+ Reply to Thread
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Results 91 to 94 of 94

Thread: Hiroshima and Nagasaki: 62 years

  1. #91
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,433
    Country: Canada
    Of course it is and that's the point.
    Chimo

  2. #92
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Contrary by Nature.
    zraver's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Oct 06
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    9,269
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Dwarven Pirate View Post
    This is insane.
    Of course it is, but its also counter-intuitive.

    People keep thinking they can legalize, classify, ancompartmentalize war and thus have and fight good nealry bloodless conflicts. It doesn't work, it can't work ever. The side that percieves that it is the one doing the losing will resort to any tactic to "win" limited only by what they think the enemy will do.

    If you go into a war fully committed to win no matter the cost then historically your enemies don't really want to fight. WW1 the obvious excpetion was an accident of a multi-polar world. More importantly is the Cold War, the Treaty of Veinna, Post war Koreas, PRC/Taiwan, Pakistan-India post nuclear era etc the cost of war has been made clear so no one wants to fight.

  3. #93
    Contributor
    Join Date
    20 Aug 07
    Posts
    321
    Very well. This argument SEEMS defensible, at least. But if you use it in justification of Hiroshima/Nagasaki, you'll make me cry.

  4. #94
    Staff Emeritus
    Military Professional
    Contrary by Nature.
    zraver's Avatar
    Join Date
    22 Oct 06
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    9,269
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Dwarven Pirate View Post
    Very well. This argument SEEMS defensible, at least. But if you use it in justification of Hiroshima/Nagasaki, you'll make me cry.
    Dwarves should not cry, but the legacy of Hiroshima and nagasaki is one of peace. The images of shadows burned into concrete and kids with skin melted off them like tallow made sure that no one was to eager to uncork the atomic genei again. If the bombs had only been used on a pure miltiary complex amybe Ponyang, or Bonn, or maybe all the great cities would ahve burned in the 50's. The legacy of slaughter brought hom just how bad war can be, and becuase of it several generatiosn refrained from going down that road again.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. "Thank God for the Atom Bomb"
    By Shek in forum The World Wars
    Replies: 224
    Last Post: 02 May 09,, 05:58
  2. An interview with Paul Tibbits aged 87
    By 101st Airborne in forum The World Wars
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 20 Mar 07,, 01:05
  3. The B-70 and the fight btw Kennedy/Vinson
    By Bill in forum Military Aviation
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06 Nov 06,, 15:11
  4. Primary Target - August 6 1945
    By vaughn in forum The Field Mess
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 16 May 06,, 16:49
  5. A different legacy of Hiroshima
    By Leader in forum International Politics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06 Aug 05,, 11:58

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts