Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A.C.L.U. Sues Over No-Fly List

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A.C.L.U. Sues Over No-Fly List

    National Briefing | Washington
    A.C.L.U. Sues Over No-Fly List
    By SCOTT SHANE
    Published: June 30, 2010
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/01/us...SOVER_BRF.html

    The American Civil Liberties Union on Wednesday filed suit against top Justice Department and F.B.I. officials on behalf of 10 Americans and legal residents on the government’s no-fly list, including 5 who are stranded overseas. They have been given no information about why they are on the list, the lawsuit says. Ben Wizner, an A.C.L.U. staff lawyer, called the government’s actions “un-American and unconstitutional.” The Justice Department had no comment. The no-fly list has roughly doubled to 8,000 names since the failed bombing of a Detroit-bound airliner on Dec. 25, officials familiar with the list said.
    A version of this brief appeared in print on July 1, 2010, on page A18 of the New York edition.
    To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway

  • #2
    Where in the Constitution did it say flying in a commercial liner is a "right?"
    "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

    Comment


    • #3
      ACLU Complaint.
      Attached Files
      To sit down with these men and deal with them as the representatives of an enlightened and civilized people is to deride ones own dignity and to invite the disaster of their treachery - General Matthew Ridgway

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by gunnut View Post
        Where in the Constitution did it say flying in a commercial liner is a "right?"
        It did say people were entitled to due process before being accepted as guilty of something, by denying or stripping rights without due process you are in fact violating the constitution.

        Nothing is a right, but the ability to do something should not stem from government meddling without due process.

        The problem is that a lot of those people did nothing wrong and are just put on the lists because it covers the behinds of the bureaucracy in charge while taking them off is never a prerogative, ergo their rights are abrogated without being guilty of anything.
        Originally from Sochi, Russia.

        Comment


        • #5
          I think what gunnut is saying is, the mode of travel isn't a right. They aren't being denied re-entry to the US, they are just being denied access to a commercial flight. They could still charter a flight or take a boat or something like that.

          Having said that, the No-Fly list is a disgrace, and there certainly needs to be some method of challenging inclusion.
          "We will go through our federal budget – page by page, line by line – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way." -President Barack Obama 11/25/2008

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by gunnut View Post
            Where in the Constitution did it say flying in a commercial liner is a "right?"
            You can't be denied access to something that is generally considered available to anyone without due process. It would violate the exclusion of bill of attainder.

            Article I, Section 9; Clause 3 is "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed".

            It also violated the due process clause in the 5th Amendment

            No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation

            an

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by zraver View Post
              You can't be denied access to something that is generally considered available to anyone without due process. It would violate the exclusion of bill of attainder.
              Easy. We'll just print out the list and have each individual airline bar them from flying rather than the federal government. Or use state agencies to do that. That's how the socialists banned guns in certain municipalities.
              "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by gunnut View Post
                Easy. We'll just print out the list and have each individual airline bar them from flying rather than the federal government. Or use state agencies to do that. That's how the socialists banned guns in certain municipalities.
                Why would you support subverting the constitution?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by zraver View Post
                  Why would you support subverting the constitution?
                  I don't. The sarcasm was lost into the ether of the interwebz. :(
                  "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    So. When is the ACLU going to Chicago to hammer Mayor Daly over his anti-gun rights agenda? BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!
                    Removing a single turd from the cesspool doesn't make any difference.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      The ACLU needs to sue over the fees of check-in baggage, using the overhead bins and all the other bogus charges the airlines are getting away with.
                      "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X