ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > World Affairs Board Pub
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
View Poll Results: In the long run, is the world getting better? (Please read first post before voting.)
Yes, the world is improving both materially and morally.. 18 17.14%
Yes, the world is improving materially but is deteriorating/stagnating morally. 34 32.38%
Yes, the world is improving morally but is deteriorating/stagnating materially. 2 1.90%
No, the world sucks all around. 26 24.76%
Undecided. 7 6.67%
I don't give a rip. 4 3.81%
Nothing changes man, it's all the same trip 14 13.33%
Voters: 105. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-09-2007, 04:16 AM   #106 (permalink)
glyn
Military Professional
 
glyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-15-06
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Posts: 6,886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parihaka View Post
You edited it but left ain't in there

Alright, who are you and what have you done with the real Glyn
Ah, but would this retired and humble spear-carrier have dared to correct the spelling or grammar of one of our glorious moderators? Heavens forfend
__________________
Semper in excretum. Solum profunda variat.
glyn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 06:31 AM   #107 (permalink)
Feanor
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
Makes sense that if they're going to live in the country they need to speak the language. I'd assume this is a basic safety precaution against cultural assimilation of the native population in waves of immigrants.
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 11:18 AM   #108 (permalink)
entropy
Senior Reader
Senior Contributor
 
entropy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-19-07
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,628
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
Heh...like everywhere in the world.
I did not demand Europeans to give me a special treatment - I saw how it is done here, and I did like them.
I would never ever ask for more Russians to be on TV, in commercial magazines (you know, the multicultural happy kids in IKEA magazines). I would even feel uncomfortable if it happened.
I analyzed Western values, and in fact I like them. I can understand that not everyone likes everything, but they can respect them at least.
I never ever thought about calling Western habits inferior, Western women whorish, and Westerners corrupt. If I would be Orthodox, I would quietly ask for a church.

There is a Russian saying: don't visit another house with your own samovar.

If I can do something, the others can do it too, Muslim or not.
__________________
If memory serves...

entropy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 12:02 PM   #109 (permalink)
JAD_333
Defense Professional
 
JAD_333's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,130
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by chankya View Post
The problem is this. As long as the immigrant is a legal immigrant, then as a citizen he shares the same rights and responsibilities as you. As such then what he/she is asking for, say ballot papers in Chinese, is not so much special privilege as equal access.

Edit: And I have as usual started side-tracking the main thread.
The problem is you're confused between immigrant and citizen. Think "resident alien" and "citizen" instead. Immigrant is not a legal status because it may include both. I am a citizen and an immigrant. BTW, because of the latter I cannot become president of the US. Nice to have an excuse.
__________________
To be Truly ignorant, Man requires an Education. (Plato)
JAD_333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 14:21 PM   #110 (permalink)
chankya
Senior Contributor
 
chankya's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-06-07
Location: San Jose
Posts: 763
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAD_333 View Post
The problem is you're confused between immigrant and citizen. Think "resident alien" and "citizen" instead. Immigrant is not a legal status because it may include both. I am a citizen and an immigrant. BTW, because of the latter I cannot become president of the US. Nice to have an excuse.
I was actually talking about immigrant citizens like you. I was specifically thinking about the ballot papers when I was writing. It probably extends into education in Spanish (The children of even illegal immigrants, if born in the US, would be US citizens.)

The resident aliens would be in the green card program. (is that accurate?) I wasn't thinking of them as a category at all because I've always assumed there aren't very many of them.
__________________
"Of all the manifestations of power, restraint impresses men the most." - Thucydides
chankya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 14:32 PM   #111 (permalink)
chankya
Senior Contributor
 
chankya's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-06-07
Location: San Jose
Posts: 763
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
That is the argument for the Voting Rights Act.

However, to become a citizen of this nation, and every nation on this earth, I suspect, one has to be proficient in the main operation language of that nation.

I don't expect to become a French citizen while not being proficient in French, then demand to participate in local elections using my native tongue.

I know for a fact that one has to be proficient in Danish to become a citizen of Denmark. The Danes may go as far as demanding new immigrants be proficient in Danish even if they have no intention of becoming citizens.
You do have a point there. I suppose the real problem is with illegal immigrants becoming citizens. (Kids born in the US and such). I'm not sure but I think(I'm not certain) that for legal immigration you probably do need English proficiency and they are probably more driven individuals in any case so they are unlikely to be a SS burden.
chankya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 14:41 PM   #112 (permalink)
JAD_333
Defense Professional
 
JAD_333's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,130
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by chankya View Post
I was actually talking about immigrant citizens like you. I was specifically thinking about the ballot papers when I was writing. It probably extends into education in Spanish (The children of even illegal immigrants, if born in the US, would be US citizens.)
What do you mean by ballot papers?

Quote:
The resident aliens would be in the green card program. (is that accurate?) I wasn't thinking of them as a category at all because I've always assumed there aren't very many of them.
Correct for permanent residents. I don't know how many green carders there are, but it's not uncommon.
JAD_333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 17:53 PM   #113 (permalink)
chankya
Senior Contributor
 
chankya's Avatar
 
Join Date: 02-06-07
Location: San Jose
Posts: 763
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAD_333 View Post
What do you mean by ballot papers?
I meant the voting ballots with candidate name and such. I'm also given to understand that you voters get to vote on certain "propositions" directly as a means of bypassing a hostile legislature.

In any case I don't really have an answer. I was just laying out a possible argument for the availability of these services/rights(voting ballots, drivers test, education) in various languages.
chankya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 19:52 PM   #114 (permalink)
Zeng
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-16-07
Posts: 608
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
I don't mean multiculturalism is bad. I mean we should be very careful about how we implement multiculturalism.

It's good to have many different people bring their cultures to this wonderful land. But the new comers must also respect those who are already here.

All government documents and proceedings should be conducted in English only. All voting ballots should be printed in English only. Driving tests should be administered in English. All classes other than foreign language classes should be conducted in English in public schools.

As of right now, we have the so called bilingual education that educates immigrants, a vast majority of them Mexicans, in Spanish. This is done in our public schools. Our voting ballots are printed in other languages. All you have to do is ask and you can vote for government officials in the United States using Spanish/Vietnamese/Chinese or any number of popular languages. You can take our driver's test in a foreign language.

I don't mind immigrants celebrate their own culture on their own time. I have a problem with immigrants bringing their culture into the public using tax dollars.

Have you heard this new one? Some universities now have "footwash basin" for the muslim students. An elementary school in San Diego pauses class 15 min everyday so the muslim students can pray.

I have no problem with muslims in this country. I have a problem when they demand special treatment.
Thanks for clarifying your opinion and I agree with most of them now.

The bilingual education or even signal minority language education (Chinese is just one language class) are provided in China today for most minority living areas. If China stops the practice, I am sure that US will accuse China for violating the human right of Chinese minorities.

I think that the ordinary new immigrants need to pass some English and America history/knowledge tests to become US permanent residents (Green Card) and citizen today, but not sure how difficult those tests are.
__________________
I am here for exchanging opinions.
Zeng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 21:37 PM   #115 (permalink)
Zeng
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-16-07
Posts: 608
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAD_333 View Post
Correct, so far...

This wasn't true nationwide.

As far as I know there have never been any Federal laws requiring Chinese Americans citizens to live in certain areas. There might have been some early territorial laws; perhaps in California. But generally, Chinese Americans could buy a house wherever they wanted to. Where discrimination existed it was subtle.

It was done by writing it into land deeds in the form of restrictive covenants. These covenants controlled what owners could do with their property, for example who they could sell it to. For example a covenant might say the owner could sell only to a Christian American caucasian. That eliminated hispanics, blacks, Jews, Chinese and Native americans, buddists, all immigrants, etc., etc. This kind of covenant was somewhat common in upscale neighborhoods.

My mother, now 97 and still giving me hell, was a real estate broker from the mid-1940s in Washington, DC., --and by the way, an immigrant to the US-- tried unsucessfully several times to get around restrictive covenants in the 1950s and finally succeeded in 1964 when the courts stopped honoring them.
I checked the history of Chinese immigrant again and found that you are correct that there were not Federal laws restricting Chinese Americans buying house outside of Chinatown.

But there were Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and Immigration Act of 1924 discriminating against Chinese as well as other Asian immigrant groups. Those Acts created beyond subtle discrimination.

I cite a paragraph from the link below:

The Chinese-American Experience: An Introduction

Under the racist slogan, "Chinese must go!" an anti-Chinese movement emerged that worked assiduously to deprive the Chinese of a means of making a living in the general economy. The movement’s goal was to drive them out of the country. This hostility hindered efforts by the Chinese to become American. It forced them to flee to the Chinatowns on the coasts, where they found safety and support. In these ghettos, they managed to eke out a meager existence, but were isolated from the rest of the population, making it difficult if not impossible to assimilate into mainstream society. To add insult to injury, Chinese were criticized for their alleged unassimilability.


I would like to acknowledge the fact that subtle race discrimination may still exist today but I don’t clearly feel it in my daily life and work place although I am a foreigner. My colleagues and neighbors are all very nice people.
Zeng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 21:54 PM   #116 (permalink)
JAD_333
Defense Professional
 
JAD_333's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-15-07
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,130
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeng_xinren View Post
I checked the history of Chinese immigrant again and found that you are correct that there were not Federal laws restricting Chinese Americans buying house outside of Chinatown.

But there were Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and Immigration Act of 1924 discriminating against Chinese as well as other Asian immigrant groups. Those Acts created beyond subtle discrimination.
There was some Chinaphobia, to coin a term, back then. A different mindset on account of racial fears no doubt. Not a shining example of our immigrant heritage.

The Chinatowns started well before the 1880s. As I heard it, Chinese were brought here originally by the railroads starting in the mid-1800s to work as laborers because the gold rush drained off American labor. The Chinese were told they could make a fortune here and many planned to come, earn a lot of money and then go back home and buy land. That's why they held on to their customs and language, and didn't try to assimilate. Chinatowns were the natural result.

Quote:
I would like to acknowledge the fact that subtle race discrimination may still exist today but I don’t clearly feel it in my daily life and work place although I am a foreigner. My colleagues and neighbors are all very nice people.
That's good to hear.
JAD_333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2007, 01:01 AM   #117 (permalink)
xrough
Senior Contributor
 
xrough's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-08-07
Location: Manila
Posts: 924
Country:
I voted for improving materially but deteriorating/stgnating morally..
__________________
xrough is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2007, 00:59 AM   #118 (permalink)
joken gonzo
New Member
 
Join Date: 08-13-07
Posts: 7
welll no the world if anything is due for another world war which will happen i dont think in this generation but probaly the next 1 theres too much hostilties going around chinas growing and if people think the kwans are gonna be peaceful lol ur sadly wrong once america stops being number 1 the chinese will be able to throw their weight around the middle east is just a freaking hotbed ready to explode and irans supposed civil nuclear progam which we all know is really for weapons use will spark that war so my prediction

the usa engaed in the middle east with isareal against iran and about every other muslim there

china vs the eu over who gets to be top dawg
joken gonzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2007, 01:07 AM   #119 (permalink)
Kansas Bear
WAB Resident Historian
Senior Contributor
 
Kansas Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-01-06
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 1,572
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by joken gonzo View Post
welll no the world if anything is due for another world war which will happen i dont think in this generation but probaly the next 1 theres too much hostilties going around chinas growing and if people think the kwans are gonna be peaceful lol ur sadly wrong once america stops being number 1 the chinese will be able to throw their weight around the middle east is just a freaking hotbed ready to explode and irans supposed civil nuclear progam which we all know is really for weapons use will spark that war so my prediction
wow, a prediction.

Quote:
the usa engaed in the middle east with isareal against iran and about every other muslim there
Whilst you are so zealous in your 'predictions', go buy a dictionary, cause..........damn.
Kansas Bear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2007, 01:55 AM   #120 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,226
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by entropy View Post
I did not demand Europeans to give me a special treatment - I saw how it is done here, and I did like them.
I would never ever ask for more Russians to be on TV, in commercial magazines (you know, the multicultural happy kids in IKEA magazines). I would even feel uncomfortable if it happened.
I analyzed Western values, and in fact I like them. I can understand that not everyone likes everything, but they can respect them at least.
I never ever thought about calling Western habits inferior, Western women whorish, and Westerners corrupt. If I would be Orthodox, I would quietly ask for a church.

There is a Russian saying: don't visit another house with your own samovar.

If I can do something, the others can do it too, Muslim or not.
I meant no offense. I meant that there are muslims all over the world, in non-muslim countries, demanding special treatment. I didn't mean that all muslims demand such things or all immigrants demand such things.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why We Are in Iraq Leader The War in Iraq 109 09-02-2008 14:13 PM
"Everything you wanted to know about my religion (but were afraid to ask)" mostlymad World Affairs Board Pub 4 07-31-2008 13:44 PM
Debate about China, india and US economies, by Businessweek oneman28 Political Discussions 7 11-28-2007 08:43 AM
Chinese Navy White Paper rickusn Naval Forces 5 01-06-2007 12:04 PM
Imperialism? tarek Political Discussions 80 02-01-2005 16:59 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8