Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Iran Election June 09

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Analysis: Iran's 2-sided rule _ turban and helmet

    By BRIAN MURPHY – 1 hour ago

    EDITOR'S NOTE: Iranian authorities have barred journalists for international news organizations from reporting on the streets and ordered them to stay in their offices. This report is based on the accounts of witnesses reached in Iran and official statements carried on Iranian media.

    ___

    Iran's Islamic regime may well ride out the post-election crisis, but not without collateral damage.

    The contours of what's likely ahead are already taking shape: more isolation from the West and a leadership turning on the pressure at home, with its military forces and street-level vigilantes swiping hard at anything or anyone perceived as a threat.

    On state television, the messages are shrill and defensive in blaming foreign "enemies" for the mayhem after the disputed June 12 vote. On the streets, security forces swarm over any hint of a protest, hauling away journalists, political figures, university professors and activists.

    The candidate-turned-opposition leader, Mir Hossein Mousavi, is now telling his backers to hunker down for a long struggle.

    It adds up to a regime turning to its survival instincts. That likely means the same pathologies that accompany any state of siege — real or perceived: more isolation, more paranoia and no hesitation to use all the weapons at its disposal.

    Iran's theocracy can call on a very serious protector: the Revolutionary Guard and its millions of civilian militiamen, known as the Basij. Spread through nearly every neighborhood and village in the country, their ability to snuff out public dissent was aptly illustrated Wednesday when a small band of demonstrators outside parliament brought an onslaught of black-clad commandos and vigilantes swooping in on motorcycles. Protest over.

    Hundreds of people have been detained in the past two weeks, including Iranian journalists, aides and advisers to Mousavi and reformist politicians. On Thursday, authorities arrested 70 university professors who met with the embattled Mousavi, who is under constant surveillance by security agents. All but four were later released, Mousavi's Web site reported.

    The Committee to Protect Journalists said about 40 journalists and media workers have been jailed in the post-election crackdown following election results that showed President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as the landslide winner.

    Mousavi's wife, Zahra Rahnavard, compared it to martial law. That's not just angry rhetoric.

    The ruling theocrats know the Revolutionary Guard have the resources to battle internal unrest as long as it takes — and can give supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei a buffer after facing unprecedented public challenges to his near-limitless powers, which some loyalists believe are divinely anointed.

    Despite elections for president and parliament, the only real power in Iran rests with the clerics at the top. But their rule has always been backed up by the clout of the security forces. The coming months may fully display how much the turban depends on the helmet.

    That's because the Revolutionary Guard and its network are just as vested in preserving the Islamic system. The 500,000-strong Guard is separate from the ordinary armed forces and serves as a private army for the Islamic establishment. But its influence stretches much deeper, including roles in Iran's ports, oil fields and missile and nuclear programs. It's a bit of the Pentagon, CIA, Homeland Security and FBI rolled into one.

    There's little chance they would fold as easily as the forces of the Western-backed shah in the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

    "Their name is exactly what they do: protect the revolution," said Talal Atrissi, a Lebanese political analyst who follows Iranian affairs. "Their loyalty is extremely high."

    The latest waves of arrests may just be a taste of what's ahead. The clerics have shown their ability to relentlessly pound at liberal-leaning supporters and outlets — during much less critical times.

    During the first years of Mohammad Khatami's reformist presidency in the late 1990s, intelligence minders and judiciary agents — both directly controlled by the theocracy — swept up hundreds of activists, writers and others. Pro-reform newspapers and publications were closed almost as fast as they could open. It came to a head in the summer of 1999 with clashes at Tehran University.

    A similar clampdown is taking place against the new means of communication: Web sites and social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter that have served as a kind of rumor mill and cry for help by many Iranians. A next step could be chipping away at the tacit pact with the Islamic baby boom generation: those born after the revolution and who account for nearly half of Iran's 70 million people.

    The regime has permitted them a limited buffet of freedoms. These include Western music, dating, Internet cafes and generally turning a blind eye to satellite dishes and women constantly testing the boundaries of Islamic dress codes with head scarves pushed far back and coats ever shorter and tighter. The unwritten deal, however, was that it was a reward for staying clear of politics that could rattle the system.

    That has broken down. Some protesters have turned Mousavi's claims of rigged elections into a journey across Iran's red lines and taboos — direct criticism of Khamenei and the ruling order. The payback from authorities could be long and severe.

    Khamenei has effectively given it a green light. He has portrayed his opponents as guided by foreign "enemies," including the United States and Britain. It instantly evokes memories of the U.S. influence under the shah and an American-aided uprising in 1953 that deposed an elected government that had nationalized the oil industry and broken Britain's long control.

    State media has followed up with a barrage of programming linking the unrest to outside plots, including "confessions" from alleged protesters.

    This has turned the crackdown — in the minds of the regime and its backers — from a civil dispute into a defense of the country. There was also a powerful subtext to Khamenei's claims. They would attempt to disgrace any internal rivalries among the hierarchy.

    With Khamenei's blanket authority weakened and questioned, speculation has risen about an inside challenge led by former President Hashemi Rafsanjani, who heads a panel that has the power to remove the supreme leader. Such an extreme measure has never been used — or even publicly discussed before — would be akin to an in-house coup.

    But it shows how much Iran has stumbled into uncharted territory.

    It could not have happened at a more pivotal time, with President Barack Obama offering groundbreaking dialogue and the West trying to pressure Iran to suspend uranium enrichment as part of its nuclear program. The violence, however, has brought increasingly harsh condemnations from Western capitals. Iran, in turn, has sharpened its language.

    Ahmadinejad added another swipe at Obama on Wednesday, saying more criticism will make Iranians "consider you similar to (former President George W.) Bush" — who in 2002 called Iran part of an "axis of evil."

    Iran has gave other signals that it may concentrate on its easy relationships and remain cool to the West. Ahmadinejad visited Russia shortly after the election. But Iran turned down a special invitation from Italy to attend a G-8 foreign minister's meeting in Trieste, beginning Thursday, to take part in discussions on stabilizing Afghanistan.

    "I think it's a missed opportunity for the Iranian government," said the European Union's external relations commissioner, Benita Ferrero-Waldner.

    Chess has some of its early roots in ancient Persia, and the past weeks could just be the first moves in a long contest.

    "In the past, successful opposition movements, such as the effort that overthrew (Slobodan) Milosevic in Serbia, coalesced over a time frame of years, not weeks or months," said Ehsan Ahrari, an analyst on regional affairs. "So it would be a mistake to read too much into the current form."

    Brian Murphy is the AP's bureau chief in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, and has covered Iranian affairs since 1999. Associated Press Writer Sam F. Ghattas in Beirut contributed to this report.
    In the realm of spirit, seek clarity; in the material world, seek utility.

    Leibniz

    Comment


    • Yes, one of the baffling aspect of all this is the open disagreement among high powered leaders. Yet, the beating of protestors continues. Key to all this may the statement issued by the Revolutionary Guard a few days ago intimating that if the protests didn't stop, it would step in. Is that a warning to the protestors, as it seems, or a warning to voices in the government speaking out against the brutality?

      New elections would be the best course, but it will be a cold day in hell when Iran lets any outside group, much less the UN, monitor them. Iran fancies itself a major power. Major powers don't have their elections monitored.

      This whole affair must be excruciating for the leadership. Years of building themselves up as a regional power and projecting an image of internal stability. And poof. Just another respressive regime slapping its people around.

      You raise an interesting question about Mousavi's persistence. It is odd that he is not in irons and keeping up the pressure despite all the arrests, beatings and warnings from the supreme leader. Is he the front man for a group within the government that wants change?

      Politics even among snakes is interesting.
      To be Truly ignorant, Man requires an Education - Plato

      Comment




      • TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) --...Iran said the gunman who killed Neda Agha-Soltan may have mistaken her for the sister of an Iranian "terrorist," the Islamic Republic News Agency reported Wednesday.

        The report said the investigation into her death is ongoing, "but according to the evidence so far, it could be said that she was killed by mistake. The marksmen had mistaken her for the sister of one of the Monafeghin who had been executed in the province of Mazandaran some time ago...



