Statquo and OOE Club: Canadian Politics
- Thread starter statquo
- Start date
statquo
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,110
Absolutely at no time in my life, nevertheless here, have I compared Justin Trudeau to Jean Chrétien. Trudeau isn’t even in the same sport nevertheless league.
We’re going to respectfully disagree. What did Stephen Harper accomplish other than lowering taxes, talking the BIG on the foreign policy stage, and keeping the social conservatives at bay? He gave everything to Quebec and then lost it to the NDP(!). Fiscal conservative? 6 straight deficits, $150 BILLION to the deficit, a nice follow-up to Chrétien and Martin who shaved $90 billion off of it and left it with a surplus. He spent like a liberal! And that was with great oil prices in the late-2000s-early 2010s. Shameful. Cozying up the Chinese? Got us nothing. Tough talk on Defense? Measly investment, if any. Embarrassing policy like the “Barbaric Cultural Practices Hotline” targeting refugees (Syrians). And let’s not forget having the charisma and personality of a lightly dusted rock wearing a sweater.
Don’t get me wrong. The oil industry swung the balance of power to the West finally, and it was great to finally get a leader. But Stephen Harper was a placeholder until the Liberals, the governing party in this country, got their shit together.
I am too. But I’m ashamed where are our country has gone under the Trudeau government. A true lost decade of economic stagnation. Rampant activism. Identity politics. Clamping of free speech. Scandals. Affordability. Incompetence. Brutalization to our debt. I voted for him in 2015, sat out in 2019, voted O’Toole in 2021. Not sure I have it in me to vote Pierre in 2025. Truly a political orphan at this stage.
Last edited:
statquo
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,110
Actually a topic that has finally been pushed forth and that I’d be interested in hearing your thoughts is the disgraceful neglect our military is in. I don’t know how they plan to pay for it without generating more revenues or putting it on the credit card for the foreseeable future, but what are your thoughts on it?
If I may ask, as things may firm up on the Canadian Army reorg/rearm would you mind adding a thread to the Land Forces section? May get more readership there.
As a Tag Up Canadian (my grandparents made brief stops in the Maritimes) I am interested and I know others will as well.
statquo
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,110
And even still our troops had to buy their own equipment in Latvia
An 'embarrassing' gear shortage has Canadian troops in Latvia buying their own helmets
Helmets? All we had were blue berets.
Isn't Latvia a training deployment to NATO vice a peacekeeping deployment like the Balkans?
Isn't Latvia a training deployment to NATO vice a peacekeeping deployment like the Balkans?
Thanks Sir. 4CMBG huh? I have visions of piranha in a giant fish tank floating in my head!
statquo
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,110
I believe the Dutch had combat troops as well?
You’re not wrong. When he took over in 2006 we took over Kandahar, and domestically the Libs, NDP and Bloc wanted to end the combat mission and stick to humanitarian and reconstruction efforts.
Absolutely we did. And that work and effort improved the reputation of our military, domestically and internationally, after the neglect of the 90s.
But like I said earlier, Harper talked a big talk. He underfunded his own commitments, cut military spending in Con majority years in order to declare budget surpluses. His overall defense spending was no different than it is now. Harper just traded dollars for duties.
statquo
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,110
But still quite true. The LEO 2s and M777s were a necessity after we took over Kandahar region, no? I remember Harper getting criticized for ‘escalating’ the war after the LEO 2 purchase. Getting sweated for not spending the 2% isn’t anything new. We’ve heard it before. Harper was lucky to have been told nicely. But he was hyperactive and deployed our military to Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Iraq, coastline of Somalia.. We took the tough missions without the 2%. And that was the trade off, even if it meant the wear and tear of equipment was kicked down the road.
I remember… and it was inevitable we’d be signing back up for it, even if Trudeau wanted to look like he cared about cost and overruns. It was politics. It didn’t make sense to make that type of investment and then pull out. It wasn’t like the Avro Arrow suddenly came online for production.
Last edited:
statquo
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,110
Refresh my memory and knowledge. I thought the Americans, British, Canadians and Dutch were the only countries who took responsibility of provinces in Afghanistan with Canada Kandahar, Dutch Uruzgan and the US and British everything else? And that’s not by any means any disrespect to other NATO countries who fought in Afghanistan and lost brave troops.
Last edited:
statquo
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,110
Soldiers had to rely on food donations because of lack of military support during Ottawa training
Staff created a “food cupboard” for the cash-strapped military personnel so they wouldn’t go hungry during specialized cyber training.
Canadian Forces personnel sent to Ottawa for specialized cyber training had to rely on donated food to make ends meet because of the lack of support from the military and the high cost of living in the city.
In other cases, soldiers went months without being reimbursed by National Defence for their expenses, creating even more financial hardship, according to military personnel who approached this newspaper with their concerns.
The recruits were not initially eligible for any housing allowance while in Ottawa.
In addition, while the troops finished their initial cyber specialist training, some are still delayed in advancing to the next phase as they have had to wait between 18 months to two years for security background checks.
Chief of the Defence Staff Gen. Wayne Eyre, who has said that the welfare of military members is one of his top priorities, did not respond to a request to provide comment.
But National Defence spokesperson Andrée-Anne Poulin acknowledged in an emailed statement the ongoing issues faced by the cyber trainees who travel to Ottawa for instruction at Willis College.
At one point Willis College staff had to create a “food cupboard” for the cash-strapped military personnel so they wouldn’t go hungry.
“We take this matter very seriously, and we recognize the significant financial pressures new CAF (Canadian Armed Forces) members have faced in Ottawa, where the cost of living is high and the CAF has limited Base support services,” Poulin stated.
The department also acknowledged that following the resumption of training in the Ottawa area after the pandemic there was a large volume of various expenses submitted by military personnel that had to be processed. Poulin said the financial claims “initiated by the military personnel on the Willis course were given a higher priority as Canadian Forces Support Group (Ottawa-Gatineau) recognized their special challenges.”
The Canadian Forces first sent personnel to Willis College in 2020 for a course that lasted longer than a year. The military announced on Sept. 7, 2021 that the first 11 Canadian Forces personnel who had been instructed at Willis College had become fully trained as cyber operators.
Poulin said the Canadian Forces responded to the ongoing concerns about housing and financial issues for the students but that didn’t take place until January 2023. Subsidized accommodations were provided that month and those military personnel who chose alternate accommodations started receiving housing differential benefits on July 1, 2023.
As for the delays in security clearance, Poulin stated the department is trying to improve that vetting process. “The CAF has made recent changes to security clearance processing for Cyber Operators so that they can complete their initial training and be employed in their first units with fewer delays,” she added. “Processing the highest levels of security clearances in the CAF continues to be a challenge across occupation groups that require higher level security clearances.”
In February this newspaper reported on an internal National Defence review which concluded the department’s cyber force was being hindered by a lack of staff and training as well as security clearances that take far too long.
The force, made up of military and civilians, is supposed to handle cyber operations and protect networks at National Defence and in the Canadian military.
“The shortage of personnel is hampering the Cyber Force’s capacity to plan and implement a solution, risking cyber initiatives,” noted the 2021 evaluation released through the Access to Information law.
“Cyber positions are being allocated across DND/CAF yet there remains a shortage of personnel to fill them.”
The cyber operator job in the Canadian Forces was created on Jan. 31, 2017, in the aftermath of earlier direction from the government for the military and National Defence to become involved in cyber defences. Such individuals conduct a variety of cyber operations; they monitor Canadian Forces communication networks to detect and respond to attempts to hack the system as well as provide cyber support for military operations.
But the department declined to provide further details. The National Defence public affairs branch stated it cannot provide such information because of security reasons.
But that statement isn’t true; the Canadian Forces itself has put information online about the jobs its cyber operators perform as well as their qualifications. It has also highlighted graduating cyber operator classes. In addition, the Canadian Army published in 2019 a profile of the first female cyber operator.
The National Defence public affairs branch did not explain why it provided false information to this newspaper.
