ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > International Strategic Affairs > The Western Alliance
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-10-2007, 03:58 AM   #91 (permalink)
Stan187
WAB BOUNCER
Senior Contributor
 
Stan187's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-06
Posts: 2,420
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dago View Post
Do you have a personal qualm with me or are you just like that with everyone? If it went over your head, as it looks as it has, perhaps you should re-read it and actually respond to the assertions made within the post as opposed to a open ended judgment. Food for thought.
Answering questions with more questions, interesting indeed, but not food for thought.

If you don't wanna back up what you said, then I guess that's just my qualm with you, because most people try to not do that.
__________________
In Iran people belive pepsi stands for pay each penny save israel. -urmomma158
The Russian Navy is still a threat, but only to those unlucky enough to be Russian sailors.-highsea
Stan187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 05:11 AM   #92 (permalink)
Adux
Banished
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: Cochin
Posts: 2,931
Country:
Did the USSR, have sufficient amount of power projection?
Amphibious capability and supply chain for a long distance battle.
They didnt have enough aircraft carrier's to give sufficient air-cover to their marine corps, or am i wrong.
Adux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 07:50 AM   #93 (permalink)
Feanor
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adux View Post
Did the USSR, have sufficient amount of power projection?
Amphibious capability and supply chain for a long distance battle.
They didnt have enough aircraft carrier's to give sufficient air-cover to their marine corps, or am i wrong.
Against most opponents we would've been fine. It's not like say Saddams Iraq would've been a match, or even back then Iran.
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 16:25 PM   #94 (permalink)
Adux
Banished
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: Cochin
Posts: 2,931
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feanor View Post
Against most opponents we would've been fine. It's not like say Saddams Iraq would've been a match, or even back then Iran.
Yes, but how would you give aircover for them,
the USN, Marine aircore gives cover to thier ground troops. Yak-38 is hardly the F-14.
Adux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 20:13 PM   #95 (permalink)
Feanor
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adux View Post
Yes, but how would you give aircover for them,
the USN, Marine aircore gives cover to thier ground troops. Yak-38 is hardly the F-14.
What year are we talking about?
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2007, 20:26 PM   #96 (permalink)
Adux
Banished
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: Cochin
Posts: 2,931
Country:
Feanor,

Lets say 1980's or late 1970's
Adux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 03:45 AM   #97 (permalink)
Rossiman
Banished
 
Join Date: 03-29-07
Location: Peoria,Arizona
Posts: 132
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Rossiman
the fact that russia thinks they are still a superpower is amusing
Rossiman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 05:20 AM   #98 (permalink)
Adux
Banished
 
Join Date: 07-29-05
Location: Cochin
Posts: 2,931
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rossiman View Post
the fact that russia thinks they are still a superpower is amusing
Its quite easy when you have thousands of Nuclear weapons
Adux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2007, 05:45 AM   #99 (permalink)
Feanor
Banished
 
Join Date: 06-12-07
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,385
Country:
Well late 80's, we had 4 Kiev class carriers. They each carried 12 forgers, and around 20 helis. Also had the Admiral Kuznetsov, one and only, with 12 Su-33 and 5 Su-25K. Add to that a notable force of aircraft from the mainland USSR itself, probably refueling in mid-air en-route a few times, and we have a notable air force to cover our advance.
Feanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Analysis: Chechnya Ironduke The Western Alliance 4 07-28-2008 19:30 PM
Most needed in US NAVY Praxus Naval Forces 345 05-17-2008 20:36 PM
For all those stuck in the Cold War.. rickusn International Defense Topics 2 02-11-2007 02:05 AM
Rivalry Brews in Russia's Backyard Gio The Western Alliance 0 12-04-2004 23:20 PM
Forward naval base to be set up near Gwadar port visioninthedark South Asian Defense Topics 2 09-01-2004 15:16 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:15 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8