ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > The Western Alliance
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-11-2008, 18:08 PM   #16 (permalink)
Aryol
New Member
 
Join Date: 05-01-08
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by aktarian View Post
Nothing except breaking away from a country which doesn't recognise that move
There were only 1% of people that wanted to break away.


Quote:
Originally Posted by aktarian View Post
Except that he won a referendum about his position after advocating independance.
Who is 'he'? what position? What you are talking about? The referendum were about status of Chechnya - whether to be independent or as a part of Russia. People said that they want to be in Russia.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aktarian View Post
They did no such thing. Russian invaded, got roughly handled, left, then came back and incorporated Chechnya back into Russia.
That's just untrue. They did. You can't just close your eyes and ears and knowingly ignore facts.
Aryol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 19:30 PM   #17 (permalink)
omon
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 1,925
Country:
so what is so bad about it???
let new cold war begin, both countries benefited from it before, at least during cold war, ussr, and us kept their dogs on the leash. now dogs are loose, and bite everyone around.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" B. Franklin
omon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 00:04 AM   #18 (permalink)
Equilibrium
Regular
 
Equilibrium's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-30-05
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 102
Country:
Gorbachev is trying to both influence history's verdict on his legacy and regain political influence domestically.

By trying to assert his claims to the mantle of nationalism (out Putin Putin?) by claiming that the US betrayed the agreements reached during the Reagan-H.W. Bush era his analysis fits in with those of today's nationalistic Russian leaders- namely Russia's global power was eroded through the betrayl and mendacity of the US and the West and their supporters within the USSR. Gorbachev is trying to disassociate himself from this second group.

He has repeated on previous occassions that the USSR's collapse was a mistake. What I would like to see now are his policy proposals in light of his statement.

As I've said previously, Russia has never been in stasis, throughout its history it has either expanded or contracted in size and power. A nation that spans two continents seething with nationalism and resentment is not a situation the US, the West or the world should encourage.
Equilibrium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 03:19 AM   #19 (permalink)
Deltacamelately
Military Professional
 
Deltacamelately's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-29-07
Posts: 718
Country:
Ahem....New Cold War in the era of Global Warming
As about the Russia n Iran vs US n Pakistan thingy...
boy this is the beauty of geopolitics.
__________________
I am the DARK that Rise to Kill..And Soar to Redeem!
Deltacamelately is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 03:35 AM   #20 (permalink)
aktarian
Regular
 
Join Date: 05-06-07
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia
Posts: 87
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aryol View Post
There were only 1% of people that wanted to break away.
Then how come other 99% fought Russians tooth and nail rather then greeting them with open arms as they came to liberate them?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aryol View Post
Who is 'he'? what position? What you are talking about? The referendum were about status of Chechnya - whether to be independent or as a part of Russia. People said that they want to be in Russia.
Sorry, "he" is Dudayev, first president of Chechnya (of Chechen-Ingushia beck then)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aryol View Post
That's just untrue. They did. You can't just close your eyes and ears and knowingly ignore facts.
They certanly didn't. they did, however, have a referendum about constitution which happened under Russian occupation and was called unfree and unfair by just about every observer. You mean this referendum?
aktarian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 04:15 AM   #21 (permalink)
Aryol
New Member
 
Join Date: 05-01-08
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by aktarian View Post
Then how come other 99% fought Russians tooth and nail rather then greeting them with open arms as they came to liberate them?
They mostly were 'greeting them with open arms as they came to liberate them'

Quote:
Originally Posted by aktarian View Post
Sorry, "he" is Dudayev, first president of Chechnya (of Chechen-Ingushia beck then)
And what referendum did he win? First Chechnya's elections? he didn't advocate independence then, he advocated it only after elections

Quote:
Originally Posted by aktarian View Post
They certanly didn't. they did, however, have a referendum about constitution which happened under Russian occupation and was called unfree and unfair by just about every observer. You mean this referendum?
Yes, i mean this referendum. And forget about observers, they all are already pre-paid.
Aryol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 05:02 AM   #22 (permalink)
Aryol
New Member
 
Join Date: 05-01-08
Posts: 21
...sorry, but actually i don't even sure that there were elections, where Dudayev won. He was senior officer in the Soviet air force when USSR collapsed, and then he just seized the power in Chechnya relying on his army
Aryol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 12:40 PM   #23 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,330
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sumku View Post
And please dont bring India into all this and for that matter Iran also.

