ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > The Western Alliance
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-03-2007, 02:51 AM   #106 (permalink)
braindead
Lost in Translation
Senior Contributor
 
braindead's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-30-06
Location: estonia
Posts: 1,260
Country:
that they originally lost their State in 1791 was their own fault , so agree with you on this .
The sad demise of young democracies in 1930-s is a sad chapther in history of Europe .
And one really has to have a pretty´strong country to resist at same time Nazi Germany AND Sov.Union if they attack you both at same time . I do not know any country in Europe who could have resisted in such circumstances .
Who needs them - well , we do .
__________________
....
braindead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 04:45 AM   #107 (permalink)
Berkis
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-28-07
Location: Latvia
Posts: 72
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex_Ivanov View Post
And whoose fault is that? I would like to turn it the other way round: Poland never had own course, never had strong and stable state, while their neighbours were far ahead in state- and policy-building. Result is - Poland was divided, conqured, divided again and conqured again and again, because strong eats weak and not vice versa.

P.S. Who really needs such a weak and at the same time hysteric ally? A lot of problems and nothing else.
From my history sudies I remember that Rzeczpospolita was one of the largest and most populous countries in 17th century Europe. It was the first European state to have a noble’s democracy as a system of government – the tradition, which hasn’t merely historical value. Besides, its economy was very developped; it was Europe’s largest grain producer at that time. No wonder, that it had become really desirable booty for strong and stable states…
__________________
Usus magister est optimus
Berkis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 07:02 AM   #108 (permalink)
Alex_Ivanov
Patron
 
Alex_Ivanov's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-17-06
Location: Kamchatka, Russia
Posts: 165
Country:
Send a message via ICQ to Alex_Ivanov
Quote:
Originally Posted by braindead View Post
And one really has to have a pretty´strong country to resist at same time Nazi Germany AND Sov.Union if they attack you both at same time . I do not know any country in Europe who could have resisted in such circumstances
Beyond the brute military force, there're politics. Only very tough guys can afford having a lot of enemies and almost no friends. Poland, being one of most probable targets of German invasion after Munich 1938, at the same time had tensions with SU and was too proud and freedom-loving to consider any kind of defence pact with red devil. And to expect western friends from far away to defend it, Poland had to make sure whether those friends know what is Poland and where it is.

Such 'wise' policy and obvious military weakness combined led to expected result: Poland was ..., oh no, again

In 1939, even before Spetember, Poland couldn't be saved, so Stalin tried to gain at least something. When Soviet troops crossed the border, Polish state and army were destroyed already, so the question was only where Germans would stop their advance. Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact allowed to create buffer zone and to delay war at least a little, so I think it was rather wise political move of Stalin, fate of Poland and Baltics aside. Everyone cares of himself only, after all. So why blame Stalin?
Alex_Ivanov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 11:00 AM   #109 (permalink)
braindead
Lost in Translation
Senior Contributor
 
braindead's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-30-06
Location: estonia
Posts: 1,260
Country:
Well , Germany and Poland had non-agression pact , which was voided by Hitler in 1938 .
SU and Poland already had a non-agression pact too (since 1932) . Besides Poland had Mutual Assistance Treaty with UK and France .
Of course it was smart move from Stalin´s part . He was IMO much smarter man than carpet-munching hysteric in Germany .
And Baltic states did exactly what you suggested and the result was ... oh , yeah , Stalin violated every aspect of pacts within 4 months , brought in 6-7 times the troops over agreed numbers , staged coups etc.
At least Poland went down fighting , with flying colours . Shame on us .
braindead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 12:11 PM   #110 (permalink)
MrFirst
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-02-07
Location: Empire of Evil
Posts: 576
There was a time when the Poles used to divide and conquer Russia. But times have changed.

And Soviet armies came into Poland after Germany ended its campaign. Poles didn't resist by then, so, that wasn't attack "at the same time". Besides, Poles had treaty with England and France and thus this was obligation of these countries to protect Poland, not of the Soviet Union.

Last edited by MrFirst : 05-03-2007 at 12:14 PM.
MrFirst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 14:30 PM   #111 (permalink)
braindead
Lost in Translation
Senior Contributor
 
braindead's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-30-06
Location: estonia
Posts: 1,260
Country:
Well , entering without host goverments permit makes it an invasion to me . SU was an agressor just as Germany . Simple .
braindead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 15:45 PM   #112 (permalink)
MrFirst
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-02-07
Location: Empire of Evil
Posts: 576
Polish government fled to Romania at the same day when Soviet forces came in Poland. SU just was returning its lands.
MrFirst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 15:52 PM   #113 (permalink)
Berkis
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-28-07
Location: Latvia
Posts: 72
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFirst View Post
There was a time when the Poles used to divide and conquer Russia. But times have changed.

And Soviet armies came into Poland after Germany ended its campaign. Poles didn't resist by then, so, that wasn't attack "at the same time". Besides, Poles had treaty with England and France and thus this was obligation of these countries to protect Poland, not of the Soviet Union.
Common... I think your interpretation of historical facts is not entirely accurate .

Warsaw, defended by reorganised retreating polish units, civilian volunteers and militia, held out until its capitulation on 28 September. Soviets attacked Poland on 17 September. The last operational unit of the Polish Army capitulated near Lublin on 6 October.

