Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kerry Bad For America

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Kerry Bad For America

    Open letter to John Kerry

    To be an American is something more than an aspiration or an idea. Americans have a right to be led by a fellow American, not by someone who received a good part of his education in a European country; by a drifter who lived in a boarding house. Americans have a right to choose a leader who does not chase after very rich women to satisfy his political hunger, or by a looser who cut classes to learn how to fly. An American leader should be something more than an adventure seeker. A leader should actually convey a sense of core values and have roots ... not contradict himself at every possible opportunity, and show a different face depending on the audience. John Kerry is a political ghost. His “values” are invisible – his “ethic”, fleeting.

    Do Americans want a Mozambique-born cosmopolitan liberal first lady with a Portuguese accent in the White House? Do Americans want a Marxist/socialist woman as our next first lady who has been quoted as saying “No American boy or girl should have to go to war and lose their lives because of our gluttonous need for oil”? The same woman who owns three SUV’s!? The same woman who said that “Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with terrorism”? Who are you people? ‘What’ are you people?

    Do Americans want the daughter of their leader to show off her tits at a film festival? >> http://www.strangecosmos.com/content/item/100009.html << Sexual promiscuity, enormous wealth, and Marxist/socialist leanings threatens business interests, the image of Americana, and American values. Is ‘this’ what Americans want?

    John Kerry is a rogue member of the Skull and Bones society at Yale. The difference between Kerry and other members of Skull & Bones is that Kerry betrayed its philosophy by constantly speaking out against Vietnam. Kerry is not a team player. John Kerry was educated primarily in Europe; made it a point to date very rich women; and applied for navy patrol boat duty in Nam: because he was taken in by John F. Kennedy’s sailing and philandering. Kerry explains his yen for adventure when he said, “I cut classes, I didn't do much. I spent a lot of time learning to fly”. Obviously, Kerry’s hunger for power is not based on a love, or loyality for American values (or his wife’s) ... they are based on recklessness and a sense of adventure. I would hate to see a family of pigs like this in the White House!

    This situation is remarkably similar to what we had in 1963 when the ungrateful and self righteous Kennedy clan was also threatening to become a monarchy on American soil. So far, Kerry has succeeded in threatening to reconstitute the liberal bureaucracy of a bygone era. And for what it is worth, like the Kennedy’s, Kerry has also succeeded in angering the Catholic Church. Politics makes for strange bedfellows.




    Philip

  • #2
    To be honest I can't think of any politician that is good for America.

    We need a philosoper president like Jefferson not a profesional bull shit artist.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by KerryGoHome
      Open letter to John Kerry

      To be an American is something more than an aspiration or an idea. Americans have a right to be led by a fellow American, not by someone who received a good part of his education in a European country; by a drifter who lived in a boarding house. Americans have a right to choose a leader who does not chase after very rich women to satisfy his political hunger, or by a looser who cut classes to learn how to fly. An American leader should be something more than an adventure seeker. A leader should actually convey a sense of core values and have roots ... not contradict himself at every possible opportunity, and show a different face depending on the audience. John Kerry is a political ghost. His “values” are invisible – his “ethic”, fleeting.
      Uhuh... coke sniffing president is always a better alternative


      Originally posted by KerryGoHome
      Do Americans want the daughter of their leader to show off her tits at a film festival? >> http://www.strangecosmos.com/content/item/100009.html << Sexual promiscuity, enormous wealth, and Marxist/socialist leanings threatens business interests, the image of Americana, and American values. Is ‘this’ what Americans want?
      Philip
      You are right, what I Americans really want is a president who's both daughters are alcoholics, official document forgerers, and peace disturbers. We should also follow Taliban example and make all women wear bedsheets over their bodies and if they dare as much as to show their ankles we will stone them.

      Originally posted by KerryGoHome
      John Kerry is a rogue member of the Skull and Bones society at Yale. The difference between Kerry and other members of Skull & Bones is that Kerry betrayed its philosophy by constantly speaking out against Vietnam. Kerry is not a team player. John Kerry was educated primarily in Europe; made it a point to date very rich women; and applied for navy patrol boat duty in Nam: because he was taken in by John F. Kennedy’s sailing and philandering. Kerry explains his yen for adventure when he said, “I cut classes, I didn't do much. I spent a lot of time learning to fly”. Obviously, Kerry’s hunger for power is not based on a love, or loyality for American values (or his wife’s) ... they are based on recklessness and a sense of adventure. I would hate to see a family of pigs like this in the White House!
      FIrst, bush is a member of skull and bones himself. Betrayed? Depends how you look at it.. may be had enough balls not to be a sheep and speak his own mind, not afraid of what his daddy is going to say or how much millions in donations he will loose. Oh, and a vast majority of people who actually faught in Vietnam and didnt watch it from a couch in trailer would much rather prefer that liberal guy. Along with thousands of bustard kids, widows, and parents who lost somebody in that useless war.
      Cut classes? Is that your big point? Obviously you have not gotten past your GED, nobody who actually went to a university would stress that point. I am going to repeat myself here, but I think Americans deserve a literate president first. I guess daddy's influence can get you up the ladder and his money can by you an admission and a degree but as they say "You can take the boy out of hick redneck country but you can't take the hick out of the boy". My favorite Bush's quote "nuCELar". You want a president who makes US the laughing stock of the whole world when he says that Cashmere is a sweater and Sri Lanka is a person? Our school's janitor who doesn't even speak english knows the difference.


      Originally posted by KerryGoHome
      And for what it is worth, like the Kennedy’s, Kerry has also succeeded in angering the Catholic Church. Politics makes for strange bedfellows.
      Read the constitution. "The church shall not interfere with the affairs of state".
      Catholic church should be the last one to talk about morals. Do you know where I'm going?
      Sometthing that never changes about Republicans: cheap, sleezy, tabloid type unrelated propaganda.

      Comment


      • #4
        My favorite Bush's quote "nuCELar".
        Are you making fun of the way I say the word?
        "Every man has his weakness. Mine was always just cigarettes."

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Irondüke
          Are you making fun of the way I say the word?
          : )
          Every time I hear somebody pronounce it that way I get an image of Homer Simpson in my head "The correct way to say it is nucelar, Lisa". And Bush of course



          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by berkut
            Sometthing that never changes about Republicans: cheap, sleezy, tabloid type unrelated propaganda.
            Gore must be a Republican then.
            No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack
            I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry
            even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry
            He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry

            Comment


            • #7
              Ah, I must have missed that. I guess I'm cheap and sleazy.
              "Every man has his weakness. Mine was always just cigarettes."

              Comment


              • #8
                Updated version of Open Letter to John Kerry...

                Open letter to John Kerry

                To be an American is something more than an aspiration or an idea. Americans have a right to be led by a fellow American, not by someone who received a good part of his education in a European country; by a drifter who lived in a boarding house. Americans have a right to choose a leader who does not chase after very rich women to satisfy his political hunger, or by a looser who cut classes to learn how to fly. An American leader should be something more than an adventure seeker. A leader should actually convey a sense of core values and have roots ... not contradict himself at every possible opportunity, and show a different face depending on the audience. John Kerry is a political ghost. His “values” are invisible – his “ethic”, fleeting.

                Do Americans want a Mozambique-born cosmopolitan liberal first lady with a Portuguese accent in the White House? Do Americans want a Marxist/socialist woman who inherited over five-hundred-million-dollars from her former husband as our next first lady – who has been quoted as saying “No American boy or girl should have to go to war and lose their lives because of our gluttonous need for oil”? The same woman who owns three SUV’s!? The same woman who said that “Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with terrorism”? Who are you people? ‘What’ are you?

                Bush bashers who criticize the way he handles the press and gives speeches are contradicting themselves. To those critics who say “Politics is an art form, and ‘therefore’ things are said in a certain way to please the crowd”, etc. This kind of thinking is way off the mark and was expressed in a letter I recently received from a friend. When on the subject of flip-flopping she said “Welcome to the world of politics, that’s the nature of the game and if you haven't figured that out yet hopefully you will soon. EVERYBODY including good old George Bush plays to the crowd. They set up to be the most appealing to the audience”. Quite revealing, I thought. If entertainment is what you are looking for then hire a magician, not a president. For those old enough to remember the television program To Tell the Truth: where there were three people associated with a story, and the panelists had to guess who was the real person involved. At the end of the program, the host would ask “Will the real, (so and so), please stand up”! I get the same sensation listening to John Kerry as I did from watching To Tell The Truth. You just don’t know who the real John Kerry is because he refuses to tell you. He puts on a different face for different crowds, and in the process makes a fool out of himself. Kerry is not even true to his own religion. So how is it possible to have faith in a man who has no faith in himself? He’s just playing to the liberal elite who are picking up the tab for his campaign. Maybe he’s pulling one over on them. Who knows? I don’t even think John Kerry knows.

                No, George Bush isn’t perfect. We all have problems and we all fall from grace every now and then. But that’s not the point. The point is that I know who Bush is because he wears the same face for everyone. I know what to expect from Bush because he is consistent. He has character. I recall Bush’s eyes watering up on television once as he was discussing his fellow American victims of 911. I don’t even have to like him, but at least I know what to expect. Kerry puts one on edge because you don’t know what his next move is. Why do we look up to people in the first place? We want a leader that we can admire, or for someone else to set an example for us and for our children. Do we want our commander-in-chief to allow his own daughter to show off her breasts at a film festival the way John Kerry’s daughter did recently? >> http://www.strangecosmos.com/content/item/100009.html << That’s not the kind of leader I want, and I pity those who do. One wonders if this was not a deliberate side show in the Kerry campaign to attract supporters. Sexual promiscuity, enormous wealth, political invisibility, and the looming Marxist/socialist leanings threaten business interests, the image of Americana, American values, and the stability of the family environment. Is this what we ‘really’ want? Or are we so caught up in republican this and democrat that, that we can no longer see the light at the end of the tunnel.

                If, hypothetically, a child old enough to understand something about politics turns to his Kerry-supporting mom and asks “Mommy, what does John Kerry believe” ... then how is it possible for that parent to convey something of value to the child, given the moral relativism that is so pervasive in Kerry’s policies.


                John Kerry is a rogue member of the Skull and Bones society at Yale. The difference between Kerry and other members of Skull & Bones is that Kerry betrayed its philosophy by constantly speaking out against Vietnam. Kerry is not a team player. Bush did not serve in Vietnam but wished he had. Kerry did serve but wished he hadn’t. John Kerry applied for navy patrol boat duty in Nam, because he was mesmerized by John F. Kennedy’s sailing and philandering. Kerry explains his yen for adventure when he said, “I cut classes, I didn't do much. I spent a lot of time learning to fly”. Obviously, Kerry’s hunger for power is not based on a love, or loyality for American values (or his wife’s) ... they are based on recklessness and a sense of adventure. I would hate to see a family of pigs like this in the White House!

                This situation is remarkably similar to what we had in 1963 when the ungrateful and self righteous Kennedy clan was also threatening to become a monarchy on American soil. So far, Kerry has succeeded in threatening to reconstitute the failed liberal bureaucracy of a bygone era. And for what it is worth, like the Kennedy’s, Kerry has also succeeded in angering the Catholic Church. Politics makes for strange bedfellows.

                ---------------------

                I have had some people ask me what I mean by 'monarchy'. Here is the clarification.

                The Kennedy's had over one hundred members in their immediate family. The patriarch, Joe Kennedy, had Mafia business ties and was a Nazi sympathizer. Joe Kennedy's Mafia ties were in theory and practice, undermining the stability of the United States Government: especially through Mafia tactics that ran counter to various federal laws and regulation. Joe Kennedy made a pact with the devil, and understood that he could never make it to president. So he pushed his three sons for the title. When Bobby Kennedy released The Enemy within: The McClellan Committee's Crusade Against Jimmy Hoffa and Corrupt Labor Unions in 1960, it was made official that the Mafia could no longer expect to court favor with the Kennedy family. From coast to coast the Kennedy's made everybody angry (including the Catholic Church), and, as it turns out, there was a collective interest in their removal.

                One difference between the Bush family and the Kennedy's is that the Kennedy's were threatening to become an active monarchy on American soil -- while the Bush's are simply a dynasty: a succession of rulers of the same family. Therefore, in the ladder case power is limited and decentralized.





                Philip

                Comment


                • #9
                  Ah, unamerican again. So now it refers to people not born or educated in the US?

                  And women have breasts? When did that happen and why was i not informed? And they choose what they wear now? Geez America is a liberal paradise. Next you'll be saying that a breast was once seen on television for half a second.
                  Last edited by Trooth; 29 May 04,, 01:41.
                  at

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Trooth
                    Ah, unamerican again. So now it refers to people not born or educated in the US?

                    And women have breasts? When did that happen and why was i not informed? And they choose what they wear now? Geez America is a liberal paradise. Next you'll be saying that a breast was once seen on television for half a second.
                    Cable always shows boobies. Broadcast networks don't show boobies.
                    "Every man has his weakness. Mine was always just cigarettes."

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by berkut
                      Uhuh... coke sniffing president is always a better alternative




                      You are right, what I Americans really want is a president who's both daughters are alcoholics, official document forgerers, and peace disturbers. We should also follow Taliban example and make all women wear bedsheets over their bodies and if they dare as much as to show their ankles we will stone them.



                      FIrst, bush is a member of skull and bones himself. Betrayed? Depends how you look at it.. may be had enough balls not to be a sheep and speak his own mind, not afraid of what his daddy is going to say or how much millions in donations he will loose. Oh, and a vast majority of people who actually faught in Vietnam and didnt watch it from a couch in trailer would much rather prefer that liberal guy. Along with thousands of bustard kids, widows, and parents who lost somebody in that useless war.
                      Cut classes? Is that your big point? Obviously you have not gotten past your GED, nobody who actually went to a university would stress that point. I am going to repeat myself here, but I think Americans deserve a literate president first. I guess daddy's influence can get you up the ladder and his money can by you an admission and a degree but as they say "You can take the boy out of hick redneck country but you can't take the hick out of the boy". My favorite Bush's quote "nuCELar". You want a president who makes US the laughing stock of the whole world when he says that Cashmere is a sweater and Sri Lanka is a person? Our school's janitor who doesn't even speak english knows the difference.




                      Read the constitution. "The church shall not interfere with the affairs of state".
                      Catholic church should be the last one to talk about morals. Do you know where I'm going?
                      Sometthing that never changes about Republicans: cheap, sleezy, tabloid type unrelated propaganda.
                      The Frightening Void: Voting For John Kerry
                      By Joseph Grant Swank (bio)

                      Other Articles by Joseph Grant Swank Jr.
                      Back to News / Home Page

                      To vote for John Kerry in November is to vote for The Void. It is to move a nation — and much of the free world — into an awesome, scary vacuum.

                      The reason is because no one, including John Kerry, knows truthfully who Kerry is. And the word "truthfully" is the key word. No one. Kerry is unknowable in that he has a base that shifts. He is Political Opportunist to the maximum — one of the most dangerous to this new century.

                      Kerry is now called The Waffler. He’s called that because he is. Who then in one’s right mind would vote in a waffler? Only the fools of the nation would cast a ballot for a person who is so unpredictable that not even John Kerry knows where he's going to land next week. His voting record in the Congress is right there before the eyes of the country. It’s public record. It’s unnerving to go over his voting history.

                      Yet this is the Democrat choice for the United States President. And this in an exceptionally changing world — speedily changing. This is the Democrat candidate to take the helm when much of the planet’s plates are moving daily.

                      No wonder then that Iran votes for Kerry. No wonder then that North Korea votes for Kerry. They consider him unpredictable, which he is; therefore, they have the chance to govern his governorship. And they will surely do that if they can. Welcome killers international to America where the president knows not his right shoe from his left, who has no real foreign policy, and projects himself as The Void in which Iranian and North Korean killers can walk in to manage.

                      All Americans should sit up straight on this one. This is not a minor item. This is major scary. Kerry is a vacuum because he’s never trained his morals to log in. He is a relativist. He is a moral opportunist. This is particularly evident in his being Catholic in name only. Kerry doesn’t care about biblical data as revealed truth. Kerry doesn’t care about the Holy See’s doctrinal conclusions. Kerry doesn’t give a hang about his church’s social teachings regarding abortion and homosexuality.

                      With a person like that to oversee the United States of America, we are in for a rocky ride. This man cannot see through the fog to take a chance at conviction. He lacks conviction except on one point: his own opportunism. He holds to the conviction that he has the right to waffle and still be considered sophisticated for waffling. He has the conviction that he can swing from wrong to right and from right to wrong, defining his own ethical code apart from divine revelation. He is one of the most obvious self-appointed deity personalities afloat today. That is, he is his own god and politic is his bible.

                      John Kerry has not set forth one substantive proposal regarding anything. Nothing. He knows how to criticize but not how to create. He knows how to pull apart but not how to build. He has not given to the voting public one strong position regarding economy, national security, and foreign security.

                      So with that, Kerry rants and raves against Mr. Bush’s campaign ads, his wife, Heinz Kerry underwriting the Whiners National who call in to say they’re offended by Bush’s accent on 9 / 11. And so it goes when you think you’re running for president of the high school student council.
                      05.13.04 01:27

                      http://www.bushcountry.org/news/colu...john_kerry.htm
                      Pain is just weakness leaving the body. USMC
                      Semper Fi

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Trooth
                        Ah, unamerican again. So now it refers to people not born or educated in the US?

                        And women have breasts? When did that happen and why was i not informed? And they choose what they wear now? Geez America is a liberal paradise. Next you'll be saying that a breast was once seen on television for half a second.
                        Michael or Janet Jackson can do no wrong simply because they are Black. If a Black leader says something it must be true because he or she is Black. When Marion Barry was re-elected it was perfectly fine with Black America because Barry is Black. Blacks do not choose their leaders based on vision -- they choose them because they are black.

                        When OJ Simpson was acquitted 95% of Black Americans experienced a catharsis: even for the crime of MURDER! For them his guilt or innocence is not the issue. Because OJ is Black he must 'therefore' be innocent.

                        Blacks are far more prejudice than Whites can ever hope to be! Even moral relativism would be better than this. At least then you have a 50-50 chance at getting it right.

                        Thank you, Philip

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by KerryGoHome
                          Michael or Janet Jackson can do no wrong simply because they are Black. If a Black leader says something it must be true because he or she is Black. When Marion Barry was re-elected it was perfectly fine with Black America because Barry is Black. Blacks do not choose their leaders based on vision -- they choose them because they are black.

                          When OJ Simpson was acquitted 95% of Black Americans experienced a catharsis: even for the crime of MURDER! For them his guilt or innocence is not the issue. Because OJ is Black he must 'therefore' be innocent.

                          Blacks are far more prejudice than Whites can ever hope to be! Even moral relativism would be better than this. At least then you have a 50-50 chance at getting it right.

                          Thank you, Philip
                          What a nice speech. What, exactly has it to do with my post?
                          at

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Trooth
                            What a nice speech. What, exactly has it to do with my post?
                            My response to: "Next you'll be saying that a breast was once seen on television for half a second".
                            Philip

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              "Blacks do not choose their leaders based on vision -- they choose them because they are black. "

                              Quite true.

                              Sad, but still true.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X