Neither am I a somekind of Anti-US jerk nor am I a great fan of Russia. But if you look at things in perspective, then if would notice Iran like India is BUYING things from other countries[Russia and US, in this case] and not like Pakistan that gets gifts from US.

Isnt it true that India paid top-dollars for that 16,000 tonnes LPAD USS-Trenton[as per my opinion, India shouldn't have bought it as its entire service life is already over] whereas Pakistan was GIFTED a MK 15 Phalanx Close-In Weapons System (CIWS) by US.

As a comparison note, Pakistan is more guilty than Iran of fomenting terrorism worldwide and Yet gets Gift.

If you call Russia guilty of providing Arms to Iran then US fortunately or Unfortunately is even a bigger sinner
IN answer to your post lets consider this. Since everbody seems to time slide back to WWII so shall we.

Germany goes to battle against Russia,Poland etc etc and who is the majority of the population exterminated. The Jewish.

Irans president threatens Israel with complete extermination. Population majority jewish among others.

Russia supplies Iran the means to do it (nuclear materials) and they have already heard this man state it that he would and calls for it.

Who will be exterminated this time? My bets say it wont be the Jewish this time. My bets say the Jewish will be the ones holding the pencil eraser this time.

Just wait until you see what happens to the russian black market arms dealer they have in custody now that finally got caught. He will probably never see the light of day again.


Sumku, By the way, USS Trenton was not in half bad shape as the Carrier India is being blackmailed over was nor a fraction of its cost and they already have it. They could have had the KittyHawk as well in running condition.
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.

Last edited by Dreadnought : 05-12-2008 at 12:49 PM.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 14:11 PM   #24 (permalink)
omon
Field mechanik
Senior Contributor
 
omon's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-01-06
Location: bk
Posts: 1,925
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
Just wait until you see what happens to the russian black market arms dealer they have in custody now that finally got caught. He will probably never see the light of day again.
you aren,t talking about Ludwig "Tarzan" Fainberg, are you???
omon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 14:34 PM   #25 (permalink)
Aryol
New Member
 
Join Date: 05-01-08
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by omon View Post
you aren,t talking about Ludwig "Tarzan" Fainberg, are you???
I suppose Dreadnought is talking about Victor Bout

Last edited by Aryol : 05-12-2008 at 14:39 PM.
Aryol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 14:47 PM   #26 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,330
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by omon View Post
you aren,t talking about Ludwig "Tarzan" Fainberg, are you???
V.A. Bout was captured in Thailand. The Russians are attempting to pressure Thailand into not handing him over to the U.S. we will see what happens.

Russia has summoned Thailand's ambassador over his country's arrest of a Russian believed to be one of the world's most notorious black-market arms dealers, according to Reuters.

In a joint U.S.-Thai sting, Thai authorities nabbed Bout in Bangkok last month on drug charges. The United States is seeking Bout's extradition. It has accused Bout of agreeing to supply millions of dollars worth of weaponry to Columbian rebels.

"The ambassador of the Kingdom of Thailand...was summoned to the Russian foreign ministry and handed a note in connection with violations of the rights of Russian citizen V.A. Bout who is under arrest in Thailand at the request of the United States," the Russian foreign ministry said in a statement, the news agency reported.

Last edited by Dreadnought : 05-12-2008 at 14:50 PM.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 14:48 PM   #27 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 5,330
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aryol View Post
I suppose Dreadnought is talking about Victor Bout
Yes that would be him. Many governments from what I understand would very much like to speak with Mr Bout.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 17:07 PM   #28 (permalink)
Sumku
Contributor
 
Sumku's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-12-08
Location: Allahabad
Posts: 375
Country:
You completely missed the Point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
Since everbody seems to time slide back to WWII so shall we.
Why not earlier. Surely History neither starts and definitely doesnt ends with WWII. Just because of what Hitler did against Jews does not mean Jews are the Worlds most prosecuted lot. There are parallels here between Israel and India.

Everytime Russia SELLS something to Iran, Isreal feels threatened and everytime US GIFTS something to Nuclear Pakistan, India also feel threatened.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
Sumku, By the way, USS Trenton was not in half bad shape as the Carrier India is being blackmailed over was nor a fraction of its cost and they already have it. They could have had the KittyHawk as well in running condition.
As concerns Gorshkov Deal that India has signed up with Russia is not going in proper manner and that the reason I had mentioned earlier that I am not a great admirer of Russia.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
Russia supplies Iran the means to do it (nuclear materials) and they have already heard this man state it that he would and calls for it.
Q A Khan rings a Bell? To how many countries has this man given Nuclear Knowhow? Which country gave Nuclear tech to Iran in the First Place - Russia or Pakistan.

What is the difference between a Person who openly states that he would wipe a country off of the face of earth and the person that does not say so quite openly but plots to do exactly the same to another country?

See I am not stating that US is right or wrong. Russia is right or wrong.
Both are guilty to some extent. However I fully understand that its quite hard to see one's own country as a defaulter.
Sumku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 18:04 PM   #29 (permalink)
highsea
Defense Professional
 
highsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-10-04
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by VarSity View Post
"The Americans promised that Nato wouldn't move beyond the boundaries of Germany after the Cold War but now half of central and eastern Europe are members, so what happened to their promises? It shows they cannot be trusted."
I laugh every time I hear this one.

Al Gore didn't have any right or authority to make such a statement, and the Russians know it.

It's governed by the Helsinki Accords, which Gorby knows full well, unless he has forgotten Eastern Germany.

Sovereign countries are free to decide which alliances they enter into or not. It's not a US decision.
__________________
My baby called me up. She said- Why don't you ever take me out? Pick me up in your brand new car....You shake the short change from the old fruit jar...
highsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 03:26 AM   #30 (permalink)
Aryol
New Member
 
Join Date: 05-01-08
Posts: 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by highsea View Post
I laugh every time I hear this one.

Al Gore didn't have any right or authority to make such a statement, and the Russians know it.

It's governed by the Helsinki Accords, which Gorby knows full well, unless he has forgotten Eastern Germany.

Sovereign countries are free to decide which alliances they enter into or not. It's not a US decision.
Al Gore? what is he doing here?

"The Americans promised that Nato wouldn't move beyond the boundaries of Germany after the Cold War but now half of central and eastern Europe are members, so what happened to their promises? It shows they cannot be trusted."

- Nato's expansion not far than to the borders of east Germany was the main term when the Berlin wall was broken. And this clause was documented and signed. But now Nato just ignore this agreement.

...and yes, sovereign countries are free to decide, but military blocks that signed documents didn't free to decide whether to expand futher or not. ideally.

Last edited by Aryol : 05-13-2008 at 03:33 AM.
Aryol is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
‘US had designs on Iran before Iraq invasion’ Ray The Iranian Question 10 05-01-2008 12:29 PM
Academics in Uniform Shek The Staff College 8 08-24-2007 11:41 AM
A New Cold War? captchasep The Iranian Question 0 08-03-2007 17:18 PM
India’s “cold Start War Doctrine” Revisited Ray South Asian Defense Topics 0 07-10-2007 13:08 PM
Indian Army transformation Ray South Asian Defense Topics 36 12-22-2005 02:00 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 15:31 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8