Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

China invades Taiwan

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Firestorm
    replied
    Originally posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    Think you can drop the air superiority after the China AF just hired 30 exRAF pilots as consultants for training. 30 pilots? That's a hell of a lot of knowledge the Chinese are missing.
    Getting inside knowledge of NATO BVR tactics sounds like an intelligence coup to me. I know of retired USAF fighter pilots who refuse to get involved in BVR combat in Digital Combat Simulator simply because they might accidentally and unintentionally reveal some tactics to other users. And that is just a simulator but they believe knowledge of tactics is that important and must be kept secret. And here we have these fine RAF chaps gleefully providing information to the Chinese in return for money. And yes, it is not treason because there is no state of war between the UK and China but these guys aren't stupid enough not to see the big picture and understand the implications.
    Last edited by Firestorm; 09 Nov 22,, 01:48.

    Leave a comment:


  • Firestorm
    replied
    Originally posted by DOR View Post
    Multiply that PLA edge by the number of PLAAF pilots with actual combat experience.
    Isn't that equally true on the Taiwanese side?

    Leave a comment:


  • DOR
    replied
    Multiply that PLA edge by the number of PLAAF pilots with actual combat experience.

    Leave a comment:


  • Officer of Engineers
    replied
    Originally posted by astralis View Post
    these days, I think a safer assumption is roughly 80-120K ROCA vs 60K PLA, with the PLA holding air superiority and able to call on PLARF.
    Think you can drop the air superiority after the China AF just hired 30 exRAF pilots as consultants for training. 30 pilots? That's a hell of a lot of knowledge the Chinese are missing.

    Leave a comment:


  • astralis
    replied
    these days, I think a safer assumption is roughly 80-120K ROCA vs 60K PLA, with the PLA holding air superiority and able to call on PLARF.

    Leave a comment:


  • Officer of Engineers
    replied
    It's still a 400K RoCA vs a 30K China Army invasion force. My bet has been and will continue to be on the Taiwanese for the foreseeable future.

    Leave a comment:


  • tbm3fan
    replied
    Then I guess 28 million people will need to be sent to re-education camps to properly indoctrinate (wash) them...

    PS: maybe I should have said 28 million sheep
    Last edited by tbm3fan; 11 Sep 22,, 05:42.

    Leave a comment:


  • Officer of Engineers
    replied
    According to Beijing, even prepping for a referemdum is akin to prep work towards Formal Independence. It is Casis Beli.

    Leave a comment:


  • Monash
    replied
    Originally posted by DOR View Post

    They tried that in Hong Kong, and the people who suggested it ended up in jail.
    Yes but there is direct land link between China and Hong Kong, which to all intents and purposes meant China could just about do anything it wanted in Hong Kong, any time it wanted once it decided it was really necessary. Ain't no such thing between China and Taiwan. Just like with Britain and NAZI Germany, a few miles of ocean make a world of difference to how easy it is to impose your will on someone.

    That said holding such a referendum and then acting on it would 'pull the trigger' in Beijing. It would be decision making time. Invade, yes or no? No going back either way.
    Last edited by Monash; 10 Sep 22,, 15:43.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dazed
    replied
    Originally posted by tbm3fan View Post
    You know a sane person would simply hold a referendum asking the Taiwanese do you want, or do you not want to reunite with mainland China. I'm pretty sure we can guess what the answer will be by a huge margin. The professional Taiwanese I know are vehemently anti-reunite. Now is Xi a sane person?
    Before Nixon went to China and the ROC was China when you said China. Chiang Kai-Shek through delusion and the fact Mao was doing his best to destroy the PRC, never thought of the two as being separate nations. I talk to citizens of the ROC often. I would say about 54 percent go with the independence without declaring it. Geopolitical don't say, don't tell.

    Leave a comment:


  • DOR
    replied
    Originally posted by tbm3fan View Post
    You know a sane person would simply hold a referendum asking the Taiwanese do you want, or do you not want to reunite with mainland China. I'm pretty sure we can guess what the answer will be by a huge margin. The professional Taiwanese I know are vehemently anti-reunite. Now is Xi a sane person?
    They tried that in Hong Kong, and the people who suggested it ended up in jail.

    Leave a comment:


  • tbm3fan
    replied
    You know a sane person would simply hold a referendum asking the Taiwanese do you want, or do you not want to reunite with mainland China. I'm pretty sure we can guess what the answer will be by a huge margin. The professional Taiwanese I know are vehemently anti-reunite. Now is Xi a sane person?

    Leave a comment:


  • DOR
    replied
    Crossing the Strait: China’s Military Prepares for War with Taiwan
    National Defense University Press, Washington DC

    Both the U.S. and Chinese militaries are increasingly focused on a possible confrontation over Taiwan. China regards the island as an integral part of its territory and is building military capabilities to deter Taiwan independence and to compel Taiwan to accept unification. These efforts have shifted the military balance in China’s favor and heightened the risk of war. At the same time, the United States insists that China and Taiwan resolve their dispute peacefully and is strengthening its military capabilities in the Western Pacific to deter a possible Chinese attack.

    Crossing the Strait: China’s Military Prepares for War with Taiwan explores the political and military context of cross-strait relations, with a focus on understanding the Chinese decision calculus about using force, the capabilities the People’s Liberation Army would bring to the fight, and what Taiwan can do to defend itself. Based on original research by leading international experts, Crossing the Strait explores China’s military options and the PLA’s ability to execute them. The authors use a range of Chinese sources to assess the PLA’s improved amphibious, airborne, logistics, sealift, command and control, and urban warfare capabilities and how they might be employed in a military conflict. The authors conclude that the PLA has made significant improvements and can already execute several military campaigns, but still lacks critical airlift, sealift, logistics, and other capabilities necessary to invade and occupy Taiwan. Under the guidance of current Central Military Commission Chairman Xi Jinping, the PLA is working hard to address these shortcomings.

    Crossing the Strait also considers what Taiwan, the United States, and other parties can do to prepare a more effective defense. Taiwan has increasingly focused on acquiring asymmetric and innovative military systems to blunt Chinese aggression. Yet contributors to the volume suggest that current efforts are insufficient: Taiwan needs to do more to prepare for the full range of contingencies it might face from the People’s Liberation Army. A Taiwan with the right strategy, training, and force investments can pose a formidable wartime challenge and thus improve deterrence. Given the high stakes, the volume should be of interest to policymakers and practitioners alike.

    https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Publication...ng-the-Strait/

    Leave a comment:


  • astralis
    replied
    yeah, blockade alone is not a viable threat. gives the US significant time and space to marshal forces and then pick the place to break the PLA Navy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Officer of Engineers
    replied
    Chinese ASW still sucks!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X