Russia vs. West

Amled

Well-known member
There are times when Russia’s anti-western actions don’t exactly fall under, what could be construed as having relation to their actions in Ukraine.
Case in point:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...on-wanted-list
Russia puts Estonian prime minister Kaja Kallas on wanted list
She’s accused of ordering the destruction of statues honoring Russian soldiers.
Soldiers, that in 1939;; in conjunction with their allies Nazi Germany, took possession of her country.
And then again in 1945, after WWII re-took it, and kept a jackboot on its neck for close to 50 years.
As if any country; if they had the chance, wouldn’t want to remove any remnants of an authority that held them subjugated for nearly fifty years!
 
US has new intelligence on Russian nuclear capabilities in space

Washington (CNN) — The US has new intelligence on Russian military capabilities related to its efforts to deploy a nuclear anti-satellite system in space, according to multiple sources familiar with the intelligence.

The intelligence was briefed to Congress and key US allies, and some lawmakers say it is serious enough that it should be declassified and made public. While the intelligence is concerning, multiple senior members of Congress briefed on the information on Wednesday emphasized that it does not pose an immediate threat to the US or its interests.

The system remains under development and is not yet in orbit, according to three US officials familiar with the intelligence. It’s not clear how far the technology has progressed, one of the officials said. A separate US official told CNN the threat does not involve a weapon that would be used to attack humans.

It was not immediately clear whether the intelligence referred to a nuclear-powered, anti-satellite capability or a nuclear-armed capability.

While members of Congress downplayed the immediacy of the threat, an anti-satellite weapon placed in orbit around Earth would pose a significant danger to US nuclear command and control satellites, said Hans Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists. The US relies on such satellites – which he called “essential” – to ensure constant, seamless control over its nuclear arsenal.

Other countries have tested anti-satellite weapons in the past, but this would be an escalation, Kristensen said, and the US has made clear that it would react “very forcefully” to an attack on its nuclear command and control satellites.

“If it’s orbital, it’s a new level of threat [to the system], whether it’s nuclear or not,” said Kristensen, who added that even conventional weapons on an orbital anti-satellite system could pose a significant threat to the US.

ABC News first reported that the intelligence related to a Russian space-based nuclear capability.

Earlier Wednesday, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Republican Rep. Mike Turner of Ohio, ignited a firestorm on Capitol Hill when he issued a cryptic statement announcing that the panel had “information concerning a serious national security threat.”

In a letter to lawmakers inviting them to view the intelligence in the committee’s classified spaces, he said that it related to a “destabilizing foreign military capability that should be known by all congressional policymakers.”

Immediately, lawmakers began tramping down to the House basement to learn what the intelligence was.

Some left underwhelmed. One Democratic member with deep national security experience said that they had never before received that kind of urgent summons over a national security matter during their time in Congress — and that the intelligence they saw when they arrived was not urgent enough to justify Turner’s alarm-pulling.

Within hours, the Republican speaker of the House, Rep. Mike Johnson, attempted to tamp down the imbroglio, telling reporters that “there is no cause for alarm” and indicating that he had known about the intelligence since at least January.

“We just want to assure everyone steady hands are at the wheel. We’re working on it and there’s no need for alarm,” Johnson said.

————————————

More in the link
 
Looks like Moscow was having fun re. Estonia .

Simply feeds the MSM with another piece of drivel for them to fill up their brain dead publications .
It will allow them to add to their soppy stories of Moscow planning to attack everybody in Europe and NATO next week .
 
Looks like Moscow was having fun re. Estonia .

Simply feeds the MSM with another piece of drivel for them to fill up their brain dead publications .
It will allow them to add to their soppy stories of Moscow planning to attack everybody in Europe and NATO next week .

That's an interesting perspective. Would you mind heading over to our Introduction Thread and telling us a little bit about yourself please? Thanks!
 
...Russian nuclear capabilities in space...

If Russia puts some nuclear warheads into orbit, it might be more useful to them to put HEMP weapons in orbit and use those to directly degrade various critical infrastructure systems in specific geographical regions on the surface, rather than putting similar efforts into orbiting nuclear warheads to use as ASAT weapons, a use which would risk cascaded satellite destruction, Kessler Syndrome, destroying all satellites in that orbit altitude, which would also destroy satellites used by Russia. If Putin wants to trigger that Kessler Syndrome event, then there are cheaper and easier means of doing so, maybe with plausable deniability on the attribution.

Used as HEMP weapons, there would be little or no warning when warheads are deorbited to detonate in the ionosphere, roughly 100km MSL. There would be no blast effects at the surface, no noise, little flash and no significant change in ambient nuclear radiation, just the destructive EMF effects in vulnerable systems not sufficiently hardened against such. Russia would not be directly affected, and might be risking little retaliation beyond some increase in economic sanctions they are currently experiencing.

This is not intended to paint the subject matter in any sensational rhetoric. I just do not see Putin gaining much in funding orbiting nuclear ASAT weapons, versus some portable ground based system. I do see where Putin might see more value in having HEMP weapons in orbit at the ready.

Opinions vary.
 
Last edited:
Bloomberg said:
Friday, 23 February 2024
Admiral Stavridis: India is Key to Resolving Ukraine, Russia Conflict
(05 min, 33 sec)
Retired US Naval Admiral and Bloomberg Opinion columnist James Stavridis offers his take on conflict across the globe. He speaks with Tom Keene and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio.
...
 
