Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bulletproof Barney Frank Retires -- Liberal, Gay, Untouchable

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bulletproof Barney Frank Retires -- Liberal, Gay, Untouchable

    Bulletproof Barney Frank Retires -- Liberal, Gay, Untouchable
    Bulletproof Barney Frank Retires -- Liberal, Gay, Untouchable - Yahoo! News
    Larry ElderBy Larry Elder | Larry Elder – 15 hrs ago

    When Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., announced his intention not to seek re-election after a 32-year career, not one of the nightly news broadcast network anchors found time or space to mention either Frank's central role in the housing meltdown or his congressional reprimand. Not one. Similarly, an Associated Press article headlined, "Democratic Rep. Barney Frank Announces Retirement," mentioned the reprimand, but nada on Frank and the housing collapse.

    ABC called him "one of the most familiar, powerful and colorful characters on Capitol Hill." NBC said, "Among his legacies — besides his legendary sharp tongue — he was the first member of Congress to publicly acknowledge he was gay, back in 1987." In a nearly 30-paragraph press release — uh, news article — headlined, "Barney Frank, a Top Liberal, Won't Seek Re-election," The New York Times sanitized, purged and whitewashed.

    The "all the news that's fit to print" newspaper, America's most influential, left out a few things.

    Frank relentlessly defended Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the "government sponsored entities" at the center of the housing meltdown. National Review editorialized: "It is as a champion of a different kind of pay-for-play operation, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, that the congressman did the most damage to the country." Economist Thomas Sowell wrote last year, "No one contributed more to the policies behind the housing boom and bust, which led to the economic disaster we are now in, than Congressman Barney Frank."

    Sowell explains: "His powerful position on the House of Representatives' Committee on Financial Services gave him leverage to force through legislation and policies which pressured banks and other lenders to grant mortgage loans to people who would not qualify under the standards which had long prevailed. ... With the federal regulators leaning on banks to make more loans to people who did not meet traditional qualifications — the 'underserved population' in political Newspeak — and quotas being given to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to buy more of these riskier mortgages from the original lenders, critics pointed out the dangers in these pressures to meet arbitrary home ownership goals. But Barney Frank counter-attacked these critics."

    Whom did Frank blame when the housing meltdown — and Freddie and Fannie's role in it — became obvious even to Frank? "Right-wing Republicans," he said.

    The Big Three nightly news anchors and the Times also managed to avoid any mention of Frank's congressional reprimand for fixing the parking tickets of a male prostitute.

    "Representative Frank," writes National Review, "was reprimanded by the House for making misleading statements to a Virginia prosecutor on behalf of the prostitute — whom the congressman eventually put on his own payroll — and for having fixed dozens of parking tickets on this behalf." Frank denied knowing that his lover, a convicted drug dealer, was running a prostitution business out of the congressman's house. The boyfriend, however, insisted that Frank knew about it.

    But wait, there's more. NR also notes: "(Frank) was sexually involved with a Fannie Mae executive during a time when he was voting on laws affecting the organization. The final cost of the Fannie/Freddie bailouts will run into the hundreds of billions of dollars, and the real damage that the organizations did to the U.S. economy — and the world economy, for that matter — probably is incalculable."

    UCLA political science professor and economist Tim Groseclose estimates that the pro-liberal mainstream media add 8 to 10 percentage points to the ratings of a Democratic candidate in a typical election. The bias comes in many forms, including simply leaving relevant things out, thus helping to shape public opinion that aids Democrats and hurts Republicans.

    The coverage of Frank's retirement shows how this is done. How would consumers getting their news from ABC/NBC/CBS/Times learn that Frank was reprimanded by Congress? They wouldn't. How would consumers getting their news from ABC/NBC/CBS/Times learn about his central role in the housing meltdown? They wouldn't.

    At a 43 percent Gallup approval rating, President Barack Obama presently governs with the worst approval rating at this juncture of any president since Harry Truman — including Jimmy Carter, whose popularity temporarily spiked after the Iran hostage crisis. Imagine where Obama's numbers would be if the media did not serve as a public-relations arm of the administration.

