Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Korean Dilemma

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I'm still bewildered that this happened out of the blue with zero indications of any crisis. However, the North Koreans cannot be happy that the ROKA reacted so fast.
    Chimo

    Comment


    • He is toast. The impeachment requires a 2/3 approval and they might get unanimous on Saturday. The President committed seppuku.

      Comment


      • What concerns me is that the ROKA Generals who obeyed this clearly illegal order, were not Yoon's yes-men.
        Chimo

        Comment


        • Kim is a frigging coward. Don't have the guts to stand by any decision. Didn't have the guts to stand for or against Martial Law, leaving it to Yoon. Don't have the guts to resign, leaving the decision to Yoon again.
          Defence Minister apologised on Wednesday for causing public concern in relation to President attempt to impose martial law and offered to resign
          Chimo

          Comment


          • The Defense Minister proposed declaring martial law to President? Ah, so even though he is the one to propose to the President he will either stay or resign. Up to the President. Is Kim proposing a Get Out of Jail card for Yoon? My fault so I'll take the blame. Well then take the blame you wimp.

            Both should be well done toast.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
              What concerns me is that the ROKA Generals who obeyed this clearly illegal order, were not Yoon's yes-men.
              Was it technically 'illegal' though? If at law the President has the power to declare a national emergency and order a national mobilization. Having received the order to do so? The generals involved may well have been legally obliged to mobilize. The key issue I believe would have been the Presidents follow up orders i.e. what were they to do once mobilized. For example any orders to say arrest opposition leaders and impose a national curfew would clearly be illegal in these circumstances.

              The thing is I haven't seen or read any news indicating what the else the generals actually did after being ordered to mobilize,.
              Last edited by Monash; 04 Dec 24,, 23:50.
              If you are emotionally invested in 'believing' something is true you have lost the ability to tell if it is true.

              Comment


              • What emergency? There's no Intel about any riots, NKs crossing the border. Nothing indicating the need for the military to move out the barracks. An officer's job is to determine the threat. What threat? If no threat, then moving against the capital is clearly illegal.
                Chimo

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
                  What emergency? There's no Intel about any riots, NKs crossing the border. Nothing indicating the need for the military to move out the barracks. An officer's job is to determine the threat. What threat? If no threat, then moving against the capital is clearly illegal.
                  And if f it was an earth quake or typhoon would that be classed as a military emergency? The point I was trying to make that mere act of ordering a national mobilization by itself would not necessarily be illegal. For example if it was done as an exercise it would not be illegal. What I'm trying to point out is that if the President merely orders 'the armed forces to mobilize' that might not be illegal since he has the authority to do so. It's the follow up bit, the reason he gives and or the follow-up orders that he issues which could get him into deep s**t . For example 'I order the armed forces to mobilize because ...... exercise, earthquake, military incursion? Yes! I order the military to mobilize because .... I want to stage a political coup? No!
                  If you are emotionally invested in 'believing' something is true you have lost the ability to tell if it is true.

                  Comment


                  • We would have the Intel for earthquake or typhoon.
                    Chimo

                    Comment


                    • As for exercises,' we give civies plenty of warning. We don't want to be sue for losing a man's job because we're blocking traffic.

                      A surprise ex will NEVER interfere with civies livelihood.

                      We plan civil chaos as part of our ex, ie we have civies volunteer to block us.

                      Yoon called out the military for no reason. The Generals should have seen it. They're Generals for Pete sakes.
                      Last edited by Officer of Engineers; 05 Dec 24,, 01:18.
                      Chimo

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by tbm3fan View Post
                        He is toast. The impeachment requires a 2/3 approval and they might get unanimous on Saturday. The President committed seppuku.
                        But he cannot be impeached because the Current Supreme Court doesn't have enough members. Either 2 or 3 retired this year and the Congress hasn't appointed new ones.

                        Seppuka is a Japanese thing Korea doesn't have any tradition like that

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
                          I'm still bewildered that this happened out of the blue with zero indications of any crisis. However, the North Koreans cannot be happy that the ROKA reacted so fast.
                          Most Koreans that I know believe his wife talked him into it. She has been involved in many scandals. And the President may have had the Justice Dept "Look the other way" in her latest scheme.

                          He was most likely looking at being impeached, Some of his ministers have already. A long shot that failed.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
                            We would have the Intel for earthquake or typhoon.
                            My point was that I don't know/haven't heard what was in the official mobilization orders. I could be mistaken but as yet I don't think they've been made public. Until we do? As far as I'm concerned the Generals are in a dammed if they do dammed if they don't situation. The President has the the legal authority to authorize a mobilization. It's one thing to just say 'mobilize' it's another to say 'mobilize and stage a coup'. If specifics weren't included the the mobilization orders the obvious answer would be to order the mobilization to commence and immediately seek clarification as to the purpose. Until specific instructions were issued? Any mobilized troops would stay on base.
                            If you are emotionally invested in 'believing' something is true you have lost the ability to tell if it is true.

                            Comment


                            • Kudos, now you've got it. Never mind the military, Korean police was also called out ... to no riot.
                              Chimo

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
                                Kudos, now you've got it. Never mind the military, Korean police was also called out ... to no riot.
                                Err... that was my point from the beginning.
                                If you are emotionally invested in 'believing' something is true you have lost the ability to tell if it is true.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X