25,000 civilians KilledIn Iraq

[Major_Armstrong]

jimmy22 is a member of Al Qaeda. This thread is part of his jihad. His lies revealed here:

The Beeb apologizes
A minor scandal, but at least they came clean:

The BBC has apologised for incorrectly broadcasting figures which suggested more Iraqi civilians had been killed by coalition and Iraqi forces than by insurgents.
The information was based on figures given by the Iraqi Ministry of Health to the BBC's Panorama programme. The statistics concerned the number of people killed in conflict-related violence in the second half of 2004.

The figures said that 3,274 civilians had died in that period, 2,041 of them as the result of "military operations".

The rest were attributed to "terrorist operations".

The BBC reported the figures as suggesting that coalition and Iraqi forces could be responsible for up to 60% of conflict-related civilian deaths in Iraq.[...]

However, the Iraqi Ministry of Health then clarified that the figures included not just civilians, but also insurgents and Iraqi security forces. And it said that the phrase "military operations" referred to Iraqis killed by insurgents as well as coalition or Iraqi forces.


Posted by Henry Hanks at January 31, 2005 07:38 PM | TrackBack

http://tvh.rjwest.com/archives/006668.html


http://news.bbc.co.uk/newswatch/ifs/...00/4222353.stm

[jimmy22]

jimmy22 is a member of Al Qaeda. This thread is part of his jihad. His lies revealed here:



http://tvh.rjwest.com/archives/006668.html


http://news.bbc.co.uk/newswatch/ifs/...00/4222353.stm

These were Not my figures dear. they were on BBC's site and i just copy pasted them here. Why would BBC apologize if they had not made such a comment

Yes its a part of my Jihad

[Bill]

"Yes its a part of my Jihad"

Do you cowardly muslim scum do duels? Or do you only blow up innocent people?

I'd gladly meet you in any nuetral site for a little mano-a-mano.

[jimmy22]

"Yes its a part of my Jihad"

Do you cowardly muslim scum do duels? Or do you only blow up innocent people?

I'd gladly meet you in any nuetral site for a little mano-a-mano.

My pleasure

[Confed999]

Well I guess that US and UK are responsible for all deaths caused by both coalition soldiers and by constant fighting in the country that is going....

Nope, the power was entirely Saddam's to stop this from happening. He had over a decade to do it. He failed.

It was you who made decision to get to Iraq while Iraq did not attack you.....

Sure they did, repeatedly...

[Confed999]

It is not like you have a choise to kill 25,000 to save 65,000.... this should not be compared.

So, you're effectively saying that you would prefer 100,000 dead and 25 million as slaves. Scarry...

[Praxus]

My pleasure

I think he'd just shoot you when you turned your back.

[Bill]

I'm an ex US soldier Jimmy, here's your chance.

Feel up for a trip to the land of the great satan?

[Bluesman]

And I'm active duty, and a senior NCO, to boot.

Want some, brave Muslim warrior? Chance for martyrdom, you human pig. Death and everlasting glory in Paradise awaits, sh!tstain.

Come get your reward.

[dalem]

"Yes its a part of my Jihad"

Do you cowardly muslim scum do duels? Or do you only blow up innocent people?

I'd gladly meet you in any nuetral site for a little mano-a-mano.

Need a second? I can bring my own rapier. ;)

-dale

[HistoricalDavid]

# Iraq, Saddam Hussein (1979-2003): 300 000

* Human Rights Watch: "twenty-five years of Ba`th Party rule ... murdered or 'disappeared' some quarter of a million Iraqis" [http://www.hrw.org/wr2k4/3.htm]
* 8/9 Dec. 2003 AP: Total murders
o New survey estimates 61,000 residents of Baghdad executed by Saddam.
o US Government estimates a total of 300,000 murders
+ 180,000 Kurds k. in Anfal
+ 60,000 Shiites in 1991
+ 50,000 misc. others executed
o "Human rights officials" est.: 500,000
o Iraqi politicians: over a million
* [These don't include the million or so dead in the Iran-Iraq War.]

Just for a refreshing change, why don't you complain about this?

http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat3.htm

[Lahori paa jee]

Iraq under Saddam was much better than it is now. Saddam was a cruel leader and killed many but still there was peace in his country. Now many have died and its no more a safe place. He only killed his opponentd now even ordinary civilians are losing lives. Its sad indeed

[Bluesman]

'Nother goddam' idiot.

Super.

[dalem]

Iraq under Saddam was much better than it is now. Saddam was a cruel leader and killed many but still there was peace in his country. Now many have died and its no more a safe place. He only killed his opponentd now even ordinary civilians are losing lives. Its sad indeed

Even allowing for your twisted view of the facts, ordinary civilians were Saddam's opponents.

-dale

[Shek]

Iraq under Saddam was much better than it is now. Saddam was a cruel leader and killed many but still there was peace in his country. Now many have died and its no more a safe place. He only killed his opponentd now even ordinary civilians are losing lives. Its sad indeed

It's too bad that Saddam's henchmen and Sunni terrorists are killing ordinary citizens. What's your solution, genius? Put Saddam back in power so he can commit genocide against the Zionist supporting Shia and Kurds?