—————————————
That’ll help with recruitment :frown:
Staff created a “food cupboard” for the cash-strapped military personnel so they wouldn’t go hungry during specialized cyber training.
Canadian Forces personnel sent to Ottawa for specialized cyber training had to rely on donated food to make ends meet because of the lack of support from the military and the high cost of living in the city.
In other cases, soldiers went months without being reimbursed by National Defence for their expenses, creating even more financial hardship, according to military personnel who approached this newspaper with their concerns.
The recruits were not initially eligible for any housing allowance while in Ottawa.
In addition, while the troops finished their initial cyber specialist training, some are still delayed in advancing to the next phase as they have had to wait between 18 months to two years for security background checks.
Chief of the Defence Staff Gen. Wayne Eyre, who has said that the welfare of military members is one of his top priorities, did not respond to a request to provide comment.
But National Defence spokesperson Andrée-Anne Poulin acknowledged in an emailed statement the ongoing issues faced by the cyber trainees who travel to Ottawa for instruction at Willis College.
At one point Willis College staff had to create a “food cupboard” for the cash-strapped military personnel so they wouldn’t go hungry.
“We take this matter very seriously, and we recognize the significant financial pressures new CAF (Canadian Armed Forces) members have faced in Ottawa, where the cost of living is high and the CAF has limited Base support services,” Poulin stated.
The department also acknowledged that following the resumption of training in the Ottawa area after the pandemic there was a large volume of various expenses submitted by military personnel that had to be processed. Poulin said the financial claims “initiated by the military personnel on the Willis course were given a higher priority as Canadian Forces Support Group (Ottawa-Gatineau) recognized their special challenges.”
The Canadian Forces first sent personnel to Willis College in 2020 for a course that lasted longer than a year. The military announced on Sept. 7, 2021 that the first 11 Canadian Forces personnel who had been instructed at Willis College had become fully trained as cyber operators.
Poulin said the Canadian Forces responded to the ongoing concerns about housing and financial issues for the students but that didn’t take place until January 2023. Subsidized accommodations were provided that month and those military personnel who chose alternate accommodations started receiving housing differential benefits on July 1, 2023.
As for the delays in security clearance, Poulin stated the department is trying to improve that vetting process. “The CAF has made recent changes to security clearance processing for Cyber Operators so that they can complete their initial training and be employed in their first units with fewer delays,” she added. “Processing the highest levels of security clearances in the CAF continues to be a challenge across occupation groups that require higher level security clearances.”
In February this newspaper reported on an internal National Defence review which concluded the department’s cyber force was being hindered by a lack of staff and training as well as security clearances that take far too long.
The force, made up of military and civilians, is supposed to handle cyber operations and protect networks at National Defence and in the Canadian military.
“The shortage of personnel is hampering the Cyber Force’s capacity to plan and implement a solution, risking cyber initiatives,” noted the 2021 evaluation released through the Access to Information law.
“Cyber positions are being allocated across DND/CAF yet there remains a shortage of personnel to fill them.”
The cyber operator job in the Canadian Forces was created on Jan. 31, 2017, in the aftermath of earlier direction from the government for the military and National Defence to become involved in cyber defences. Such individuals conduct a variety of cyber operations; they monitor Canadian Forces communication networks to detect and respond to attempts to hack the system as well as provide cyber support for military operations.
But the department declined to provide further details. The National Defence public affairs branch stated it cannot provide such information because of security reasons.
But that statement isn’t true; the Canadian Forces itself has put information online about the jobs its cyber operators perform as well as their qualifications. It has also highlighted graduating cyber operator classes. In addition, the Canadian Army published in 2019 a profile of the first female cyber operator.
The National Defence public affairs branch did not explain why it provided false information to this newspaper.
—————————————
That’ll help with recruitment :frown:
statquo
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,110
Pierre will take his cues from the Con premiers and get rid of it. BC and whatever provinces that are for it will keep their own carbon pricing. He won’t win anything in Quebec or Vancouver so he’ll have to take the Harper route and win everywhere else plus the GTA.
I mean the carbon tax isn’t anything new. It’s been policy for a few years. Affordability, housing and just a bleak economic outlook is what should finish Trudeau. Still can’t believe they brought in a million immigrants in a year and didn’t have a housing policy. That’s just pure incompetence.
This, in a word, is disgraceful. Your fellow countrymen on Twitter are going absolutely ballistic over this and rightly so. I can get training with industry who have the latest and greatest. But in this case they may have well missed the mark. Hell, just send them to the US Cyber School at FT Eisenhower! It would have been cheaper and the Soldiers would have been properly cared for. BUt it would have been a hardship as they would have had to drink American beer and there is no hockey in Augusta since 2011.
statquo
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,110
Canada’s new defence policy marks a crucial shift in strategic thinking
Wesley Wark is a senior fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation and writes on national security and intelligence issues for his Substack newsletter.
Canada’s new defence policy, released today, makes two big promises. One is to enhance our ability to protect Canada’s sovereignty and interests in the Arctic; the other is to remake the CAF as a technologically advanced fighting force. Both promises will require big spending increases over an extended period.
The most significant advancement, however, may have less to do with buzzy technology and more to do with Canadian defence thinking at large.
The long-awaited policy defines Arctic security as “our most urgent task,” which is made clear by its title – “Our North, Strong and Free” – and the cover illustration of a Canadian frigate navigating through ice-free waters under the Northern Lights. The need for greater attention to the Arctic is premised on the effects of climate change, including in opening up the region to maritime transit and resource exploitation, and on heightened geopolitical tensions in the region, including Russian and Chinese activities.
The new-look defence of the Arctic will include enhanced basing capabilities, a fleet of airborne early-warning aircraft (AWACS, of which the CAF currently has none), deployment of ground and under-sea sensor capabilities to monitor activities in the region, the building of a satellite ground station in the Arctic, enhanced foreign intelligence capabilities, and new tactical helicopters that can operate in the high North. Alongside these capabilities, the defence policy promises improved capabilities of satellites looking down from space, and sets out that the government will “explore options” for a new submarine fleet with operational capacity under the ice.
But if Canada hopes to achieve a technologically cutting-edge military, there are a lot of capability gaps still to be filled, including new weaponry and planning for vastly increased data capabilities in the coming age of AI and quantum computing. Next-generation weaponry would include air-to-air missiles, ground air-defence systems, and long-range, land-based missile and artillery systems. DND will look at options for acquiring surveillance and strike drones and sophisticated counter-drone capabilities, with much of this based on lessons being learned from Russia’s war against Ukraine.
Command and control of a technologically modernized CAF will require enhanced communications capabilities, more and more of which will be based on satellite systems, including for accurate navigational capacity. This will also demand sophisticated and hardened computer capabilities.
The defence policy also acknowledges the need for Canada to have “much better eyes and ears in space.” This is an area in which Canada lags. However, we are home to cutting-edge technological and industry capabilities, and catching up is possible.
Improving our eyes and ears in space means not just developing an ability to have situational awareness in an increasingly crowded environment of low-Earth orbits, but creating capacity to use space platforms (satellites and high-altitude unmanned aircraft) to monitor the Earth’s surface for broad security purposes, including collecting intelligence on conflict zones and threats, and monitoring the effects of climate change. Satellites trained on the Arctic will be particularly important for the future of Canadian defence policy.
Perhaps most importantly, though, is that the DND and its partners are also considering releasing a public threat assessment document to underpin the policy. That they may do so suggests that the ministry is looking to bring the public along in thinking about the singular importance of the Arctic to Canada’s defence and broader contribution as an allied partner to NATO and NORAD. This is crucial, as spending forecasts for the new defence policy have both a five-year horizon (for a projected $8-billion commitment) and a 20-year horizon (for $73-billion) – big numbers that are beyond the remit of the current or future governments. Political buy-in will be necessary.