    But thanks to the media's love and support, the bullying Congressman Frank gets to leave Congress with his head high instead of what he deserves — the deep and widespread scorn of the American people.

    But there's worse news.

    The ranking Democrat who stands to inherit his position on the powerful House Financial Services Committee is none other than hyper-lefty Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif. Waters is currently under an ethics investigation for not disclosing her financial interest in a community bank for which she successfully obtained a bailout. After accusing, without evidence, oil companies of price fixing, she threatened to "socialize" them — or, as she explained to the oil execs, "Basically, taking over and the government running all of your companies."

    On second thought, maybe Frank wasn't so bad.

    Larry Elder is a best-selling author and radio talk-show host. To find out more about Larry Elder, or become an "Elderado," visit LarryElder.com - Home of The Larry Elder Show and the Elderados - The Sage from South Central.. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at Creators Syndicate - The Best Content in The World.

    COPYRIGHT 2011 LAURENCE A. ELDER

    DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM
    To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway

  • #2
    What's meant to be the big shocker here, that politicians are corrupt or that the a majority of the mass media and the MSM are pro-left wing and highly liberal? Nothing new in either of those...
    Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

    Abusing Yellow is meant to be a labor of love, not something you sell to the highest bidder.

    Comment


    • #3
      Larry Elder hammers his points over and over again and sometimes sounds like a broken record.

      At the same time, Franks should be raked over the coals for his acions wrt Fannie and Freddie.

      Probably the biggest part of our current financial situation could be placed at this guy's feet.

      Maxine Waters won't cause the problem this guy did because she's just not smart enough.

      Comment


      • #4
        yeah, he certainly was no pramour of virtue but, he did accomplish a lot of positive things as well and the whole freddie and fannie narrative as a root cause of the crisis is patently false. Right now republicans are once again preaching deregulation and reversing the paltry amount of regulations put in place to make derivatives and credit swap defaults which big time movers trade in a little less likely to destroy joe the Plumbers economic world.

        I found it ironic Newt said he ought got to jail for accepting something like 1/10th the amount in campaign donations as newt was paid personally by the housing entities. I also find it hilarious you'd post a hit peice on Frank while ignoring the disgusting money making scam newt inc is and the cloud of criminal activity that was swirling around him when he was forced to retire by his own congressional caucus his crimes were so clear
        House Reprimands, Penalizes Speaker
        By John E. Yang
        Washington Post Staff Writer
        Wednesday, January 22 1997; Page A01

        The House voted overwhelmingly yesterday to reprimand House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.) and order him to pay an unprecedented $300,000 penalty, the first time in the House's 208-year history it has disciplined a speaker for ethical wrongdoing.

        The ethics case and its resolution leave Gingrich with little leeway for future personal controversies, House Republicans said. Exactly one month before yesterday's vote, Gingrich admitted that he brought discredit to the House and broke its rules by failing to ensure that financing for two projects would not violate federal tax law and by giving the House ethics committee false information.

        "Newt has done some things that have embarrassed House Republicans and embarrassed the House," said Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-Mich.). "If [the voters] see more of that, they will question our judgment."

        House Democrats are likely to continue to press other ethics charges against Gingrich and the Internal Revenue Service is looking into matters related to the case that came to an end yesterday.

        The 395 to 28 vote closes a tumultuous chapter that began Sept. 7, 1994, when former representative Ben Jones (D-Ga.), then running against Gingrich, filed an ethics complaint against the then-GOP whip. The complaint took on greater significance when the Republicans took control of the House for the first time in four decades, propelling Gingrich into the speaker's chair.

        With so much at stake for each side -- the survival of the GOP's speaker and the Democrats' hopes of regaining control of the House -- partisanship strained the ethics process nearly to the breaking point.

        All but two of the votes against the punishment were cast by Republicans, including Rep. Roscoe G. Bartlett (Md.), many of whom said they believed the sanction -- especially the financial penalty -- was too severe.

        Two Democrats, Reps. Earl F. Hilliard (Ala.) and Gene Taylor (Miss.), voted against the punishment. Taylor said the measure should have specified that the $300,000 come from personal funds, not campaign coffers or a legal expense fund. Hilliard did not return telephone calls.

        In addition, five Democrats voted "present," many of them saying they believed the sanction was not severe enough. "If Newt Gingrich did what they said he did, he should have been censured," said Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), one of the five who voted "present." A censure, second only in severity to expulsion, would have threatened Gingrich's speakership.

        House ethics committee members took pride in yesterday's bipartisan resolution of the case. "We have proved to the American people that no matter how rough the process is, we can police ourselves, we do know right from wrong," said Rep. Porter J. Goss (R-Fla.), who headed the investigative subcommittee that charged Gingrich.

        But even as they brought the case to a close, committee Republicans and Democrats traded potshots over the chaos of the last two weeks, during which an agreement for lengthy televised hearings collapsed amid partisan bickering.

        The ethics case added to the last congressional session's fierce partisanship, as Democrats sought to embarrass House Republicans with it in last year's elections. Lawmakers in both parties said they hope the vote to punish Gingrich will help ease those tensions.

        "If our action today fails to chasten this body and bring a halt to the crippling partisanship and animosity that has surrounded us, then we will have lost an opportunity," said Rep. Nancy L. Johnson (R-Conn.), ethics committee chairman.

        Similarly, President Clinton, when asked about the matter, said: "The House should do its business and then we should get back to the people's business."

        For Gingrich, it was another humbling event in a remarkable series of peaks and valleys since 1994. That year, he led his party to the promised land of control of the House and Senate, only to threaten it when he was blamed for two partial government shutdowns during the battle over the budget, making him seem reckless. Then he complained about his treatment on a long flight aboard Air Force One, making him seem petty. The GOP narrowly retained its House majority last November, giving him a brief reprieve. The next month, he admitted to the charges brought by the ethics subcommittee.

        The speaker was barely visible yesterday, staying away from the House floor during the 90-minute debate and vote on his punishment. He was in his office and did not watch the proceedings on television, according to spokeswoman Lauren Maddox. Gingrich left late yesterday afternoon for a two-day GOP House leadership retreat at Airlie Farm and Conference Center in Fauquier County, Va. As he left, he was asked if he was glad the case was over. He smiled broadly and said "yes."

        House Democrats had considered trying to force a vote yesterday on reconsidering Gingrich's Jan. 7 reelection as speaker -- the first for a Republican in 68 years -- but decided against it, fearing it would distract from the harsh punishment being meted out. In addition, Democrats believe enough damaging information has been presented to tarnish the speaker, Democratic leadership aides said.

        "This is not a vote on whether Mr. Gingrich should remain speaker," said Rep. Benjamin L. Cardin (Md.), the ethics panel's top Democrat in the Gingrich case. "In the days and weeks to come, Mr. Gingrich and each member of this House should consider how these charges bear on the question of his speakership."

        In a strongly worded report, special counsel James M. Cole concluded that Gingrich had violated tax law and lied to the investigating panel, but the subcommittee would not go that far. In exchange for the subcommittee agreeing to modify the charges against him, Gingrich agreed to the penalty Dec. 20 as part of a deal in which he admitted guilt.

        Johnson called the reprimand and financial penalty "tough and unprecedented. It is also appropriate," she said. "No one is above the rules of the House."

        The ethics committee that handled the charges against Gingrich went out of business at midnight last night without resolving complaints that the speaker received improper gifts, contributions and support from GOPAC, the political action committee he once headed. House Democrats are likely to submit those charges to the new ethics committee.

        In addition, the Internal Revenue Service is looking into the use of tax-deductible charitable contributions to finance the college course Gingrich taught, which was at the center of the ethics case, and the ethics committee is making the material it gathered available to the tax agency.

