+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 39

Thread: Worst decision in WW2

  1. #16
    Bandaid Military Professional
    Join Date
    04 Oct 04
    Location
    India
    Posts
    3,323
    Quote Originally Posted by sparten
    Okay back to WW2 blunders, the Arakhan offensives in Burma.
    Made Market Garden seem smart.
    Are you referring to the Chindit I & II expeditions?

    Cheers!...on the rocks!!

  2. #17
    Defense Professional
    Join Date
    18 Jun 04
    Posts
    1,632
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
    There was one thing that I've learned while in service. Hindsight is always 20/20. You have to see these decisions within context, even stupid context. We/they should have known better BUT they did not.

    Hong Kong is a prime example. British military thinking at the time was that wars would be actions on the roads. Control the roads and you control the action. It simply did not occur to anyone that whole corps can travel off road that fast.

    One cannot view Juno Beach without understanding the Dieppe experience.

    And of course, there was Montgomery who really is a legend in his own mind. The man, in his mind, never lost a battle.
    Hi OE! This is very true to understanding why Hitler went on for Barbarossa !!!

    In one book based on the files of German supreme command discussions I read that in August 1940.... Hitler was disappointed by Britain not asking for a peace. He asked his generals how long it would take to get Britain off.... They replied that it would take at least 18 month including 9 month on preparation. Hitler was very furious on this.... Then he asked his intelligence about Soviet Union and got answer - Soviet Army is now activelly re-equipping with new weapons. Hitler replied - "What I get if I spend 18 month on Britain? Nothing.... However Stalin will build significant force there and will attack us..... the peace with communists is not sustainable. There would be only one of us surviving us or communists. We always planned to attack them and they did same. We will attack first now before they get strong and get hold on their huge resources. With such a plenty resources we would have no reason to be afraid of blocked Britain"

    In the same bookd in the minutes of the same meeting Gerring promised him - Furer we can skip all those preparations - Luftwaffe is as strong as never.... we will start assualt right away!!! Hence even though Germany started its Sea Lion it actually was preparing for Eastern invasion and had been transfering armies and aircraft to Eastern Boarder. From statistics taken by Red Army in Berlin it was evident that only 1/3 of Luftwaffe was located on air strips close to Brittain while remaining force was attacking from very far or not participating in Battle for Brittain.

    And finally. In the following meetings Hilter was getting intilligence data on Soviet Army... its size.... order of battle... and number of resources it had. IT WAS WRONG!!! Hilter had data on Soviet Army which was 3 TIMES LOWER THAN ACTUALY..... Hitler estimated Soviet Army domination in artillery, tanks and aircraft as twice while it was six to ten times in different types of hardware. He underestimated number of soviet divisions THREE TIMES!!!

    Hence knowing the information which he had the Barbarossa actually made sence.... he simply did not have information about how big was his enemy. And Stalin was sure that Hitler will not attack him KNOWING WHAT A HUGE ARMY SOVIET UNION HAS..... Both were wrong

  3. #18
    Actus Reus Senior Contributor sparten's Avatar
    Join Date
    10 Apr 04
    Location
    You would like to know would'nt you?
    Posts
    1,497
    Country: Pakistan
    Quote Originally Posted by lemontree
    Are you referring to the Chindit I & II expeditions?
    The first one specifically, how many survived again? 10?
    "Any relations in a social order will endure if there is infused into them some of that spirit of human sympathy, which qualifies life for immortality." ~ George William Russell

  4. #19
    Bandaid Military Professional
    Join Date
    04 Oct 04
    Location
    India
    Posts
    3,323
    Quote Originally Posted by sparten
    The first one specifically, how many survived again? 10?
    out of 3000 odd men some 810 were killed of captured and the rest made it back.
    Wingate had little experience and tried what he had learn't in the Ethiopian campaign 2 years earlier. Jungle warfare was different and there was the objective of Chindit I was vague and served mainly as an experiment.
    - Wingate ordered all wounded to be left behind in villages.
    - Wingate repeatedly changed plans without informing other column commanders.
    - His HQ escaped to India much before the other columns and he ordred one column to continue marching eastwards IMO to enable his own escape.