At Brest-Litovsk, Soviet and German commanders held a joint victory parade before German forces withdrew westward behind a new demarcation line according Molotov-Ribentrop pact.
Berkis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 16:55 PM   #114 (permalink)
MrFirst
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-02-07
Location: Empire of Evil
Posts: 576
17 sep. the Germans were in Brest, Polish government in Romania, Warsaw was encircled. As a matter of fact the German-Polish war was over.
MrFirst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2007, 18:09 PM   #115 (permalink)
Fallout
New Member
 
Join Date: 12-31-06
Posts: 5
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFirst View Post
17 sep. the Germans were in Brest, Polish government in Romania, Warsaw was encircled. As a matter of fact the German-Polish war was over.
Just for note: what an interesting coincidence: polish government leaves the country and soviet army enters the same day. They must've had good intelligence.. Well, not. Think, where the polish government could reside before they left country? Somewhere in the east of country obviously, near soviet border. Got it now? They left Poland AFTER they heard red army has crossed the borders.
Fallout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2007, 02:08 AM   #116 (permalink)
MrFirst
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-02-07
Location: Empire of Evil
Posts: 576
The Polish government was in centre of the then Poland, in the city of Lyublin. Obviously you're right, they left country after Red Army crossing borders. But this doesn't change the fact the Poles were defeated and the only question was where the Germans stop. They easily could seize the whole Poland and thus USSR would get the border some hundreds kilometres nearer to Moscow.
MrFirst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2007, 09:29 AM   #117 (permalink)
braindead
Lost in Translation
Senior Contributor
 
braindead's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-30-06
Location: estonia
Posts: 1,260
Country:
Then again , if SU moves in and captures half of Poland that puts THEM couple hundered km.-s from Berlin.....
braindead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2007, 02:06 AM   #118 (permalink)
Berkis
Regular
 
Join Date: 04-28-07
Location: Latvia
Posts: 72
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFirst View Post
17 sep. the Germans were in Brest, Polish government in Romania, Warsaw was encircled. As a matter of fact the German-Polish war was over.
That wasn’t German - Polish war.

That was the war of Germany and the Soviet Union jointly attacking Poland after conclusion of Molotov-Ribentrop pact. Soviets and Germans jointly besieged Lwów and there were numeros battles between Soviet and Polish forces. One of the last was a battle of Wytyczno still on October 1.

By the way, On 31 October, Molotov reported to the Supreme Soviet:: "A short blow by the German army, and subsequently by the Red Army, was enough for nothing to be left of this ugly creature of the Treaty of Versailles”.
Berkis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2007, 05:34 AM   #119 (permalink)
MrFirst
Contributor
 
Join Date: 01-02-07
Location: Empire of Evil
Posts: 576
If that was a "war of Germany and the Soviet Union jointly attacking Poland", then Poland and Germany were jointly attacking Czechoslovakia in 1938, as is known Germany took Sudetes, Poland - Teschen Silesia. As for siege of Lvov, the German troops left this area after Soviets approached city and the touch between two armies took place, so the "jointly besieged" is a little exaggeration, to put it mildly. And again, the Germans attacked 1 september, the Soviets 17 september. More than two weeks, where the Poland's allies were??? Why didn't they strike Germany from west? Poland itself was aggressor state which had seized Teschen from Czechoslovakia and Vilnius region from Lithuania. So, Molotov perhaps was right, calling this the "ugly creature of the Treaty of Versailles".
MrFirst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2007, 07:02 AM   #120 (permalink)
Big K
HürGeneral
Senior Contributor
 
Big K's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-11-06
Location: Istanbul
Posts: 1,046
Country:
Send a message via Skype™ to Big K
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrFirst View Post
If that was a "war of Germany and the Soviet Union jointly attacking Poland", then Poland and Germany were jointly attacking Czechoslovakia in 1938, as is known Germany took Sudetes, Poland - Teschen Silesia. As for siege of Lvov, the German troops left this area after Soviets approached city and the touch between two armies took place, so the "jointly besieged" is a little exaggeration, to put it mildly. And again, the Germans attacked 1 september, the Soviets 17 september. More than two weeks, where the Poland's allies were??? Why didn't they strike Germany from west? Poland itself was aggressor state which had seized Teschen from Czechoslovakia and Vilnius region from Lithuania. So, Molotov perhaps was right, calling this the "ugly creature of the Treaty of Versailles".
the treaty of Versailles was the precursor of the ww2. thats for sure

but

what about the Massacre of Katyn Forest?
__________________
When i say, there will be no effect but i am not willing to remain silent.
-Fuzuli
Big K is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Armenian Genocide Ironduke The World Wars 72 12-29-2007 01:12 AM
For all those stuck in the Cold War.. rickusn International Defense Topics 2 02-11-2007 02:05 AM
Israel works on Iran N-strike Ray Political Discussions 30 01-14-2007 15:54 PM
America's Pathetic Putin-Envy VovaLee Political Discussions 44 12-19-2006 17:34 PM
Rivalry Brews in Russia's Backyard Gio The Western Alliance 0 12-04-2004 23:20 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:01 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8