        At a closed-door meeting of House Republicans yesterday morning, the speaker noted his agreement to accept the sanction, which the ethics committee approved on a 7 to 1 vote Friday night, and said he wanted to get the matter behind him, according to lawmakers who attended.

        Many House Republicans said they had trouble reconciling their leaders' characterization of Gingrich's rules violations as tantamount to a jaywalking ticket and the magnitude of the penalty. "That argument loses its steam [when] you talk about $300,000," said Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.).

        Rep. Mark Sanford (R-S.C.) said that had he known what was in the ethics committee's report, he would not have voted for Gingrich as speaker. "The gray got grayer when you read the report," he said. "When I think of my three boys and what kind of example I want to set for them for leadership in this country, gray is not the example."

        But some lawmakers said the $300,000 financial penalty, described as a reimbursement to the ethics committee for the additional cost Gingrich caused it when he gave it false information, was too severe.

        "I was willing to swallow hard and vote for the reprimand, but when they add the $300,000 assessment . . . that's excessive," said House Government Reform and Oversight Committee Chairman Dan Burton (R-Ind.), one of three committee chairmen to vote against the punishment

        Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Tex.), who cast the lone dissenting vote on the ethics committee, said of Gingrich's violations: "They are real mistakes but they shouldn't be hanging offenses."

        House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) gave a spirited speech calling the penalty unwarranted. Answering those who said a speaker should be held to a higher standard of ethical conduct, DeLay said: "The highest possible standard does not mean an impossible standard no American could possibly reach." He closed by declaring: "Let's stop this madness, let's stop the cannibalism."

        The last phrase echoed the May 31, 1989, resignation speech of House Speaker Jim Wright (D-Tex.), who called on lawmakers "to bring this period of mindless cannibalism to an end." Wright resigned in an ethics scandal triggered by a complaint filed by Gingrich.

        Despite the partisanship that surrounded the Gingrich ethics case for more than two years, DeLay's speech provided the only spark of yesterday's debate. With Gingrich willing to accept the punishment, the outcome was never in doubt.

        Still, more lawmakers were on the floor than for the average House debate; many of them were reading Cole's report. Rep. Doug Bereuter (R-Neb.), presiding over the debate, took the unusual step of reading aloud from the House rule that admonishes lawmakers to "maintain an atmosphere of mutual respect" at all times.

        As they have since Gingrich publicly admitted to the charges Dec. 21, Republicans sought to minimize the speaker's misdeeds while Democrats tried to make them more sinister.

        Rep. Steven Schiff (R-N.M.), a member of the ethics investigative subcommittee that charged Gingrich, called the speaker's submission of false information to the panel "a comedy of errors." But Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called it a "violation of trust. . . . We trust each other that we will deal truthfully with each other."

        Republicans also sought to portray the question of using charitable donations to finance projects that appeared to have a political intent as a matter of unsettled tax law. But Rep. Thomas C. Sawyer (D-Ohio), a member of the ethics panel, countered that "ethical behavior may be more important when the lines are blurred than when they are clear."

        Rep. Jim McDermott (Wash.), who had been the ethics panel's top Democrat, was among those who voted "present."

        He withdrew from the Gingrich case last week after being implicated in the leaking of a tape recording of a telephone conference call involving the speaker, which Republicans said was illegally made.

        McDermott did not return telephone calls.
        Frank is retiring not resigning. The front runner for the Republican presidential nomination resigned under a cloud of gross ethics violations and the possibility of obstruction charges because he actually admitted to lieing to Ethics commitee investigators. hate Frank or not his past is irelevant now unlike Newt ( insider profiteer, pay to play, access selling) Gingrich. His last few yrs in congress and his entire time since are an example of evrything wrong with congress.

