U.S. Carriers Becoming Too Vulnerable To Be Relevant? New Report Says Yes

looks like we were using the Red Sea engagements to test our non kinetic killing ability.

https://www.businessinsider.com/us-w...-fight-2025-2#

I knew active jamming was in play as soon as I saw the headline but I can't help wondering if they also didn't take the opportunity to test any of the laser systems currently under development in a real world combat environment?

Nice to see the forums is finally back up again BTW. For a while there I was beginning to think AB was gone fro good!
 
Last edited:
Was going to say timely, but the thread was started 2013.

An F-18 was lost overboard while the USS Truman was making a hard turn to avoid incoming Houthi fire.
 
Was going to say timely, but the thread was started 2013.

An F-18 was lost overboard while the USS Truman was making a hard turn to avoid incoming Houthi fire.
The question is why when you have three guided missile DD's and one Ticonderoga Class cruiser.

 
The Houthis had acquired the TRUMAN's position, though not a weapons lock. I, for one, would seek to deny them the knowledge of my new position.

Unless it was operating literally right off the coast of Yemen? (Which would be stupid.) 'Someone' must have tattled. So I assume someone else is taking careful note of local shipping and radio traffic.
 
Last edited:
The question is why when you have three guided missile DD's and one Ticonderoga Class cruiser.

Missile range to carrier may have got closer than they liked, even if the missiles were being engaged by the escorts. Ship turns to unmask the majority of its anti-air systems.

The warning that Ward mentioned is a "If there is time" alert. Works great in peacetime
 
Unless it was operating literally right off the coast of Yemen? (Which would be stupid.) 'Someone' must have been tattled. So I assume someone should be taking careful note of local shipping and radio traffic.
Yea but you can't sink every fishing boat in the pond
 
Back
Top