View Poll Results: Showa Emperor was guilty or not ???

Voters
44. You may not vote on this poll
  • Emperor was completely guilty as head of state

    27 61.36%
  • Emperor was not guilty as all

    6 13.64%
  • Emperor should have been prosecuted, but was up to the Court to decide the extent of his guilt

    12 27.27%
  • Emperor was blameless, but other member of Imperial Familly were guilty

    1 2.27%
  • General Matsui was wrongfully executed to coverup

    2 4.55%
  • Regardless both Matsui and the Prince were guilty

    2 4.55%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 53 of 53

Thread: Imperial familly - crimes against Humanity

  1. #46
    Senior Contributor Triple C's Avatar
    Join Date
    11 Apr 06
    Location
    Chicago IL
    Posts
    1,719
    Sirs,

    From what I understand, the shrines were not under Japanese gov't control. It is ran by a civil committee that registered itself as a religious organization and therefore under the protection of the freedom of religion guaranteed by the Japanese constituition. Even if the Japanese government is inclined to remove the war criminals from the shrine they will not be at liberty to do so.

    Personally, I believe that the emperor could stop the war because of the immense clout of his status as the supreme and divine ruler, even if his power is more symbolic than real.

    Japanese empererors after the Meiji Restoration had done little or no actual governing of the state because the nitty gritty of politics was beneath their divinity, Hirohito still retained the power to summon or dismiss a cabinet at will. The sovereinty of the Japanese empire literally rested in the emperor's person and he is the fountainhead of legitmate power. In that sense the emperor's powers are very real, since his disapproval of any policy, if expressed publically, becomes law.
    All those who are merciful with the cruel will come to be cruel to the merciful.
    -Talmud Kohelet Rabbah, 7:16.

  2. #47
    Defense Professional Dreadnought's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 May 05
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA.
    Posts
    13,648
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers View Post
    Hirehito was in on the war from the start. There were some key decisions that he've made, especially concerning China and Korea. He was guilty, no question, and not just because he was the Head of State.
    I'm with OOE on this. The Emperor was as guilty a war criminal to Japan as Hitler was to Germany and no doubt if we did what we should have he would have no doubt hung as a war criminal instead politics once again played its part and denied true justice from taking place at the trials.

    As people hold the U.S. president accountable for our troops so should they be held accountable in the very same aspects for their troops.
    Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.

  3. #48
    Registered User
    Join Date
    26 Jul 08
    Posts
    88
    the Army ran the war. not him. check this out. Unit 731


  4. #49
    Defense Professional Dreadnought's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 May 05
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA.
    Posts
    13,648
    Sir,
    I can understand your point. However the army and navy were both subservant to his wishes and if we were to quote certain conversations from him it would directly point out that he controlled both forces but allowed them to think for themselves. In much the same as a parent is responsible for their children IMO.
    Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.

  5. #50
    Padishah Shahanshah Senior Contributor xerxes's Avatar
    Join Date
    23 Jan 07
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,441
    The following is my opinion

    Hirohito may have been divine by birth and by his office, but nevertheless he chose to reign rather to rule. He may have known things here and there, very much the sameway Edward VII might have a few things going within his own kingdom, but he certainly was not involved in the planning the wars of aggression as was the case of the autocratic ruler of Russia or that of the Kaiser. Besides, had the war went the other way (Axis victory), most probably the Axis would have brought same charges on FDR, in regards of conspiring to take his nation to war against Germany.

    The above is my opinion


    ------------------------------------------------
    so the questions boils down to the following:

    Are we being fair?
    If we contrast the rapid progress of this mischievous discovery of gunpowder with the slow and laborious advances of reason, science, and the arts of peace, a philosopher, according to his temper, will laugh or weep at the folly of mankind. - Edward Gibbon

  6. #51
    Staff Emeritus
    Join Date
    06 Aug 03
    Posts
    21,966
    It's one or the other. Can't have it both ways. If he reigned, then he had no power to overrule his generals. That means that he had no authority to surrender, not even the decision to surrender.

    If he ruled, then he has to accept responsibility for everything.
    Chimo

  7. #52
    Canadian again at last! Military Professional
    Join Date
    17 May 05
    Location
    Yellowknife, NWT
    Posts
    1,400
    He is completely guilty of war crimes. The Emperor knew what he was doing and could have ordered anyone who disagreed to slit their belly and they would have even if it was under protest just for honours sake. He was not under lock and key held by the reigning Shogun like many before him.

    Xerxes, you are continuing just for the hell of it now.

  8. #53
    Banned Regular
    Join Date
    01 Sep 08
    Location
    Glasgow
    Posts
    77
    Quote Originally Posted by xerxes View Post
    This is true in most monarchies, even the constitional ones. Again, i will bring up the example of king of Italy who willingly sat on the throne of Ethiopia and Albania, both conquered nations by force of arms. Why he was not tried as a criminal.
    At least it was ensured that Italy became a republic!

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Could genocide happen again?
    By truhottgirl in forum Warfare in the Modern Age
    Replies: 141
    Last Post: 16 Jan 08,, 15:27
  2. FBI: Violent crimes jump in first half of 2006
    By Julie in forum International Politics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 19 Dec 06,, 01:22
  3. A War Crimes Tribunal May be the Only Deterrent to a Global War
    By SolveEtCoagula in forum World Affairs Board Pub
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09 Aug 06,, 20:21
  4. Human rights group sues Rumsfeld for war crimes
    By Parihaka in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 23 Dec 04,, 00:07
  5. Bush, A War Criminal?
    By Ray in forum American Politics & Economy
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 17 Dec 04,, 18:45

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •