No announcement yet.

Clovis first theory dead

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Clovis first theory dead

    Artifacts in Texas predate Clovis culture by 2,500 years, new study shows

    Researchers in Texas have discovered thousands of human artifacts in a layer of earth that lies directly beneath an assemblage of Clovis relics, expanding evidence that other cultures preceded the Clovis culture in North America. This pre-Clovis toolkit appears to be between 13,200 and 15,500 years old and it includes biface and blade technology that may have later been adapted -- and improved upon -- by the Clovis culture.

    The Clovis people, whose tools were known for their distinctive "fluted" points, were once thought to be the original settlers of North America about 13,000 years ago. Over the past few years, however, scattered evidence has hinted at several earlier cultures. But, such evidence has often been disputed in part because so few artifacts have actually been recovered.

    The new site in Texas, known as the Debra L. Friedkin site, documents a pre-Clovis settlement in the region and informs researchers about the transition to Clovis culture and technology, which is later seen across North and Central America (and also into northern South America). These new artifacts comprise what researchers are calling the Buttermilk Creek Complex, and details of its excavation will be reported in the 25 March issue of Science, which is published by AAAS, the nonprofit science society.

    Michael Waters from Texas A&M University and colleagues from across the United States describe the various blades, scrapers and choppers found among the 15,528 artifacts in the Buttermilk Creek Complex. They used luminescence dating, which measures the light energy trapped in sediment grains, to date the 20-centimeter thick layer of sediment surrounding the toolkit.

    "At the Debra L. Friedkin site, Texas, we have found evidence of an early human occupation… 2,500 years older than Clovis," said Dr. Waters. "This makes the Friedkin site the oldest credible archaeological site in Texas and North America. The site is important to the debate about the timing of the colonization of the Americas and the origins of Clovis."

    The newly discovered tools are small and made of chert, and the researchers suggest that they were designed for a mobile toolkit -- something that could be easily packed up and moved to a new location. These tools are recognizably different from Clovis tools although they do share some similarities, including the use of biface and bladelet technology.

    In the past, researchers have argued that the Clovis people were the oldest human inhabitants of the Americas. This "Clovis First" model theorizes that the Clovis people came to the New World from Northeast Asia by crossing the Bering Land Bridge, which once connected Asia and North America. From there, it suggests that they spread out across the continent and eventually made their way down to South America.
    However, some problems with this model have recently arisen. First of all, no Clovis technology has been found in Northeast Asia and the fluted points that have been discovered in Alaska are all too young to be Clovis. (They were also made a bit differently than Clovis points.) Furthermore, there are six sites in South America that do not contain Clovis technology, although they did exist during the same time period.

    The Debra L. Friedkin site in Texas, implies that Clovis tools could have eventually evolved from the tools found in the Buttermilk Creek Complex -- and that the Clovis culture, including the use of fluted points, likely developed in North America.

    "This discovery provides ample time for Clovis to develop," said Waters. "People [from the Buttermilk Creek Complex] could have experimented with stone and invented the weapons and tools that we now recognize as Clovis… In short, it is now time to abandon once and for all the 'Clovis First' model and develop a new model for the peopling of the Americas."
    Artifacts in Texas predate Clovis culture by 2,500 years, new study shows -- ScienceDaily

    Dr Paula Campos, a former postdoc at Willerslev’s lab in Copenhagen, now at Science Museum, University of Coimbra, Portugal, elaborates the point:
    "When we published the first DNA results from the Paisley Caves four years ago it caused an outcry. Many archaeologists felt that our results must be wrong. They considered it an established fact that Clovis were the first Americans. People would come up with any number of alternative explanations to our data in order to repudiate our interpretation. Today we demonstrate that our conclusions were right."

    Thomas Stafford, also of the Centre for GeoGenetics in Copenhagen, and Loren Davies of Oregon State University agree:
    "Critics said that the stratigraphy in the Paisley Caves is diffuse and chaotic and that this explains the finding of human coprolites older that Clovis. This couldn’t be more wrong. The stratigraphy is well developed, clear and ordered correctly top to bottom."

    Thomas Stafford elaborates:
    "No other archaeological site in the US has been as thoroughly and exhaustively dated as the Paisley Caves. We’ve completed more than 141 new radiocarbon measurements on materials ranging from coprolites to wood and plant artefacts, fossil plants and mummified animals, to unique, water soluble chemical fractions from sediments and the coprolites themselves. We have used 14C dating to physically and temporally dissect the Paisley Caves strata at the millimetre l level. At present, we see no evidence that geologically younger, water-borne molecules — DNA in particular — have moved downward and contaminated deeper, older coprolites. The aDNA and 14C data are iterative and corroborate each other. Our conclusion is that humans were present in North America at least one thousand years before Clovis and that these earlier peoples probably had no technological or genetic similarity to the iconic Clovis Culture. The Clovis First debate has ended. The theory is now dead and buried."
    The Clovis First Theory is put to rest at Paisley Caves – University of Copenhagen

    Understanding the history of the settlement of the Americas has definitely now got a lot more complicated.
    Last edited by tantalus; 14 Jan 15,, 22:44.

  • #2

    Humans settled in the Americas much earlier than previously thought, according to new finds from Mexico.

    They suggest people were living there 33,000 years ago, twice the widely accepted age for the earliest settlement of the Americas.

    The results are based on work at Chiquihuite Cave, a high-altitude rock shelter in central Mexico.

    Archaeologists found nearly 2,000 stone tools, suggesting the cave was used by people for at least 20,000 years.
    Prof David Meltzer, from Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas, who was not involved in the research, said the findings were "interesting". But he explained: "It is not enough to argue that the stone specimens could be cultural (artefacts), one has to show that they are not natural." Natural processes could mimic some types of stone tool, Prof Meltzer said.

    Second, he explained: "With a stone tool tradition that long-lasting, one expects it would have been far more widespread in the region, raising the question of why that technology hasn't been spotted elsewhere," adding: "Perhaps more important, with modern humans one expects to see evidence of technological and cultural change over such a long span of time."

    Finally, he said, "the cave is 1,000 metres above the valley floor, but leaving aside the issue of why not camp closer to the valley floor, why keep coming back to that same place on 'a relatively constant basis' over such a long period of time? I find that curious. Not many sites have that kind of long term repeated occupation, unless there is something quite useful / available at the spot".
    Will take time for other experts to review this


    • #3

      Footprint evidence from 23 thousand years ago. Seems solid. Oldest strong evidence but far from definite this is the oldest date.

      Genetic evidence suggests they didnt survive and are not the native american ancestors. Yet this population were in the southwest of the USA in the middle of the ice age.