It has been said that every country where birth-rate fells below the 2.2 kids in every family is not able to effectivly fight any serious war . Or to have sustainable agressive / expansionist foreign policy .
Do declining birth-rate cut back the ability to wage a big-scale war ? I remember reading that the current rising star , China is especially challenged in this sense because of the 1-child policy . Basicly ´No way a chinese family is going to let goverment kill their only child´.
In west the sensitivity over dead soldiers numbers date back to the time where families got smaller with less children .
Currently the hottest spots in the world all have growing birth-rates . Would the same logic apply for them too if their birth-rate would fell ?
What do you think ?
Do declining birth-rate cut back the ability to wage a big-scale war ? I remember reading that the current rising star , China is especially challenged in this sense because of the 1-child policy . Basicly ´No way a chinese family is going to let goverment kill their only child´.
In west the sensitivity over dead soldiers numbers date back to the time where families got smaller with less children .
Currently the hottest spots in the world all have growing birth-rates . Would the same logic apply for them too if their birth-rate would fell ?
What do you think ?
Comment