Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chairman of Foreign Relations Committee backs US-India Nuclear Deal

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Chairman of Foreign Relations Committee backs US-India Nuclear Deal

    Key Senator Backs U.S.-India Nuclear Deal
    The Associated Press
    Friday, June 16, 2006; 12:33 PM


    WASHINGTON -- An influential U.S. senator said Friday the United States should move quickly to approve a nuclear agreement with India that he described as "the most important strategic diplomatic initiative undertaken" by President George W. Bush.

    Sen. Richard Lugar, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, said a congressional rejection of the agreement or an open-ended delay risks wasting an opportunity "to expand beyond Cold War alliance structures to include dynamic nations with whom our alliances are converging."

    It was the strongest statement of support for the agreement by Lugar, who has been one of Congress' leading advocates of nuclear nonproliferation.

    He described the agreement as a departure "from the crisis management mentality" that has dominated U.S. diplomacy in recent years. Lugar's comments came in remarks prepared for delivery to the Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island.


    The nuclear agreement was signed in March by Bush and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh but now must be cleared by the U.S. Congress, which needs to change laws that prohibit export of nuclear fuel and technology to countries that have not submitted to full inspections.

    Some U.S lawmakers have expressed concerns that the deal could undermine the Nuclear Nonproliferation treaty and help foster the spread of nuclear weapons. India has never signed the treaty and thus has not been subject to inspections.

    The State Department says the agreement would bring international inspections and safeguards to 14 nuclear reactors India has designated as civilian; India's eight military facilities would remain off-limits.

    In return, the United States would agree to ship nuclear technology and fuel to India. The accord does not include Pakistan, India's nuclear-armed neighbor and rival, which has also refused to sign the NPT.

    Critics, including former Sen. Sam Nunn, an arms specialist who has worked closely with Lugar, have raised concerns the deal could promote a regional arms race with China and Pakistan and make it more difficult for the United States to win support for sanctions against such countries as Iran and North Korea.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...061600873.html

  • #2
    most interesting point to note is that indo-usa nuclear deal is also supported by IAEA cheif Mohamed ElBaradei !!!
    it actually will be a boon to USA to hv the deal......would be very helpful is the future relations of india and USA

    i wonder how russia is dealing with this? india and russia hv always been closest friends but russia is like bitter rival of USA !! must be very frustating !!
    i would hv loved a similar nuke-deal with russia rather than USA .
    what say u guys

    Comment


    • #3
      Actually, Russia is going to benefit alot from this deal.. more than the US :)
      India is going to be buying fuel and reactors from Russia..

      US Nuclear technology is dated back to the 70s.. Once NSG opens up to India, India will have virtually unlimited options to expand its civil nuclear power industry

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by anand1266
        most interesting point to note is that indo-usa nuclear deal is also supported by IAEA cheif Mohamed ElBaradei !!!
        it actually will be a boon to USA to hv the deal......would be very helpful is the future relations of india and USA

        i wonder how russia is dealing with this? india and russia hv always been closest friends but russia is like bitter rival of USA !! must be very frustating !!
        i would hv loved a similar nuke-deal with russia rather than USA .
        what say u guys
        Russia has been providing China with oil leaving nothing for India.India has also urged US for regular supply of Nuclear fuel.Some european countries have also come ahead to support India with Nuclear fuel.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by net_dawg2005
          Russia has been providing China with oil leaving nothing for India.
          they dont mind providing oil to india.. and have given ownerships for a no of oil flds too(sakalin)..
          the problem is the distance....and problem in laying pipelines from russia to india..

          India has also urged US for regular supply of Nuclear fuel.Some european countries have also come ahead to support India with Nuclear fuel.
          india recently recieved fuel from russia for tarapur.. its for sure that russia will benefit a lot. from this deal.. but is it more than what us will gain.. is a good question.... as russians will just be selling more fuel and power plants .. but all for money.. while americans will come even with funds( from american institutions..).. they gain a lot in terms of opening of indians arms market to them.. while russians will be the loosers in that area( all because of this deal)..
          we will need to wait and watch the unsaid contracts between india and US along with this deal.. like supply of 126 fighter jets.. etc etc..

          Comment


          • #6
            duplicate post .. self delete
            Last edited by ajaybhutani; 23 Jun 06,, 15:50.

            Comment


            • #7
              I'm not convinced that Bush can garner the votes in Congress on this one. The Dems will come in almost completely against it, for partisan reasons if nothing else. I think the Repubs are split pretty much down the middle, with part of them lining up behind Bush out of political loyalty, and the other half shying away due to re-election concerns or concerns over the effect on the NPT. There's a good chance that it will pass in the house but fail in the Senate, where the seats are much more closely split.

              Either way, I think India stands to gain. Even if the Congress doesn't go along with it, Russia will be much more likely to go ahead and supply India now, since there has been a lot of political support generated for India among other countries, the IAEA, etc.

              Wrt the fuel for Tarapur, Russia and India are claiming it is a "safety issue" and is therefore exempted from Russia's NPT obligations. This is a little bit of a bogus argument, since India could just power down the reactor. So it's really more of an economic issue, in that India needs the power, and Russia nees the money.

              Lugar has a lot of clout, but so does Nunn. So you have two prominent republicans on opposite sides of the argument, which shows that there is not broad support among republicans for the deal.

              The other question is, will India accept the terms that the Congress will almost surely demand wrt verification and a formal agreement to forego any further testing?
              "We will go through our federal budget – page by page, line by line – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way." -President Barack Obama 11/25/2008

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by OrdinaryGuy
                ...US Nuclear technology is dated back to the 70s.
                Only in the case of our domestic power reactors. We provide modern reactors to Japan, South Korea, etc. We just can't build them in the US because the enviro-nuts won't allow it.
                "We will go through our federal budget – page by page, line by line – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way." -President Barack Obama 11/25/2008

                Comment


                • #9
                  Actually given the security hazards wrt reactors, ie protecting them from our neighbours lovely jihadis- I dont think relying on N power is such a great idea for India.
                  Karmani Vyapurutham Dhanuhu

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    nahh... it's a great idea... a bunch of jehadis can't do nuthin... i mean common... if countries stopped buildin n-plants just cuz they might be targetted by terrorists.. well, thats ridiculous...
                    Cow is the only animal that not only inhales oxygen, but also exhales it.
                    -Rekha Arya, Former Minister of Animal Husbandry

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X