Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

USS Iowa (SSN-797)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • USS Iowa (SSN-797)

    AMES, Iowa —The USS Iowa was the last United States battleship and was first launched in 1942 during WWII. It was de-commissioned in 1990, but now a 21st century version of the USS Iowa is about to be built.

    The exact details on what the new USS Iowa will look like is still a secret, but it will be an upgraded version of the USS John Warner, which was commissioned last month.

    The new 377-foot long submarine will be able to dive more than 800 feet and have the ability to operate for more than three decades without refueling.

    “You would think a land locked state like Iowa so far from the water and so far from the sea wouldn't have the connections to the Navy that it has, but there are significant connections to the Navy,” said Capt. Ricks Polk, commanding officer for Iowa State University’s Naval ROTC program.

    Polk said one of those connections includes Iowa-native Eugene Eli who is credited with the first shipboard aircraft takeoff and landing in 1911.

    The U.S. Navy secretary will make the announcement about the new submarine Wednesday at ISU, a location chosen in part because it's the only university in the state with an NROTC program.

    “To have a brand new submarine with all its technical capabilities to be named Iowa along with the historical USS Iowa, the battleship, the class, the first of its class is pretty exciting,” Polk said.

    For some, the Navy choosing Iowa isn't all that unusual. For ISU NROTC student Virginia Boy, this might be her first look at the submarine she could be spending some of the most memorable days of her life in.

    “They're coming here to announce it just as I’m coming through and I could go and be one of the first females on the USS Iowa. That’s a pretty extraordinary time,” Boy said.

    The ship is expected to be built by the early 2020s. The cost for these types of ships, called the Virginia Class attack submarines, is about $2.7 billion.

    http://www.kcci.com/news/21st-centur...built/35050178

    And another article: http://www.desmoinesregister.com/sto...iowa/71451250/
    Last edited by Ken_NJ; 04 Sep 15,, 02:22.

  • #2
    O boy that definitely means the BB Iowa won't get commissioned again ;). Thanks for the info though.
    RIP Charles "Bob" Spence. 1936-2014.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by 85 gt kid View Post
      O boy that definitely means the BB Iowa won't get commissioned again ;). Thanks for the info though.
      If the USN were hell bent on bringing a Battleship back, they would just rename one of them. There were a few old flush deckers before WW2 that had lost their names to new construction and were just hull numbers, (IE: DD-70 http://www.navsource.org/archives/05/070.htm) but they got recommissioned when WW2 broke out anyway with a new name. Now as to which hull would lose their name? That would pose an interesting question. Technically, the recommissioning ship, in this case BB-61 should be the one that gets renamed, but because the battleship is to famous to effectively rename, I'd lean towards the sub.

      Comment


      • #4
        To some of us who "go down to the sea . . . blah, blah, yadda, yadda, yadda . . .," renaming a ship is considered bad luck.

        Comment


        • #5
          I think if we needed the Iowa bad enough to recomission her again the name would be the least of our worries...
          RIP Charles "Bob" Spence. 1936-2014.

          Comment


          • #6
            Yup.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by 85 gt kid View Post
              I think if we needed the Iowa bad enough to recommission her again the name would be the least of our worries...
              I don't even want to think about such a scenario. :-(
              “He was the most prodigious personification of all human inferiorities. He was an utterly incapable, unadapted, irresponsible, psychopathic personality, full of empty, infantile fantasies, but cursed with the keen intuition of a rat or a guttersnipe. He represented the shadow, the inferior part of everybody’s personality, in an overwhelming degree, and this was another reason why they fell for him.”

              Comment


              • #8
                Love the idea but ..... just the idea ....

                Okay I love the idea of the Battlewagons liting off and the chance to watch them sortie, but ladies and gentlemen it's just an idea!
                Perhaps my idea could escort the BB to sea with my DD's ? :)
                Attached Files
                Last edited by blidgepump; 05 Sep 15,, 03:16.

                Comment


                • #9
                  well, the USS Constitution was re-named..

                  On 1 December 1917 she was renamed Old Constitution, to free her name for a planned new Lexington-class battlecruiser. Originally destined for the lead ship of the class, the name Constitution was shuffled around between hulls until CC-5 was given the name; construction of CC-5 was canceled in 1923 due to the Washington Naval Treaty. The incomplete hull was sold for scrap, and Old Constitution was granted the return of her name on 24 July 1925.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    SSN-801 is to be Utah, the first of the Pearl Harbor perma-losses to have their name resurrected.

                    http://www.seapowermagazine.org/stor...-utah-ssn.html

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I was wondering what was going to happen as we ran out of state names. Pretty sure Arizona won't get another ship, but what about Oklahoma?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by GrayGhost1975 View Post
                        I was wondering what was going to happen as we ran out of state names. Pretty sure Arizona won't get another ship, but what about Oklahoma?
                        I count 7 states left without a current ship/sub. The states and year the last ship was stricken is below. Kansas is the worst offender atm with 1923 since their Battleship was stricken.

                        Kansas (1923)
                        Arizona (1942)
                        Oklahoma (1944)
                        Massachusetts (1962)
                        Arkansas (1998)
                        South Carolina (1999)
                        Wisconsin (2006)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Kinda weird how they're skipping hull numbers in the naming process:

                          Iowa
                          ?? SSN-798
                          Idaho
                          ?? SSN-800
                          Utah

                          Also amusing to see the power of the Virginia Congressional Delegation for the past 100+ years:

                          Virginia-class battleship (1906)
                          Virginia-class cruiser (1976)
                          Virginia-class submarine (2004)

                          The name of Virginia doesn't get out of bed for anything less than lead ship in her class lol.
                          Last edited by TopHatter; 25 Sep 15,, 20:21.
                          “He was the most prodigious personification of all human inferiorities. He was an utterly incapable, unadapted, irresponsible, psychopathic personality, full of empty, infantile fantasies, but cursed with the keen intuition of a rat or a guttersnipe. He represented the shadow, the inferior part of everybody’s personality, in an overwhelming degree, and this was another reason why they fell for him.”

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by TopHatter View Post
                            Kinda weird how they're skipping hull numbers in the naming process:

                            Iowa
                            ?? SSN-798
                            Idaho
                            ?? SSN-800
                            Utah

                            Also amusing to see the power of the Virginia Congressional Delegation for the past 100+ years:

                            Virginia-class battleship (1906)
                            Virginia-class cruiser (1976)
                            Virginia-class submarine (2004)

                            The name of Virginia doesn't get out of bed for anything less than lead ship in her class lol.
                            DC does sit next to, some say, inside, Virginia.
                            "Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              [QUOTE=TopHatter;996825]Kinda weird how they're skipping hull numbers in the naming process:

                              Iowa
                              ?? SSN-798
                              Idaho
                              ?? SSN-800
                              Utah

                              I'm sure they've got them picked, but just aren't announcing them in order for some reason, mostly likely they are announcing them when it's handy for other events. They sat on SSN-794 for a long time while they announced the names of 795, 796, 797 and 799 and only announced 794 was Montana when Mabus was in town to have the naming ceremony for Billings LCS-15. With that in mind, it wouldn't surprise me if they announce an Oklahoma at an event for LCS-16 (Tulsa), South Carolina at an event for LCS-18 (Charleston), Kansas at an event for LCS-22 (Kansas City).

                              They could even make a distraction for Wisconsin and Arkansas at the commissioning's of LCS-5 and LCS-9

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X