![]() |
|
|||||||
|
Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board! The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today? |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Cultural Attache
Senior Contributor
|
Modern Russia
As the title is indicative, I wish to figure out how and where is Modern Russia headed, their role in global politics over the next 50yrs and how she will handle her two giant neighbhours who are both vying for Moscow's favours. How is Russia going to handle these things. How is the russian economy going to work out and how are they going to play the great game of geopolitics for the next 50yrs. All analysis is appreciated.
And a specific question to the russian boarders like Garry and Lurker, Are there any of the old strong men from the Brezhnev or Gorbachev era still left in position of power in current Russia. What can you tell me about the current political players in Russia and where they came from.
__________________
"Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except all those others that have been tried from time to time. " "Although prepared for martyrdom, I preferred that it be postponed." Sir Winston Churchill |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Defense Professional
|
Quote:
In my view Russia will no longer be a global power... however it will be a regional superpower in Europe, Caucaus, Central Asia & Caspian region and Middle East. In near 20 years Russia will not have any effective policy nor interests in Western hemisphere.... Africa, South Pasific Asia. Instead it will focus on getting maximum power in the areas which are of its interest (see above)... Russian interests are no longer stem from ideology.... it will be only economic interests.... or anything which influences Russian economy even indirectly. RUSSIA HAS NO IDEOLOGY TO OFFER.... OIL & GAZ reserves and flows will remain its PRIMARY international priority. Russia will try to sabotage creation of new independent links between energy consumers of FSU and Europe with resources of Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan. Russia will try to turn this flow through its territory thus ensuring CONTROL of alternative energy suppliers. Creation of Baku Ceihan was a blow to that.... the underwater Caspian pipeline from Kazakshtan to Baku is even larger blow to Russia policy... Now Russia has to invent something to prevent enlargement fo the route.... Besides that Russia will do its best to take control of pipelines in Ukraine, Poland, Baltics and Georgia as it already did in Belorussia. Russian politics will see more and more nationalistic pressure from their people. However these people will not want to fight for their nationalistic believes.... unlike US, which cured completelly from Vietnam defeat, most Russians do not believe that they can win anything abroad.... they will not go to fight abroad unless there is a VERY VERY strong sence of danger. Even presence of Russian troops in Tajikistan is greatelly questioned by people - "Why our soldiers should die for stability of foreign independent state?" Russia will NO LONGER SUBSIDIZE oil/gas deliveries to Former Soviet Union states. Ukraine is just first case.... Moldova, Baltic States and EVEN Belorussia will follow.... Instead of hidden subsidies Russia will be granting FINANCIAL LOANS, which are much more transparent and easier to recover..... In economy Russia will now encourage revival of high techs.... however no clear and feasible policy is developed to discuss. New super projects are another trend. Russia wants to direct oil revenues for these projects..... Millitary Next decade or so Russia will be reforming its army and millitary industry.... the purpose - REDUCE OVERCAPACITY.... and restructure army. Russian army is made of conscripts, build on the Front/Army/Division priciple and is good only for large long conventional wars.... something it WILL NOT encounter (despite some theoritizing in this forum). Russia needs SMALLER ARMY... efficient in regional small/medium scale confliects in regions which most probably BORDER with Russia. However for next decade it will have to keep 1mln soldiers..... Gradually Russia will change priciple of its army to Brigade/regiment principle.... and will assemble armies from Brigades in case of need. MOBILITY is a new fancy slogan... Russian millitary HARDWARE will be completelly exausted and outdated by 2010 - most tanks/APC/IFV/aircraft/artillery guns/AND EVEN TRUCKS would be 20-25 year old then. Only part of this needs to be replaced.... while most stockpiles of hardware is much beyond the need.... However current industry can not supply limited batches of weapons.... only large volumes of output make it economically efficient. There are still few million people employed in those idle millitary giants.... Russia will need to SHUT DOWN 3/4 of its millitary industry and give volume only to remaining 25% of its industry. The remaining enterprises will have to readjust to a small batch priciple from CONVEYOR like it is now in Europe or USA. However even those modest by soviet scale orders would BOOST remaining millitary companies. By 2015-18 Russia will replace 1/3 of its hardware with newly designed and produced + send remaining old pieces to roast in reserves..... Russia will focus on breakthrough of specific new types of hardware - NEW FIGHTER,...... new TRAINER, UAVs, LIGHT helicopter/convertor, New SMALL/Medium Class NAVY Destroyers/Corvets, New SAMs, New IBCMs, New Reconnaisance/Targetting Sattelites. It will not put much cash into upgrading Tanks/APCs/IFV/Artillery/MLRS....... The new generation of Russian generals believe that Tanks/APC/IFV conceipt must be reconsidered for a conflicts where massive use of ATGM is expected. The most empasis is now given to AIR DOMINANCE, and coordination/communication of Air Force with Army/NAVY Force. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Patron
|
Next 50 years, they will be a superpower again. an Industrial powerhouse with much of the world relying on it for energy needs.
