Tweet
Quite a rant about the World Zionist Organization ( WZO ) in this Pakistani paper, most likely assisted by some top quality hashish.
Some of the rants raised :
1. “ WZO controls the policy-making mechanism in US, The UK, Russia and other European countries.”
2. “ India policy too is designed and is strongly being controlled by the WZO.”
3. “ Breaking up of India (for several important reasons), is a part of WZO’s scheme, which will be implemented before the US is broken up by the WZO.”
4. " Jews cannot take away Balochistan bonanza of Gwadar by abetting her own terrorists " ( This one completely beat me. I couldnt even understand it )
5. “ Jews have planned to privatize water in Pakistan”.
Pakistan Observer :
Some of the rants raised :
1. “ WZO controls the policy-making mechanism in US, The UK, Russia and other European countries.”
2. “ India policy too is designed and is strongly being controlled by the WZO.”
3. “ Breaking up of India (for several important reasons), is a part of WZO’s scheme, which will be implemented before the US is broken up by the WZO.”
4. " Jews cannot take away Balochistan bonanza of Gwadar by abetting her own terrorists " ( This one completely beat me. I couldnt even understand it )
5. “ Jews have planned to privatize water in Pakistan”.
Pakistan Observer :
Resolve core issue for self-preservation
The principle of the right to self determination, prohibition of the use of force, the rule against the Commission of genocide, Crimes against humanity, and the rules against slavery, piracy and social discrimination are repeatedly mentioned by almost all experts of International Law, including the American jurists, as pre-emptory norms, which cannot be deviated from, in any circumstances. The fundamental principles are also known as ‘jus cogens’. Prof Schwarzenberger states: “If States start to circumvent and infringe treaties in bad faith then, I am sure, everyone endowed with small common sense would agree that thus we have no hope whatsoever, for prevalence of the Rule of Law”.
The expert argued that use of force was only permissible in the following circumstances: When the question of the right of an individual or of individuals has arisen; When the UNCS authorizes it as ‘collective response’ to a threat to the peace, breach of peace or act of aggression. The doctrine of pre-emptive self-defence against an attack that might arise at some hypothetical future time, has no basis in International Law. Neither UNSC resolution 1441 nor any prior resolutions authorized the proposed used of force in the present circumstances. In the absence of a valid resolution of the Security Council, any use of force was clearly illegal at the crudest level. According to BBC survey, only 9 per cent of the UK population was in favour of military action against Iraq, in the absence of the essential and relevant UN resolution needed for so-doing. Now, might is right in an horrendous way.
The resolutions passed by the Security Council under Chapter VI of the UN Charter for the Right to Self-determination of the people of the state of Jammu and Kashmir, in 1948-49, are and will remain valid until these are implemented. These were sort to be passed as such by India herself. Now, she can’t wriggle out of it. The same stands valid as far as the UNSC resolutions that was passed by it after the Arab-Israel war in 1967.
India, after 9/11, has been closely following US and Israel’s actions for herself which she emulated speedily in dealing with the people of that vastly Muslim State, as though everything through ‘Unilateralism’ was being done as part of the whole, to eliminate/ subjugate Muslims all over the world according to one single plan. Like Israel, India also erected wall on the LoC and speeded up Kashmiri Muslim’s genocide etc. Why did it not do so earlier if she considered it to be a right thing to do? Prior to that she kept her Armed Forces on International borders poised against Pakistan from Dec 2002 to Oct 2003. In addition to all that, she has been creating scenes after scenes with her acrobatics to malign Pakistan so that it is declared a terrorist State by the world community, under the influence of Israel and US.
