Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2021 Trump-Incited Insurrection at Capitol Building

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Republicans Don’t Want to Talk About Jan. 6. Trump Can’t Help Himself.


    A Trump 2020 scarf lays on the ground outside the Capitol on Jan. 7, 2021, a day after a mob of his supporters stormed the building

    When a moderator asked Donald Trump about Jan. 6, 2021, at the presidential debate, the former president slipped immediately into a now-familiar revisionist history of the attack on the U.S. Capitol.

    He falsely claimed that he had nothing to do with the assault, blaming it on former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the police officers who protected the building that day against a mob of his supporters.

    But then Trump made a brief but telling remark: He used the pronoun “we” to describe some of the rioters, grammatically placing himself among those who have been charged with storming into the Capitol.

    “We didn’t do — ” Trump started to say before he began again, “This group of people that have been treated so badly.”


    It was a fleeting moment, but one that captured Trump’s reluctance to part ways with the final explosive act of his presidency, even in a general election in which it offers little political upside.

    For years, Trump has helped craft an alternate history of that day, one in which the violent attack was a “love fest,” the jailed rioters were “hostages,” and their prosecution was a part of a larger story of persecution — of both Trump and his supporters — that has been at the core of his argument for a return to the presidency.

    But as he courts voters beyond his loyal base before the November election, he and his campaign have engaged in an awkward push and pull over how closely to associate with the riot’s legacy. A recording of jailed Jan. 6 defendants singing the national anthem no longer plays at his rallies. When some defendants, including a man whom federal prosecutors have described as a “white supremacist and Nazi sympathizer,” gathered at Trump’s Bedminster golf club for a fundraiser, the former president, who has attended similar events, sent his support in a video message instead.

    “Our hearts are with you,” Trump said in the video. “Our soul is with you.”

    The former president’s close-but-not-too-close relationship with the Jan. 6 cause is a tacit acknowledgment of his personal attachment to an issue with questionable political benefits, and of the country’s stark partisan divide over the Capitol riot, a divide largely of Trump’s own making.

    “They have made a conscious effort to pivot away from Jan. 6” before the general election, said Joseph McBride, a lawyer who has represented several Jan. 6 defendants in their criminal cases. “But I don’t know how he harmonizes those two positions.”

    The Rewrite

    The rewriting of Jan. 6 began with a collection of right-wing politicians, news media figures, activists and influencers immediately after the Capitol attack, when Trump himself was largely out of the spotlight. But as he returned to politics in the 2022 midterms, the former president seized on the narrative, and he eventually wove it into his presidential campaign as a base-building note.

    Since then, Trump has maintained that he did nothing wrong that day, pointing out that he told supporters who rallied before the riot to assemble “peacefully and patriotically” and that those who entered the Capitol were merely peaceful demonstrators.

    Most frequently, he has denounced the treatment of the Jan. 6 defendants who are in jail awaiting trial or serving prison sentences, many of them for assaulting police officers. He has regularly described them as “hostages” and “political prisoners,” and occasionally as “warriors,” who have been unfairly prosecuted more severely than the left-wing activists who took part in protests and riots in cities like Minneapolis and Portland, Oregon, in 2020.

    But federal judges, including some appointed by Trump, have repeatedly rejected that argument, pointing out that there were clear differences between even the most violent 2020 upheavals and the disruption of the democratic process that took place at the Capitol.

    “The Portland rioters’ conduct, while obviously serious, did not target a proceeding prescribed by the Constitution and established to ensure a peaceful transition of power,” wrote Carl J. Nichols, a Trump-appointed federal judge in the District of Columbia.

    Trump has claimed that the rioters’ prosecutions and his own, by special counsel Jack Smith, are part of a vast conspiracy by the Biden administration and the larger “deep state”: an effort to silence questions about the 2020 election and to disqualify him preemptively from taking office again in 2025.

    It is a rhetorical move that encourages supporters to see themselves as partners in Trump’s persecution. And, legal experts worry, it has laid the ideological groundwork for Trump to feel validated in using the Justice Department against his enemies should he retake the White House.

    “If he can convince people of the lie that our legitimate government institutions were all wielded in corrupt ways to persecute him, he can convince people that he’s justified in turning those same institutions back on those he claims are responsible for that,” said Ian Bassin, the executive director of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan organization that advocates legal protections against authoritarianism.

    As recently as June, Trump called on the Biden administration to “release the hostages” and promised to pardon them if elected. “The moment we win, we will rapidly review the cases of every political prisoner unjustly victimized by the Harris regime, and I will sign their pardons on Day One,” he wrote on social media this month.

    “President Trump remains committed to ensuring there is equal justice for all Americans when he returns to the White House,” said a campaign spokesperson, Karoline Leavitt.

    A Political Sleight of Hand

    In the days immediately after the riot, even many Republicans assumed that the violence and destruction would be devastating for Trump and his political future.

    But thanks in large part to Trump’s false recasting of the event, that has not been the case.

    Public opinion of Jan. 6 and Trump’s role in it has been split along partisan lines since the riot and has shifted little over time. Even the televised hearings of the House of Representatives’ Jan. 6 committee, which drew an audience of as many as 20 million viewers, had almost no impact on Americans’ views on the episode, according to a Monmouth University poll taken at the time.

    A CBS News/YouGov poll taken this year found Republicans to be broadly supportive of pardoning the rioters, although most also disapproved of their actions at the Capitol.

    But, importantly, Republican voters have told pollsters that they would prefer not to talk about the episode. Another CBS News/YouGov poll taken early in the Republican primary contest last year found that a large majority of likely Republican primary voters — 60% — wanted a presidential candidate who would not comment on Jan. 6 at all, rather than either supporting or criticizing the rioters.

    “Jan. 6 is an issue that excites the base, which is why they all keep bringing it up,” Julie Kelly, a journalist and activist who has long supported the defendants and their families, said of Republican politicians. “But in the end, no one wants to come on too strong supporting these people.”

    Independents, like Democrats, are far more likely to view the Jan. 6 participants’ actions as serious and their legal consequences as justified. But efforts by President Joe Biden’s campaign to center the race on Trump’s attempts to subvert democracy, including on Jan. 6, did little to turn voters against the former president. Vice President Kamala Harris has spent less time on that line of attack.

    Inconvenient Allies

    The most die-hard supporters of the Jan. 6 defendants remain a small but persistent constituency on the far right. They hold regular vigils outside the Washington, D.C., jail where some of the rioters are still awaiting trial; occasional protests outside the Metropolitan Detention Center in New York City; and panel events and fundraisers elsewhere.

    They have a handful of dedicated champions in Republican politics who continue to highlight their cause — most notably, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, who hosted a hearing on the subject in Washington this past week.

    During the primaries, Trump, too, actively catered to this constituency. Last year, he invited family members of Jan. 6 defendants to dinner at Mar-a-Lago, his private club and residence in Palm Beach, Florida, and hosted an event for them at his Bedminster, New Jersey, golf club. He opened his first rally of the campaign in Waco, Texas, in March 2023, with “And Justice for All”: a recording of Jan. 6 defendants singing “The Star-Spangled Banner” over a prison phone line as Trump recites the Pledge of Allegiance, which was produced by operatives close to his campaign.

    “You see the spirit from the hostages,” he said after playing the recording again at a rally in Dayton, Ohio, in March. “They’ve been treated terribly and very unfairly, and you know that, and everybody knows that. And we’re going to be working on that.”

    But Trump has noticeably, if subtly, eased off such displays in the general election. He has dropped “And Justice for All” from the regular campaign program, and defendants came up less frequently in speeches this summer than they did last winter and spring.

    In June, the Patriot Freedom Fund, a prominent Jan. 6 legal defense group, held an event at Trump’s golf course in Bedminster, where speeches were given by Jan. 6 defendants, including Timothy Hale-Cusanelli, a convicted riot participant who is known to wear a Hitler mustache and has posted antisemitic statements on social media. Trump sent a video message to the group but did not attend in person.

    Two months later, Phyllis Schlafly’s Eagle Council hosted another event at Bedminster, again featuring Hale-Cusanelli and other Jan. 6 rioters and activists. Trump, who was on the premises for a news conference that day, did not meet with them.

    Ultimately, his staff shooed the Jan. 6 participants out of the room to make way for Trump’s presentation on inflation.

    Campaign staff said that in both cases, the groups had paid to rent the event space at Bedminster and that Trump was not aware that Hale-Cusanelli was going to be attending when he made the video for the June event.

    Regarding Hale-Cusanelli’s views, Leavitt, the campaign spokesperson, said, “President Trump condemns hatred and bigotry of any kind, and does not agree with these statements.”

    At the Republican National Convention in July, Jan. 6 was mentioned by only one speaker: former Trump aide Peter Navarro, who had been released that morning after serving four months in prison for refusing a subpoena from the House Jan. 6 committee.

    McBride, the lawyer, said that before the convention, he reached out to a group of people he described as being “one phone call away” from Trump, hoping to convince the former president to have a speaker at the convention who could talk about the plight of the rioters.

    But that did not happen, McBride said, largely because Trump’s campaign advisers did not want too much focus on the Capitol attack at the event.

    “Jan. 6 has always been an issue that more seasoned people in the Trump campaign have been gatekeepers on,” he said. “And they don’t want to draw more attention to the issue.”
    ____________

    To Trump, Jan 6 was a beautiful day, where his followers did exactly as he ordered them, they went to Capitol and "fought like hell" for him.

    Odd that he said nothing about "the FBI" or "Ray Epps"...
    “He was the most prodigious personification of all human inferiorities. He was an utterly incapable, unadapted, irresponsible, psychopathic personality, full of empty, infantile fantasies, but cursed with the keen intuition of a rat or a guttersnipe. He represented the shadow, the inferior part of everybody’s personality, in an overwhelming degree, and this was another reason why they fell for him.”

    Comment


    • Trump's Response When He Learned Pence's Life Was In Danger On Jan. 6: 'So What?"

      WASHINGTON ― When Donald Trump was told by a White House aide that his own vice president, Mike Pence, had to be evacuated from the Senate on Jan. 6, 2021, for his own safety following an inflammatory tweet from Trump, the former president had but a two-word response: “So what?”

      The anecdote was among hundreds of pieces of evidence gathered by federal prosecutors into a 165-page court filing, unsealed Wednesday, in their four-count felony prosecution against Trump for his actions leading up to and during his coup attempt.

      “This motion provides a comprehensive account of the defendant’s private criminal conduct; sets forth the legal framework created by Trump for resolving immunity claims; applies that framework to establish that none of the defendant’s charged conduct is immunized because it either was unofficial or any presumptive immunity is rebutted; and requests the relief the government seeks, which is, at bottom, this: that the court determine that the defendant must stand trial for his private crimes as would any other citizen,” special counsel Jack Smith wrote.

      The question of immunity became critical thanks to a July Supreme Court ruling stating that all official acts done by a president are immune from prosecution, but left it to the trial court to determine whether Trump’s attempt to remain in power were “official.”

      “The answer to that question is no,” Smith argued.

      The filing was unsealed by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, the judge in the case. It can be read here.

      Trump’s lawyers had argued that everything their client did leading up to Jan. 6 was covered by the Supreme Court ruling, and requested that Chutkan not allow the public to see any of the evidence Smith has collected against Trump.

      Chutkan rejected that and, in an order also filed Wednesday, ruled that Smith would be permitted to file a version of his brief with some names and details redacted. Wednesday’s brief by Smith is riddled with blacked-out words and phrases in the section providing the narrative of the indictment.

      Much of the information in the filing was known previously, thanks largely to the work of the House Jan. 6 Committee, albeit in broader strokes. But key players in Trump’s attempt to overturn his 2020 election loss and remain in office did not cooperate with that committee. They did, however, honor prosecutors’ subpoenas.

      Pence — a crucial witness, as Smith’s brief makes clear almost from the start — had repeatedly told Trump he had lost and to look ahead to 2024 instead.

      On Nov. 12, during a private lunch with Trump, Pence “reiterated a face-saving option for the defendant: ‘don’t concede but recognize the process is over.’”

      In another private lunch on Dec. 21, Pence ”‘encouraged’ the defendant ‘not to look at the election “as a loss ― just as an intermission.”’”

      The brief then offers a detailed chronology of Trump’s attempts to coerce Pence into rejecting the electors from states Joe Biden had won and simply declaring that Trump had won instead.

      Trump made his last effort to persuade Pence just minutes before he took the stage at his “Stop the Steal” rally on the Ellipse, just south of the White House. Trump again demanded that Pence declare him the election winner, but Pence, again, refused.

      “The defendant was incensed. He decided to re-insert into his campaign speech at the Ellipse remarks targeting Pence for his refusal to misuse his role in the certification. And the defendant set into motion the last plan in furtherance of his conspiracies,” Smith wrote.

      “If Pence would not do as he asked, the defendant needed to find another way to prevent the certification of Biden as president. So on January 6, the defendant sent to the Capitol a crowd of angry supporters, whom the defendant had called to the city, and inundated with false claims of outcome-determinative election fraud, to induce Pence not to certify the legitimate electoral votes and to obstruct the certification.”

      Trump sent out a tweet at 2:24 p.m. telling his followers that Pence had lacked “the courage” to do as he was told, which was followed by a surge of his supporters into the Capitol. A minute later, Pence had to be moved by his Secret Service detail to a secure location.

      As Pence came within yards of Trump’s angry mob, the president demonstrated his unconcern for his running mate’s life.

      As Smith’s brief details, Trump was just as unbothered by safety concerns in the run-up to Jan. 6.

      When a campaign aide warned a Trump operative ― both of whose names have been blacked out ― that attempts to block vote counting in Detroit could lead to unrest, the operative responded “Make them riot” and “Do it!!!”

      “The defendant’s campaign operatives and supporters used similar tactics at other tabulation centers, including in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the defendant sometimes used the resulting confrontations to falsely claim that his election observers were being denied proper access,” Smith wrote.

      When one of his private lawyers, apparently a childhood friend of Jared Kushner, repeatedly told Trump that he had lost and that the legal cases were not going to succeed, Trump replied that “the details don’t matter,” Smith wrote.

      Smith said Trump and his co-conspirators ― who have not been indicted ― simply “made up figures out of whole cloth,” and then provided Arizona as an example.

      “The conspirators started with the allegation that 36,000 non-citizens voted in Arizona; five days later, it was ‘beyond credulity that a few hundred thousand didn’t vote,’” he wrote. “Three weeks later, ‘the bare minimum [was] 40 or 50,000. The reality is about 250,000’; days after that, the assertion was 32,000, and ultimately, the conspirators landed back where they started, at 36,000, a false figure that they never verified or corroborated.”

      Trump, as is his fashion, responded to the new filing with a series of angry social media posts attacking Smith and others.

      “The release of this falsehood-ridden, Unconstitutional, J6 brief immediately following Tim Walz’s disastrous Debate performance, and 33 days before the Most Important Election in the History of our Country, is another obvious attempt by the Harris-Biden regime to undermine and Weaponize American Democracy, and INTERFERE IN THE 2024 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION,” Trump wrote.

      His lawyers have until Oct. 17 to file a response to Smith’s brief, and Smith will have until Oct. 29 to respond to that.
      ____________

      “He was the most prodigious personification of all human inferiorities. He was an utterly incapable, unadapted, irresponsible, psychopathic personality, full of empty, infantile fantasies, but cursed with the keen intuition of a rat or a guttersnipe. He represented the shadow, the inferior part of everybody’s personality, in an overwhelming degree, and this was another reason why they fell for him.”

      Comment


      • Jan 6 prisoners Trump has vowed to free are becoming more radicalized inside jail, report says

        Prisoners charged with and convicted of crimes related to the January 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, are reportedly growing more radical by being held together in a Washington, D.C., a harbinger of the dark mood around the 2024 election as top Republicans continue to deny or avoid the fact Trump lost the 2020 election and the former president himself has mused publicly in recent days that his supporters want him to “go after” his enemies.

        Current and former inmates of the unit at the D.C. Jail, dubbed the “Patriot Wing,” told New York Magazine that their time facing charges for January 6 and living together only hardened their support for the false stolen election claims of Donald Trump, who has promised to pardon January 6 rioters.

        “I haven’t met a single person here who regrets January 6,” Dominic Box, 34, who is charged with felony civil disorder, told the magazine. “Or who doesn’t think that it was a noble cause.”

        “I definitely am so much more for overthrowing the government after what they did to me,” former Patriot Wing inmate Brandon Fellows added in the piece. “I’m totally down. Especially if Trump doesn’t get in. I want it to happen. I wasn’t onboard before, but now — f*** these guys.”

        Inside the wing, inmates also reportedly screen new transfers for their politics and ideology, and make threats to those who cooperated with the government or are suspected to be informants.

        The Independent has contacted officials overseeing the D.C. jail for comment.


        January 6 defendants have radicalized inside of prison and even recorded a podcast they broadcast to the outside

        Beyond just pushing each other further in support of Donald Trump’s stolen election narrative, those inside the prison have also used the web to spread their views to others, including recording multiple episodes of a video discussion show that was broadcast online and received thousands of videos.

        The show is part of a wider movement framing the more than 1,000 people who have been convicted of January 6-related offenses as political prisoners and victims of unjust detention, a movement that includes regular vigils, fundraising for legal defense, and cash gifts to fill up the commissary accounts of rioters behind bars.

        Donald Trump himself is a part of the push.

        In March of 2023, he released a song with a choir composed of January 6 rioters, which he regularly played on the campaign trail.

        Organizers have planned this year to hold a gala in honor of January 6 rioters at Trump’s Bedminster golf club in New Jersey, though the event has been postponed multiple times, and it’s unclear if the former president planned to attend it.

        The election denialism that fueled the January 6 riot hasn’t gone anywhere either.

        In recent days, top Republicans including JD Vance, House Speaker Mike Johnson, and Senator Tom Cotton have refused to say Trump lost the 2020 election.

        As of last month, more than 1,000 people hailing from nearly all 50 states had been convicted of January 6-related crimes, with roughly 350 trials still pending, the largest criminal investigation and prosecution in U.S. history.
        ________

        “He was the most prodigious personification of all human inferiorities. He was an utterly incapable, unadapted, irresponsible, psychopathic personality, full of empty, infantile fantasies, but cursed with the keen intuition of a rat or a guttersnipe. He represented the shadow, the inferior part of everybody’s personality, in an overwhelming degree, and this was another reason why they fell for him.”

        Comment


        • Jan. 6 rioter who assaulted police says she was 'duped' by Trump's election lies

          WASHINGTON — A Donald Trump supporter who stormed the Capitol and assaulted law enforcement officers now says she was "duped" by the former president's lies about the 2020 election.

          Dana Jean Bell was sentenced to 17 months in federal prison by U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Kelly on Thursday. Federal prosecutors had sought 27 months in federal prison, saying Bell "belligerently pushed, grabbed, and verbally attacked countless U.S. Capitol Police ('USCP') and Metropolitan Police Department ('MPD') officers who were attempting to clear rioters from inside the United States Capitol Building."

          Bell pleaded guilty in July to one count of assaulting officers. Her behavior included giving "officers the middle finger while scowling at them and repeatedly yelling 'F--- YOU' towards them," prosecutors said.

          One of the officers who Bell, a 62-year-old Trump supporter, encountered was the late Jeffrey Smith.

          “Get a real job, get a real job!” Bell yelled at Smith, in video captured on his body camera. “We don’t support y’all anymore. Now NO ONE supports you! Nobody!”


          Bell physically assaults MPD Officer S.H. by throwing her elbow into his chest, on Jan. 6, 2021.

          After his encounter with Bell, Smith was subsequently assaulted on at least two separate occasions, including being struck by a flying metal object thrown by another member of the mob on the west front of the U.S. Capitol after nightfall. Smith then reported for treatment, but the facility was so overwhelmed with other officers who had been assaulted by other Trump supporters that, his family says, he did not get proper treatment.

          Smith died by suicide nine days later, and a police board and the Justice Department ruled his death was in the line of duty, caused directly by the injuries he sustained at the Capitol. Last month, the Washington Nationals baseball honored Jeffrey Smith, dedicating a seat to him alongside other officers who died in the line of duty.

          Erin Smith, Jeffrey Smith's widow, was in court on Thursday for Bell's sentencing and gave a victim impact statement. Erin Smith told the court she would not have lost her husband had “this woman and others not chose violence that fateful day,” saying Bell chose to “assault and berate police, who, like my husband, held very real jobs, jobs that got four of them killed and hundreds injured.”


          Bell, according to her defense team, believed it was “her civil and patriotic duty to answer Trump’s call” on Jan. 6. But they say she has now seen the light. In a psychiatric evaluation her lawyer filed in court, a doctor said Bell now realizes she was “duped” by “President Donald Trump’s lies and manipulation” and “has also come to realize former President Trump did lose the 2020 election and he has used all of his followers including herself for his own gain.”

          "Dana regrets ever having responded to Trump’s call," her lawyer wrote.



          Bell, assaulting news reporters and others on north lawn, on Jan. 6, 2021.

          Bell joined the mob in entering the Capitol on Jan. 6. When she left, she "approached a news crew, joining a crowd that was giving the news crew the middle finger, calling them 'traitors' and 'fake news,' and telling them to 'get out.' Bell then began attempting to push and grab at a certain female news anchor, who was recording the event on her cell phone. Bell then raised her hand and attempted to kick another individual when that person attempted to intervene."

          More than 1,500 people have been charged with crimes related to the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and new cases continue to roll in.

          Earlier on Thursday, Peter G. Moloney, a Trump supporter who inherited a chain of funeral homes in Long Island, pleaded guilty to a felony charge of assaulting an officer along with a misdemeanor. Moloney admitted that he assaulted officers with “Black Flag Wasp, Hornet, & Yellow Jacket Killer” spray and that he assaulted two people he thought were with the media. Moloney is scheduled to be sentenced on Feb. 11, 2025, just weeks after the next presidential inauguration, but that could change under a Trump presidency.
          ________

          "It was a love-fest!"
          “He was the most prodigious personification of all human inferiorities. He was an utterly incapable, unadapted, irresponsible, psychopathic personality, full of empty, infantile fantasies, but cursed with the keen intuition of a rat or a guttersnipe. He represented the shadow, the inferior part of everybody’s personality, in an overwhelming degree, and this was another reason why they fell for him.”

          Comment


          • Originally posted by TopHatter View Post
            Jan. 6 rioter who assaulted police says she was 'duped' by Trump's election lies

            WASHINGTON — A Donald Trump supporter who stormed the Capitol and assaulted law enforcement officers now says she was "duped" by the former president's lies about the 2020 election.....

            ..... Peter G. Moloney, a Trump supporter who inherited a chain of funeral homes in Long Island, pleaded guilty to a felony charge of assaulting an officer along with a misdemeanor. Moloney admitted that he assaulted officers with “Black Flag Wasp, Hornet, & Yellow Jacket Killer” spray and that he assaulted two people he thought were with the media. Moloney is scheduled to be sentenced on Feb. 11, 2025, just weeks after the next presidential inauguration, but that could change under a Trump presidency.
            ________

            "It was a love-fest!"
            That's been a common plea re; mitigation made by many of the people charged after the riot. Unfortunately it's also very common for the persons who do this to recant after sentencing and go strait back to full on 'stolen election mode'. Which IMO just makes these 'patriots' look like the cowards and hypocrites they actually are.

            I've got way more respect for the truly hard core Trump fanatics who go into court fully supporting their actions on the day and come out the other side the same way than I do for the ones who plead for clemency and then show their true colors again afterwards. Same thing goes for the rioters who go to court, renounce the beliefs that got them there in the first place and then ostensibly continue to 'own' their mistake afterwards. The former might be a lost cause but at least they hold to their convictions. Meanwhile latter at least have the courage to admit their mistakes. It's the flip/floppers in the middle who piss me off! Not only are they wrong they're gutless.
            Last edited by Monash; 20 Oct 24,, 22:12.
            If you are emotionally invested in 'believing' something is true you have lost the ability to tell if it is true.

            Comment


            • Conviction upheld against former county official for illegally entering Capitol grounds on Jan. 6


              FILE - Then Otero County, New Mexico Commissioner Couy Griffin speaks to reporters at federal court in Washington, June. 17, 2022.

              SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) — A federal appeals court upheld on Tuesday a conviction against a former New Mexico county commissioner for illegally entering the U.S. Capitol grounds during the Jan. 6, 2021, riot.

              A panel of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld the 2022 conviction against Couy Griffin, of Tularosa, in a 2-1 decision.

              Separately, Griffin has been banished from public office for aiding in insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, under a state district court ruling. The U.S. Supreme Court in March refused to hear an appeal of the ruling.

              Griffin, a cowboy pastor who rode to national political fame by embracing then-President Donald Trump with a series of horseback caravans, was convicted of the misdemeanor charge at a 2022 bench trial at U.S. District Court in Washington while being acquitted of disorderly conduct.

              Griffin was sentenced to 14 days and given credit for time served after his arrest in Washington in the days leading up to Joe Biden’s inauguration.

              Griffin contends that he entered the Capitol grounds on Jan. 6 without recognizing that it had been designated as a restricted area by the U.S. Secret Service and that he attempted to lead a crowd in prayer using a bullhorn, without engaging in violence. Nearby, Capitol police struggled to control a mob that disrupted Congress from certifying Biden’s presidential election victory.

              The majority opinion from the Circuit Court rejected Griffin's arguments that the Capitol was no longer cordoned off when he arrived and that prosecutors should have been required to prove that he knew that then-Vice President Mike Pence would be visiting the Capitol to participate in the election certification.

              In a dissenting opinion, Circuit Judge Gregory Katsas said the lower court erred by not ruling on whether Griffin knew that Pence was present.

              Griffin said he plans to appeal the new ruling.

              “I will continue in this fight for justice because this issue is much bigger than the plight of Couy Griffin,” he said in a text message. “With God as my witness I did not know that area was restricted.”
              ___
              “He was the most prodigious personification of all human inferiorities. He was an utterly incapable, unadapted, irresponsible, psychopathic personality, full of empty, infantile fantasies, but cursed with the keen intuition of a rat or a guttersnipe. He represented the shadow, the inferior part of everybody’s personality, in an overwhelming degree, and this was another reason why they fell for him.”

              Comment

              Working...
              X