Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Muslims Lash Out at Pope's Remarks

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Muslims Lash Out at Pope's Remarks

    Muslims Lash Out at Pope's Remarks

    Benedict's criticism of Islamic violence draws sharp rebukes and may threaten his Turkey trip.
    By Tracy Wilkinson, Times Staff Writer
    September 15, 2006

    ROME — Pope Benedict XVI flew back to Rome on Thursday to face an international flurry of protest over comments he made critical of historical Islamic violence during a six-day trip to his native Germany.

    Muslim clerics and community leaders from Europe to the Middle East and beyond condemned the pope's comments made this week. In Turkey, the first Muslim country the pope is scheduled to visit, the nation's leading religious official demanded an apology and told the pontiff to "look in the mirror" when he assails religious violence.

    The furor may jeopardize Benedict's trip, scheduled for Nov. 28, in what would be an embarrassing contretemps for the Vatican.

    "I do not see any use in somebody visiting the Islamic world who thinks in this way about the holy prophet of Islam," the Turkish official, Ali Bardakoglu, told the news channel NTV. "He should first rid himself of feelings of hate."

    The reactions follow a speech by the pope Tuesday at the University of Regensburg in which he attacked the Muslim concept of holy war as a violation of God's will and nature. He used the word "jihad," a politically and emotionally charged Arabic term for holy war or struggle. And he quoted a 14th century Byzantine emperor who derided Islam and its founder, the prophet Muhammad.

    The emperor, Manuel II Paleologus, said, according to Benedict, that Muhammad had introduced "things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached."

    Benedict, in the same speech, held up Christianity as the "profound encounter of faith and reason."

    As the backlash grew, the Vatican issued a statement Thursday evening defending the pope and saying he did not intend to offend Islam.

    "It is clear that the Holy Father's intention is to cultivate respect and dialogue toward other religions and cultures, and that clearly includes Islam," said the statement by chief Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi.

    "What is in the Holy Father's heart is a clear and radical rejection of religious motives for violence," Lombardi said.

    Critics, such as Aiman Mazyek, head of the Central Council of Muslims in Germany, offered a litany of brutalities in Christianity's history, saying Catholicism too has a bloodstained past.

    "One only has to recall the Crusades and the forced conversions of Jews and Muslims in [Medieval] Spain," Mazyek told the German newspaper Der Tagesspiegel, also noting the Vatican's relationship with Hitler and Catholic conquests of Latin America. "I do not think the church should point a finger at extremist activities in other religions."

    It is not yet clear if reaction to the pope's comments will snowball into something more violent, as was the case when a Danish newspaper published cartoons last year satirizing Muhammad. Deadly riots erupted across the Muslim world.

    The pope, by contrast, is a world religious leader whose comments come in a broader context that also advocates tolerance and cultural dialogue.

    Rhetorically, though, the fury was spreading.

    Pakistan's parliament today unanimously adopted a resolution condemning what it called the pope's "derogatory" remarks.

    In Cairo, the Muslim Brotherhood, a highly influential organization with membership across the Middle East, demanded an apology. The pope "aroused the anger of the whole Islamic world and strengthened the argument of those who say that the West is hostile to everything Islamic," said a statement by the group's leader, Mohammed Mahdi Akef.

    In Kuwait, a high-ranking Islamist official, Haken Mutairi, called on all Arab and Muslim states to recall their ambassadors from the Holy See and expel any Vatican diplomats "until the pope says he is sorry for the wrong done to the prophet and to Islam, which preaches peace, tolerance, justice and equality," Agence France-Presse reported.

    Sheik Yusuf Qaradawi, whose broadcasts on Al Jazeera television make him one of Islam's most influential scholars, said the pope was mistaken in his characterization of the faith.

    "Muslims have the right to be angry and hurt by these comments from the highest cleric in Christianity," Qaradawi said on Al Jazeera.

    "We ask the pope to apologize to the Muslim nation for insulting its religion, its prophet and its beliefs."

    Pakistani scholars and clerics also voiced anger over Benedict's comments, saying he should avoid echoing President Bush and instead work to bring Christians and Muslims together.

    Muslim groups in France and Italy also expressed dismay and confusion over the remarks.

    The angry reaction in Turkey is in many ways the most significant because the upcoming pilgrimage has been portrayed as an important milestone in religious dialogue.

    Bardakoglu said Benedict had defamed Muhammad in "hostile and arrogant" remarks that would "fan a feud" between the faiths. Bardakoglu, as head of the state's religious affairs department, appoints and controls all imams in the country.

    While in Turkey, Benedict also intends to meet with the spiritual leader of the world's Orthodox Christians, the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I.

    [email protected]
    http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...eadlines-world
    Jihad is the Holy Terror waged by the Moslems against non Moslem. primarily to convert them. It is a War. War brings destruction, pillage, rape, loot and surfaces all the negativity of Man.

    In fact, Jihad personifies hate and intolerance!

    Likewise, I believe in the Quaran it is written that Allah has exhorts all Moslems to treat all non Moslem as the enemy. Again, this is fomenting hate!

    Religion is basically to bring solace to the troubled soul. Here we find Islam emphasising hatred to a placid soul to become troubled!

    It is thus a paradox that religion is inciting hatred.

    Therefore, how is the Pope wrong?

    Why should he apologise for telling the Truth?

    Again that is odd. They expect the Pope to tell a Lie to hide the Truth.

    Funny!

    And what is odd are these statements:

    "We ask the pope to apologize to the Muslim nation for insulting its religion, its prophet and its beliefs."

    Turkish official, Ali Bardakoglu, told the news channel NTV. "He should first rid himself of feelings of hate".

    Holy almighty!

    The Prophet Mohammed believes that wars fomenting religious hatred is holy?

    To hate others who form mankind is holy?

    And the Turkish official is ridiculous to state that the Pope has feelings of Hate. Jihad is Hate itself. And the Islamic Prophet Mohamet has incited and sanctified this Hate.

    Therefore, who is the actual one who has snactified Hate?


    "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

    I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

    HAKUNA MATATA

  • #2
    I completely agree. The muslim leaders are completely unwilling to acknowledge that there are serious issues with their religion that lead it's members down a destructive path. Instead they want an apology when it's pointed out!
    They spin it around to take attention off the issue by becoming offended and start asking for an apology. And some people are dumb enough to buy into it.

    This latest only makes it more transparent the divide between West and Islam. If it was anyone other than the pope we'd probably be seeing rioting all over the islamic world. But since it was the 'Pope' the muslim leaders are holding back their followers for the time being asking only for an apology.

    The Pope should have spoken up along time ago and should have been much harsher if you ask me. The divide is starting to get more and more medieval.

    Comment


    • #3
      These Islamofascists are so weird in their arguments.

      And they have no qualms in appearing to be prize idiots and without logic!

      They live in hate and are taught so by their scriptures and then they pretend to be purer than the snow on Mount Etna!

      Note: applicable to the senseless Moslems and not to those who realise the fallacy of the reasoning and there are many who believe that the logic is warped.


      "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

      I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

      HAKUNA MATATA

      Comment


      • #4
        The Turks may have been the fastest clerics off the block but when it comes to legislatures, living up to the Islamic Republic part of its title, Pakistan is the first of block.

        I simply cannot understand the scale of the reaction implied by the Pakistan’s legislature passing a resolution. Agitated Clerics would be de rigueur but not certainly not agitated resolution passing legislators.

        All the Pope did was to refer to comments made by a long dead Byzantine emperor, Manuel II Paleologus on Jihad in a dialogue with a long dead “educated Persian” presumable of the Muslim faith.

        Read the full text of the Papal speech for yourselves here :

        Papal Address at University of Regensburg

        Pakistan’s Parliament should spend less time working itself up into a frenzied resolution passing mode on non events such as this and more time on passing resolutions that repeal Hudood laws that deny Pakistani women the basic human right of not being held responsible for being raped :

        Pakistan's parliament adopts resolution condemning Pope's remarks about Islam

        Friday, September 15, 2006
        ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (AP) - Pakistan's parliament on Friday unanimously adopted a resolution condemning Pope Benedict for making what it called "derogatory" comments about Islam, and seeking an apology from him for hurting Muslims' feelings.