After US unilateralism, the UNO has been reduced to a mere showpiece. It exists only as a non-entity. Every Ally of US can occupy any other UN member’s territory, at US/ Israel’s behest. Geographical boundaries of any member State are no longer inviolable. Might is right. And the internal matters of a UN member State or Internationalized to dominate any part of its territory which the US/ Israel need for their future actions against the next target. Why do the Red Indians and the real inhabitants of Australia are not given back their countries? Why do they remain still occupied slaves? No, Jews cannot take away Balochistan bonanza of Gwadar by abetting her own terrorists that she keeps or gathers through underground communications and other means, anywhere in the world, wherever needed, including the USA. The law of Jungle prevails. No one can lure Pakistan into a position of cooperation with India for joint defence. Such like thoughts are absurd. The USA sees the dispute of Jammu and Kashmir in a different light. It is for this reason that the UNSC resolutions of the 1948-49 have been faded into background. To ascertain the wishes of the people under UN aegis is the only fairer way. India should speed up the process to that end, otherwise, she too will be deprived of it, sooner than one might imagine. US is determined to occupy Indian sensitive region of Ladakh. With this, US believes that, she will be helping India to perpetuate status quo. India would not feel triumphant enough, if Ladakh is occupied by US, in lieu of Great Power Status for her, at this stage, when no one believes in the authority of the UN itself. Unilateralism has enslaved the UNO. Anyway, if India does not sincerely cooperate with Pakistan she will lose herself too. Ladakh will be occupied as a first step while India will remain mum. The domination of China is US priority No 1. It must be recalled that Israel was established by World Zionist Organization (WZO) after sustained effort of 50 long years. WZO controls the policy-making mechanism in US, The UK, Russia and other European countries. American foreign policy towards ME is controlled by the WZO. Sometimes, it appears that India policy too is designed and is strongly being controlled by the WZO.
Afghanistan is fully dominated by the WZO. Breaking up of India (for several important reasons), is a part of WZO’s scheme, which will be implemented before the US is broken up by the WZO. India should therefore not cut its own nose to spite Pakistan. A strong Pakistan now, infact, is in the wider interest of India. By the force of public media, WZO has been deceiving the Americans into thinking that their interests were the same as those of Israel. How could that be when WZO wants to break up US?
Statistics data supports the substance. (Federal Deficit, Debt, & Interest 1980-2000 in billions of dollars). One can hear the sad state of US deficit on various US TV Channels. Exponential increase in deficit seems alarming. There were 40,000 Jews in Afghanistan settled mainly in Herat, Kabul and Bulkh, in 1980. In Iran in 1980, there were 85,000. The key diplomats in India and Pakistan are Jews. The mentioned population of Jews must have multiplied by 3 4 times by now. All of them have come back. Mossad consists mainly of them. RAW works with Mossad hand in glove. Pak-Afghan border is studded with Indo-Israeli consulates. Each consulate trains terrorists in its camp. They may number 4 to 5 hundred in each camp. Balochistan is being plundered by these very rich terrorists from underground.
Jews have planned to privatize water in Pakistan. India and Israel are working on this scheme for many long years. The water resources of Pakistan are to be given to Private Companies. This was revealed by World Bank. This is the World Bank Plan, to have the entire fresh water of Pakistan in the hands of Multinationals. India must realize the gravity of the situation and imagine who possess the WB.
Kasmir can be taken from India because the people do not want to be under Indian tyrannical control. If both India and Pakistan cooperate with each other, atleast for self-preservation, no one can cause them any harm. Otherwise, they might be torn into bits and pieces. Their past strategies against each other, if continued, will prove fatal for their own very existence, in the present scenario. A strong Pakistan is India’s need and vice-versa.
The principle of the right to self determination, prohibition of the use of force, the rule against the Commission of genocide, Crimes against humanity, and the rules against slavery, piracy and social discrimination are repeatedly mentioned by almost all experts of International Law, including the American jurists, as pre-emptory norms, which cannot be deviated from, in any circumstances. The fundamental principles are also known as ‘jus cogens’. Prof Schwarzenberger states: “If States start to circumvent and infringe treaties in bad faith then, I am sure, everyone endowed with small common sense would agree that thus we have no hope whatsoever, for prevalence of the Rule of Law”.
The expert argued that use of force was only permissible in the following circumstances: When the question of the right of an individual or of individuals has arisen; When the UNCS authorizes it as ‘collective response’ to a threat to the peace, breach of peace or act of aggression. The doctrine of pre-emptive self-defence against an attack that might arise at some hypothetical future time, has no basis in International Law. Neither UNSC resolution 1441 nor any prior resolutions authorized the proposed used of force in the present circumstances. In the absence of a valid resolution of the Security Council, any use of force was clearly illegal at the crudest level. According to BBC survey, only 9 per cent of the UK population was in favour of military action against Iraq, in the absence of the essential and relevant UN resolution needed for so-doing. Now, might is right in an horrendous way.
The resolutions passed by the Security Council under Chapter VI of the UN Charter for the Right to Self-determination of the people of the state of Jammu and Kashmir, in 1948-49, are and will remain valid until these are implemented. These were sort to be passed as such by India herself. Now, she can’t wriggle out of it. The same stands valid as far as the UNSC resolutions that was passed by it after the Arab-Israel war in 1967.
India, after 9/11, has been closely following US and Israel’s actions for herself which she emulated speedily in dealing with the people of that vastly Muslim State, as though everything through ‘Unilateralism’ was being done as part of the whole, to eliminate/ subjugate Muslims all over the world according to one single plan. Like Israel, India also erected wall on the LoC and speeded up Kashmiri Muslim’s genocide etc. Why did it not do so earlier if she considered it to be a right thing to do? Prior to that she kept her Armed Forces on International borders poised against Pakistan from Dec 2002 to Oct 2003. In addition to all that, she has been creating scenes after scenes with her acrobatics to malign Pakistan so that it is declared a terrorist State by the world community, under the influence of Israel and US.
After US unilateralism, the UNO has been reduced to a mere showpiece. It exists only as a non-entity. Every Ally of US can occupy any other UN member’s territory, at US/ Israel’s behest. Geographical boundaries of any member State are no longer inviolable. Might is right. And the internal matters of a UN member State or Internationalized to dominate any part of its territory which the US/ Israel need for their future actions against the next target. Why do the Red Indians and the real inhabitants of Australia are not given back their countries? Why do they remain still occupied slaves? No, Jews cannot take away Balochistan bonanza of Gwadar by abetting her own terrorists that she keeps or gathers through underground communications and other means, anywhere in the world, wherever needed, including the USA. The law of Jungle prevails. No one can lure Pakistan into a position of cooperation with India for joint defence. Such like thoughts are absurd. The USA sees the dispute of Jammu and Kashmir in a different light. It is for this reason that the UNSC resolutions of the 1948-49 have been faded into background. To ascertain the wishes of the people under UN aegis is the only fairer way. India should speed up the process to that end, otherwise, she too will be deprived of it, sooner than one might imagine. US is determined to occupy Indian sensitive region of Ladakh. With this, US believes that, she will be helping India to perpetuate status quo. India would not feel triumphant enough, if Ladakh is occupied by US, in lieu of Great Power Status for her, at this stage, when no one believes in the authority of the UN itself. Unilateralism has enslaved the UNO. Anyway, if India does not sincerely cooperate with Pakistan she will lose herself too. Ladakh will be occupied as a first step while India will remain mum. The domination of China is US priority No 1. It must be recalled that Israel was established by World Zionist Organization (WZO) after sustained effort of 50 long years. WZO controls the policy-making mechanism in US, The UK, Russia and other European countries. American foreign policy towards ME is controlled by the WZO. Sometimes, it appears that India policy too is designed and is strongly being controlled by the WZO.
Afghanistan is fully dominated by the WZO. Breaking up of India (for several important reasons), is a part of WZO’s scheme, which will be implemented before the US is broken up by the WZO. India should therefore not cut its own nose to spite Pakistan. A strong Pakistan now, infact, is in the wider interest of India. By the force of public media, WZO has been deceiving the Americans into thinking that their interests were the same as those of Israel. How could that be when WZO wants to break up US?
Statistics data supports the substance. (Federal Deficit, Debt, & Interest 1980-2000 in billions of dollars). One can hear the sad state of US deficit on various US TV Channels. Exponential increase in deficit seems alarming. There were 40,000 Jews in Afghanistan settled mainly in Herat, Kabul and Bulkh, in 1980. In Iran in 1980, there were 85,000. The key diplomats in India and Pakistan are Jews. The mentioned population of Jews must have multiplied by 3 4 times by now. All of them have come back. Mossad consists mainly of them. RAW works with Mossad hand in glove. Pak-Afghan border is studded with Indo-Israeli consulates. Each consulate trains terrorists in its camp. They may number 4 to 5 hundred in each camp. Balochistan is being plundered by these very rich terrorists from underground.
Jews have planned to privatize water in Pakistan. India and Israel are working on this scheme for many long years. The water resources of Pakistan are to be given to Private Companies. This was revealed by World Bank. This is the World Bank Plan, to have the entire fresh water of Pakistan in the hands of Multinationals. India must realize the gravity of the situation and imagine who possess the WB.
Kasmir can be taken from India because the people do not want to be under Indian tyrannical control. If both India and Pakistan cooperate with each other, atleast for self-preservation, no one can cause them any harm. Otherwise, they might be torn into bits and pieces. Their past strategies against each other, if continued, will prove fatal for their own very existence, in the present scenario. A strong Pakistan is India’s need and vice-versa.
Comment