        If the Iranian tall tales agency wants to create a reasonable doubt about the cause of Neda's killing they could have invented a more plausible scenario. This one won't fly.

        Anyone who has been in or seen a full blown demonstration, with people shouting and swirling around, sirens, smoke, tear gas, and cops charging the crowd knows the chances are almost nil that a sniper would find just the one person he is after out of the thousands of people in the streets below, especially when she's wearing a veil and looks like every other woman wearing a veil?
        To be Truly ignorant, Man requires an Education - Plato

        Comment


        • Originally posted by JAD_333 View Post
          Yes, one of the baffling aspect of all this is the open disagreement among high powered leaders. Yet, the beating of protestors continues. Key to all this may the statement issued by the Revolutionary Guard a few days ago intimating that if the protests didn't stop, it would step in. Is that a warning to the protestors, as it seems, or a warning to voices in the government speaking out against the brutality?

          New elections would be the best course, but it will be a cold day in hell when Iran lets any outside group, much less the UN, monitor them. Iran fancies itself a major power. Major powers don't have their elections monitored.

          This whole affair must be excruciating for the leadership. Years of building themselves up as a regional power and projecting an image of internal stability. And poof. Just another respressive regime slapping its people around.

          You raise an interesting question about Mousavi's persistence. It is odd that he is not in irons and keeping up the pressure despite all the arrests, beatings and warnings from the supreme leader. Is he the front man for a group within the government that wants change?

          Politics even among snakes is interesting.
          JAD,

          It is indeed a fascinating situation. We have been given a peek at the complexities of a regime that most of us understood only a little.

          What interest me most about all of this is the breadth of the opposition to Khamenei & A-jad. There is the opposition we expected - the younger generation, the remnants of the pre-revolutionary urban middle class & more moderate members of the clerical class.

          The segment I think we knew less about was more conservative clergy who also oppose the pair - Khamenei because he is underqualified & A-jad because he is a populist & has a power base beyond the clerics. What is interesting about them is where they might end up. Right now they are probably more worried by the liberals than Khamenei. I wonder if that will change if the theocracy morphs into a common dictatorship.

          There is another thought in the back of my mind connected with all of this. Shi'ism traditionally held itself above politics - especially the Iraqi version. I wonder if a combination of a resurgent Iraqi Shia movement & an unpleasant experience of the corruption of political power in Iran might lead to a very different attitude among the clerics of Qom in the years to come. Their withdrawal from politics could be just as lethal to the long term prospects of the likes of Khamenei as their opposition. I'm just musing here, but it is interesting to consider.
          sigpic

          Win nervously lose tragically - Reds C C

          Comment


          • Originally posted by JAD_333 View Post


            If the Iranian tall tales agency wants to create a reasonable doubt about the cause of Neda's killing they could have invented a more plausible scenario. This one won't fly.
            Oh it does get better!
            Mohammad Hassan Ghadiri, Iranian ambassador to Mexico, thinks the CIA might have had a hand in it.

            Source:
            Iran ambassador suggests CIA could have killed Neda Soltan | Top of the Ticket | Los Angeles Times

            Cheers.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Lunatock View Post
              With the world still able to watch, despite the attempted media and communication blackout?

              ?BBC ??????? - ??????? - ??????: ?????? ??? ??? ???? ??????
              No! I don't think BBC had any representation on the scene. But most of the major news outlets of the world encourage Iranians to send them news and pix through cell phones.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by zraver View Post
                To paraphrase Stalin and Andrew Jackson

                How many troops does the Council of Experts have? And let the Council enforce that decision themselves. I've been predicting a coup by the guards for some time. What I failed to account for what Khamenei siding with the guards due to a rivalry with Rafasajani and Montezeri.
                Z,
                True! But IRGC is not the intended ideologically pumped guardians of revolution and supreme leader any more. They are now elite businessmen holding 20% of Iran's GDP.
                IMHO they will follow the commerce, where ever that will be, need to be seen.

                Comment


                • =Pluto;650850]Hi all,

                  Joining a bit late in this long yet interesting thread. Here's my take...

                  Do you believe the vote was rigged, and if so, by enough to change the outcome?

                  To the first part, well votes are rigged all over the world, be it the US or Pakistan or Iran. So yes the votes would have been rigged in this election as well.

                  The question is that would the rigging have affected the outcome allowing Ahmadinejad a victory, the answer can be a yes or no.

                  I'll explain the "no" first. While the West perceives Ahmadinejad as a threat, for many in the Muslim world he epitomises the sole resistance to the "West". There are very few Muslim countries that will stand up against the western states. So he does have support in his Iran (no matter how much we might like to believe otherwise) and in other countries.
                  Yes I believe there've been a huge vote rigging.
                  Guardian Council announced that so far they have found irregularities in 50 different districts with 3 million votes, that is 7% of entire ballots.
                  At the other hand the number of fraud don't really matter, it facilitates a ground to question the whole electoral process.
                  Do you believe that the protests will develop into something more, such as regime change or reform of the Iranian system?

                  Given the current block on the flow of information (television, radio, internet), it is unlikely. The protesters have to find a way to organise themselves and come out on the streets and do so even though they are being threatened with "bloodshed" by the state itself. It's a test of resilience here.
                  It is better than sitting silent and doing nothing. Iranians have already tainted the face of this tyrannic regime beyond recovery.

                  The protesters also have to promote "their" cause. Why are they fighting for a regime change: the average Iranian – who is not university educated, does not use internet, does not know what Twitter – has to be told of the reasons for the cause and its effect. Merely stating that the US is unhappy with the current regime will not be enough to change allegiances.
                  The Iranians you are trying to describe are not the average. Per capita Iran has the highest number of internet users in the world. Only 30% of total population live in rural areas and not all are religious fanatics supporting the regime.

                  Thirdly, Iran saw a popular revolution in 1979 and this is a continuation of the policies of the then instated regime. Regime change — probably yes. Reforming the Iranian system — probably not.
                  The original IRI constitution was written in summer of 1979 and has been going through serious illegal butchering ever since to a point the present Const. doesn't even resemble the original.

                  Do you have any stories to share about what it taking place inside Iran today?
                  Not as yet. Though I do have an Iranian friend and he was the one who explained that while his family has migrated to Pakistan because his father could not stand the religious conservatism and state monopoly post-1979, his uncles and aunts did not agree and have stayed in Iran since.
                  I personally will not establish a point of view based on something an Iranian is telling me whose own parents have migrated to Pakistan to scape "conservatism".
                  Last edited by Aryajet; 26 Jun 09,, 18:03.

                  Comment


                  • @Merlin,

                    Questioning the judgment and actions of a leader is not at all unusual in democracies, but it is a very serious step in Iran, where the supreme leader traditionally is a revered patriarchal figure whose word should be gospel to his nation.
                    I found a small discrepancy in that report from A.P.
                    The concept of Supreme Leader is not a tradition in Iran, it is only 29 years old.
                    At the dawn of the inception of S.L it wasn't even supposed to be addressed as such, It meant to be called "Vali e Faghih", rough translation means "The Guardian of Jurisprudence". And still has been going through serious criticism, argued against ever since the advent of such a position.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by BenRoethig View Post
                      Pure of what? Those who want their voice to be heard and not follow a hitler wannabe loon and a bunch of power hungry charlatans who defame the word of God for their own end? They're not going to keep anything pure, they're going to end up starting a war you have no chance of winning and getting a lot of your countrymen killed.
                      Ben,
                      I don't believe armant is an Iranian, b/c even few Iranians who support Ahmadneedsajob accept him as an elected president that is all, not a champion of hearts who is able to keep the country "pure".

