Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Chronicling Mitt Romey's Lies

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 15
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 15 template Next
  • #1

    Chronicling Mitt Romey's Lies

    Already up to it's 33'rd installment, this edition has 30 points in which he has lied, stretched the truth, or just plain mis-lead by deceit.

    "Jon Chait noted the other day that Mitt Romney "has built his entire campaign on, well, lies." Jon made the observation in passing, but it struck me as significant, especially as the Republican National Convention unfolded -- Romney isn't the first national politician to try to deceive the public, but he's arguably the first to build his entire campaign around the deceptions."

    HERE
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Don't you think you could have just created one thread, something along the lines of "I don't like Romney, neener neener neener" instead of three separate ones all pretty much saying the same thing?
    Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

    Abusing Yellow is meant to be a labor of love, not something you sell to the highest bidder.

    Comment

    • #3
      Originally posted by dmwnc1959 View Post
      Already up to it's 33'rd installment, this edition has 30 points in which he has lied, stretched the truth, or just plain mis-lead by deceit.

      Really? A link to the Rachel Madcow blog? You have proven you cannot think for yourself. Tis better to let people think you are a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
      "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams

      Comment

      • #4
        Originally posted by bigross86 View Post
        Don't you think you could have just created one thread, something along the lines of "I don't like Romney, neener neener neener" instead of three separate ones all pretty much saying the same thing?
        With that kind of attitude, they'll likely sink to the bottom anyway.
        “He was the most prodigious personification of all human inferiorities. He was an utterly incapable, unadapted, irresponsible, psychopathic personality, full of empty, infantile fantasies, but cursed with the keen intuition of a rat or a guttersnipe. He represented the shadow, the inferior part of everybody’s personality, in an overwhelming degree, and this was another reason why they fell for him.”

        Comment

        • #5
          Spamming is better?
          No such thing as a good tax - Churchill

          To make mistakes is human. To blame someone else for your mistake, is strategic.

          Comment

          • #6
            Originally posted by McFire View Post
            Really? A link to the Rachel Madcow blog? You have proven you cannot think for yourself. Tis better to let people think you are a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
            So if anyone EVER posts a link to ANY article from ANY source that they tend to agree with now all of a sudden that means they can't think for themselves? Maybe if I were quoting from those whose opinions are from the Right like Rush, Beck, O'Reilly, or Hannity it would be more credible? Did you even bother to read the blog or did you instantaneously roll your eyes because of the source and instantly dismiss it? My guess is you never bothered to even read it. Closed minded much? Pitiful.

            Comment

            • #7
              Originally posted by bigross86 View Post
              Don't you think you could have just created one thread, something along the lines of "I don't like Romney, neener neener neener" instead of three separate ones all pretty much saying the same thing?
              Even though there may be a common theme among the threads that the GOP and Mitt Romney have been telling bold face lies from Day 1 and held the American people and its economy hostage because they don't like the person sitting in the oval office, I thought each deserved its own space so that they didn't get lost in mayhem. ;)

              Comment

              • #8
                Originally posted by dmwnc1959 View Post
                So if anyone EVER posts a link to ANY article from ANY source that they tend to agree with now all of a sudden that means they can't think for themselves? Maybe if I were quoting from those whose opinions are from the Right like Rush, Beck, O'Reilly, or Hannity it would be more credible? Did you even bother to read the blog or did you instantaneously roll your eyes because of the source and instantly dismiss it? My guess is you never bothered to even read it. Closed minded much? Pitiful.
                I read it. For each of her points she sourced herself as evidence, apart from one which sourced herself saying Biden had said the republicans wouldn't work with Obama. But with no evidence. Is that all you have?
                In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility.

                Leibniz

                Comment

                • #9
                  Originally posted by dmwnc1959 View Post
                  So if anyone EVER posts a link to ANY article from ANY source that they tend to agree with now all of a sudden that means they can't think for themselves? Maybe if I were quoting from those whose opinions are from the Right like Rush, Beck, O'Reilly, or Hannity it would be more credible? Did you even bother to read the blog or did you instantaneously roll your eyes because of the source and instantly dismiss it? My guess is you never bothered to even read it. Closed minded much? Pitiful.
                  No, they wouldn't. Because serious posters here on the WAB don't post links to Rush, Beck, Hannity or the rest, to support their argument.

                  It would be like posting links to Carlo Kopp or Mike "Sparky" Sparks to support argument about aircraft or armored vehicles. It's just plain idiotic.
                  “He was the most prodigious personification of all human inferiorities. He was an utterly incapable, unadapted, irresponsible, psychopathic personality, full of empty, infantile fantasies, but cursed with the keen intuition of a rat or a guttersnipe. He represented the shadow, the inferior part of everybody’s personality, in an overwhelming degree, and this was another reason why they fell for him.”

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Originally posted by TopHatter View Post
                    It would be like posting links to Carlo Kopp or Mike "Sparky" Sparks to support argument ...
                    Leave GG and AR out of this. They reached truce an are happy having the YelloHunt season opened.
                    No such thing as a good tax - Churchill

                    To make mistakes is human. To blame someone else for your mistake, is strategic.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Parihaka View Post
                      I read it. For each of her points she sourced herself as evidence, apart from one which sourced herself saying Biden had said the republicans wouldn't work with Obama. But with no evidence. Is that all you have?
                      There's proof right there that you DIDN'T read it. The blog isn't written by Rachel Maddow, it's written by Steve Bennen. If you bothered to read it you would see embedded within the articles were sources were quotes and links from national newspapers and magazines. Try again.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Originally posted by dmwnc1959 View Post
                        There's proof right there that you DIDN'T read it. The blog isn't written by Rachel Maddow, it's written by Steve Bennen. If you bothered to read it you would see embedded within the articles were sources were quotes and links from national newspapers and magazines. Try again.
                        Oh sorry. She got someone else to write on her blog, sourcing her blog as proof. That's better is it?
                        In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility.

                        Leibniz

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Parihaka View Post
                          Oh sorry. She got someone else to write on her blog, sourcing her blog as proof. That's better is it?
                          Still haven't bothered to read it have you? Wow.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Originally posted by TopHatter View Post
                            No, they wouldn't. Because serious posters here on the WAB don't post links to Rush, Beck, Hannity or the rest, to support their argument.

                            It would be like posting links to Carlo Kopp or Mike "Sparky" Sparks to support argument about aircraft or armored vehicles. It's just plain idiotic.
                            Kind of like Fox and Friends? That kind of idiotic? ;)

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Attached Files

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 15 template Next
                              Working...
                              X