The new policy will also be anchored in a commitment to produce a national-security strategy every four years. Canada has not done so since 2004, despite multiple independent external appraisals stressing the need for such a strategy to ensure all Canadians understand the nature of the threat environment, what resources and tools will be needed to confront it, and the road map for government action. This innovation, as well as a vow to establish “a more regular cycle of review” for Canadian defence policy, signals a major shift, recognizing the risk of ad-hoc and episodic thinking about defence needs and the importance of embedding defence outlooks into the broader compass of national-security considerations.
The new policy, then, is a marker of new ambitions for Canadian defence. For the vision to become reality, it will be important for all political parties to identify their defence policies in their election platforms in 2025 (or earlier, depending on the political gods) so that voters can then have their say on this vision.
Wesley Wark is a senior fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation and writes on national security and intelligence issues for his Substack newsletter.
Canada’s new defence policy, released today, makes two big promises. One is to enhance our ability to protect Canada’s sovereignty and interests in the Arctic; the other is to remake the CAF as a technologically advanced fighting force. Both promises will require big spending increases over an extended period.
The most significant advancement, however, may have less to do with buzzy technology and more to do with Canadian defence thinking at large.
The long-awaited policy defines Arctic security as “our most urgent task,” which is made clear by its title – “Our North, Strong and Free” – and the cover illustration of a Canadian frigate navigating through ice-free waters under the Northern Lights. The need for greater attention to the Arctic is premised on the effects of climate change, including in opening up the region to maritime transit and resource exploitation, and on heightened geopolitical tensions in the region, including Russian and Chinese activities.
The new-look defence of the Arctic will include enhanced basing capabilities, a fleet of airborne early-warning aircraft (AWACS, of which the CAF currently has none), deployment of ground and under-sea sensor capabilities to monitor activities in the region, the building of a satellite ground station in the Arctic, enhanced foreign intelligence capabilities, and new tactical helicopters that can operate in the high North. Alongside these capabilities, the defence policy promises improved capabilities of satellites looking down from space, and sets out that the government will “explore options” for a new submarine fleet with operational capacity under the ice.
But if Canada hopes to achieve a technologically cutting-edge military, there are a lot of capability gaps still to be filled, including new weaponry and planning for vastly increased data capabilities in the coming age of AI and quantum computing. Next-generation weaponry would include air-to-air missiles, ground air-defence systems, and long-range, land-based missile and artillery systems. DND will look at options for acquiring surveillance and strike drones and sophisticated counter-drone capabilities, with much of this based on lessons being learned from Russia’s war against Ukraine.
Command and control of a technologically modernized CAF will require enhanced communications capabilities, more and more of which will be based on satellite systems, including for accurate navigational capacity. This will also demand sophisticated and hardened computer capabilities.
The defence policy also acknowledges the need for Canada to have “much better eyes and ears in space.” This is an area in which Canada lags. However, we are home to cutting-edge technological and industry capabilities, and catching up is possible.
Improving our eyes and ears in space means not just developing an ability to have situational awareness in an increasingly crowded environment of low-Earth orbits, but creating capacity to use space platforms (satellites and high-altitude unmanned aircraft) to monitor the Earth’s surface for broad security purposes, including collecting intelligence on conflict zones and threats, and monitoring the effects of climate change. Satellites trained on the Arctic will be particularly important for the future of Canadian defence policy.
Perhaps most importantly, though, is that the DND and its partners are also considering releasing a public threat assessment document to underpin the policy. That they may do so suggests that the ministry is looking to bring the public along in thinking about the singular importance of the Arctic to Canada’s defence and broader contribution as an allied partner to NATO and NORAD. This is crucial, as spending forecasts for the new defence policy have both a five-year horizon (for a projected $8-billion commitment) and a 20-year horizon (for $73-billion) – big numbers that are beyond the remit of the current or future governments. Political buy-in will be necessary.
The new policy will also be anchored in a commitment to produce a national-security strategy every four years. Canada has not done so since 2004, despite multiple independent external appraisals stressing the need for such a strategy to ensure all Canadians understand the nature of the threat environment, what resources and tools will be needed to confront it, and the road map for government action. This innovation, as well as a vow to establish “a more regular cycle of review” for Canadian defence policy, signals a major shift, recognizing the risk of ad-hoc and episodic thinking about defence needs and the importance of embedding defence outlooks into the broader compass of national-security considerations.