    Cheers!...on the rocks!!

  5. #20
    HKHolic Senior Contributor leib10's Avatar
    Join Date
    17 Feb 05
    Location
    Lubbock, TX
    Posts
    3,489
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
    Accroding to his biography, he didn't think Market-Garden was a disaster. Never mind the fact he did not held ground, he pulverized the Germans. The man would not accept he has been defeated.
    Yep. The man was an arrogant prick. Same thing happened with Operation Goodwood. Although he is on stronger ground when he says that he won the strategic battle (i.e., tying down German troops while Americans massed for the breakthrough at St. Lo) tactically the offensive was a total disaster.
    Last edited by leib10; 04 Mar 06, at 09:04.
    "The right man in the wrong place can make all the difference in the world. So wake up, Mr. Freeman. Wake up and smell the ashes." G-Man

  6. #21
    Defense Professional RustyBattleship's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 Jan 06
    Location
    Long Beach, CA
    Posts
    5,200
    Country: United States
    As far as blunders are concerned, how about ordering major invasions based upon horrible intelligence? The landings of Attu and Kiska Islands come to mind. On Attu the troops sent were trained for North Africa and were poorly equipped to fight in the bitter cold of the Aleutian Island chain of Alaska.

    Then the attack on Kiska (by then totally abandoned by the Japanese) was with troops trained in the High Sierras, but at summertime when even the water in the bay was warm enough to swim in.

    Didn't anybody ever ask any Alaskan residents (did not have to be Aleuts but would have been logical and even more accurate) what the weather was like up there? Our "intelligence" gathering for those operations was obviously based only upon theory by people who know nothing about world geography or Alaskan weather patterns.

    It is no wonder why the words "Army" and "Intelligence" should not be said in the same breath.

  7. #22
    New Member DWBSR620's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 Sep 05
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    2
    Country: United States

    Timing

    I've always held a firm belief that taking on Russia so quickly by the Germans before finishing off England was one of the greatest blunders of WWII. But also after taking on Russia, Germany proved superior forces over Russia, yet how far could they've chased the Bear would've been the question, could they've really completely conquered The Soviets? Possibly with the help of Japan but we know that Japan made their costly error drawing The United States into war to soon, America had no intentions of getting in the war until Pearl Harbor. Too much, too soon for the Axis may've been the overall greatest cumulative blunder of the war. It's obvious that England alone would've eventually fell if Germany wouldn't have invaded The Soviet Union, and with The United States no where near ready to commit to war with The Axis whatsoever well let's say it all would've turned out very differently that's for certain. Too much, too soon, cost The Axis the war, truly in the case of The Allies never was there a better statement to ascribe to them then, "United We Stand, Divided We Fall." The Axis could only blame themselves for putting The Allies together at a time when it was The Axis choosing.


    Peace To All.

  8. #23
    Title Classified Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    23 Nov 04
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    1,139
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by DWBSR620
    I've always held a firm belief that taking on Russia so quickly by the Germans before finishing off England was one of the greatest blunders of WWII. But also after taking on Russia, Germany proved superior forces over Russia, yet how far could they've chased the Bear would've been the question, could they've really completely conquered The Soviets? Possibly with the help of Japan but we know that Japan made their costly error drawing The United States into war to soon, America had no intentions of getting in the war until Pearl Harbor. Too much, too soon for the Axis may've been the overall greatest cumulative blunder of the war. It's obvious that England alone would've eventually fell if Germany wouldn't have invaded The Soviet Union, and with The United States no where near ready to commit to war with The Axis whatsoever well let's say it all would've turned out very differently that's for certain. Too much, too soon, cost The Axis the war, truly in the case of The Allies never was there a better statement to ascribe to them then, "United We Stand, Divided We Fall." The Axis could only blame themselves for putting The Allies together at a time when it was The Axis choosing.


    Peace To All.
    Germany never had ANY chance at all of conquering the Soviet union, the best they could hope for was to force a favorable peace, but Stalin turned the war into a national war of venagence and when that happened there would be no peace until Germany was crushed.
    "We always have been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be, detested in France."
    -Sir Arthur Wellesley

  9. #24
    Defense Professional Dreadnought's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 May 05
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA.
    Posts
    13,507
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Wraith601
    Germany never had ANY chance at all of conquering the Soviet union, the best they could hope for was to force a favorable peace, but Stalin turned the war into a national war of venagence and when that happened there would be no peace until Germany was crushed.
    Germany made the grim mistake of invading Poland early. During this time Hiltler was building his Navy. Hitler didnt want to go to war with Britian until 1941-1942 when his Navy would be complete with the newest capital ships he planned to build in order to gain naval supremecy over the British Fleet. But England beat him to the punch and declared war in 1939. If Hitler had built what he planned as far as capital ships he possibly could have starved the soviets by completely decimating the convoy systems that kept the soviets supplied with food and munitions. The Soviets no doubt had greater troop numbers then Germany had at this time. But the fact remains that Germany could have possibly starved them into submission had he the Navy that he planned before making the mistake of invading Poland too early.

    Also had the Allies not caught Hitler when they did the Soviets and the Allies could have been on the recieving end of the first atomic bomb. They already knew how to create it however they could not test it or assemble it while the Allies were quickly advancing on Germany and they had to cut and run. But as Japan soon found out the U.S. capitalized on the idea of the atomic bomb.
    Last edited by Dreadnought; 15 Mar 06, at 21:22.

  10. #25
    Title Classified Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    23 Nov 04
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    1,139
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Dreadnought
    Germany made the grim mistake of invading Poland early. During this time Hiltler was building his Navy. Hitler didnt want to go to war with Britian until 1941-1942 when his Navy would be complete with the newest capital ships he planned to build in order to gain naval supremecy over the British Fleet. But England beat him to the punch and declared war in 1939. If Hitler had built what he planned as far as capital ships he possibly could have starved the soviets by completely decimating the convoy systems that kept the soviets supplied with food and munitions. The Soviets no doubt had greater troop numbers then Germany had at this time. But the fact remains that Germany could have possibly starved them into submission had he the Navy that he planned before making the mistake of invading Poland too early.

    Also had the Allies not caught Hitler when they did the Soviets and the Allies could have been on the recieving end of the first atomic bomb. They already knew how to create it however they could not test it or assemble it while the Allies were quickly advancing on Germany and they had to cut and run. But as Japan soon found out the U.S. capitalized on the idea of the atomic bomb.

    The Germans were never anywhere near building an atomic bomb as they relied on heavy water, which they had precious little, to enrich uranium.
    "We always have been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be, detested in France."
    -Sir Arthur Wellesley

  11. #26
    Defense Professional Dreadnought's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 May 05
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA.
    Posts
    13,507
    Country: United States

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by Wraith601
    The Germans were never anywhere near building an atomic bomb as they relied on heavy water, which they had precious little, to enrich uranium.
    Wraith, perhaps you may want to read about the sub U-234. Uranium that was on board among other things (jet technology etc were bound for Japan as Berlin was falling to the Allies) were taken by the americans and the speculation is that it was the key ingredients in the first atomic bomb. They have witness accounts that places the Uranium onboard the sub however once captured it lists no destination for that Uranuim.
    Leading many to believe including experts thats where our first atomic bomb technologies originated from. I have been reading more about this sub but havent found any hard evidence but what I do find I will post links for.

    This link is to a similar story of U-234. http://www.ussvance.com/Vance/nazisub.htm

    An Edeict on U-234 from Wilkipedia (Not a great souce but still a source)

    Japan disclosed its program to its ally Germany, and requested assistance. It is not known how much material Japan received from Germany, but at least one shipment that was sent to Japan by a German submarine was intercepted.

    This submarine, Unterseeboot 234 (U-234) was sent to Japan in 1945 to deliver 560 kg of uranium for the Japanese program, as well as a disassembled Me-262 jet fighter and V-2 rocket parts (which would have been of little use for a primitive nuclear weapon). Two Japanese military officials and a number of German experts were also on board. The nuclear cargo was labeled "U-235," perhaps as a mislabeling of the submarine name, or perhaps in reference to the fissile isotope of uranium, uranium-235. It is extremely unlikely, though, that it was truly 560 kg of uranium-235—this would have been some eight times more of the rare element than was produced by the entire U.S. effort, and enough for Nazi Germany to have built many atomic bombs of their own with great ease. It is more likely that the uranium was un- or partially-enriched uranium oxide (which naturally has over 99% uranium 238). The submarine was ordered to surrender on May 10, 1945, two days after the overall German surrender, by Admiral Dönitz. To avoid capture, the two Japanese officials, Lieutenant Commander Hideo Tomonaga and Lieutenant Commander Genzo Shoji, committed suicide and were buried at sea the next day. The submarine was boarded by US forces on May 14 and the cargo fell into U.S. hands.

    Some reports claim that the 560 kg of uranium oxide was enough to build two atomic bombs, but this would mean that it was substantially enriched (and would have also meant that Germany could have developed its own bomb with it, which it did not). That amount of unenriched uranium, if enriched to around the 90% needed for an atomic bomb, would provide around 4 kg of bomb-grade material, far less than needed for an atomic bomb (the "Little Boy" uranium weapon dropped on Hiroshima used over 60 kg of uranium-235). If put into a reactor, however, it could have potentially been used to breed plutonium, perhaps enough to use for a weapon if the program had been larger.

    American bombing raids disrupted the development of the genshi bakudan, and both raw material and equipment was destroyed at the Institute for Physical and Chemical Research. To avoid further bombing, the development was relocated to Konan (now called Hungnam, in North Korea) early in 1945. This region was close to the source of ore, in less danger of attack than mainland Japan, and also a major industrial area in Asia. However, the move delayed the development by critical three months. Konan was captured by the Russian army in August 1945, and belongs currently to North Korea. The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on August 6 and August 9 led to the Japanese surrender on August 15, 1945.

    Another about u-234

    Escape Of Martin Bormann
    Currently, at the Amazon.com web site, Hydrick's book gets rave reviews. One review, "All History Is Not In The Textbooks," gives Critical Mass five stars and reports that Hydrick "tells us how the Germans developed the atomic bomb." A pre-publication review of Hydrick's then-research ("Hydrick U234 -- Rethinking the Manhattan Project") bases its synopsis on a web site formerly maintained by the author.


    The pre-publication review, "Hydrick U234," explains how Martin Bormann, chief of the Nazi Party and Hitler's personal secretary, along with Gestapo Chief Heinrich Mueller, may have escaped justice in the closing days of World War II. A U-Boat, "U-234," the largest submarine in the German navy, silently patrolled the North Sea in the waning days of the war. Onboard was a special cargo: 1120 pounds of enriched uranium stored in special cylinders lined with gold. The submarine awaited orders from Admiral Karl Doenitz, commander of all German U-Boats. Late at night on April 29, 1945, Hanna Reitsch, a famous German aviatrix, flew a small plane carrying General Ritter von Greim, Martin Bormann, and Heinrich Mueller out of Berlin. They landed in Hamburg, where Bormann and Mueller boarded the now-waiting U-234.


