Australian Politics - are we there yet?

Bigfella

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 12, 2007
Messages
10,696
Location
Melbourne
As Canada isn't the only place having an election this week I might as well offer a few insights and explanation to our non-Australian posters. In the interests of full disclosure I'm a pretty rusted on Labor (ALP) voter, but I'll try to keep this as unbiased as I can. I'm sure Monash will jump in to keep me honest if required. ;)

OK, so first the system and the players. We have a bicameral Parliament and a multi party system. Our lower house or House of Representitives is based on single member constituencies and elected using preferential voting. The upper house or Senate is notionally the State's house, with 12 senators per state (and two each for the two territories) based on proportional representation and an impossibly complicated preferential system ). The main parties are: The Labor party (ALP), a centre left party that has been shifting firmly toward the centre for over 40 years; The Liberal party, a centre right party that has been shifting firmly to the right for 30 years (arguably 50, but thats another discussion); The National party, a right wing agrarian socialist party that represents rural voters & is in permenant coalition with the Liberals - collectively the LNP; The Greens - you already know. There are a bunch of minor parties not worth explaining, but the other relvant grouping is a collection of centre-right independents (not a formal party) known as the Teals. They grabbed a bunch of formerly safe LNP seats at the last election based on their support for environmental & more progressive social policies. They have created a major impediment to the LNP forming a government.

In 2022 Labor returned to power under Anthony Albanese (universally known as Albo) an affable former member of the party's left who shifted centre more recently. While he only gained a small majority, the immense unpopularity of the LNP government made him very popular initially. The leader of the opposition is Peter Dutton, a member of the party's right who lacks Albo's ease with people....to put it mildly. Dutton is most effective on the attack and is especially fond of 'culture wars' issues. He got his opportunity when the ALP held a referrendum on constitutional recognition for Indigenous people in the constitution in late 2023. This had originally been a bipartisan endevour, but Dutton unsurprisingly opposed it and it was defeated. Following that Albanese's popularity dropped & he adopted a more cautious style. Additionally, the war in Gaza has been an issue for the ALP, with muslim voters generally concentrated in ALP seats and an ALP senator leaving the party to form her own Muslim-based party. Another problem for the ALP is an increasingly unpopular Labor state government in Victoria, easily Labor's strongest state. By late last year the LNP was consistently polling ahead of the ALP and Dutton was more explicitly associating himself with the ascendant Donald Trump. That seemed a winning strategy at the start of the year, but Trump's erratic behaviour has seen the LNP desperately trying to distance itself from him.

As is often the case with politics, most people only start paying attention when the campaign begins. The election was called in late March for May 3. By this point the LNP vote had begun to drop & the ALP was level or slightly ahead. It is fair to say the LNP has had a nightmare of a campaign. As mentioned, Albo has an advantage in the 'likeability' stakes and Dutton's preferred style of attacking has been undermined by people's reaction to Trump. That alone would be an issue, but the LNP doesn't seem to have thought out its policies very well. The result is multiple backflips & contradictory messages. A policy to build nuclear reactors that was supposed to appeal to people after lower energy prices has become increasingly unpopular and seems unlikely to help win back 'Teal' seats or Victorian voters. The ALP hasn't done anything spectacular, but it has been disciplined & on message. Dutton has increasingly retreated to 'culture wars' issues that look more aimed at stopping LNP voters drifting to right wing minor parties than trying to gain seats from the ALP or Teals.

As of today polling says that the ALP will retain and possibly expand its majority while the Liberal party will register its lowest vote since the party's foundation in 1944. I am not convinced of either claim. I suspect there will be some very odd results in individual seats. So, my prediction is a minority ALP government that negotiates with the Greens & Teals to guarantee supply. That said, I won't be shocked with a narrow ALP win. Other results seem considerably less likely.

While there are some similarities here with Canada, they should not be overstated. The ALP was never as unpopular as the Liberals in Canada & they weren't burdened with a leader as unpopular as Trudeau. The LNP was ahead for the past 6 months, but not as far ahead as the Conservatives in Canada. They also have a leader who has never been especially popular personally. While Trump has had an impact here, he is not the issue he is in Canada. Further, Australia has not thrown out a first term government at Federal level since 1932 - the depth of the Great Depression. That said, with cost of living still an issue here there was definately an opening for the opposition, but they had to have a more effective strategy.

By this time tomorrow we will likely know the results.
 
There doesn't seem to be an 'edit' function. Crap!

I meant to mention that I can't remember an electorate less interested in a campaign, thus the title. We all feel a bit like the kid stuck in the car asking 'are we there yet' 10 minutes into a half day drive. :(
 
Well the results are in and it looks like a clear win for Labor with their majority in the lower house increasing significantly and the Liberals taking a caning. It was so bad even Dutton the Opposition Leader lost his seat. The half Senate election though, as always is more complicated. At this stage it looks like Labor has gained three seats at the Liberals expense but will still need minor party support to pass legislation. The big winners seem to be the Greens who are likely to increase their numbers in the Senate (from 5 seats of the 40 seats up for grabs to 11). To early to tell if they'll hold the balance of power though which is a prospect the government will NOT be looking forward to. We still have to wait a while to see what the final picture will look like.
 
Last edited:
Does a Labour victory mean status quo or can we expect big foreign policy changes?

Short answer - no.

Longer answer - the ALP has been committed to the US/Australia alliance since it started it in WW2, but it is also better placed to reach out beyond that, especially in our region. Our foreign minister, Penny Wong, is not only one of the smartest people in Parliament, she was born in Malaysia to a Malaysian Chinese father & speaks at least some Bahasa Malaysia, Cantonese & Hakka. She has done a great job strengthening ties in the region & combatting negative images of Australia.

If events in America compel changes Labor is reasonably placed to manage them.
 
It will take a few days to finalize lower house numbers & longer for the Senate count, but there are some conclusions that can already be drawn.

This is a historically bad result for the LNP. They are likely to have their lowest primary vote since the party was formed in 1944 and they will have less than 50 seats in a 150 seat parliament. They lost seats & suffered swings in every state. They no longer hold a single seat in Tasmania or in Adelaide & have virtually been wiped out in Perth & Melbourne. For a party that was supposed to be targetting the suburbs where most Australians live this is a terrible result.

Labor had a truly remarkable night. It has already won the largest number of seats in its history with the largest share of the vote (2 party preferred) since 1946. If it gets over 90 seats, which seems possible, it will be the equal largest percentage of lower house seats (with the 1983 landslide win) since WW2. While an ALP win was considered likely, literally no one, including ALP insiders, saw this coming. As Monash says, there will be a need to negotiate in the Senate, but this has been the case for decades. The ALP will work with the Greens & the LNP if necessary. Stuff will get done.

So what does this all mean?

For the LNP this is a crisis. The long shift of to the right and obsession with 'culture wars' issues has finally come back to bite it in a major way. Courtesy of 'compulsary voting'* and preferential voting it isn't possible for parties who want to govern to just appeal to their base. They can't ignore the base, but it won't win them government. The LNP has cultivated an increasingly right wing base over the past few decades. Too many in the LNP have been happy to pitch to ageing consumers of Murdoch owned media and convince themselves this is 'Australia. It isn't. That demographic is literally dying off. This has had serious negative consequences in some states - especially Victoria - but it was always able to find some sort of balance at Federal level. Dutton was a risk to this because he has always been a hard right 'culture wars' politician. The party is now low on talent and some of the younger members who might have been expected to step up in this moment have lost their seats. It has some thinking to do.

In some ways the pictue for the ALP is messier. While the repudiation of the LNP is clear, it isn't necessarily a full embrace of the ALP. Albanese will now have unchallenged authority within the party to implement his ideas, but its not entirely clear what those will be. History suggests that even governments that win a landslide run major risks if they begin to implement big policies they didn't specifically explain they were implementing at the election. History also suggests that the relative position of the two parties gives the ALP a big chance at winning at least one more term. We will get a clearer sense of the second term agenda over the next few months.

On a personal note I am overjoyed. While Albanese has his flaws, he is a good person with sound ideas and I am pleased he will now have a bit of space to implement them. Even more importantly, this is a firm rejection of what many ordinary people have described as 'Trump-style politics'. People don't want a government based on anger, hate, division and scapegoating. The LNP have gone too far down that road. They have some major decisions to make while Albo gets on with governing.


*Just to clarify, no one is compelled to vote for anyone in Australia. People are compelled to get their name marked off the electoral role as having participated. You can return a blank ballot or just write a pithy observation rather than casting a valid vote.
 
Back
Top