Dogania

[Dreadnought]

Sounds like you need to get all your facts, police reports, witnesses etc and go visit a town meeting and make issue with this problem.

Many who have children and the elderly Im sure would agree that something must be done and would no doubt support you in getting some kind of Ordinance passed. Take them with you too the meeting. Wild dogs will spread disease as well as a danger to the public at large and livestock.

Good Luck and if all else fails, a tree stand and a rifle on a baited path.

We do it here to curve the deer populations, but they dont bite which should make it even more applicable.

[Versus]

Sounds like you need to get all your facts, police reports, witnesses etc and go visit a town meeting and make issue with this problem.

Many who have children and the elderly Im sure would agree that something must be done and would no doubt support you in getting some kind of Ordinance passed. Take them with you too the meeting. Wild dogs will spread disease as well as a danger to the public at large and livestock.

Good Luck and if all else fails, a tree stand and a rifle on a baited path.

We do it here to curve the deer populations, but they dont bite which should make it even more applicable.

They just made my life so much easier, today. They passed another act that is uber discriminatory. I WILL BURY them.

[Dreadnought]

They just made my life so much easier, today. They passed another act that is uber discriminatory. I WILL BURY them.

"Uber" dicriminatory as in a good thing or a bad thing?

[Mihais]

Just strap a package resembling an explosive device on a dog and call SAJ.

It's actually good you found a possible legal way.But the question is how much influence the nutters have.Don't know about your system,but our judicial system can be hijacked with a bone,so to speak.

[Versus]

"Uber" dicriminatory as in a good thing or a bad thing?

Well, it basically says that the population of stray dogs must exist in order to control population of other animals, animals like cats and rats. But this is not the new thing, it is a pinnacle of deeply perverted system that hatched here. I will explain in depth how it was conceived, how it grew and how it matured in full blown monstrosity.
The stray animals always existed in Serbia. This happened because Serbia never experienced the industrial revolution in a sense that industrialization grew from within, that it is placed in a historical, scientific and economical context. In other words, the Serbian intellectuals,scientist and engineers were always the minority and they never had the significant influence in the technological progress of the country. Whom ever wanted to go on the path of science and technology had to immigrate to other countries in order to be a scientist or an engineer. Serbia always exported its best and the brightest and imported their work, the work they did in the foreign countries. This process, before globalization, slowed the paste of technological progress and the scientific side of history in Serbia, leaving it undeveloped and backwards. This course of events also pushed aside the scientific, logical and rational way of thinking and gave the room for religious-ethnocentric or emotional way of thinking to develop. The consequence of this is well known, mindless wars, oppressive governments, iron rulers, despots that favored the patriarchate-macho-testosterone driven culture where the authority of man is undisputed. This situation lasted for a very long time and created a strong traditional-patriarchate context where males are always first and the females are always second. But the technological progress made the impact on the tools of war, making them more deadly and complex and since Serbia was in the mood for war,its male population was raised on the medieval heroes epic songs,meaning that there wasn't artillery support and machine gun nests during the medieval period,this lead to the high casualty rates in every war effort. It is one thing to charge at the enemy in 1389 and completely different thing to do the same thing in 1914. Ottomans and medieval Serbia had spears and swords in 1389 and you had to charge en masse and had sword fights, but to do the same thing in 1914 when Austro Hungarian Army invaded Serbia , armed with maxim machine guns and howitzers is a suicide. And it was. The Serbian male population was decimated. So with less men to support the patriarchate rule, the role of women grew but, since women never actually matured in intellectual sense, there wasn't a feminist movement in Serbia, they never freed themselves form the patriarchate teaching and they never embraced the freedom that they got. The Serbian women were free but they didn't know what to do with their freedom which lead to the rise of the “prince on the white horse” cult. In other words, they were free in the reality but in their minds they were not. The future wars will only strengthen this situation, as the number of men decreased insuring the dominance of women whom await the prince on the white horse.

This situation created the permanent problem with sexuality, since the population of women surpassed the population of men by far, forcing them to compete among themselves. Since they all wanted the same thing, the prince on the white horse, the shortage of princes became the problem. However the shortage of horses was never an issue. Horses or animals in other words.
Dog as an animal and that whole myth that is attached to it, the man best friend,became the ideal substitute for a prince on white horse. Dog is loyal,playful, intelligent, it gives unconditional attention and it is protective. A perfect substitute for a man that exist in dreams. So the bonding between women and dogs became absolute. In their minds, dog became a mythical being, more than a animal and more than a pet. Men however wanted the women and in order to get to the women they had to love dogs. Dogs also suit men, since patriarchate men love control and dominance and dogs allow just that. Also dog is a hunter's companion and the hunters are men, the providers of food. With this last piece in place, the conditions were set for the dog to became dominant animal in Serbia.

The dog worshiping cult was created on a Serbian meta physical plane.

The weak technological progress lead to the slow industrialization of the society and thus the bond between natural, agricultural setting on one side and the urban, industrial setting on the other was never broken. Since people on the countryside were living in a close proximity of the animals, their understanding of the relationship between humans and animals was seen as normal aka natural. So they were simply letting their dogs and cats multiplying without restrictions since, that is what animals do. It is natural aka normal.

This is the context of animal question, the frame in which this issue is placed.
So when the old federation collapsed and the war broke out, economy was shattered there was no funding for the city animal control service and animals were breading uncontrollably. Their population exploded and they became the problem. Once the Milosevic regime fell, the new government wanted to cut all connections with the past. They started massive liberalization of the political life and heavily relied on NGO's support in formulating new laws and rules, since they wanted to present a new image of government that is liberal, open minded and progressive and more civilized as opposed to rigid, communist and violent regime of the past. Needles to say, the animal rights activists groups and NGO's mushroomed and they were all lead by, guess who-women whom care only about dogs and hate cats. They supported the dogs, they nurtured them, giving them food and shelter, medical care and in return, dogs multiplied even more, eradicating the population of cats. But the NGO's didn mind that, their only concern was the dogs so the more dogs there are, the bigger their agenda is and the bigger agenda is the more donations they will get for their cause. As their influence grew, their financial solvency grew as well so the whole situation became an very lucrative business. They quickly abandoned policy of helping the animals and moved toward education. In other words, instead of spaying strays and building shelters in order to get them of the streets, they invested in media campaigns demanding the ethical treatment of animals. But as the number of dogs grew, the incidents mounted. But as the incidents monuted the NGO's used that as a proof to boost up their agenda, they used the violence of the society towards dogs as a proof of ignorance, that the population is uneducated and the they need more funds to educate the population. Since their campaigns were well funded, they reached the wider audience trough media and the NGO's influence became a political factor. Since the whom ever wanted the votes needs to be progressive and green and the way how to do it is to be good toward NGO's and their agenda.

So Serbian NGO's are not actually the NGO's they are the government. They have the power to act but since they are the NGO's they don't have the responsibility for their actions. And since they all care only about dogs, they are not the animal protection NGO's but the dog protection NGO's.

They are protecting the dogs, while dogs do the slaughter left and right. Dog is the uber animal and all other animals are sub animals.Pure Canine-Nazism.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bs5bnVoZK4Q

[Dreadnought]

Thanks for the explanation.

[Versus]

Thanks for the explanation.

You are welcomed. I hope that I was somewhat coherent in my writings.
The problem are not cats or dogs, the problem is that they are used as tools to achieve other goals, mainly to gain exposure in the media, acquire material wealth or to secure votes on the elections. Once this question got the economic and political value attached to it, the faith of the animals was sealed. They are the "capital" for the NGO's so taking down the NGO's is my primary goal.