    A deal had allegedly been struck: in exchange for the badly-needed uranium and secret devices such as infra-red bomb fuses, Bormann and Mueller would be protected by the Allies. Bormann disembarked from the U-234 off the coast of Axis-friendly Spain. Mueller and the U-234's special cargo continued on, until it soon thereafter surrendered to U.S. forces at sea.. "Mueller, Bormann and many other Nazis received American protection for decades, and continue to receive such protection even up to the present day," reports the pre-publication synopsis.

    http://www.shout.net/~bigred/Patton.html

    I can keep posting if you like. There are numerous sources to this information.
    http://www.mikekemble.com/ww2/u234.html
    http://www.americanfreepress.net/01_...ve_a-bomb.html

    From this page the subs contents http://www.spiritone.com/~gdy52150/goldp9.html

    one ton of diplomatic and personal mail
    technical drawings and blueprints for advanced combat weaponry
    anti-tank weapons
    advanced bombsights and fire-control systems
    airborne radar
    an Me 262 jet fighter
    additional jet engines
    560 kilograms of uranium oxide76
    Additionally the U-234 carried the following top Nazi experts.
    Luftwaffe General Ulrich Kessler, on his way to become German air attache in Tokyo
    Luftwaffe Lieutenant Colonel Fritz von Sandrart and Lieutenant Erich Menzel, experts in air communications, airborne radar, and AA defenses
    Four Kriegsmarine officers, including a naval aviation expert, an AA expert, a naval construction engineer, and a naval judge (whose job would be to finally stamp out the last vestiges of the Sorge spy ring)
    August Brinewald and Franz Ruf, experts in the technology and construction of jet aircraft whose mission was to begin production of Me 262 jet fighters in Japan
    Dr. Heinz Schlike, a specialist in radar and infrared technologies76

    Wraith,
    FYI more technologies transfered between the Germans and the Japanese in the closing months of WWII then ever thought possible. There is plenty out there to read about if you wish.

    Now that I have posted enough perhaps you may post enough to disavow this post?
    Last edited by Dreadnought; 16 Mar 06, at 17:28.

  12. #27
    Title Classified Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    23 Nov 04
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    1,139
    Country: United States
    Except the Germans never had a nuclear "pile" achieve criticality during the war. The Germans scrapped their entire program when they saw it fruitless.

    German A-Bomb

    You can post all the rubbish you like but you're still wrong, just having uranium is only a small step on the way to building an atomic bomb.
    "We always have been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be, detested in France."
    -Sir Arthur Wellesley

  13. #28
    Defense Professional Dreadnought's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 May 05
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA.
    Posts
    13,507
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Wraith601
    Except the Germans never had a nuclear "pile" achieve criticality during the war. The Germans scrapped their entire program when they saw it fruitless.

    German A-Bomb

    You can post all the rubbish you like but you're still wrong, just having uranium is only a small step on the way to building an atomic bomb.

    Rubbish? Ok whatever. Lost cause.
    Last edited by Dreadnought; 16 Mar 06, at 19:18.

  14. #29
    Title Classified Senior Contributor
    Join Date
    23 Nov 04
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    1,139
    Country: United States
    Quote Originally Posted by Dreadnought
    Rubbish? Ok whatever. Lost cause.
    Glad you acknowledge that you're wrong.
    "We always have been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be, detested in France."
    -Sir Arthur Wellesley

  15. #30
    Defense Professional Dreadnought's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 May 05
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA.
    Posts
    13,507
    Country: United States

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by Wraith601
    Glad you acknowledge that you're wrong.
    Maybe you should read more about the technology the Germans and Japanese exchanged before declaring anybody wrong.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. MPAs slam jirga’s decision to legitimise honour killing
    By Ray in forum International Politics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06 May 06,, 18:07
  2. Replies: 69
    Last Post: 18 Aug 05,, 22:47
  3. Gangs rule world's worst city
    By Jay in forum International Economy
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 22 Sep 04,, 21:14

Share this thread with friends:

Share this thread with friends:

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts