Originally posted by JA Boomer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ask An Expert- LAND Forces.
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
-
Originally posted by ci150004 View PostHello everybody!
I'm new to this site. I have a question that was given by my chief instructor, why do most rifle bullets diameter are not round up? i mean for example 5.56mm, 7.62mm, 7.92mm, etc... why didnt they manufacture and use like maybe 5mm, 7mm, 8mm, or any other round up number?
The caliber of a rifle is a very specific thing, not something that you would round up. Since most common calibers are between say 5mm and 8mm, the use of a few significant digits is prudent to help differentiate the calibers.
Similarly, cartridges are very specific. So specific that you can have different cartridges within the the same caliber of rifle that you can not interchange. So again, the use of a few significant digits is well warranted. Also, gun and ammunition manufacturers are competing against each other for sales, so it makes sense that they will name each specific cartridge something unique.
That in a nutshell is why there's so many cartridge and calibers out there, some in metric like the those you mentioned, and many more in imperial such as the .223, .243, and .308.
To be clear the caliber of a rifle is the diameter of the bore of the barrel. The cartridge describes not only the diameter of the bullet, but the shell casing size as well. So while .308 is the caliber, .308 Winchester is the cartridge, and there can be many .308 cartridges for the .308 caliber.
Hope this helps.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedHello everybody!
I'm new to this site. I have a question that was given by my chief instructor, why do most rifle bullets diameter are not round up? i mean for example 5.56mm, 7.62mm, 7.92mm, etc... why didnt they manufacture and use like maybe 5mm, 7mm, 8mm, or any other round up number?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Versus View PostBlack arrow has been replaced with new model but we will need something with the higher rate of fire. After all there will be a lots of them.
This is the Black Spear, the replacement for Black arrow.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mihais View PostYou give too much credit to stigmatization.I repeat,few people give fvck about rampaging muslims being killed.It is not the 90's.Another war means more towelheads attacking civilians in the West.Not that it's not occuring on weekly basis,but it will intensify.So chill, NATO won't move this time.
Leave a comment:
-
You give too much credit to stigmatization.I repeat,few people give fvck about rampaging muslims being killed.It is not the 90's.Another war means more towelheads attacking civilians in the West.Not that it's not occuring on weekly basis,but it will intensify.So chill, NATO won't move this time.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mihais View PostSaudi forces aren't worth crap.The Turks are getting dangerous,but they'll also face all EE.They'd still enjoy superiority,at least initially.
As for the nice fellows coming in,they can cause lots of damage.That is all.We'll see
Back to .50's.You all have a rifle at home.Basically all male population,regardless of age,has an AK.An anti-material rifle is first a psychological weapon.You blow a guy from 1.5 km away,you freeze in place a platoon.Or you take out MG nests.Or whatever else you need to do.In urban combat you can cover an awsome area of environment from a dominant position. But you still only need a couple per btn. More important is training in low level infantry tactics,instinctive shooting,camouflage and movement under fire.Fact is a squad in well done ambush can take out half a company without breaking a sweat.Last edited by Versus; 07 Sep 16,, 21:01.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Versus View PostYes there is, there is Turkey and Saudi Arabia. The thing is, that if the worse happen, we would be overrun in less than three hours, the threat is immense.
Also I was analyzing combat footage from various parts of middle east. The pop up threat is the most challenging thing to deal with. Urban ambushes also, IED's you name it. So many problems.
I mean the takia has no effect on us, because we know who they are for real, however the mask of their deception is so strong in the west that, unfortunately you will have to count them in also.
As for the nice fellows coming in,they can cause lots of damage.That is all.We'll see
Back to .50's.You all have a rifle at home.Basically all male population,regardless of age,has an AK.An anti-material rifle is first a psychological weapon.You blow a guy from 1.5 km away,you freeze in place a platoon.Or you take out MG nests.Or whatever else you need to do.In urban combat you can cover an awsome area of environment from a dominant position. But you still only need a couple per btn. More important is training in low level infantry tactics,instinctive shooting,camouflage and movement under fire.Fact is a squad in well done ambush can take out half a company without breaking a sweat.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SteveDaPirate View PostOf course if you REALLY need the ability to penetrate cover/destroy urban vehicles. You could get something along the lines of the suppressor capable Anzio 20mm.
http://www.anzioironworks.com/MAG-FED-20MM-RIFLE.htm
[ATTACH=CONFIG]42071[/ATTACH]
.223 > .338 > .50 > 20mm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSEOi4zx-8MLast edited by Versus; 07 Sep 16,, 17:58.
Leave a comment:
-
Of course if you REALLY need the ability to demolish cover/body armor/engine blocks. You could get something along the lines of the suppressor capable Anzio 20mm.
http://www.anzioironworks.com/MAG-FED-20MM-RIFLE.htm
.223 > .338 > .50 > 20mmLast edited by SteveDaPirate; 07 Sep 16,, 17:54.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mihais View PostYeah.Lots of well trained light infantry.And enough heavy weapons.Enough to win battles.Hunger wins the war.This isn't the 90's anymore.
Your guys showed they can win IO's back in 99.The context now is much more favourable.No JDAM will fly this time vs you.
Also I was analyzing combat footage from various parts of middle east. The pop up threat is the most challenging thing to deal with. Urban ambushes also, IED's you name it. So many problems.
I mean the takia has no effect on us, because we know who they are for real, however the mask of their deception is so strong in the west that, unfortunately you will have to count them in also.Last edited by Versus; 07 Sep 16,, 17:51.
Leave a comment:
-
Yeah.Lots of well trained light infantry.And enough heavy weapons.Enough to win battles.Hunger wins the war.This isn't the 90's anymore.
Your guys showed they can win IO's back in 99.The context now is much more favourable.No JDAM will fly this time vs you.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Mihais View PostBro, a .50 is easily 7000$. Add 2000 in decent optics and you suddenly need a fortune.Plus 10$ /round.
Such a beast would certainly serve well.But you'd need a bunch of guys to buy and train a 2 men sniper team.Last edited by Versus; 07 Sep 16,, 17:17.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Versus View PostBlack arrow has been replaced with new model but we will need something with the higher rate of fire. After all there will be a lots of them.
Such a beast would certainly serve well.But you'd need a bunch of guys to buy and train a 2 men sniper team.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SteveDaPirate View PostThe good thing is that it's effective at punching through masonry and cinderblock walls to hit fighters using them for cover. The downside is that it punches through walls and hits people who are just trying to stay out of the fight.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: