiated anything that didn't have a burning fuze under Clinton", another person might related US indecisivness in regard to Iraq during Clinton era, easilly to Bush the elder (67), whose administartion decided not to finish job. Therefore, Clinton-enthusiats might use your own logic, that he (Clinton) inheritated Iraq problem. That is very truth.

                          In case of Al-Qaida, like other things, while GWB enthusiats claim that he (GWB) had inherited the problem from the indesicive Clinton, I can say similiarly that Clinton inherited Al-Qaida problem from the Soviet-Afghan war and the Reagan administartion policy, and I presume another pro-republican will say that policy help to defeat the Soviets at a critical time, therefore it was worth the price.

                          In my view, it is extremelly easy to point finger, if a person has the inclintation to do so.
                          Of course it's all in reference, that is my point, along with standing up and taking responsibility and doing something difficult and unpleasant (W Bush), rather than sitting around and hope somebody else takes care of the situation for you (Clinton). HW Bush followed the left-leaning line of thinking: formed a coalition, and listened to the UN and local nations when they all recommended they only liberate Kuwait and leave Saddam in power, ie, "not finish the job". So, you need to make up your mind on that one: leftist-inspired coalitions and negotiations and foreign imput was bad, resulting in "not finishing the job" in Iraq, or right-wing refusal of such imput was bad the second time round, resulting in "finishing the job" with a really lousy post-op result?

                          The fact is, Iraq would be in a much better condition if the UN and neighboring states got up off their fannies, sent forces and supplies into Iraq to help secure, stabilize, and rebuild it, and do what they're supposed to under the UN charter and basic decency to help the people of Iraq build a prosperous, stable, democracy. Others complain about the United States actions, I call those nations self-serving do-nothing cowards that need to put up or shut up.
                          The black flag is raised: Ban them all... Let the Admin sort them out.

                          I know I'm going to have the last word... I have powers of deletion and lock.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            To be fair, the Iraq war was not sanctioned by the UN.

                            Therefore, there is no obligation per se of the comity of nation to clean up the mess.

                            Yet, at the same time, from a humanitarian standpoint, one should step forward to stop the rot!


                            "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

                            I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

                            HAKUNA MATATA

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Ray View Post
                              To be fair, the Iraq war was not sanctioned by the UN.

                              Therefore, there is no obligation per se of the comity of nation to clean up the mess.

                              Yet, at the same time, from a humanitarian standpoint, one should step forward to stop the rot!
                              The Israeli incursion into Lebanon to crush Hezbollah was not sanctioned by the UN, either. Yet a multinational UN force sits there.

                              I say the obligation is a moral one, and a very strong one, at the very least.
                              The black flag is raised: Ban them all... Let the Admin sort them out.

                              I know I'm going to have the last word... I have powers of deletion and lock.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X