This is a difficult question. It is easy to focus on historically important figures, and they are always a safe choice. After all, they became historically significant generally because they did something noteworthy or praiseworthy.
It's hard to ignore military figures, because war brings out the best and worst in people. I reserve most of my admiration for the common citizen soldier. Every nation has them. They rise to the challenge, perform brilliantly at great risk to self, then fade back (happily) into their otherwise normal lives. The men who stood by General G. Washington in the dark days of the American Revolution, the winter at Valley Forge, stand out. As do the men who volunteered and fought through U.S. Civil War campaigns, the World Wars, on up to the present day conflicts.
I also greatly admire men of science, too numerous to name them all, who have opened up the universe to humanity.
Oddly (or maybe not) enough, I couldn't give a hoot in hell for any athletes, pop artists, or anyone else whose motivation is fame, fortune, and a "look at me!" attitude in life. Also, I have no admiration for business titans, even those who reshaped a nation (like Rockefeller and his ilk) because their motivations were less than pure.



2Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


Share this thread with friends: