Who would win? ABCA vs ME, China and Russia

[Ruskiy]

Expending 4 interceptors on a single target doesn't translate to an accuracy of 3%. It's 25%.

There were only few Scads intersepted.

[Stan187]

There were only few Scads intersepted.

So are you gonna address our other points of contention, or are you just going to ignore the arguments that don't support what you think?

[Ruskiy]

So are you gonna address our other points of contention, or are you just going to ignore the arguments that don't support what you think?

no, I'll just going to take the facts and put them together to determine the affectivnes of US AA shield.

[Stan187]

no, I'll just going to take the facts and put them together to determine the affectivnes of US AA shield.

But you aren't. You've never cited ANY facts. You're talking about missiles not working from 15 years ago. You were probably barely born then. Its like assuming that an Abrams in 1979 and 2006 would perform the same, which is absurd. Sure its still called a Patriot, that doesn't mean it still works the same. As I said before, you're too ignorant to even read a wikipedia article about, let alone some real military science analysis.

[deadkenny]

Weird. How do Russia, China and 'the Middle East' even form any kind of coherent 'alliance'? At least there's some sort of possiblity that Australia, Britain, Canada and the US could cooperate. The winner IMHO would be Europe, who presumably would not be involved in this bizarre scenario.