The problem with nuclear weapons in space is maintenance. My understanding as a lay person is that most conventional warheads need their tritium replaced at least once a decade. Then you have the problem that the conventional shaped explosive charges will also degrade due to radiation exposure. All of which means once you're put it up there you either have to send someone up to do maintenance or you write the weapon off and (hopefully) boost it out into a decaying solar orbit. So if we're talking about more that a few bombs at a time in orbit the whole enterprise is going to get very expensive very quickly. You'll be committing yourself to a costly long term maintenance program or an equally costly capital write off, at least compared to the per unit cost of maintaining the same number of ground based weapons. I'd also question whether your attack profile is shortened enough to make the whole effort really worth while. How much time are you really saving by having your warheads in orbit over conventional surface based nukes. As far as I can see its mostly just the time in boost.

I suppose a complete redesign could give you a viable bomb capable of lasting say 20 years in orbit without maintenance but I still doubt the benefits will outweigh the costs. And even then I don't know how costly it would be to design and build the launch vehicle (satellite) containing your bomb given all the guidance and navigation electronics etc also have to have the same 20 year plus lifespan. I haven't seen any hard figures but for most satellites 20 years would seem to be pushing the envelope.
 
Last edited:
Don't need nukes in space.

Project Thor

Ah yes, the old 'rods from god trick'. By way of clarification I only posted what I did as a response to Putin's supposed interest in putting a nuclear weapon (system) in to orbit and the problems with that idea. In reality? This is another of his great Russian 'super weapon' boasts. Like the Armata tank, the SU-35 and his robotic long range nuclear torpedo. Honestly? IMO the man seems more like Hitler every day, trying to 'wunder weapon' his way to global relevancy. And yet? He's just as misguided.
 
Last edited:
The US used 250 pound concrete bombs enforcing the SOuthern Iraqi No Fly Zone in the 18 months prior to OIF to reduce collateral damage, especially targets located in civilian areas. They were basically inert JDAMS. Really devastating against radar stations and air defense system control vans.
 
Ah yes, the old 'rods from god trick'. By way of clarification I only posted what I did as a response to Putin's supposed interest in putting a nuclear weapon (system) in to orbit and the problems with that idea. In reality? This is another of his great Russian 'super weapon' boasts. Like the Armata tank, the SU-35 and his robotic long range nuclear torpedo. Honestly? IMO the man seems more like Hitler every day, trying to 'wunder weapon' his way to global relevancy. And yet? He's just as misguided.

Succeeded in getting Congress to panic anyway, not that Congress is full of bright people.

All you need in space is the ability to manuever a block into another. I heard of expected Russian ability to do that circa 2016/2017. There was a Russian I believe military satellite that deviated from expected orbit. The U.S. commercial satellite in the neighborhood complained of the closeness (been awhile, 10 miles maybe? this is close in space) and the Russians apologized citing satellite malfunction, but it was suspected at the time the deviation was intentional
 
Succeeded in getting Congress to panic anyway, not that Congress is full of bright people.

All you need in space is the ability to manuever a block into another. I heard of expected Russian ability to do that circa 2016/2017. There was a Russian I believe military satellite that deviated from expected orbit. The U.S. commercial satellite in the neighborhood complained of the closeness (been awhile, 10 miles maybe? this is close in space) and the Russians apologized citing satellite malfunction, but it was suspected at the time the deviation was intentional

If you really want to play a game of 'space billiards' using your own and your opponents satellites you can of course but nukes aren't required.
 
Transnistria: Will Russia's next war be in Moldova?
https://www.dw.com/en/transnistria-w...ova/a-68418058
With Finland and Sweden now safely under NATO’s umbrella,
it seems that Moldova is the last piece of low hanging fruit, a would-be conquer like Putin can safely pick here in Europe!
If that turns out to be the case, it just remains, will he make a move on Moldova, before trying to take Odessa?:frown:
 
https://kyivindependent.com/russia-d...rorist-attack/

Russia demands extradition of Ukrainians, including head of SBU, after ISIS-K attributed terrorist attack

OK, seeing the venue of the link, it’s fair to say that it would probably have to be taken with a grain of salt….but still?
Then it struck me…it’s April 1[SUP]st[/SUP]. so it’s a an April Fools Gag!:biggrin:
Nope, it was true!:eek:
The Russians want the Ukrainian’s to hand over a number of high-ranking Ukrainian’s as complicit in the recent attack in Moscow! They can’t even be bothered to submit any manufactured evidence to substantiate their demands!!!
Talk about chutzpah!!!:rolleyes:
 
If Russia puts some nuclear warheads into orbit, it might be more useful to them to put HEMP weapons in orbit and use those to directly degrade various critical infrastructure systems in specific geographical regions on the surface, rather than putting similar efforts into orbiting nuclear warheads to use as ASAT weapons, a use which would risk cascaded satellite destruction, Kessler Syndrome, destroying all satellites in that orbit altitude, which would also destroy satellites used by Russia. If Putin wants to trigger that Kessler Syndrome event, then there are cheaper and easier means of doing so, maybe with plausable deniability on the attribution.

Used as HEMP weapons, there would be little or no warning when warheads are deorbited to detonate in the ionosphere, roughly 100km MSL. There would be no blast effects at the surface, no noise, little flash and no significant change in ambient nuclear radiation, just the destructive EMF effects in vulnerable systems not sufficiently hardened against such. Russia would not be directly affected, and might be risking little retaliation beyond some increase in economic sanctions they are currently experiencing.

This is not intended to paint the subject matter in any sensational rhetoric. I just do not see Putin gaining much in funding orbiting nuclear ASAT weapons, versus some portable ground based system. I do see where Putin might see more value in having HEMP weapons in orbit at the ready.

Opinions vary.

Russia has virtually defeated West in Ukraine. They have more to laugh on Western sanctions. These sanctions gave new opportunity to trade in Chinese Yuan with other countries in place of dollar. With trading with india and other countries in local currencies, is now visible
 
Back
Top