        frank's gone now how about spending some of that energy preventing a serial offendor from gaining the republican nomination? I'm really getting sick of the fantasy story about frank or congress forcing investment banks to over leverage and give out loans to low income borrowers when in point of fact if it had just been low income borrowers defaulting there wouldnt of been a crisis. that scenario ignores the mcmansion neighborhoods filled with empty homes Community Reinvestment Act had nothing to do with subprime crisis - BusinessWeek Repeating a lie over and over doesnt make it a truth. The idea the right is still blowing this dog whistle 3 yrs later speaks to the veracity of Frum's peice on the truth disengagement by the right. Even after greenspan admitted he was wrong on a basic level about greed and the need for regulation to prevent the kind of wealth destruction we experienced fully 3 yrs later we are still getting peices like this trying fictionalize history that conflicts with political beliefs that more accurately resemble articles of faith than evidence based beliefs.
        Last edited by Roosveltrepub; 02 Dec 11,, 00:48.
        Where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost.”
        ~Ronald Reagan

        Comment


        • #5
          ....and there's rosie still arguing that one whore is more virtuous than the other.....

          Comment


          • #6
            Both are poster boys for what is wrong with our government. Sadly, those two are not the only bad apples.:bang:
            Removing a single turd from the cesspool doesn't make any difference.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by bonehead View Post
              Both are poster boys for what is wrong with our government. Sadly, those two are not the only bad apples.:bang:
              I personally think all of Congress is an entire whore house.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Julie View Post
                I personally think all of Congress is an entire whore house.
                Thats a huge dig on whorehouses Julie. Some are respectable and honest businesses. Congress lost that ability a long time ago. The saddest part is that congress doesn't even pretend about it anymore.
                Removing a single turd from the cesspool doesn't make any difference.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by YellowFever View Post
                  ....and there's rosie still arguing that one whore is more virtuous than the other.....
                  No not really I pointed out the whole BS lie about the commity reinvestment act being the cause of the crisis...again...and that it was a hit peice about a pol going away when we should be vetting the whore still on the stage. I also said in another post we should put dracoian measures in place so when our servants leave goverment they cannot use what was supposed to be service as a vehicle to enrich themselves which so many seem to do and which always seem to be antithical to the public good. Santorum is another one....what has he made a living off of the last 6 yrs?
                  Last edited by Roosveltrepub; 02 Dec 11,, 05:28.
                  Where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost.”
                  ~Ronald Reagan

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by bonehead View Post
                    Thats a huge dig on whorehouses Julie. Some are respectable and honest businesses. Congress lost that ability a long time ago. The saddest part is that congress doesn't even pretend about it anymore.
                    somewhat agree but thinkm Gingrich as of now is the bigger whore but i expect frank will join him and enrich himself by being an ex congressman like Gingrich did.
                    Where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost.”
                    ~Ronald Reagan

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Roosveltrepub View Post
                      No not really I pointed out the whole BS lie about the commity reinvestment act being the cause of the crisis...again...and that it was a hit peice about a pol going away when we should be vetting the whore still on the stage. I also said in another post we should put dracoian measures in place so when our servants leave goverment they cannot use what was supposed to be service as a vehicle to enrich themselves which so many seem to do and which always seem to be antithical to the public good. Santorum is another one....what has he made a living off of the last 6 yrs?
                      We are in the mess we are because of the Community Reinvestment Act AND Alan Greenspan slashing the federal funds rate back in 2001-2002.

                      No reason to get all excited because Larry elder has decided to put the lion's share of the blame on Barney.

                      Frank's hands aren't clean, but then again, there are alot of dirty hands on both side of the aisle.

                      But that's besides the point.

                      I just find it funny that everytime an article shows up blaming a Dem for something or another you're right behind with a, "Oh, yeah, well a Repub did this..." post.

                      Therefore my sarcastic (and granted, uncalled for) remark:

                      Originally posted by YellowFever View Post
                      ....and there's rosie still arguing that one whore is more virtuous than the other.....
                      There's enough blame to go around, rosie. Don't restrict yourself to one party's point of view.

                      Don't take this the wrong way but you might be the only one on this board that does.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by YellowFever View Post
                        We are in the mess we are because of the Community Reinvestment Act AND Alan Greenspan slashing the federal funds rate back in 2001-2002.

                        No reason to get all excited because Larry elder has decided to put the lion's share of the blame on Barney.

                        Frank's hands aren't clean, but then again, there are alot of dirty hands on both side of the aisle.

                        But that's besides the point.

                        I just find it funny that everytime an article shows up blaming a Dem for something or another you're right behind with a, "Oh, yeah, well a Repub did this..." post.

                        Therefore my sarcastic (and granted, uncalled for) remark:



                        There's enough blame to go around, rosie. Don't restrict yourself to one party's point of view.

                        Don't take this the wrong way but you might be the only one on this board that does.
                        No the community reinvestment act had nothing to do with the investment banks making poor loans and being under collaterized. I provided a neutral link to explain that and there are a ton more out there from other business sites like Bloomberg and claiming it was the cause ignores the fact the vast dollar value of the forclosed properties was not in communities defined by the act. it's a dog whistle blaming the poor for forclosed mcmansions and other than sites with a decided partisan slant you wont be able to source it as a root cause. I'd agree greenspan and his worshipping at the alter of Aynn rand's greed is good for all bs and excessive deregulaltion in the banking industry and ignoring human nature in general share the responsibility. I also would lay a good amount at the feet of the MACs but hardly a majority since they didnt hold anywhere near a majority of the failed mortgages and in fact despite being under the community reinvestment act unlike the wall st banks had a subprime portfolio whoose performance was not as bad as the big investment banks. I didnt take it the wrong way and please dont take this the wrong way. Your insistance the community reinvestment act was responsible is evidence of exactly what you accused me of. i didnt let frank off the hook I just pointed out he is irrelevant now. he also got tagged with far more blame by those who through poor news sources were led to believe things like community reinvestment act and the macs were the main problem rather than banking deregulation in 99 and ignoring of collaterization requirements as shitty as they were by regulators because....regulations were "bad" and business knew best. The fact is by blaming the community reinvestment act you are blaming democrats for something that really wasnt the problem. I blame the democrats for what they were responsible for but frankly the republicans were controlling the house and the white house when folks blame the democrats for preventing reforming the MACs in the house. I agree they fought reformnng them but you also had stellar folks like Gingrich lobbying his old colleagues in the majority party against it. As you also blame republicans what exactly do you hold them responsible for? I hold the democrats responsible for going along with Gramm's stupid banking deregulation bill in 99 and Clinton for signing it. I also will hold the democrats responsible the next financial meltdown caused by CDOs and sollaterized securities because despite charges they over regulated banking the actuall law was mostly toothless beyond forcing the creation of a fund so we dont have to bail banks out the next time they destroy the economy because they are so under regulated still

                        As to the sarcastic remark dont sweat it i didnt take offense and I do point out the relativism when people act like democrats are the anti christs so am guilty as charged but that isnt thye same thing as saying it excuses it
                        Last edited by Roosveltrepub; 02 Dec 11,, 07:06.
                        Where free unions and collective bargaining are forbidden, freedom is lost.”
                        ~Ronald Reagan

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Roosveltrepub View Post
                          yeah, he certainly was no pramour of virtue but,
                          Yeah, not a lot of virtue in being the a$$-ramming paramour (you meant "paragon" I'm sure) of a whoremonger, or of protecting FannieFreddieMacMae from investigation with his ex-boyfriend in charge.

                          -dale

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            OUCH! My ass hurts and I am a hetero.

                            Kind of looks like Newt was on the outside working to protect fannie/freddy too. He was on the payroll and he knows exactly who and how to talk to those who pull the strings in Washington. Newt being hired at that time was no coincidence and he sure as hell profited by the ordeal.
                            Removing a single turd from the cesspool doesn't make any difference.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              YF,

                              We are in the mess we are because of the Community Reinvestment Act AND Alan Greenspan slashing the federal funds rate back in 2001-2002.
                              both contributed, neither was the main factor.
                              There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "My ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."- Isaac Asimov

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X