The military will be second to none. 2005 ended with a $170 Billion dollar surplus for them. unlike the USA which is pushing the national debt to 8.3 Trillion. the wild-west 90s are long gone. Now they will pump money into the country. Although i have a feeling they might go communist again, but without the mistakes of the Soviet era. Lot of the ministers are former Communist leaders as well. Putin included. Half are Jews, but when you even mention Gorb he is a piece of ****. Everyone hates him. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||||
|
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But how can that happen? This is the New Russia, right? Quote:
Quote:
__________________
If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader. ~John Quincy Adams Last edited by TopHatter : 01-01-2006 at 19:42 PM. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Patron
|
Quote:
What are you generalizing and making assumptions? The money comes from Gas/Oil profits. Putin is a favorite among the military since they finally are getting paid. unlike the 90's. You are talking from a western perspective. Food shortages were caused by the west, and only in the late 80s where there virtually was no USSR anymore. You think that USA doesn't have the same corruption? Different mentailies, there the corruption is open. Here its pushed under the carpet. At least there finally is somewhat of a crackdown on the republican party for corruption. Vodka and cucumbers? what are you talking about? great generalizations there. You're going to teach me about my own country. Gorb was a dumbass that was tricked by the West. He was corrupt and gave up everything to make some money for himself. Police state huh, thats why USA admits spying on its own Citizens, and President having the audacity to defend it too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Administrator
|
Quote:
And assumptions? Hardly. It's called history repeating itself Mr Santayana! Quote:
Quote:
Hopefully he'll open up the budget to pay for a new KGB because God know's those soldiers are going to come after his ass when he eventually shuts off the payroll machine once that surplus is nothing but a distant memory. Quote:
Quote:
Nobody gave a damn about harvesting the crops until they were rotting in the fields! Then they had to mobilize the fricken ARMY for the love of Lenin to head out into the orchards and crops! Quote:
Quote:
Fortunately, American corruption - we call it "pork"- doesn't completely BANKRUPT us. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() Last edited by TopHatter : 01-01-2006 at 20:45 PM. |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Patron
|
Quote:
Let me ask you a question, did you live in the Soviet Union? Did you live under the collectivation? Did you even experience it? What does blaming have to do with facts? Umm, corruption, same as everywhere else like i told you. During the time of the Soviet-era the total number of Federal workers for the entire country was 140,000. Besides unlike here where the corruption is massive, dealing in the hundreds of millions, it was much less, on a monetary scale. Do you even understand Communism? Everyone helped each other, we lived in harmony, and people weren't at each others throats. The army was for the people, it helped the people. Started to go bad when Gorb came. Some of his ideas were good, but he approached them the wrong way. USSR never had the murder rates, aboration rates, suicide rates, and all bad things as Russia has now. that was in the 30s where Sabotage was widespread. many of the former revolutionaries didn't like how Stalin was leading the country, hence they wanted to destroy it. Lot of them operated out of like..London, Paris. Westeren Europe. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Patron
|
Soviet-era thuggery? Nothing of the sort. Corrupt officals were usally killed. Unlike here where they can get away in court and the such.
If you want "thuggery" i hate to say it but it is now. Russia is run by bandits, and Bandism is widespread. It is dying down. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |||||||||
|
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It's too damn bad the teenagers in this country are such chickenshyts.... And lest you ask, I was prevented from joining the service (the USN) for medical reasons. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Um, yeah I can't imagine why they wanted such a cancer to not spread any further... ![]() Last edited by TopHatter : 01-01-2006 at 21:12 PM. |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Patron
|
Quote:
Soldiers are always patriots, in any country or any system. The Government was broke because, no leadership, it was torn apart. and LOTS of money was stolen among other things such as historic relics. Stories you hear are prolly from Jews who wanted to leave in the 70s. Its a given that not everyone always like the sytem. Tons of people also don't like it here. So what? I nevered even wanted to ask if you were in the service at all. What about your healthy diet? When statistics point out that 60% of adults in the USA are obese. thats healthy? It was like Shell-shock to see all of the werid diseases or weak children here in the States. All kinds of human problems are found in the USA, and are higher than other parts of the world. In the USSR, the scale was never as high as it is here. Majority of American adults also have mental problems. They do because the work life here is crazy. the pressure to succeed is crazy. It always pisses me off when i see a pregaunt women working here. Do you know that when a women was pregaunt in the USSR she could take 1 year off work and be paid, and given a bonus. It was unimaginable to see a pregaunt women working. Its not a failed government system. Quite successful in China. Perhaps it is hard for you to understand, but people were nicer in the USSR. something which is lacking here. You're going to defend the aristocracy who shot at civilians in 1905? the same aristocracy which had the people under the barrel of a gun? No, they weren't needed. I can agree that the brutality was too much. but nothing else could be expected of a slaved people. Im expecting a barrage of angry replies ![]() Last edited by SovietHonor : 01-01-2006 at 21:32 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The shame of the Revolution, robbing the very country it was trying to change for the better. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Except Great Britain. The way their women talk drives me CRAZY! Quote:
Quote:
Perhaps it is hard for you to understand, but people were nicer in the USSR. something which is lacking here. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
SovietHonor, I received a PM from a decent respectable fellow that we kill this particular debate for now. I agree with him. ![]() |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Military Professional
Moderator |
Quote:
Vietnam is still a boogeyman for many in the US, especially on the left wing. Heck, even the last Presidential campaign revolved on a personal level around Vietnam (the faked memos about President Bush's Air National Guard Service and Kerry "reporting for duty" and then getting attacked by the Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth). Within weeks of going into Afghanistan, reporters began asking if Afghanistan had become a quagmire, and the same thing happened within two weeks of OIF. Now, from a military perspective, I think that Vietnam has finally been cured with OEF and OIF. You can look at ODS as demonstrating the successful reforms post-Vietnam, but you still had a cautious attitude within the military of not wanting to get involved unless we had absolutely overwhelming force available - the planning for both Afghanistan and Iraq still had a component of overestimating the force needed until the SecDef trimmed the plans heavily.
__________________
"So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand." Thucydides 1.20.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Patron
|
Quote:
Lol, ya belenko. Eh, traitor every country has them. Like the 90s Ames or Amos, something like that. Was working for the Russians apparently. Kinda, liberals destroyed USSR, but to compare USSR to USA it was based on Liberal ideas. so i guess they were by American standards....Uber-liberals? Having first-hand experience i can't exactly say the best. The tech is the best no doubt. But sometimes the doctors themselves are such idiots. what is it like, 400k are killed every year because of doctor error? How cold-hearted it is that the government doesn't provide healthcare for everyone. USSR did, not sure if Russia does now. Social Security operates with 1% for overhead, yet politicians tell us that we can't afford healthcare for all. but we have enough to bomb Iraq and build $400 million prisons? Well, there was no death penalty in USSR as it was seen as inhumane. longest time in Gulag was average of 15 years. Most of it was in desperate times. I agree thou many people were wrong imprisoned. but how many people have been wrongly killed here by the state with the death penatly?And now this is my last post, thanks for your understanding. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | ||||
|
Military Professional
Moderator |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
As far as the Russian economy goes, it is just over 1/10th the size of the US economy. Better start taking some steroids! Quote:
Last edited by Shek : 01-01-2006 at 22:04 PM. |
||||
|
|
|