                      Comment


                      • Dreadnought,

                        The report said the investigation into her death is ongoing, "but according to the evidence so far, it could be said that she was killed by mistake. The marksmen had mistaken her for the sister of one of the Monafeghin who had been executed in the province of Mazandaran some time ago."
                        Lets take this report on its face value and assume it is true.
                        The government of a nation is openly admitting that they assassinate family members of opposition group using snipers mounted on rooftops.
                        And when they mark the target even if he/she is among waves of other people swirling around, they will take him/her out without any concern for the safety of the others.
                        Great self-incriminating story, just keep it coming, mullas.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Aryajet View Post
                          Dreadnought,


                          Lets take this report on its face value and assume it is true.
                          The government of a nation is openly admitting that they assassinate family members of opposition group using snipers mounted on rooftops.
                          And when they mark the target even if he/she is among waves of other people swirling around, they will take him/her out without any concern for the safety of the others.
                          Great self-incriminating story, just keep it coming, mullas.
                          The absurdity and the stupidity of the explanation given in regards to Neda's killing is staggering. What are we .. North Korea? ... I would think even the most retarded fanatic IRGC would not be buying that, let alone the middle class.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by omon View Post
                            how do you think us and israel should be taken out from equation??
                            They cannot be and they should not be ... unless U.S. president feels like humiliating his nation, which I prey he wont do.

                            Look at the Israeli-Iranian standoff, I still cannot figure out the point of this artificial confilct except to serve as a source for good propoganda material for Iran. Iran has no business in meddeling in the affairs of Israel. It is akin to me walking on the street, seeing someone standing for the bus, and suddenly out of the blue decide to spit on his face. It is wrong, needless and most importantly unprovoked.

                            Medeling in Iraq is something else. Americans do not like when I say that, but that is only because they are on the other side of the wall i.e. currently in Iraq. Replace Iraq with Cuba, and the point of view of the most freedom loving military servicemen changes overnight backed by arguments such as that is because .....

                            Back to my point, you cannot and should not takeout U.S. and Israel out of the equation. Stay firm.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by captain View Post
                              Oh it does get better!
                              Mohammad Hassan Ghadiri, Iranian ambassador to Mexico, thinks the CIA might have had a hand in it.

                              Source:
                              Iran ambassador suggests CIA could have killed Neda Soltan | Top of the Ticket | Los Angeles Times

                              Cheers.
                              It gets even better. The NYT reported that one Iranian news outlet in accusing the BBC of hiring a hit man to kill her in order to flame dissent. Vivid imaginations at work over there.

                              You'll notice that the dissinformation is never stated as fact, just as possibility or suspicion. It's the classic use of innuendo-becomes-fact technique. :)
                              To be Truly ignorant, Man requires an Education - Plato

                              Comment


                              • It seems a slow back-down is in progress.

                                Leaders Press End to Iranian Protest Over Election

                                MICHAEL SLACKMAN
                                Published: June 26, 2009

                                TEHRAN — The direct confrontation over Iran’s presidential election was effectively silenced Friday when the main opposition leader said he would seek permits for any future protests, an influential cleric suggested that leaders of the demonstrations could be executed, and the council responsible for validating the election repeated its declaration that there were no major irregularities.

                                Rather than address the underlying issues that led to the most sustained, unexpected challenge to the leadership since the 1979 revolution, the government pressed its effort to recast the entire conflict not as an internal dispute that brought millions of Iranians into the streets, but as one between Iran and outside agents from Europe, the United States and even Saudi Arabia.

                                It was a narrative that spoke both to the leadership’s belief that it had beaten back the popular outburst, but also to the fragility of the calm. “There has been too much violence to forget about it,” said an expatriate Iranian analyst who is not being identified because he has family in Iran and is afraid of reprisals against them.

                                Although the government appeared to have the upper hand, political analysts said it was too soon for President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to declare his troubles over. Though it seemed increasingly likely he would be sworn in for a second term by early August, there was no guarantee how that term would unfold or whether competitors within the system — who have a different vision of Iran — would work against him.

                                Even before he faced a challenge to his legitimacy, Mr. Ahmadinejad was often castigated by the Parliament for his troubled handling of the economy and there had been talk of trying to impeach him. Several of his own ministers quit the government in protest over his economic policies.

