Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Olympics and Opium Wars

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Olympics and Opium Wars

    Thought I'd like to share this.



    By Richard L King

    In a few days, the XXIX Summer Olympiad will be held in Beijing. The opening ceremony will begin precisely at 8:08 am on August 8, 2008 or 808.8.8.08. The number 8 is an auspicious number in China , equivalent to lucky 7 in the West - July 7, 2007, saw a rash of weddings all around the US.

    Hundreds of thousands of foreign visitors - not to mention more than 20,000 journalists - will be descending on China. They will marvel at the ultra-modern architectural wonders. Most will arrive
    by air, landing in the new Terminal 3 of Beijing International which was designed by British architect Norman Forster.

    In the city, visitors will be able to gaze at the "Bird's Nest", the main stadium designed by the Swiss firm Herzog and de Meuron. There are other outstanding buildings such as the National Center for Performing Arts, nicked named "The Egg". Its architect is Paul Andreu of France. There are other outstanding buildings such as China Central TV ( CCTV)'s headquarters, designed by Dutch architect Rem Koolhass, and the whimsical Beijing National Aquatics Center nicked named "The Water Cube".

    But there is another landmark sight that visitors should see: the burned ruins of the former Summer Palace, or Yuan Ming Yuan. It was a collection of palaces containing more than 200 buildings that housed irreplaceable works of art - paintings, sculptures, porcelains and manuscripts. It is located only minutes away from the Olympic park.

    But it's a world apart. In the 19th century, when Britain forced opium on China, the Chinese government rightly resisted and this precipitated two so-called "Opium Wars". The Treaty of Nanking in 1842 gave Britain the right to continue to sell opium to China, and China was forced to open five treaty ports granting extraterritorial rights to Britain, ceding Hong Kong to Britain in perpetuity. But Britain still was not satisfied; it once again invaded China, this time with France, in 1860.

    On the order of Lord Thomas Elgin the Summer Palace was burned down. The Hindi word "loot" entered the English lexicon at that time when Anglo-French soldiers stripped the palace of its treasures. China was forced to make further concessions and to pay a huge indemnity to the victors.

    The clash between the two empires in the 19th Century was a total mismatch. Britain was at the zenith of Pax Britannia, and China was at the nadir of its long history. Britain had advanced modern weapons, while China was still fighting with bows and arrows. The resulting destruction and slaughter of tens of thousands of Chinese will always be a blot on Britain'’s history.

    Some may say that these events took place more than a century and half ago and that China should let bygones be bygones. However, these injustices were righted only recently, especially from the Chinese perspective of its long history. When asked in 1972 what he thought about the success of the French Revolution, the late Zhou En Lai's response was: "Don't you think it's too soon to tell?" The elimination of extra-territorial rights took place only in 1943, a century after being forced on China. And China did not recover Hong Kong until 1997.

    If anyone, especially those from the West, wishes to criticize China about human rights, religious freedom and corruption; they should be sensitive to China 's sense and sensibility. Forcing opium on China enslaved a generation of Chinese and caused corruption on a scale that dwarfs anything in present-day China or even current chaos in Mexico.

    Quoting Travis Hanes and Frank Sanello's excellent book, Opium Wars:

    Imagine this scenario: the Medellin cocaine cartel of Columbia mounts a successful military offensive against the United States, then forces the US to legalize cocaine and allow the cartel to import the drug into five major American cities ... plus the US has to pay war reparations of $100 billion for the Columbians' cost of waging the war. That scenario is of course preposterous. However, that was exactly what Britain forced on China . Along with opium came Christian missionaries whose zealous attempts to convert "heathen" Chinese destroyed indigenous religions in the process and served as a helping hand to the colonial exploits of the West.

    If the new buildings represent China 's renaissance, the burned out Summer Palace remains a symbol reminding China of its past weakness and humiliation. In the 1800s, China paid Western imperialists' thirst with blood. Now in the 21st century, China is paying Western thirst for profits in cash, and it can afford to. There is certain irony that two of the main attractions are designed by Forster and Andreu whose forbears were the ones who burned down the Summer Palace .

    The West, with this stain on its past, lost its moral high ground a long time ago. It will have to earn that trust from China with acts of constructive engagement, not lectures, if we are to see a world that is truly global, and not a continuing clash of civilizations.

    Richard L King, PhD, has been in the investment industry for more than 30 years. He received his PhD in nuclear physics from New York University in 1970 and also attended Stern Graduate School of Business at NYU. He is currently a venture partner at GRP Venture Partners, a large partnership based in Los Angeles which manages more than $600 million. He is also an adviser to Next, the Finnish venture partnership firm specializing in wireless technologies with offices in Helsinki and in Silicon Valley. Originally from Shanghai, Dr King is a grandson, on both sides of his family, of two of the founders of the Bank of China.

    original link:

    Asia Times Online :: China News, China Business News, Taiwan and Hong Kong News and Business.

  • #2
    To some extent, Hong Kong has to say thank you to the Opium war.

    Comment


    • #3
      In 1860, during the Second Opium War, British and French expeditionary forces, having marched inland from the coast, reached Beijing (then known as Peking). On the night of October 6 French units diverted from the main attack force towards the Old Summer Palace. Although the French commander Montauban assured the British commander Grant that "nothing had been touched", extensive looting, also by British and Chinese, took place. The Old Summer Palace was then occupied only by a few eunuchs, the Emperor Xianfeng having fled. There was no significant resistance to the looting from the Chinese, even though many Imperial soldiers were in the surrounding country.[1]

      On October 18, 1860, the British High Commissioner to China Lord Elgin, ordered the destruction of the palace as a way to punish the Emperor Xianfeng without harming the general population or destroying Beijing itself for the torture[2] and execution of almost twenty Western prisoners, including two British envoys and a journalist for The Times.[3]

      Destroying the Forbidden City was also thought to be a way of discouraging the Chinese from using kidnapping as a bargaining tool and to exact revenge for the mistreatment of the prisoners.[4]

      It took 3,500 British troops to set the entire place ablaze, taking three days to burn.
      And it was James Bruce, 8th Earl of Elgin and 12th Earl of Kincardine, not Lord Thomas Elgin as whoever the idiot revisionist who wrote this piece stated.
      Smart man was James

      In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility.

      Leibniz

      Comment


      • #4
        [QUOTE=hamurana;526414]

        By Richard L King


        Most will arrive by air, landing in the new Terminal 3 of Beijing International which was designed by British architect Norman Forster.

        Now that is a good trick. :)Elsewhere they land on the runways and then undergo the boring taxy to the terminals appropriate disembarkation point! The multi-talented Richard L King must be an ace reporter (or writer of science fiction!):))
        Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.

        Comment


        • #5
          The West, with this stain on its past, lost its moral high ground a long time ago. It will have to earn that trust from China with acts of constructive engagement, not lectures, if we are to see a world that is truly global, and not a continuing clash of civilizations.
          Well, I guess then Dalai Lama has the right to be suspicious about Beijing's intentions in Tibet. If the Chinese cannot trust the west for what happened 150 years ago, the Tibetans still fresh from the conflict in the 1950's have every reason to be critical on china. China "has not" earned their trust, yet ;)
          A grain of wheat eclipsed the sun of Adam !!

          Comment


          • #6
            ......and the gold medal for self pity goes to.....CHINA!!!
            sigpic

            Win nervously lose tragically - Reds C C

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Parihaka View Post
              And it was James Bruce, 8th Earl of Elgin and 12th Earl of Kincardine, not Lord Thomas Elgin as whoever the idiot revisionist who wrote this piece stated.
              Smart man was James

              Doesn't look very impressive that he was the enforcer for a drug cartel though.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Jay View Post
                Well, I guess then Dalai Lama has the right to be suspicious about Beijing's intentions in Tibet. If the Chinese cannot trust the west for what happened 150 years ago, the Tibetans still fresh from the conflict in the 1950's have every reason to be critical on china. China "has not" earned their trust, yet ;)
                Tibet was part of China before the whites arrived.

                Get your analogy right.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Parihaka View Post
                  And it was James Bruce, 8th Earl of Elgin and 12th Earl of Kincardine, not Lord Thomas Elgin as whoever the idiot revisionist who wrote this piece stated.
                  Smart man was James

                  Who cares about the name.

                  It was some stupid idiot from that country ordered to burn down the place and looted all the treasure to their beloved Queue.

                  That's what matters.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Skywatcher View Post
                    Doesn't look very impressive that he was the enforcer for a drug cartel though.

                    He is an ugly prick alright.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Bigfella View Post
                      ......and the gold medal for self pity goes to.....CHINA!!!

                      yeah, your ancestor were probably still locked up in the cells back then while others looting China, no wonder you have no sympathy.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by hamurana View Post
                        yeah, your ancestor were probably still locked up in the cells back then while others looting China, no wonder you have no sympathy.
                        That's uncalled for. Still, whining does not help anyways :))
                        A grain of wheat eclipsed the sun of Adam !!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Jay View Post
                          That's uncalled for. Still, whining does not help anyways :))
                          so in your dictionary, stating facts that happened in the past is the same as whinning?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Trying to justify China's current repression of Tibet by whining about the Opium Wars a century and change ago is a biiiig stretch.
                            What else but whining would you call it.
                            For Gallifrey! For Victory! For the end of time itself!!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              The repression and the manner of stifling dissent in China is also a legacy of history?

                              Earl Bruce is responsible for that too?

                              It has got me wondering!


                              "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

                              I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

                              HAKUNA MATATA

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X