Originally posted by Monash
View Post
For example, German legislation:
1. sexual acts* with a person under 14 are illegal
2. sexual acts with a person under 16 can be illegal if the person isn't mentally capable of sexual self-determination (and the perpetrator is over 21)
3. youths over 14 are legally able to be guilty of a crime
4. youths over 14 but under 21 are only legally responsible for a crime if the perpetrator is mentally capable of understanding the illegality of their acts and their guilt in the crime.
It's pretty much the other way around from blunt. We have a word for law combinations like that. Schwammig. Spongy. Effectively the judge can do pretty much anything with the above.
* sexual acts being defined as any act concerning sexuality; passive, active, voyeuristic (if the act is requested), exhibitionist. The possible sentence depends on the circumstances of the act, i.e. whether penetration occurs, whether there are multiple perpetrators, whether there was physical or psychological damage to the victim etc.
Comment