                                “There are quite a few people sitting on the fence watching to see which way the wind will blow,” said Ali M. Ansari, a professor of Iranian history at St. Andrews University in Scotland. “Information is very hard to come by but there seems to be much back-room negotiating predicated on the fact normality should first return to the country.”

                                Throughout the crisis, events in Iran have focused on two camps, the opposition, led by Mir Hussein Moussavi, a former prime minister, and the camp surrounding Mr. Ahmadinejad, including the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and the military and security agencies. But there is a third group of more pragmatic military and security figures who have competed with Mr. Ahmadinejad, but are believed to remain close to Ayatollah Khamenei.

                                Two of the most influential in that group are the mayor of Tehran, Mohammad Baqer Ghalibaf, a former commander in the Revolutionary Guards, and the speaker of Parliament, Ali Larijani, the nation’s former chief nuclear negotiator. Both ran for president four years ago, want to run again, and have at times been sharp critics of Mr. Ahmadinejad’s stewardship. Political analysts have described them as loyal to the leader, committed to Islamic government, but eager for a more modern state integrated with the rest of the world. Mr. Larijani resigned as nuclear negotiator in part because he favored engagement over confrontation.

                                During the electoral crisis both made statements demonstrating their independence from Mr. Ahmadinejad — and their objection to some aspects of the crackdown. The mayor called for allowing legal protests. The speaker said that it was improper for the Guardian Council, which is supposed to monitor the elections, to side with Mr. Ahmadinejad. Mr. Larijani also said that the majority of the people did not believe the government’s contention that Mr. Ahmadinejad won with 63 percent of the vote.

                                “It’s an odd dynamic,” said Karim Sadjadpour, an Iran expert with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “The person they have to be loyal to, the supreme leader, has thrown his weight behind this person they despise. Ghalibaf is one of these people, like Larijani, and others had been on the fence and if there is a tipping point they could go the other way.”

                                The government continued to try to frame any opponents as traitors to the nation. The Friday Prayer ceremony is a political and religious ritual held in a large hall at Tehran University and broadcast all over the nation. Ayatollah Ahmad Khatami, a stout turbaned cleric who frequently delivers the Friday speech, hewed to the hard party line.

                                He urged that those who led protests be convicted for taking up arms against people, an offense punishable by death.

                                “I want the judiciary to punish leading rioters firmly and without showing any mercy to teach everyone a lesson,” he said.

                                A few hours earlier, the Guardian Council repeated its claim that the election had been fair. “There has been no fraud in the election,” said the council’s spokesman, Abbas-Ali Kadkhodaei, acknowledging that the review process was not technically completed. He said the council had checked discrepancies reported by Mr. Moussavi, but that they had not borne out.

                                Mr. Moussavi immediately posted a report containing a long list of irregularities on his Web site, an action that barely registered against the might of the state machine.

                                But he also signaled that the street phase of the protests was ending, saying on his Web site that he would try to seek permits for future protests — permits the government has consistently refused.



                                While protesters were aided at first by technology — primarily the Internet and text messaging — the government deployed its control of state television and news outlets to sweep away competing narratives.

                                “It is still possible that the information age will crack authoritarian structures in Iran,” wrote Jon B. Alterman, director of the Middle East program for the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. “But it is far more likely that the government will be able to use that technology to secure its own rule.”

                                Mr. Moussavi may have little room to maneuver, but he has refused to surrender altogether. He is being closely monitored by security agents. Members of Parliament aligned with Ayatollah Khamenei met with Mr. Moussavi on Wednesday and tried to press him to relent.

                                “Mr. Moussavi still wants the election results nullified,” Ismail Kossari, one of the members of Parliament, told the ILNA news agency.

                                “We told him that his demand was unreasonable and immoral and he shouldn’t have repeated his demand after the supreme leader’s statements at the Friday prayers,” Mr. Kossari was quoted as saying.

                                Nazila Fathi reported from Tehran, and Michael Slackman from Cairo. Alan Cowell contributed reporting from Paris, Mona el-Naggar from Cairo, and Sharon Otterman from New York.

                                http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/27/wo...27iran.html?hp
                                To be Truly ignorant, Man requires an Education - Plato

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X