The new policy, then, is a marker of new ambitions for Canadian defence. For the vision to become reality, it will be important for all political parties to identify their defence policies in their election platforms in 2025 (or earlier, depending on the political gods) so that voters can then have their say on this vision.
So a question...just what can Canada afford? What are taxes like? How much defense spending can occur without damaging overall economy? What is you homegrown defense industry like? Thanks
statquo
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,110
We can’t afford anything. It’s either go further in debt or raise taxes higher, and with current affordability issues, that’s a none starter.
Perhaps growing the economy would help….
Okay...we are a different subgroup of our populations.
What is the general attitude of the Canadian populace towards rearming? They are the ones who will need to pay for it.
Thanks, Colonel
Excellent breakdown
Excellent breakdown
Colonel we have many of the same issues here. One of the ways the F-35 was kept going through its terrible mismanagement days was to spread production out across so many Congressional districts that cutting it became a political poison pill. In this case it turned to be a good idea to give LockMart time to work out the issues for the most part.
But it doesn't make sense on many programs. I mean you can't have frigates built in North Dakota.
But it doesn't make sense on many programs. I mean you can't have frigates built in North Dakota.
We catered the after action barbecues. They're kind of our forte!
Having attended BBQs hosted by 3RCR, PPCLI & RCHA this is spot on!
Colonel this blows my mind. Ten thousand dollars for a single rifle? It is just an AR-15 isn't it? Also, if the million round barrel life was a requirement specified by the Canadian military then the Chinese AK clone would fail the technical evaluation wouldn't it?
Also, that is a life cycle cost so it figures in all projected maintenance and upgrades as needed.
statquo
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,110
Canadian military to destroy 11,000 Second World War-era pistols
The move comes as the Canadian Forces confirmed it has received the final deliveries of a new 9-mm pistol as part of a $19.4-million project.
The Canadian military plans to destroy 11,000 of its Second World War-era pistols by the end of this year.
The move comes as the Canadian Forces confirmed it has received the final deliveries of a new 9-mm pistol as part of a $19.4-million project.
The military purchased the Sig Sauer P320, which is being distributed to units. It replaces the Browning Hi-Power pistol that has been used by the Canadian Forces for decades.
National Defence spokesperson Cheryl Forrest said all military units would send their Browning handguns to Canadian Forces supply depots in Quebec and Alberta for disposal.
“The pistols have not yet been destroyed,” she said in an email. “We anticipate the pistols will be disposed of by the end of 2024.”
Forrest said approximately 150 Browning Hi-Power handguns would be kept for museums, but at this point none had been distributed to those organizations.
In addition, the Canadian Army is determining if a small amount of the Brownings should be kept for special purposes or specific training, she added.
“The Canadian Army keeps a small stock of older small arms and small arms in service in other countries to assist with training for emergency situations and for recognition,” Forrest said. “The Browning may also retain some training value as a simulation/training tool.”
But no final decision on that has been made, she added.
More than a million Browning Hi-Power pistols were manufactured since the Second World War and the gun has been used by dozens of militaries and police forces.
The Canadian Forces previously removed another group of older weapons from its inventory when it provided modern rifles to the Canadian Rangers. That group had been using Lee Enfield rifles also from the Second World War era.
Around 9,500 Lee Enfields were transferred to military cadets, mostly as non-functional rifles, for use in drills or training. Approximately 5,000 of the rifles were gifted to serving Canadian Rangers.
Another 50 rifles were offered to museums affiliated with the Canadian Forces or military units as display artifacts, National Defence said.
After that, around 1,500 Lee Enfields remained and they were destroyed as the military ruled out sale of the surplus rifles to the general public.
The Canadian Forces announced it had received the final deliveries of the new P320s on March 6. The delivery involved 16,500 of what are being called C22 pistols. Those are being used by the army, navy and air force.
Another 3,200 new pistols, to be called the C24, were sent to military police units.
The federal government announced the awarding of the Sig Sauer P320 contract in October 2022. It was awarded to M.D. Charlton Co. Ltd. of Victoria, B.C.
The Sig Sauer P320 is in use with multiple militaries around the world including Denmark, France, and the United States. The Pentagon selected the P320 in 2017 and Sig Sauer is providing the U.S. military with 420,000 of those guns.
The Canadian military had been trying for years to replace its Browning Hi-Power pistols as it was running out of parts for the weapons.
The acquisition project was stalled for years after small arms firms rejected in 2011 the federal government requirement that the new guns be built at Colt Canada in Kitchener, Ont. In addition, the companies balked at a stipulation that they had to turn over proprietary firearms information to Colt, a firm some saw as a competitor.
The move comes as the Canadian Forces confirmed it has received the final deliveries of a new 9-mm pistol as part of a $19.4-million project.
The Canadian military plans to destroy 11,000 of its Second World War-era pistols by the end of this year.
The move comes as the Canadian Forces confirmed it has received the final deliveries of a new 9-mm pistol as part of a $19.4-million project.
The military purchased the Sig Sauer P320, which is being distributed to units. It replaces the Browning Hi-Power pistol that has been used by the Canadian Forces for decades.
National Defence spokesperson Cheryl Forrest said all military units would send their Browning handguns to Canadian Forces supply depots in Quebec and Alberta for disposal.
“The pistols have not yet been destroyed,” she said in an email. “We anticipate the pistols will be disposed of by the end of 2024.”
Forrest said approximately 150 Browning Hi-Power handguns would be kept for museums, but at this point none had been distributed to those organizations.
In addition, the Canadian Army is determining if a small amount of the Brownings should be kept for special purposes or specific training, she added.
“The Canadian Army keeps a small stock of older small arms and small arms in service in other countries to assist with training for emergency situations and for recognition,” Forrest said. “The Browning may also retain some training value as a simulation/training tool.”
But no final decision on that has been made, she added.
More than a million Browning Hi-Power pistols were manufactured since the Second World War and the gun has been used by dozens of militaries and police forces.
The Canadian Forces previously removed another group of older weapons from its inventory when it provided modern rifles to the Canadian Rangers. That group had been using Lee Enfield rifles also from the Second World War era.
Around 9,500 Lee Enfields were transferred to military cadets, mostly as non-functional rifles, for use in drills or training. Approximately 5,000 of the rifles were gifted to serving Canadian Rangers.
Another 50 rifles were offered to museums affiliated with the Canadian Forces or military units as display artifacts, National Defence said.
After that, around 1,500 Lee Enfields remained and they were destroyed as the military ruled out sale of the surplus rifles to the general public.
The Canadian Forces announced it had received the final deliveries of the new P320s on March 6. The delivery involved 16,500 of what are being called C22 pistols. Those are being used by the army, navy and air force.
Another 3,200 new pistols, to be called the C24, were sent to military police units.
The federal government announced the awarding of the Sig Sauer P320 contract in October 2022. It was awarded to M.D. Charlton Co. Ltd. of Victoria, B.C.
The Sig Sauer P320 is in use with multiple militaries around the world including Denmark, France, and the United States. The Pentagon selected the P320 in 2017 and Sig Sauer is providing the U.S. military with 420,000 of those guns.
The Canadian military had been trying for years to replace its Browning Hi-Power pistols as it was running out of parts for the weapons.
The acquisition project was stalled for years after small arms firms rejected in 2011 the federal government requirement that the new guns be built at Colt Canada in Kitchener, Ont. In addition, the companies balked at a stipulation that they had to turn over proprietary firearms information to Colt, a firm some saw as a competitor.
Out of curiosity why are the Rangers restricted to using bolt action rifles if they're officially a military unit?
Also, as I recall, the Canadian SLRs were having issues with splits appearing in the receivers/chambers due to aging. Heard it from 3RCR & PPCLI officers I served with an read in trade journals in the 1980s-90s.