        The resolution, moved by hardline legislator Fazal Karim, was supported by both government and opposition lawmakers in the National Assembly or lower house of parliament.

        Chaudhry Ameer Hussain, speaker of the National Assembly, allowed Karim to move the resolution after Karim said the pope had insulted Islam and the Prophet Muhammad, and hurt the feelings of the entire Muslim world by making "derogatory remarks."

        The measure was adopted a day after the Vatican sought to defuse criticism of the pontiff's remarks, when he quoted from a book recounting a conversation between 14th century Byzantine Christian Emperor Manuel Paleologos II and an educated Persian on the truths of Christianity and Islam.

        "The emperor . . . said, I quote, 'Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached,' " he quoted the emperor as saying.

        On Thursday, the Vatican said the Pope had not intended to offend Muslim sensibilities with the remarks.

        But the Foreign Ministry in Islamabad termed the remarks "regrettable."
        "Anyone who describes Islam as a religion as intolerant encourages violence," Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam said.

        "What he has done is that he has quoted very offensive remarks by some emperor hundreds of years ago," Aslam said on Friday. "It is not helpful (because) we have been trying to bridge the gap, calling for dialogue and understanding between religions."

        She said Muslims had a long history of tolerance, adding that when the Catholic kingdom of Spain expelled its Jewish population in 1492 they were welcomed by Muslim countries such as the Turkish Ottoman Empire.
        Last edited by Hari_Om; 15 Sep 06,, 18:28.

        Comment


        • #5
          Pakistan likes to believe that they are the lodestar of Islam.

          They live in a state of denial but are clever enough to know which side of the bread is buttered.

          Do we hear of any criticism of George Bush's actions?

          GBW will just choke their oxygen supply! :)

          They live of the munificence of the US, as they have throughout their recorded history, and that is God's Own truth.


          "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

          I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

          HAKUNA MATATA

          Comment


          • #6
            Islam isn't a very tolerant religion. Most muslims aren't bad. The problem is the few who make the most noise and interpret their religion in the most violent way possible.
            "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

            Comment


            • #7
              Religious hatred, Saudi-style

              By Jeff Jacoby, Globe Columnist | February 6, 2005

              IN WHICH country are Muslims being taught the following lessons?



              ''Everyone who does not embrace Islam is an unbeliever and must be called an unbeliever. . . . One who does not call the Jews and the Christians unbelievers is himself an unbeliever."

              ''Whoever believes that churches are houses of God . . . or that what Jews and Christians do constitutes the worship of God . . . is an infidel."

              To offer greetings to a Christian at Christmas -- even to wish ''Happy holidays" -- is ''a practice more loathsome to God . . . than imbibing liquor, or murder, or fornication."

              Jews ''are worse than donkeys." They are the corrupting force ''behind materialism, bestiality, the destruction of the family, and the dissolution of society.

              Muslims who convert to another religion ''should be killed because [they] have denied the Koran."

              Democracy is ''responsible for all the horrible wars" of the 20th century, and for spreading ''ignorance, moral decadence, and drugs."

              If this sounds to you like the kind of fanaticism you might encounter in Saudi Arabia -- where the established creed is Wahhabism, an intolerant and extremist version of Islam -- you're right. Unfortunately, this religious hatred isn't confined to the Arabian peninsula. Thanks to the Saudi government's elaborate campaign to export Wahhabism worldwide, such anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, anti-Western poison can also be found throughout the United States.

              We know this from the work of Freedom House, a venerable human rights group that promotes democracy around the globe. In a new report, it documents the alarming degree to which Wahhabist propaganda has penetrated American mosques.

              Between November 2003 and December 2004, Freedom House researchers assembled more than 200 publications from 15 mosques and Islamic centers in Illinois, Texas, California, New York, New Jersey, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. All the documents were linked to the Saudi religious establishment -- many were official Saudi government publications or had been supplied by the Saudi embassy, and several of the mosques disseminating them are funded by the Saudi royal family. Each was reviewed by independent translators, who found them replete with what Freedom House calls ''a totalitarian ideology of hatred that can incite to violence."

              Before Sept. 11, 2001, the notion that literature in mosques could be dangerous might have struck some as alarmist. But of the 19 terrorist-hijackers that day, 15 were Saudi, and all of them were steeped in the relentless hostility to ''infidels" that the Saudi publications inculcate. For some, the mosques were a crucial resource. The King Fahd Mosque in Los Angeles, for example, was a home away from home for hijackers Nawaf al Hazmi and Khalid al Mihdhar. The mosque's imam, Fahad al Thumairy, was an accredited Saudi diplomat in Los Angeles until 2003, when he was expelled from the United States for suspected involvement in terrorism.

              Perhaps Hazmi and Mihdhar spent some of their time at the mosque studying ''Loyalty and Dissociation in Islam," a Wahhabi work that emphasizes the duty of every Muslim to cultivate enmity between themselves and non-Muslims. ''Be dissociated from the infidels," the book instructs. ''Hate them for their religion, leave them, never rely on them for support, do not admire them, and always oppose them in every way according to Islamic law."

              Or perhaps they consulted ''Religious Edicts for the Immigrant Muslim." As Nina Shea of Freedom House observes, they would have found in its pages detailed instructions for intensifying their resentment of Americans: ''Never greet the Christian or Jew first. Never congratulate the infidel on his holiday. Never befriend an infidel unless it is to convert him. Never imitate the infidel. Never work for an infidel. Do not wear a graduation gown because this imitates the infidel."

              It is important to note that most Muslims do not share the xenophobic Wahhabi dogma. Freedom House undertook its study in part because ''many Muslims . . . requested our help in exposing Saudi extremism in the hope of freeing their communities from ideological strangulation." Now that Freedom House has done so, it is up to moderate American Muslims to purge their mosques of the Saudi toxin, and to ostracize the extremists.

              And it is up to Washington to end the pretense of US-Saudi harmony. President Bush last week referred to Saudi Arabia as one of ''our friends" in the Middle East. But friends don't flood friends' houses of worship with hateful religious propaganda. We are in a war against radical Islamist terrorism, and Saudi Arabia supplies the ideology on which the terrorists feed. Until that incitement is stifled, the Saudis are no friends of ours.


              Jeff Jacoby's e-mail address is [email protected].
              © Copyright 2005 Globe Newspaper Company.
              http://www.boston.com/news/globe/edi...d_saudi_style/
              Applicable world wide.

              There is hardly any difference in the countries of Islam especially since Saudi money is eating into the innards of Islamic societies worldwide and the Islamic govts are encouraging it!

              On the path to self destruct and then lament, beating their chest, that all are against them!
              Last edited by Ray; 15 Sep 06,, 18:49.


              "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

              I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

              HAKUNA MATATA

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Ray View Post
                These Islamofascists are so weird in their arguments.

                And they have no qualms in appearing to be prize idiots and without logic!

                They live in hate and are taught so by their scriptures and then they pretend to be purer than the snow on Mount Etna!

                Note: applicable to the senseless Moslems and not to those who realise the fallacy of the reasoning and there are many who believe that the logic is warped.
                Actually the original concept of Jihad was to protect Muslims that were under attack, alas those taking part in Jihad wound up as human beings with varying amounts of power, and like in many other cases power corrupts and we have an infestation of who's who in terrorism.

                If it was actually following Islam as you should thats to blame, there'd be a lot more wacked out mullahs from the PDF comedians to people like A-Jad and Bashir Al-Asaad. Yours truly would probably be no exception.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Its funny how the Pope can make one diplomactic faux pas yet Muslims are nearly untouchable in reverse.. immature religion.. just a shame we have to suffer it adolescence
                  Attached Files

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Lunatock View Post
                    Actually the original concept of Jihad was to protect Muslims that were under attack, alas those taking part in Jihad wound up as human beings with varying amounts of power, and like in many other cases power corrupts and we have an infestation of who's who in terrorism.
                    Jihad as has been practised in reality has almost always been in pursuit of power and to convert others to the faith. Terrorism today is peanuts compared to whats gone on in the name of Jihad earlier. Before Islam came, practically the entire Indian subcontinent was Buddhist, Hindu and animist. Today the ratio is roughly 45 % Muslim, the entire region's history is literally a tale of jihad for different reasons to expand Islam and of extreme violence waged on "non believers" & one which is still continuing today. The entire ME and a wide swathe of Central Asia fell to Islam. Was it all under peaceful missionary proselytisation? Hardly. What happened when Islam reached Europe? Again, the battle cry was of jihad.

                    If it was actually following Islam as you should thats to blame, there'd be a lot more wacked out mullahs from the PDF comedians to people like A-Jad and Bashir Al-Asaad. Yours truly would probably be no exception.
                    What makes you think PDF is an exception? You & many American Muslims are the exception.

                    The attitudes displayed in PDF are common across Pak Muslims and I have lost count of the times, I have politely cut a conversation short with otherwise erudite Arab, ME, Persian and on occasion Malaysian gentlemen and ladies who suddenly drip venom when it comes to "jews" and express extreme contempt for whatever they see as idolatry.
                    PDF is just the open expression of those attitudes, without having the problem of hiding behind the mask of tolerance when amongst strangers & non Muslims who will not "understand" them.
                    Last edited by Archer; 16 Sep 06,, 05:05.
                    Karmani Vyapurutham Dhanuhu

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Lunatock View Post
                      Actually the original concept of Jihad was to protect Muslims that were under attack, alas those taking part in Jihad wound up as human beings with varying amounts of power, and like in many other cases power corrupts and we have an infestation of who's who in terrorism.

                      If it was actually following Islam as you should thats to blame, there'd be a lot more wacked out mullahs from the PDF comedians to people like A-Jad and Bashir Al-Asaad. Yours truly would probably be no exception.
                      I am totally with you and I had mentioned in my post that the sensible Moslems do not warp up the concept.

                      The concept of Jihad for self defence (I have to read this again) is inalienable as it is for any human being.

                      However, historically, Jihad has been used for purposes other than what it is said to mean. Temporal exigencies have conveniently converted the spiritual rationale.

                      Today, any person wanting revenge invokes the name of Allah and calls it a Jihad!

                      That is the issue.


                      "Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."

                      I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.

                      HAKUNA MATATA

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Ray i thought that you were a sencible Indian amoung all the indians in this forum but Alas! what you have said does not coincide with that.Ray you must have done your home work before saying all that you must have done some search and should have searched the meaning of Jihad.

                        Jihad has a great significance in the lives of Muslims .
                        Like any language, Arabic has unique words which have a particular meaning which cannot be translated precisely. The best translation known for such a word
                        is the following: a sincere and noticeable effort (for good); an all true and unselfishstriving for spiritual good.Jihad as presented in the Quran and any of the other scriptures implies the striving of spiritual good. This Jihad particularly involves change in one's self and mentality.
                        It may concern the sacrifice of material property, social class and even emotional comfort solely for the salvation and worship of God ALONE. As a result, one who practises Jihad will gain tremendously in the Hereafter.
                        Jihad may also reflect the war aspects in Islam .
                        The fighting of a war in the name of justice or Islam, to deter an aggressor , for self defense, and/or to establish justice and freedom to practice religion , would also be considered a Jihad .In the light and essence of Islam and the Quran, there is no war which is holy;this, under any circumstances whatsoever. In fact the whole text of the Quran and the religion of Islam revolves around the concept of peace, not war. To many people's ignorance, Islam is also a word that share the same root of the.Arabic word Salaam meaning peace. To Islam , war is unholy, Jihad must ean anything but holy war. However, there are times, in certain circumstances, when Islam tolerates, permits and sometimes
                        even accepts the practise of war. Islam strongly emphasizes the ideas of justice, freedom and opposition to oppression. There is another condition: fighting for self-defense. War is tolerated in these conditions, but if there is a possibility to avoid war, then this alternative, as long as it is reasonable, must be taken. Even as an enemy, the Muslim must respect his adversaries. Mere, brutal and barbaric fighting is condemned in Islam . Islam condemns barbaric killing of any human being. During military activities, the killing must not include civilians, provided they do not attack or provoke or share directly in the war. . The enemies, even when at war, must be treated justly. If victory is achieved in any war for justice, then there is to be no
                        oppression, enslavement or injustice to the enemy or people. Nor must there be control over source of wealth of the nation or people or colonial regimes. The division of people, putting them one against the other is also forbidden. Justice and freedom must be established. The cooperation and acceptance of other cultures and peoples is compulsory too.
                        In Brief; the meaning the media gives to this word (Jihad) is false. This word does not mean a holy war, for there is nothing holy about a war in Islam . There are times when war is tolerated, permitted and even, in some case, to a point accepted, but never considered holy. Islam (Submission) is a religion of peace, no matter what certain media or deranged individuals say or claim. Islam revolves around the concept of peace.


                        Yeah its a bad time going on for Muslims.Do you remember that how did the Islam spread in the Indo-Pak Subcontinent.Muhammad Bin Qasim raided because his ship was looted in the port which was situated in the Subcontinent.And the people from your relegion which were Hidus started converting to Muslim just because of the behaviour of the Muslim ruler he was very kind upon you and did not looted your homes and did not made killings of innocent people which were living in the villages.I know the Hindus dont know their history and how can they condemn the Muslims upon such issues.
                        And i have to say about the Christians, a new edition of Bible comes every year.The nation which cannot take care of their relegious book how can they be the lodestar of peace, there are a lot of Bible available one os Bible of Youhana and others how can someone judge which one is true.Tell me where is the orignal Bible which was given to you by the Holy Prophet Jesus.This shows that they can change anything which is notsuitable to them like they have done with the Bible.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Hmmm………..

                          To claim to be an expert on specific individuals on the forum, besides lying that is, IMO requires the individual being a long time lurker or an existing member creating a duplicate identity or a previously banned member sneaking back onto the forum.

                          Wonder which one of the options is correct ?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by thedefender View Post

                            Yeah its a bad time going on for Muslims.
                            And Christians, Jews and Hindus because of the actions of terrorists.

                            Do you remember that how did the Islam spread in the Indo-Pak Subcontinent.
                            I doubt Ray was alive then

                            Muhammad Bin Qasim raided because his ship was looted in the port which was situated in the Subcontinent.And the people from your relegion which were Hidus started converting to Muslim just because of the behaviour of the Muslim ruler he was very kind upon you and did not looted your homes and did not made killings of innocent people which were living in the villages.I know the Hindus dont know their history and how can they condemn the Muslims upon such issues.
                            Interesting history lesson. Do you remember how Islam spread into North Africa? How it spread in Iberia? Sicily? Do you know the significance of Charles Martel and the battle of Poitiers? Or the Balkaans?

                            Islam is as guilty (perhaps more guilty) as Christianity for spreading its message by the sword.

                            And i have to say about the Christians, a new edition of Bible comes every year.The nation which cannot take care of their relegious book how can they be the lodestar of peace,
                            OK, Christians arent a "nation", they are lots of individuals and groups in lots of nations.

                            there are a lot of Bible available one os Bible of Youhana and others how can someone judge which one is true.Tell me where is the orignal Bible which was given to you by the Holy Prophet Jesus.This shows that they can change anything which is notsuitable to them like they have done with the Bible.
                            Theologically you may be correct - but at least Christians have translated their text into their natives languages - so that all can read it. Christians grew out of the reading it in a different language that no one understood.

                            Oh, and the New Testament wasnt given to Christians by Jesus. It was written by various apostles/disciples and edited and selected by Church fathers at various church councils.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Islams complaining again, dont they know Freedom of Speech.

                              Why is it they can criticise christianity and other religions non stop, and we dont react and we criticise them like 1/10 of the time they do too use and they dont stop complaining and rioting.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X