2008 Election | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB


Go Back   World Affairs Board > History of International Conflict > The World Wars
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 08-25-2003, 00:45 AM   #1 (permalink)
Captain C
Military Professional
 
Captain C's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-08-03
Location: Bakersfield, California
Posts: 172
Country:
GuadalCanal Remixed

If you were in charge of the Imperial Japanese military in 1942, what would you have done differently in order to defeat the American's at GuadalCanal? I believe history shows that serious blunders were made by the Japanese military that led to their defeat at GuadalCanal and led to a much quicker defeat in the war than might otherwise have been possible. I do believe the Allies would have still won this war, but it might have taken another year before that happened. Your comments and insights please.

O
__________________
Revelation 16:16 And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon.
(Been There)
Captain C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2003, 05:25 AM   #2 (permalink)
bigross86
401 Ikvot Habarzel
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 08-07-03
Location: Ra'anana, Israel
Posts: 3,148
Send a message via ICQ to bigross86 Send a message via AIM to bigross86 Send a message via Yahoo to bigross86
From what I heard it was pretty damn hard anyway, despite the mistakes the Japs made...
__________________
You're a naughty girl, go to my room!
bigross86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2003, 14:27 PM   #3 (permalink)
Captain C
Military Professional
 
Captain C's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-08-03
Location: Bakersfield, California
Posts: 172
Country:
There was no doubt it was hard!!! It could have been much worse. The Japanese had overwhelming naval power in the area and refused to use it. They had 6 battleships in the area (4 Kongo Class and 2 Yamato Class) and 4 carriers, yet for the longest refused to commit them to the bombardment of Henderson field. When they finally did late in the game, the Americans had two modern battleships to face off the Japanese. Even when the Japanese finally committed battleships for bombardment, they only committed two Kongo Class BB's instead of the whole fleet of BB's.

If when the American forces first landed the Japanese would have initiated daily battleship bombardment of Henderson field, The Japanese would have kept planes off Henderson field and starved the Americans out. As it was, it worked out the other way around. The American planes on Henderson field stopped almost all resupply efforts of the Japanese. The Japanese were so concerned with the "Mother of all Battles" with the U.S. fleet that they didn't take care of business. They were afraid to let the BB's and carriers take part in attacks on Henderson field that would have destroyed any defensive capability the U.S. forces had.

Another problem was Japanese pride. They had such a long string of victories against the Chinese, British and Americans, that they couldn't conceive the need for equal firepower much less superior firepower. Due to upper echelon pride and arrogance, they refused to look at the actual situation until it was too late to do anything about it. By the time leaders with good sense were in a position to do anything about it, it was too late…… Don't ever let yourself get arrogant and prideful, it will give you a serious butt kicking at the worst possible time!!!!

:S :ph34r
Captain C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2003, 14:44 PM   #4 (permalink)
Stinger
Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-08-03
Posts: 714
Send a message via Yahoo to Stinger
Don't forget the fact that the Japanese Navy and Army had a pissing contest going over who was responsible for Guadalcanals defence.
__________________
Your look more lost than a bastard child on fathers day.
Stinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2003, 14:57 PM   #5 (permalink)
2DREZQ
Contributor
 
2DREZQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-04-03
Posts: 702
I would have ordered the Subs to go after tankers and cargo supply ships, and ignore warships, except the carriers.
__________________
USS North Dakota
2DREZQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2003, 15:04 PM   #6 (permalink)
Stinger
Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-08-03
Posts: 714
Send a message via Yahoo to Stinger
In short you would have changed the entirety of IJN subfleet operations
Stinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2003, 15:27 PM   #7 (permalink)
Captain C
Military Professional
 
Captain C's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-08-03
Location: Bakersfield, California
Posts: 172
Country:
That's exactly what I would have done. They sat on their rears waiting for the big battle instead of taking the war to the enemy. That cost them big time. I am not saying the Japanese had a prayer of winning the war, but they could have delayed the end for another year.
Captain C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2003, 17:04 PM   #8 (permalink)
markaspen
Regular
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 51
I certainly would have stayed around for more follow through after Savo Island, maybe getting the supply ships. On the other hand, how godd was my intelligence to begin with?

By rights, they shouldn't have lost New Guinea either.
__________________
Pa'am Tzanhan, Tamid Tzanhan.
markaspen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2003, 19:45 PM   #9 (permalink)
ChrisF202
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-12-03
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 2,500
Country:
Send a message via AIM to ChrisF202
Quote:
Originally Posted by markaspen
I certainly would have stayed around for more follow through after Savo Island, maybe getting the supply ships. On the other hand, how godd was my intelligence to begin with?

By rights, they shouldn't have lost New Guinea either.
we lost something like 10 ships there, tahts why its called "Ironbottom Sound"
ChrisF202 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2003, 00:13 AM   #10 (permalink)
Captain C
Military Professional
 
Captain C's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-08-03
Location: Bakersfield, California
Posts: 172
Country:
Of course we left a few of theirs on the bottom as well, including a couple of BB's.....
Captain C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2003, 06:14 AM   #11 (permalink)
bigross86
401 Ikvot Habarzel
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 08-07-03
Location: Ra'anana, Israel
Posts: 3,148
Send a message via ICQ to bigross86 Send a message via AIM to bigross86 Send a message via Yahoo to bigross86
Isn't the best defense a good offense? Shame they didn't apply that...
bigross86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2003, 11:32 AM   #12 (permalink)
markaspen
Regular
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 51
Quote:
Of course we left a few of theirs on the bottom as well, including a couple of BB's.....
Not at the first Battle of Savo we didn't. Had the Japanese not retired, they would have picked off whatever supply and warships were left.
http://www.ww2pacific.com/savo.html

Imagine what we could have done with the Long Lance. Worse yet, imagine what the U-Boat command could have done with them.
markaspen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2003, 22:17 PM   #13 (permalink)
Captain C
Military Professional
 
Captain C's Avatar
 
Join Date: 08-08-03
Location: Bakersfield, California
Posts: 172
Country:
Those Mk 25's were a sorry lot weren't they? Luckily the Long Lance wasn't perfect either. Otherwise we might have lost both SoDak and Washington at Second Savo.....
Captain C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2003, 22:21 PM   #14 (permalink)
ChrisF202
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 08-12-03
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 2,500
Country:
Send a message via AIM to ChrisF202
anybody know how many ships we lost there?
ChrisF202 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2003, 03:42 AM   #15 (permalink)
Anon
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-03-03
Posts: 1
The IJN's mistakes were large, but they all pale in comparision to Halsey idioticly charging away with the BB's and leaving the USMC protected by nothing more than a few jeep carriers and a destroyer squadron.

Of course, the IJN not taking advantadge of the situation was also a critical error.
Anon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Marine vs. Naval Aviation Stan187 Military Aviation 36 04-17-2007 18:38 PM
Do G4 have a case. crooks Political Discussions 165 12-31-2006 06:58 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:39 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8