Originally posted by M21Sniper
However, the payload of a ICBM warhead is finite. Anything you add either takes away payload, or takes away range.
If they have to put a 20kt warhead on it in place of a 200kt warhead(the size difference between the two is pretty small), for instance....then the MBMD interceptor has already saved 10s of thousands of lives in the event of an excange.
That's called virtual attrition.
If they have to put a 20kt warhead on it in place of a 200kt warhead(the size difference between the two is pretty small), for instance....then the MBMD interceptor has already saved 10s of thousands of lives in the event of an excange.
That's called virtual attrition.
And there's still no saying that with 20 interceptors the US won't still get the missile anyway. Remember, this is designed to protect vs launches of a couple missiles.
Another problem is that the EKV is dead-end technology. There is no evolution path to a more capable system. A viable mid-course intercept system would be one based on beam weapons, neutral particle or laser. It would make far more sense to spend the money there rather than on an instant "white elephant" like the EKV.
Comment