Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!
The World Affairs Board is the premier forum for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include military and defense developments, international terrorism, insurgency & COIN doctrine, international security and policing, weapons proliferation, and military technological development.
Our membership includes many from military, defense, academic, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Don't really need a poll to know the majority are better off with out Saddam. That's a no-brainer.
No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack
I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry
even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry
He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry
I thought the one about who they wanted to govern them was quite interesting. They know who they don't want, seemingly. But not who they do want. None of the parties polled much support.
Also whilst the concensus felt better off without Saddam, they were pretty split on whether or not it was right for the coallition to invade. Perhaps, to quote GWB, they were waiting for Saddam to lose the next election
Comment